Military Influence: While the U.S. ended the draft in 1973, voluntary military service remains a significant institution. Recruitment campaigns emphasize patriotism and benefits (e.g., education, healthcare), aligning with the document's idea of channeling youth energy.
Cultural Narratives: Media and education often glorify military service, shaping perceptions of duty. For example, ROTC programs in schools and veteran-focused media reinforce patriotic ideals.
Limitation: The absence of a mandatory draft in 2025 weakens this claim.
Social control through military service is less overt, though cultural narratives still influence behavior.
Is the Process of Energetic Control Potentially Real and Occurring Now?
The document's concept of "energetic control" hinges on manipulating economic and social systems to channel resources, behavior, and attention toward elite goals. While the document's conspiratorial framing lacks verifiable evidence, several mechanisms it describes align with observable trends, suggesting that elements of such control could be occurring, though not necessarily as a unified, intentional strategy. Below is an evaluation of its plausibility in 2025:
Plausibility of Economic Control:
Real: Economic systems are influenced by powerful entities (e.g., central banks, corporations). For instance, Federal Reserve rate hikes in 2022-2023 slowed economic growth to curb inflation, impacting consumer behavior in predictable ways, similar to the document's shock testing. Corporate consolidation (e.g., tech giants controlling data) concentrates economic power, enabling influence over markets and behavior.
Limitation: These actions are often driven by economic goals (e.g., stability, profit) rather than a coordinated effort to enslave the public. The complexity of global markets makes a singular "elite" control challenging to orchestrate.
Plausibility of Social Manipulation:
Real: Media algorithms, surveillance, and data analytics shape behavior. For example, social media platforms in 2025 use Al to prioritize content that maximizes engagement, often amplifying division or distraction, as the document suggests. Government policies (e.g., tax Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
