/liberty/ - Liberty

>>101707

>>101770

Ok trannies, just kill all statists and done - no goverment.

>>90926

Because women are things

>>101722

Please do so I can send her pics of clowns jacking off in shit

>>101788

trannies can be ancaps too

>>101827

>implying society will still exist in 20-30 years

we're circling the toilet. There's simply no way to stop the pendulum swing.

>>101776

>implying ancap is anything more than an autistic LARP

>>101829

>steal from a rich guy

>hope the politicians you elected will give you something

>ask mommy

You're right, /pol/ and /leftypol/ has better advice.

>>101776

Let me give this a shot. These are just general principles I learned from people I know IRL who are very financially stable.

-Look into job opportunities and growth. Whether it is getting into an applicable stem job or climbing the corporate ladder. A good example of this is learning how to code along with other skills to expand your economic opportunities

-Diversify your assets. Many giants and average joes have been swept off their feet for relying too much on one thing. Invest in stocks, bonds, gold and other varied assets (liquid or otherwise) so that you have a good basis of wealth for yourself.

-Cut frivolous spending. With the desire for wealth some sacrifices have to be made (Unless you get really lucky of course). Try your best not to spend on things that will not benefit you financially in the long run like starbucks, expensive outings, etc. I'm not telling you to be a workaholic robot that never buys things that make them happy just because it has no financial incentive but you should be able to balance things and gauge how much you're willing to sacrifice without being miserable. The more you sacrifice the more gains you will potentially receive

-Always strive to learn. Everything is a learning experience one way or the other and in our society information is more important than ever. Learn about rising economic powers like china or the I.T sector, Learn about job and investment opportunities that might pay off in the future. Constantly living like this might be tiring for some but it is very rewarding in the long run.

I apologize if these are too abstract or cliche for you but that's the best I know as of the moment kek.

>>101775

It has captions.

>>101710

>intellectuals

>introverted, shy, honest

WHAT

>>101590

based Rothbard he really thought of everything

There's a set of two duplicate threads in the catalog right now; initially there were three. The only reason I can think of that the second duplicate wasn't deleted along with the third is that the second had one reply to it at the time of the third's deletion. I'm beginning to believe with increasing conviction that we don't actually have a BO, but a script programmed to perform certain BO activities.

>>101679

But that's a normal fetish, anon, it's not severe.

>>101514

Shitposting was always just that—shit.

>>101688

But everyone is retarded, including myself

>>96138

Keep crying

Over 40% of world's chess champions are Jewish

Roughly 30% of Nobel prizes are given to Jews

40% of billionaires are Jewish while 40% of the 145+ IQ population is Jewish

>>96219

forgot to quote >>96173

also WAIS is still used widely.

stalin hated cosmopolitism, right? but he hated nationalists too, right?

>>101748

>The Crisis of overproduction is a real phenomina that does exist

I… do not believe you.

I'll grant that the process you describe does exist; it occurs even without the mechanism you describe, as someone will always be cheaper.

I do not, however, believe it is a crisis. Money is manufactured scarcity while stuff is wealth; as such, overproduction is GENERALLY the literal opposite of a crisis (though the sum of all possible cases is more complex; opportunity cost is not even remotely universally true, but is at least possible) - and the reduction or removal of money from economics is pretty much definitionally the exact opposite of crisis.

So, doesn't real, even though the process you describe does. ;)

Neo-{Blanktemplate}ism is a better life than Capitalism.

>what is rome

If the rate of profit has been decreasing over the decades, shouldn't we see a decrease in market index returns? Also, what is the source of that graph and how do they calculate rate of profit?

>>101748

>talk to literally any farmer.

I know farmers and they are not overproducing goods. They are in fact converting much of their land for solar panels (because of tax subsidies) and switching to crops that are profitable.

>>101734

Liberalism mixed with Marxism.

Democracy happened to them, what do you think? It's a system that encourages present-orientedness in the citizenry and rulers alike, while simultaneously encouraging sociopathic liars to enter the halls of power on the backs of parasites and rubes.

>>101735

>liberalism

why?

>>98147

Cuban migration to the US has pretty much stopped since Cuba's standard of living met a parity with the US some years ago

Some Cuban-Born US citizens in Florida now travel to Cuba for medical care etc

And yes obviously because of Venezuelas issues people will migrate abroad but this is not different then any other third world state

>Guatemala

>High taxes aren't capitalist

>Hyper-inflation can't occur under capitalism

>High crime rates can't occur under capitalism

It maintains a capitalist economy and has been under a right-wing capitalist goverment for decades at the behest of the US

So yes it is capitalist

<"Not real capitalism!"

Lmao

>Yeah, you don't know what the hell you're talking about. Venezuela, the economy that's seen massive expropriations of virtually everything from food to oil and even landmass sees independence from the state

>but China, which has actually made SOME tangible (albeit questionable) progress since the 1980s towards a more market oriented economy sees no independence from the state?

The Chinese communist party has always ensured that capitalist class existing within china is firmly under the boot of the dictatorship of the Proletariate unlike Venezuela which still allows its capitalist class to act independently (Thus why we see them being so uncooperatice with the Venezuelan goverment)

Also do you have any evidence for your claim that "All food oil and Land" is being expropriated by the state?

He's a 100+kg military dictator in a country where the average weight is 71kg.

Venezuela is Korea tier, which is what every communist/socialist/communalist society turns into.

>>98154

The people of Venezuela

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2pjEYBhJSo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1zdePe-yuQ

Maduro

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWCVMPTkPeA

Madurocucks are the absolute most retarded people on earth

>>98154

fug i need to settle there to lose weight

>>101610

Now I will assert your bullshit claims yes I am doubleposting, stay mad moralfag

>Do you also believe that someone buying a piece of land neighboring yours and setting up a rival business is a violation of your property rights and gives you justification to walk across the property line and shoot them in the head?

Such a situation could be justified depending on the framework we have as a contest, there can only be one company that does provide defense services with the legitimization necesary to be assigned the authority of trying to impose the defense rights of the third parties that pay them (their costumers), while there can be individuals who defend themselves in a consistent basis there cannot be more than one collective that does such a thing, as the mere existence of other collective supposes an instant aggresion towards the original one that possesed such authority, this is exactly the same reasons why labour unionist and communist should be purged or persecuted as the animals they are, you cannot propose a framework of ethics that respects those you do not follow the framework as it does promote evilness, thus, being, unethical or ineffective in its ethicness.

TLDR: Violent imposition of monopolies is perfectly ethical according to libertarian principles as it is just another form of market competition, which is different from individual survival and self-ownership, being business collective by definition.

>>101612

I don't agree with your reasoning but it doesn't matter because it's completely irrelevant. Assume that it's a cake store, since we're talking about whether or not decreasing the value of your property counts as aggression, not the violation of some sort of weird universal Highlander contract.

So initially, you owned a cake store, and that cake store had a monopoly on the cake market in our hypothetical town, thereby increasing the value of the cake store dramatically. Another person opens up a cake store, thereby harming your cake store's value by taking away its monopoly. Does that count as aggression in your mind?

Being abundant is not the same thing as literally not being scarce. No matter how abundant water or air may be, there is still a fixed quantity of air or water that exists on your property, and if that particular quantity of air or water is altered, your property rights have been violated. If the disc on which you store content is tampered with, then your property has been violated. If a different disc, owned by a different person, that happens to store very similar content, is altered, your personal disc is not altered. Nothing that you own has been tampered with. Your property has not been violated. No intellectual property is property at all, and outside of trademarks none of it can be reasonably enforced in the free market.

>As both a Disney and Activision-Blizzard shareholder you are literally taking food out of my mouth.

>as the owner of a state-granted monopoly, competition is literally taking food out of my mouth

>as the producer of an inferior good, higher quality goods are literally taking food out of my mouth

>as the owner of a terrible restaurant, bad reviews are literally taking food out of my mouth

Nigger-tier argument, go ask for gibs somewhere else you tripleposting cockmongler. If your ability to compete on the market has been reduced, make yourself more competitive instead of kvetching and begging for a handout.

>>101613

It all boils down at how damaging that value decrease is, the most fundamental base for all property rights is "might makes right", those unable to exercise any might as social leverage (i.e. animals) are unable to possess property, like Rhodesians defending their lands, if you are unable to defend something, then, it is not yours by definition.

>Does that count as aggression in your mind?

Funny to see what kind of buzzwords you use to defend your ridiculous points, self-defense is not an aggresion, is the violence uses with the purpuse of preventing or neutralizing more aggresions from OTHER people, those unable to defend themselves (like animals, or little children- i.e. see Rothbard's case for adoption markets) are not only unable to have property, but are also able to be uses LIKE property.

You are mumbling some socialistic-tier autistic bullshit bro, why is it so difficult for statists like you to understand that people should be free to defense their property and business to thrive and compete? You are literally comparing violence with aggresion like a statists compares the social contract with self-ownership & property-rights.

Suck it, retard.

>>101648

>It all boils down at how damaging that value decrease is

That's retarded. Rights violations are binary; they either happen or they do not. You can't violate rights halfway, so it's nonsensical to assume that severity plays into whether a rights violation has occurred.

>the most fundamental base for all property rights is "might makes right"

No, it isn't. First because that implies rights are relative (by definition they can't be), second because there are wide variety things which you can enforce by might which are decidedly not property. Propertarianism is gay and you should strongly consider electroshock therapy if you believe in htis.

>>93524

Thats kinda fucked up but hot tbh

what website should i use to find a waifu?

>>101552

Outside.

>>101556

tell more

>OP thinks that his fascism is better because jews benefit from capitalism

>inb4opdiscoverszionism

>>95972

>>95981

Lol

>>100996

Kikes are children of cain, they bear the mark of cain (circumcision) and have been Chosen by God for misery and suffering. God only keeps enough kikes alive to torture them as a people.

Only the Messiah Christ, deep prayer and celibacy can save these low iq inbred mutants from the wrath of God.

Repent!

>>101538

break time is over, now back to /christian/ asylum

>>101538

cain is not a historical figure

he is as real as zeus or thor

prove me wrong