>>136913
>I don't think there's enough ground to claim that all deities are internal if there really are no deities. I also find it much more likely that you have a connection to these deities, rather than them literally being you.
Its a leftover from brahmanic monism, turned into meditation practice of "lesser" deity. Has some significant similarity to Pharaohs and cult of Roman Emperors, but in reality its just self-wank in order to get worshiped, similar to Catholic cult of saints and other hero worship. When people die they can get a job of being a Daemon, but you have to be specially chosen for this and extraordinary spiritually uplifted, as in:
>We assume a new being in death: we become protectors of the living and the dead.
>>136916
>oral instructions from a qualified teacher
Gurus been abusing tantric rules for a while. Think of all the temple devadasi prostitutes in Shaktist indian temples, which are mostly sold out by their own parents for money. I understand Shakti metaphysics are appealing especially in how Evola and John Woodroffe describe them (mostly because they project their own non-eastern ideas because of personal Spirit), but think twice if sex and abuse ascend you anyhow.
Just so you know, random "number" generator, which generates not just numbers, that contains all forms of Logos in the whole universe, contains all ideas of God. But only one (Trinitarian God) created our own order, that you pretend is not real, hurt your hand and pretend it doesn't hurt. That original primordial water of chaos is not god. Because it lacks Personality that came out of it.
If God came out of chaos, human comes out of orderly world. We both meet at heavenly order where chaos and order meet up. For one to be a God it would take to be born of chaos.