/islam/ - 8kun Masjid

>>41535

They banned a lot of small Muslim subreddits, its really opened the eyes of many Muslims on the site and some of them are leaving. There was a post on r/MuslimLounge today encouraging people to leave (https://www.reddit.com/r/MuslimLounge/comments/hjo7d3/reddits_latest_widespread_ban_somehow_banned/).

>>41536

<<ودوا لو تكفرون كما كفروا فتكونون سواء>>

https://www.guilded.gg/i/3E0GzRnp

A lobby for the dispersed; for now.

>>41545

Using a copycat service is useless. Just like Reddit and Discord they will steal all your information, profit from it and delete whatever they don't like once enough people are dependent on their service. Try a decentralized, free (libre) software alternative like Matrix, XMPP or IRC if you need a community platform.

I've found a room about Islam on Matrix (Matrix is the protocol, Element is the client, you have the freedom to choose how to use the protocol) but most of the people are unaware how to use the the service properly since they're registered on matrix.org which is ran by kufar that are known for deleting rooms they don't like. Try chat.tchncs.de or chat.privacytools.io in the meanwhile.

>>41545

>the dispersed

Uh, bro, we're fine. We can talk openly on Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, and Discord. We do it all the time without any problems. It's nobody's fault but your own that you can't be Muslim and talk about Islam in public.

>>42769

A Sufi website about prohibiting music, what could go wrong.

What about music like this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByaA9qTeq-w

>>44156

Is the audio haram or the images?

No.

>>42292

Depends. If the music is used for parties and things that lead to the wrong path, then it is. Just like the usage of alcohol. If it is used for medical purpose, then it's halal while it is not when you use it to get drunk.

I'm not sure what you mean by that, but it's common to see people criticize him. Sure, anyone can levy some criticism on his methods, but who among us has done more to spread Islam than him? Who else strikes more fear in the hearts of the street 🤬ters of India than him? So much so that they banned him from the country and spread lies about him as a terrorist sympathizer. May Allah (swt) forgive him of his errors and shortcomings and reward him for his efforts.

Avoid the ignorant but be kind to everyone. Give people the benefit of doubt and don't make assumptions. Every time someone berates you for your religion it's a means of purifying and testing you.

>>44283

Like you were ever turned on to Islam, you disingenuous clown.

>>44188

you're not being helpful here, it can be hard for him to tell them about his religion idk who you think you are to say that to him it's so unacceptable, you either help him or shut up

>>44298

>it can be hard for him to tell them about his religion

a bloo bloo bloo

>either help him or shut up

Make me.

>>41862

> "why are muslims becoming less muslims than previous muslims ?".

Living in dar al kufr

>>41869

>I am really hesitating on whether I should share these materials with non-muslims.

Why tho? I am a Christian, yet here I am on this board because I am interested in everything what isn't familiar to me and because I like to do my own research. You should share what ever you considering to be a worth information for sharing, although, be aware and don't take everything seriously when you face some of the negative comments. There will always be those ones who are going to support you and your ideas and those ones who are going to hate you for no good reasons. We are living in the big world together, but we are separated from each others due to media's false narrative and peoples who are literally beveling in everything what media has to tell them (facebook twitter, etc). I have a very good neighbor who is a Muslim and we are respecting each others for a long time already. They know me since the times when I was a little kid, as same as I know their childerns since the times when they were a little kids.

I am congratulating their significant dates of holy holidays and vice versa. Life is too short to hate someone, or something.

>>41869

There are other sites than youtube. For example rumble or bitchute. Bitchute has alot of /pol/ trash content

I don't know if it's a concios effort but muslims living in the western world are certainly being "brainwashed". Mostly by social media like twitter I think. I am tired and can't really express my thoughts well but I will explain when I wake up tomorrow

>>41867

Lmao fake jew sucks off Shi'a iran, also Memri.tv was literally financed and made by 2 jewish businessmen

>>40726

lmao whats the point of commenting that

>>41480

lmao whats the point of replying to a 3 month old post?

>>41473

>This guy alija kicked out the volunteering mujahidin who came to save the bosnians in exchange for secular democracy.

Source brother?

>>41532

Just read the history of the bosnian mujahideen, basically after the war the serbs, bosnian govt & USA signed the Dayton peace accord in 1995 which would find an agreement between the parties and it made alija Izetbegović become a president of bosnia. Under the agreement terms that he had to kick out the foreign volunteer mujahideen from the Balkans (who were from all over the ummah). So this murtad effectively exchanged the blood of the mujahideen for a position in a democratic kaffir system. This is treason and he is 100% a taghut, anyone who does not see that is blind or is ignorant of the history. This goes to show we should not trust any person who claims to be islamist, actions show your true nature.

>>44208

How was he not secular?

>>34972

I'm a muslim bro

>>34960

You know what women don't have? Foreskin!

>>35029

Just stop. It's called a clitoral hood. Both sexes have a prepuce.

>>35038

Khitan ختان‎ is specifically the word for MALE circumcision. That is what's used in Qur'an. There is no word for female circumcision used in Qur'an. Stop spreading your kafir lies.

>>44194

Go be a barbarian LARPer somewhere else.

>>44189

>But he said "last night"

Yeah ... in a post he made on 03/15/19. Do you check how old something is before you reply?

Okie dokie

>>44178

>bumps a 10 month old thread to say he doesn't care

lol

>>33281

An intoxicated person chose to be intoxicated.

>>33282

But their intention wasn't to commit any sins beyond that right?

>>33342

Unknown, however if you know that being intoxicated will cause you to sin and you get intoxicated anyway, then you are probably held responsible for what you do while intoxicated.

>>33281

Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

The one who studies the sources of sharee‘ah will realise that the Lawgiver disregarded words that were not meant as said by the one who uttered them; rather he uttered them unintentionally, as in the case of one who is sleeping, or forgot, or was intoxicated, or was ignorant, or was compelled, or made a mistake as a result of extreme joy or anger or sickness, and the like.

End quote from I‘laam al-Muwaqqi‘een, 3/78

Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allah be pleased with him) said:

Words spoken by one who was intoxicated do not count at all, whether they concerning himself or anyone else, and his actions are like the actions of one who made a mistake; he is to be taken to task for actions for which one who made a mistake is to be taken to task, so long as we do not know that he intended to do this haraam action by consuming the intoxicant. In that case we regard his actions as being like the actions of one who is sober and he is to be taken to task for them.

End quote from ash-Sharh al-Mumti‘, 14/444

The Messenger of Allah (صلي الله عليه وسلم) said: “The Pen is lifted from three (i.e., their deeds are not recorded):

a child until he reaches puberty;

an insane man until he comes to his senses;

one who is asleep until he wakes up.”

[Recorded in Abu Dawud #4403, and Ibn Majah #2041]

Intoxication is not in one of these cases so it really depends on the intention of the drinker beforehand.

>>44165

>Praying in English is kufr

So all new converts who haven't learned Arabic yet are kufr? Stop pretending to be Islam's gatekeeper.

>>44127

Google.

Those that hate him are pretty much grave worshippers.

Since at the time it was widespread in the arabian peninsula. Now not so much, alhamdullilah.

https://www.kalamullah.com/abdul-wahhab.html

You can also find anything on https://archive.org/

Just search the book title

Most popular works :

>Kitab at-Tawhid (The Book of the Oneness of God)

>Kashf ush-Shubuhaat (Clarification of the Doubts)

>Al-Usool-uth-Thalaatha (The Three Fundamental Principles)

>Nawaaqid al Islaam (Nullifiers of Islam)

>Al Qawaaid Al 'Arbaa (The Four Foundations)

Others :

Risālah Aslu Dīn Al-Islām wa Qā'idatuhu

Kitab al-Quran (The book of Allah)

Al-Usool us Sittah (The Six Fundamental Principles)

Adab al-Mashy Ila as-Salaa (Manners of Walking to the Prayer)

Usul al-Iman (Foundations of Faith)

Fada'il al-Islam (Excellent Virtues of Islam)

Fada'il al-Qur'an (Excellent Virtues of the Qur'an)

Majmu'a al-Hadith 'Ala Abwab al-Fiqh (Compendium of the Hadith on the Main Topics of the Fiqh)

Mukhtasar al-Iman (Abridgement of the Faith; i.e. the summarised version of a work on Faith)

Mukhtasar al-Insaf wa'l-Sharh al-Kabir (Abridgement of the Equity and the Great Explanation)

Mukhtasar Seerat ar-Rasul (Summarised Biography of the Prophet)

Kitaabu l-Kabaair (The Book of Great Sins)

Kitabu l-Imaan (The Book of Trust)

Al-Radd 'ala al-Rafida (The Refutation of the Rejectionists)

>>44132

Like I said, I'm not interested in his teachings and theology, from what I understand it was just a call to pure tawheed.

What I want to understand was his political involvement in history, because they claim that he teamed up with Al Saud, and convinced them to rebel against the Ottomans, and spread violence with the sword in Arabia, until they were crushed, and that this movement had a few more revivals in history until the Arab states were established after WW1.

It seems like opponents always point to the history to say that his movement was harmful but ignore his works, but Salafis point to his works to say that there was nothing of deviance yet don't talk about the history. Thats why I'm just so confused and want to get the Salafi or proponent perspective on the history.

>>44139

>What I want to understand was his political involvement in history,

At least you do you research instead of believing the common brainlet tropes

>because they claim that he teamed up with Al Saud,

Yup he did, and there's nothing wrong with that, in that time it was a common practice for an alliance between houses and the religious establishment. The ottomans had a monarchy too, but there the religion obeyed the king, but in the al saud pact, the power was split 50/50.

Al saud are not something odd in history, if the europeans didn't get involved, they would have simply been the next sultanate after the ottomans.

>and convinced them to rebel against the Ottomans,

It was not khuruj, or rebellion, since the ottomans didn't control the najd, and they neglected the regions they controlled of the hejaz, so much that the hajj was an unsafe journey full of road robbers. Also none of the sultans ever did hajj.

>and spread violence with the sword in Arabia,

Ottomans were way more violent, raped and beheaded muslims, blew them up with cannons, it was extreme racism against arabs. Even innocent ones.

>until they were crushed, and that this movement had a few more revivals in history until the Arab states were established after WW1.

Basically the 1st saud state was the purest in terms of theology, then the 2nd, but the 3rd (modern saudi) was established by ibn saud, who is a murtad actually, since he allied with britain against his own army called the ikhwan, which wanted a pan islamic state, not only bound to arabia.

Those ikhwan were the inheritors of abdul wahab, they were the theological group, ibn saud was the political leader, but he sided with britain, instead of trying to make a new caliphate.

>It seems like opponents always point to the history to say that his movement was harmful but ignore his works,

yup those are mostly rafidha and qoboori sufis who are trying to tarnish his personaliPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>44160

Did image boards make people forget how to use the internet?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amin_al-Husseini

Sheesh. lrn2 Google.

>>43715

Who cares?

>>43717

The whole world cares!

>>43721

The world wants nobody to have nukes. The world doesn't care if country A has more than country B.

pakistan & india hate each other so pakistan needs nukes as a deterrent for its survival

as for arabs well israel keeps bombing their nuclear plants and research facilities like in syria and iraq, also kills egyptian nuclear scientists, to prevent that, but saudi may or may not have nukes, since they funded pakistan's nuclear program they have a deal to share warheads, saudi bought chinese ballistic missiles which can carry nuclear warheads just in case iran gets a nuke

Completely the entire book. If you are a Muslim

>>44092

Truth

>>44092

It's a whole book, not a series of sentences.

>>44105

>>44104

It's allowed to have a favorite verse, as Ali (sunni source) did :

>Ali bin Abi Talib {May Allah be well pleased with him} said:

>“There is no Ayat/Verse in the Quran more beloved to me than this Verse:

>“Truly, Allah does not forgive associating others with Him, but He forgives what is less than that for whomever He wills. {Quran, 4:116).”

عَلِيِّ بْنِ أَبِي طَالِبٍ، قَالَ مَا فِي الْقُرْآنِ آيَةٌ أَحَبُّ إِلَىَّ مِنْ هَذِهِ الآيَةِ : إِنَّ اللَّهَ لاَ يَغْفِرُ أَنْ يُشْرَكَ بِهِ وَيَغْفِرُ مَا دُونَ ذَلِكَ لِمَنْ يَشَاءُ )

{Sunan at-Tirmidhi ~ The Chapter on Tafsir of the Quran}

>>44050

>And if all trees that are on the earth were to be pens, and the ocean (converted into ink) is supported by seven seas following it, the words of Allah would not come to an end. Surely, Allah is Mighty, Wise.

mashaAllah OP

>>44014

Technically, every israeli "citizen" does army service and is in reserve, so basically enemy combatants. Besides, shariah wise, they attack civilians as well so they broke that protection.

>>44045

Yes, there is a conscription law (of which 26% of civilians were exempt from btw), but people who went to boot camp and served the bare minimum (never saw combat) would not be considered enemy combatants in this current conflict. Besides, a combatant, by definition, has to be active, so inactive people in reserve units do not count (fyi the majority of conscripts do not go into reserve units).

People who have not joined the army yet should also be taken to account.

>Besides, shariah wise, they attack civilians as well so they broke that protection.

The police who attacked civilians, and those who were attacked rightfully fought back. Does not excuse killing civilians in the other side of the country, though.

What does the Quran say about Jews?

>>44106

The first verse in the Qur'an directly about Jews is 2:40 where God is addressing them and telling Jews to remember His favors on them and a covenant that is between them. Generally when it's about Jews, God talks about their history, how and why He bestowed favors on them, why He cursed them. God also talks about the psychology of Jews and how they behave and that at some point they projected their own flaws onto Him.

>>44108

I see. What was the covenant between God and the Jews, and how did He curse them? Was it for breaking the covenant?