The founding document of Luxembourg is not a constitution, it’s a deed. A deed of purchase by Count Siegfried from a monastery. That inheritance has transferred down to the current Grand Duke.
>Siegfried or his ancestors got that money to pay for that land through violence!
The only accounts are wars of defense, or defending their legitimately inherited titles.
>Yeah, but everyone back then—
Innocent until proven guilty.
>He was violent against his citizens for sure! Luxembourg doesn’t allow X, Y, Z under threat of force.
He’s merely a landlord, and therefore has the right to physically remove under libertarian law.
>But that doesn’t pass until the modern day because when Count Weingraf of Smexelblob inherited the lands and combined them with his other holdings of Ruritania, he dirtied Luxembourgish inheritance together with the spoils of THOSE ill-gotten gains, and—
O.k.. So if theoretically a libertarian court found the amount of renumerations that the current Grand Duke is liable for, and the Luxembourgish government paid for that, would the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg be ancap?
>But Luxembourg today has a parliament, and—
A generous landlord.