/fringe/ - Fringe

Redirecting to towards creative outlets is possible. But that involves not being so invested in one of the most common things of this world (everyone is a product of it).

I never liked lustful things even when my parents were pretty lax about it, so I infer it's just something innate in humans.

>>137570

Are you the same dude who went on the chad tirade in the AIDungeon grimoire?

>>137571

The aidungeon grimoire thread****

>>137571

It's too funny to be me.

>>137569

Well this is interesting to me. But we need someone to actually contribute otherwise it could just go in the question thread.

Where I'm at now I'm just trying to put my sexual energy into thoughtforms. Not by orgasming mind you as I feel that drains me more than anything.

I also feel suspicion towards the notion that sexual energy is bad and must be transmuted into some creative energy in the sense that you must stop thinking about sex and instead paint pictures or something.

For me, thinking about sex and not giving the energy any particular channel has been the most spectacular thing and I like the feeling of being bursting with energy. That is what I want to explore.

I'd like some ideas. Perhaps some ideas for thoughtforms to use.

I think that the whole anti-sex stance in celibacy circles stems from gross misinterpretations. I heard self-proclaimed "Brahmacharyas" openly tell men to think of women as gross fleshbags in order to diminish sexual desire, and they struggle a lot with nocturnal emissions. They haven't learned a thing about even seperating ejuclation, orgasm, and physical sexual stimulation - treating it as one and the same and such are greatly misinformed. See, this is like cutting off your frenulum in order to have greater tongue flexibility instead of doing the work and stretching it gently, or like forcing yourself to sit uptight, wrecking your spine, in order to not fall asleep instead of learning to become a master of sleep. Toxic teachings that have no understanding of why and how, they see one thing being practiced and emulated it with their narrow perspective.

Toxic celibacy preachers are the ones you see on /pol/ and nofap communities wanting to ban porn, make-up, and introduce Sharia levels of "modesty". They are so horny that the smallest amount of nudity and the mere existence of sexual imagery sets them off going back to the habit of furiously masturbating, and they are under the impression that everybody is like them and therefore must be protected from performing such "evil".

This is what happens when you throw pearls before swine.

>>137577

That elicits some level of interest in me. I don't have anything to say on that, though.

>>137578

You are, as you phrase it, "toxically' judgemental. However, the bit about the right kind of lewd over the complete exclusion of lewd generally rings true to me. Porn and the like is still a definite no go since it can still inspire lust in those who aren't prepared, but light hearted romance does provide relief that can calm down the fires of passion. Actual catharsis does require elevation and relief, it's like forging metal. Maybe that one fire flag poster from 2(?) years ago was right.

>>137569

i also would like to know how to embrace lust. anyway to manifest incubus energy or something?

From my understanding, sex magic is a meme that those who can’t actually practice thaumaturgy (you’re so adorable with your little crystals and your delusions of power, though) use to justify their masturbatory habits.

Real “sex magic” is impractical for a number of reasons, from the widespread use of birth control to the fact that you’re either burdening the adoption system with the byproduct or you’re raising it for the next 18 years. At best impractical.

As far as how it works, my understanding is that the aetheric forces which are released by the talented practitioner in the working are catalyzed and stained by the act of ritual copulation. This act mandates both the intent to reproduce and capacity for uninhibited conception of life. It may not need result in the conception of life, though it is likely.

Another reason it’s impractical - and I’m not well-versed on the science behind this one so bear with me for a moment - is that it’s easier to destroy than to create. There’s a good reason why we resort to the sacrifice human life as a thaumic source more often than we host ritual orgies… aside from the difficulty of convincing dozens of people to have completely unprotected sex with the intent of conceiving, that is. A single human sacrifice is vastly more potent in terms of aetheric yield and the destructive staining is easily made creative with the incorporation of a simple rebound element into the working.

Hope that helps.

>>137618

An orgy won't get you sent to prison, though, and there's always the morning after pill.