/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

sorry for double thread i get error when i create thread i

>>856731

Am I gonna get v& for clicking on any of these vids? A brief description would be nice…

>>856721

With all due respect, who cares?

>>856445

>>856530

>>856531

>2021

>still taking masonic/luciferian symbolism seriously

the fact that you believe this has any power over us is heresy, repent now and find the Lord. the power of Christ compels you.

>>856530

Sex is not inherently bad

There is magic in the Lord of the Rings and the Chronicles of Narnia also

Oh no! Not geometric symbols! My faith is shattered now!

>>856598

I have heard that it's not possible to caste as spell on Christians, but i don't know how true that is. I've also heard that they can get around on casting spells on people who they can't caste spells on. I don't know much about magick, but it can't be as dangerous or as harmless as most Christians say it is.

>>856523

>>856530

>>856531

>>856532

>>856542

>>856585

>>856602

World of warcraft they use real occult symbolism the creator of the game the blizzard are freemasons satanic church they are a big group

the Naruto anime series same problem

the old anime Yu-ghi-oh use same occult symbolism image in card games you can find in every games and movies identic

but is a shame that people ignore this.. if you show them the true they call you conspiracy tin foil hat

what about 1$ dollar symbolism the eye illuminati ?still conspiracy?

i know there are some fake christians lukewarm or fake people who come here to talk trash or some of them are shills infiltrate who protect those evil people

--Galatians 5:19-21 KJV-----

Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.

>>856661

FBI honeypot, don't click

"About how there's no evidence or documentation besides the christian media."

Not true. there is as much evidence of Jesus existence than any other notable figure of the era. Respected historians (like josephus) have reported on Jesus, there are communications between leaders of that time discussing Jesus, etc.

Denying the existence of Jesus is just a con by those that hate christianity. Jews, for instance, will be quick to claim that Jesus never existed even though their own religious texts (the talmud) speak of him.

>>856642

No worries, I have been studying this period of time surrounding Jesus and up until roughly the time where some one who knew someone starts getting long.

It was a big help. Early church fathers made attempts to document as much as they could vet because the idea of a risen Lord was big news.

My personal opinion is that Isaiah set a fire and a plan that Jesus carried out, whether or not it was a divine plan and resurrection is where your faith comes in, and all the benefits and challenges that being a believer entail. It is a challenge I am not very good at doing since I am very logically oriented and only want the truth.

So, that leaves me with John, Thomas, Peter, and Mark (Peter's translator and companion). Peter's relationship to Saul is one area of study worth looking into, as well as Polycarp being a hearer of John, and what that means. It has been a wonderful mystery I can not solve but keep trying anyways. We do owe our Western Civilization to this plan carried out long ago. It was the best path forward for humanity getting out of the barbarian and tribal times.

If the historical proof for Jesus doenst do then you'd have to erase 99% of history from the books.

>>856642

>About how there's no evidence or documentation besides the christian media.

First of all, that's not true: http://paxexsistovos.blogspot.com/2012/01/tacitus-suetonius-pliny-younger.html

Second of all, even if that was true, it would still prove that there was a man called Jesus

who lived in the first century and was part of a religious movement.

>B-b-but, it would be biased!

Every piece of literature is biased, and what we're talking about is the existence of someone in history, not implications of their deeds or character. This is why Jesus mythists aren't taken seriously by those who do history.

>>856708

The kingdom of God is present in the heart and soul of every believer, rather, the Kingdom is inside of you, and it is outside of you.

Live 10 years or 1000, what would change? Uploading a mind is impossible, for a mind is a working conscious utilizing all senses and memory. It is the energy moving between functioning synapses with purpose of intent.

>>856709

Interesting take,however I disagree with your statement of uploading a mind,if you think of it a computer is just that ,a functioning synapses with purpose of intent,where the mind differs is that it controls itself and some interference of God,it will have peripherals for sense so you aren't a vegetable.

And y the "10 years or 1000" do you mean immortality ,and then would the 120 rule be a metaphor we don't understand?

Medicine is not against God, i remember reading an OT verse telling us to both go to the doctor and pray.

As to uploading minds - we cant upload our souls, so if a mind could be uploaded only our recurrent thought patterns would be there but not the free will. As if you took a photo and thus said that you are now immortal because your image is now eternal. Uploading minds is like a photo of thoughts.

Also it happens already, but instead of being uploaded to computers its uploaded to other brains. Aristotle had an idea, his thought spreads around to this day, is he alive because his thoughts are? no.

>>856703

There is a museum of the Bible in DC I believe, so if you do decide to honor your father's wishes you should go to the museum and report back.

>>856309

Is this where the Tribe of Benjamin messed things up?

The soul animates the body, even animals have them, but they are not spiritual.

The spirit is a quality of the soul in which grace abides.

>>856692

Yeah, there might never be anything really solid to prove Jesus' story enough to make it plainly evident.

Everything is slightly out of reach like Josephus' writings. And it does feel intentionally designed to be that way. Because like Ghandi said, the five senses often are misleading and so God must prove his existence in a way stronger than the five senses can prove use. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SakitCoNYc

I want to help people accept Jesus by providing evidence but I'm not sure how often when I correct someone's historical knowledge if it ever helps. And it's hard to get people to just audio book listen to one Gospel which is I think the best way.

If remains of 2000 year old pigs were still around the earth would be filled with carcasses.

Bodies need special conditions to be preserved for a long time.

Most bodies turn to dust in time.

In humid conditions, bones might break down in a matter of a decade or so.

>>856694

I explain in the post how underwater preservation happens for land animals like with https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbcMY6ADdi8

Something needs to be buried alive under the sea bed. But the more I think about it it's unlikely for the pigs to have pushed some of the others into the soil, they would have floated along the water all across the lake and then the bones would sink to the bottom.

Ok so there are two main points to why this search would be ultimately fruitless.

Firstly, yes you have described the basics of the process for fossilization, but you're assuming that all the pigs were drowned and covered entirely under stilt and sediment very quickly. Most likely the pigs would have settled at the bottom of the lake for a short time before aquatic creatures began devouring and scattering their remains, not to mention any possible currents or undertows in the lake itself.

And secondly, this would honestly be one of the weaker pieces of evidence to support Creationism. Most people would either glance over the reportings of it, or simply say "Oh look, they happened to find a binch of pigs in this place, that could be anything." Those who don't want to believe will find any excuse not to. We've already found that genetic material can't be added to via natural processes, we've found carbon-14 in "billion-year-old" diamond, and we've found more fossils than should ever be possible without a global flood.

Proving the existence of God and the truth of The Bible isn't the issue, you can know all these things without truly accepting and believing them. Only God can open the eyes of the soul and save the unbeliever.

>>856697

>you're assuming that all the pigs were drowned and covered entirely under stilt and sediment very quickly

No I wasn't. But now I'm on to something very suspicious Google Maps is doing with Noah's Ark.

Ancient Egypt and the Bible with Dr. Falk