/liberty/ - Liberty

Women are more susceptible to emotional arguments, more at 11

>>103192

this is why it was mistake to grand them voting rights

>>103193

democracy was a mistake in general

>>103197

states were mistakes in general

>>103163

>men vote for what gives men power

>women vote for what gives women power

Welcome to democracy, motherfucker.

>>103163

This is not the case, in the early 20th century women were known to be conservative voters resistant to the radical plans of the far left. Women also voted for Hitler in big numbers.

Women are less to be seen on the far right in the modern era because women are less likely to be seen in all fringe movements. Presumably as these fringe movements grow they will attract a greater proportion of women.

>>103210

but women are less happy now than in the 70s

>>103259

I don't disagree, genius, but as long as there is a democratic government to offer an organized form of violence against parts of society, there will always be evil people and retards to accept the government's offer.

>>103259

Lots of people don't understand cause and effect. If you tell this to a feminist they'll say it's because of patriarchal backlash to civil rights policies and that female happiness will only increase when the patriarchy is destroyed forever. Or they'll tell you that women in the past were only happy because they had internalized sexism. If you ask a normie, they'll only look at you in confusion because they don't look up statistics like these. They've been told from birth that the sexual liberation has been good and empowering for the wahmens, and have never seen a reason to question that.

>>103294

Glancing at female imageboards, I noticed that feminists there have built their entire ideology on coping mechanisms, they conveniently ignore or justify everything that hurts their ego, if they are out having a fun time with a guy, and after a week of dating they stop liking him for some reason, they will not say "yeah, I judged him incorrectly, I should be more careful next time", they will justify the fact that they were with this guy as them being "manipulated" by him or something and genuinely forget it ever happened until a thread appears on the specific topic and they share details about it with disclaimers and "I didn't really want to do it" thrown in here and there.

You can understand how this lack of conscientiousness applies to other areas in life, such a person would say they were "forced by capitalism" into getting a useless diploma, or "shamed" into having children with some alcoholic fuckboy, or they were "pressured by society" to make every wrong choice about their lives, yet magically every good choice they make is their own and they take full credit for it (until they become unhappy with that too). A lot of women and also men do this to some extent, it's coping mechanisms after all, but it takes a really emotionally unhinged person to cope so hard.

Healthy people want freedom to be more responsible about their own lives, with responsiblity comes empowerment, which is actually what feminism is supposed to be about, but being the government-subsidized totalitarian ideology that it really is, it depends on mentally ill losers with no control over their own lives to control other people's lives and delegate this control to big daddy government. Whether we're dealing with fascists, liberals, feminists, or any other socialist, these people do want freedom or empowerment or anything they claim to stand for, they want freedom from responsibility and to be pampered like children in some kind of neverending childhood. It is an ideology that literally takes the worst and most evil aspects that humans have to offer and unites them into some kind of many-headed abomination that regrows two heads for every one that you cut off.

Right wing socialists exist you know? Sadly they don't have any institutional power atm.

Also liberal =/= socialist. Most women vote in liberal centrists, not actual communists. And believe me there have been cases of extremist communists like the URA in Japan, though most Revolutionary Socialists aren't a fan of voting just like individualist anarchists. Most prefer direct action.

That being said, a person like Franco or Pinochet has little chance as well.

>>103299

Women exist on imageboards? News to me, unless you're referring to /cow/ which is a gossip board for low hanging fruit, which doesn't surprise me in the least.

Also if women are such good judges of character and read body language better than men, you'd think they would'nt go date criminals and niggers yet here we are.

In short, women hate extremism or anything that rocks the boat too much. Also water is wet.

>>103304

>Women exist on imageboards? News to me, unless you're referring to /cow/ which is a gossip board for low hanging fruit, which doesn't surprise me in the least.

Spotted the newfag. They always lurked and posted on imageboards, they have at least two imageboards exclusively for themselves.

>Also if women are such good judges of character and read body language better than men, you'd think they would'nt go date criminals and niggers yet here we are.

tbh if I were a wahman I would probably date criminals over soyboy cucks too, it's actually really nuanced and there's a lot of reasons why a criminal would probably be a better choice than some nice guy, at least from a safety standpoint (as contradictory as it sounds), but this is not to say that criminals are a good option. As for the niggers, that's just a retarded meme /pol/ happily gobbbled up from Shlomo being the cucks they are. According to statistics, white women are the most loyal to their own race out of women of all other races and about twice as more loyal to their own race than white men.