>>14628
>just like the tool, it depends on the man behind them
In this case it doesn't I think when it comes to deconstructivism. Its very nature is outraging, even more to the target, the man-machine. The only problem is when it becomes mild or widespread, so that people get used to it, and then it's already not deconstructivism per se. Which may be a problem of today tho, that it has been weirdly incorporated into the Style without the important parts and with consenting architects and only serves as usually Style does, as a twisted catalyst for revolution.
>functionalist
I hate 'form follows function' and like 'I don't do function'. Even in more sane times when the world doesn't resemble panopticum, I would be opposed to it. People are useless. Our existence has no other function but to live. Functionalism seems to me like exposure-related superstition which, like all human-induced styles that speak of efficiency or ubermenschen or shit like that, fail because it was invented with mind set on such things; even the thought of it is failure.
Anyway, I'm too much influenced by anarchists to not at least think 'function follows form'.
Not to say that I live in post-communist country, so the cheap, bumbling functionalism is everywhere I can see.
>"Why can't I do it if I'm this project's god?"
Systemic godlessness is better than systemic, systematic and systematizing god.
>but the walling gets shafted due to the same irregularity thus having to place fake walls to create the optimal geometry for the acoustics
>some kind of alloy that blinds the shit out of you from the near highway and 2 street-level roads in most months not summer when the sun angle is not 80+
That's also purpose of deconstructivism in my eyes, to some extent, to ostensively not work.
>the music sheets... a mere touristic landmark
Showcase of capitalism I say, the absolute ugliness of shallowness. Even if it wasn't intended, it works against them.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.