/liberty/ - Liberty

>>99964

https://mises.org/wire/gdp-growth-not-same-thing-real-economic-growth

Why does share of global gdp matter?

There's a billion Asians now, most of them in slum conditions. Theres money in that part of the world and I get cheap products from it. Where's the problem?

>>99964

Asia is just growing faster than EU and US. But all three grow, so it is good for all three.

>>99971

GDP is really just "Maximum taxable income" of the country. It's a statistic sovereign nations collate so they can more easily get loans.

>>99754

really? why?

>>99863

companies never change their prices. the average company changes their prices once a year

>>99864

>the average company changes their prices once a year

source?

>>99692

>I'm not a pedophile, so I'd prefer to not browse a board that has CP.

4chan.

>>99885

Worthless textbooks written by Paul Krugman.

>>100194

Think about it from a libertarian perspective. If someone is trespassing on your land you can shoot them legally right? The only question in the NZ case is WHO OWNS THE LAND… and the only realy answer is the one who has the monopoly of 'legitimate' (as supported by the media) force. History can play a factor but is only ever justification. The fact that (((central banking derived finance))) controls the media means they control the land… unless there is resistance. THe only difference between a 'terrorist' (ISIS) and a king (SAUDI ARABIA) is their power relative to each other nya~

https://meguca.org/nya/

>>100198

take your pills schizo

>>100143

>>100161

>It fucking was and still is

Restating the original goal is not goal shifting no matter how many times you complain.

>By being violated.

Passive statements do not answer the question. Was specific action(s) of violation?

>Something that doesn't exist in communism

No, as we see in the CNT, where they recognized personal property rights.

>No, it's not.

> NAP cannot claim anything.

>And NAP isn't about ethics.

Proof? I cited my source and you failed to provide a rebuttal.

>Who said anything about books,

It is a metaphor, moron. Your generic suggestion is analogous to that leftypol meme.

>So you are actually incapable of reading sentences

Your words <not mine:

<I would not, if they did not claim that it's in their domain.

<domain

There's no such thing as "moral law"

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/moral%20law

>>99437

So you are against freedom of speech?

>>100343

Yo

>>100343

A better question would be how many of us lolbergs have read it. I'm 40% of the way through. Excellent quality, but one of the driest books I've ever read.

>>100343

Did they make a movie of it that I can watch?

>>100343

Read Rothbard’s Man, Economy, and State first.

>>100346

Very nice!

>>100359

Also very nice, 40% is good progress.

>>100372

No, literally read a book.

>>100373

I am about 60% through with MES, I read Human Action before that. I like both very much, but perhaps MES is easier to start with for most people. For me, Human Action was better, because it went more in depth on the methodological stuff. To each his own.

>>100047

because their goal is not to suck off shareholders but to keep the trust in the dollar

shareholders obviously dont like rate increases and therefore cried a shitton and even managed the fed to stop further increases for the near future

in my opinion the fed is one of the few institutions left in the us that still has some credibility

>>100062

actually lower interest rates were obviously the result of QE which was necessary due to the crisis which was initially enabled and therefore caused by lack of regulation of loans an mortages

People like rollercoasters, and like their currency to be a rollercoaster because rollercoasters are fun.

Thus they hate the central bank.

They want tiny-private-bank backed currencies that are subject to speculation.

they manipulate interest rates and caused the housing crisis

>>96984

>Rivers are a good example of collective, limited usufruct rights.

Not really. Rivers are as much of a collective property as fucking environment, which is to say, none. It could be called "reactive property" as it reacts and impacts the property of others, but that's only as far as it goes.

>You can own the fruits of your labour upon the river, but only insofar as the rights of the other users are maintained.

Fuck you and your commie rhetoric. You can do whatever the fuck you want and let anyone do whatever the fuck you want unless it causes damage to other's property. No rights except property rights, stick that labor up your ass.

>Another example of different principles arriving at the same conclusion.

Except he said nothing about labor. How much of a gay faggot can you be?

I enjoyed reading this thread, good stuff, thanks.

ancapistan will only fully be realized in spess where there is very little scarcity

anything on earf is just a compromises

>>95793

BASED

>>100000

get

>>99980

>yes to Communist shit

>no to Military

You moron. No to all I can understand, but this is just pure retardery.

>>100211

yeah why can't you just completely cut welfare and Medicare?

>>100213

This is my issue with ALL of these fucking budget calculators (ESPECIALLY >>100206 , you niggerfaggot). You can't line item by department, you have to do only the options the thinktank who made it will let you do.

In this case, if you read the popup, they explain their asinine reasoning.

>>100207

I'm not autistic enough to adjust the other settings as it would take too long.

>>100069

>The US Navy would suck my cock, if I had a billion dollars, I'd invest in nuclear defenses.

https://worldwarwings.com/when-pepsi-controlled-the-worlds-6th-largest-navy/

>>100101

>“I’m dismantling the Soviet Union faster than you are.”

Based. What a great read, I didn't know about this. Maybe the US would be such a communist shithole in comparison to us that they would sell their own navy along with its gay sailors in exchange for some products we have.

>>100106

US government was always 3/4 communist even in the cold war, fucks sake we were funding food and agri subsidies for USSR which helped them divert their own funds to military growth. Commies WON the cold war, they control the west now. Russia and China are less socialist than any Western country.

>>100237

>we were funding food and agri subsidies for USSR

Not just that. Who bought their oil and gas?

>>100226

>no counter argument

>random insult

And I mean random, where did you even got chink from?

>>100220

Well, the first pic is pretty damn stupid, as Christianity did not originate in Europe. It originated in the Middle East, and stayed there until the Mohammedan conquests hundreds of years later. It spread over Europe, yes, but also over North Africa, and further over the Middle East. It was never racially homogenous.

It's even more stupid when you consider that most white supremacists have a weird boner for the Scandinavians, who, however, came rather late to the party. The Mediterraneans, who are still derided by some white supremacists, were christianized early on, as were the Hebrews and Middle Easterners. The prototypical "Aryans", the Scandinavians, were still praying to their gay nigger gods when half the Middle East was Christian. it wasn't until later

I'm not even an anti-racist, but racialism as an ideology is pathetic. No one even manages to stay consistent with it. Just be a cultural chauvinist retard.

>>100222

Kek, that stuff is glorious though!

>>98332

you havent taken the red pill yet fren

>>97091

>ultra-capitalism

>39.2% statist

Man, who ever makes the political tests/compasses are retarded as fuck.

>>97612

>tfw India is more pro-American government than America

Can we just ship all of our politicians to Pooville?

>>100138

>t. nigger

>unironic Whiggism

Into the trash it goes.

>but muh data

Remind that data isn't worth shit. Samuelson looked at muh data in 1987 and thought the Soviet Union would overtake the US in a decade.

>>99958

>the internet

Literally a giant behavioural sink.

>>99891

Statistics only go till 2010.

Invasion of Europe first started in 2014.

>>100058

You can try. There's no reason to argue that things are great if they are great. It'd be obvious to everyone from how amazing life would be. Furthermore people living in a prosperous life don't post on imageboards. They're off living their life. Their wonderful, beautiful lives.

>>100185

<Niggers are universally, definitively dimwitted

<Therefore, there's nothing wrong with treating them as property

>YEAH BECAUSE THERE ARE NO RETARDED WHITE PEOPLE RIGHT?????

Not only have you posted an obvious non-sequitur, but your shift key has clearly become broken from your repeated posting of absolute garbage. I don't even have to use hyperbole to demonstrate how terrible your post is, an actual direct quote is sufficient.

>>99994

Isnt it about what has more value?

Individualism is the moral stance, political philosophy, ideology, or social outlook that emphasizes the moral worth of the individual.

Collectivism is a cultural value that is characterized by emphasis on cohesiveness among individuals and "prioritization of the group over self."

Simple wiki definition ofc, but seems exclusive to me

>>98864

I think this explains it the best.

>>99166

>the chan

Oh shit anons, he speaks for the chan!

>>100005

Value doesn't exist in a vacuum. Both have different values in different contexts.

>>100017

Well, I get what you mean, I guess the problem arises when it's not voluntary, which seems to be the case more often than not with collectivism.

>>99711

It's still an improvement over THIS board.

>>99731

That board is like getting in a fight in a redneck bar that only has three people in it while the bartender suspiciously eyes you with a gun, while this board is like getting in a fight in a gay bar that has ten people in it–five of which are sucking each others' dicks in the bathroom in the back, two are constantly complaining about how shit the place is, and all the while the bartender doesn't give a shit about what's going on.

Hey /liberty/, don't you guys ever get tired of searching all over the internet for the hottest cuck porn? Come visit >>>/pol/ to find it all in one place!

>>99740

Yeah there are leftist people here that hate this board and actively work to undermine it, of course well meaning people are a leg up… but that's like being smarter than a nigger, it's not an achievement.

>>99748

So we can talk fascist fucks that are too retarded to tie their own shoelaces?