>>20744413
Those familiar with blood factors, admit that Rh - humans must at minimum, be a mutation
(if not descendants) of a different ancestor. If a mutation, what caused the mutation? Why
does it continue with the exact characteristics? Why does it so violently reject the Rh factor,
if it was within their own ancestry? Who was this ancestor? Difficulties in determining
ethnology are largely overcome by the use of blood group data, for they are a single gene
characteristic and not affected by the environment.
The Basque people of Spain and France have the highest percentage of Rh negative blood.
About 30% have (rr) Rh negative and about 60% carry one (r) negative gene. The average
is only 15%-Rh negative, while some groups have very little. The Oriental jewish people of
Israel, also have a high percent Rh negative, although most other Oriental people have only
about 1% Rh negative. The Samaritans and the Black Cochin jewish also have a high
percentage of Rh negative blood, although again the Rh negative blood is rare among most
black people.
Could the Basque people be one of these colonies? Or could it have been the original colony
on earth? The origin of the Basques is unknown. Their language is unlike any other
European language. Some believe that Basque was the original language of the book of
Genesis. Some believe it was the original language of the world and possibly of the creator.
Genesis 6:2 "The sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and took them
wives, all of which they chose." Who were the children of these marriages? Genesis 6:4 "God
came into the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, and the same became
mighty of old." From the King James Bible dictionary we find: "menchildrenPost too long. Click here to view the full text.