>>856738
>but I'm not going to watch 25 minutes of propaganda to verify this claim that probably isn't true anyways.
It's sourced, and i quoted the source with the book, so you don't have to watch the video. The video explains why poor nations are poor and what rich nations had to do with it, involving colonialism.
>while idiots like you try to paint the Aztecs as peaceful innocent victims of terrible invaders from across the ocean.
That's a strawman, I never said they were innocent, but colonialism effected their population and economy for the future. It was different when the rich Conquistadors killed and enslaved the aztects than their human sacrifice and cannibalism. There are better ways to spread Christianity, than to enlsalve countries to the US. So what if other empires did it, it was still economic crippling.
>they also reshaped the cultures they conquered into objectively better cultures.
To be poverty slaves to the US?
>Human rights aren't real.
You realize that this is a Christian board, and beliefs such as loving your neighbor or them being your brothers is inherently Christian.
>about how Christians did the one thing that literally all races/religions/nations also did all throughout history.
I'm not blaming Christians specifically, i am blaming the rich empires who practiced colonialism, who happen to include rich Christians.
>t. a native mexican
You realize the deep self-destructive irony, colonization makes the poor countries dependent on the rich countries, this is still the reason why today's poor countries are still poor to their rich host nations/empires, the rich empire decides the government, wage, citizen ship status, of the enslaved natives.
You don't have to be a leftist to see that capitalism is a bad system for the poor, someone is always the slave and someone is the master. I would know since my Latin American home land is even more poor than Mexico.