[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / ausneets / cyber / fit / kpop / pen / random / tingles / wtp ][Options][ watchlist ]

/philosophy/ - Philosophy

Start with the Greeks

Catalog  Archive

You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.

Name
Email
Subject
REC

0:00

Comment *
File*
Select/drop/paste files here
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
Flag*
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

[ Literature ] [ E-books ] [ Politics ] [ Science ] [ Religion ]

File (hide): 48dd549a51c744b⋯.jpg (108.19 KB,734x960,367:480,C_CBuxOUwAA_zDn.jpg) (h) (u)

[–]

c4d916 No.5096 [Open thread][Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

Don't do it. Be selfish.

1 post omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

c9b6f0 No.5111

Never saw this before. It's horrifying to consider people actually think this way. Blatantly misogynistic as well, loath as I am to use that term.

And I'm aware it's a shitpost. Doesn't mean it's not founded on some people's honest thoughts.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fffd52 No.5130

If I didn't have a sister who spit on everything my parents and grandparents ever did for her, I'd have a problem with this.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9d7c2d No.5149

Good Point!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f5669d No.5156

This is actually true, if only because of how sexually depraved society has become.

If a daughter doesn't have sex until marriage, and she has her parents blessings for said marriage, then the father is not a cuck.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e2e0c7 No.5298

Well, novel at least. Utterly moronic, but novel.

Cuckoldry isn't about sex. It's about reproduction. The point of the cuck isn't that they don't get to fuck their wife. The point is their genes die out, and they spend time and money spreading someone else's. Daughters getting fucked is the very opposite of your genes not being spread.

There's a little bit of incel in the definition of cuck.

>have daughters

>not incel

Novel, but dumbfoundingly stupid. A Babelonian-tier monument to idiocy.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File (hide): eab80d7c028e559⋯.webm (2.36 MB,720x480,3:2,1e6a0cbfed3f2aa480a51e8d4….webm) (h) (u) [play once] [loop]

[–]

8221f3 No.5078 [Open thread][Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

Does /philosopy/ take Nietzsche seriously?

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.


File (hide): 49030a85162dd3d⋯.jpg (85.67 KB,600x627,200:209,Psyops.jpg) (h) (u)

[–]

47d19c No.5059 [Open thread]>>5065 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

Is there anything you feel as if people NEED to know in order to be free people?

People seem to have latched into the idea that only thing that they need to be free is not to have chains in their hands, but other groups, such as the old medieval liberal arts, believed that you needed knowledge of grammar, logic and rhetoric to be a free man(amongst four other things, but that's just arithmetic, geometry, music and astronomy).

I was just curious, is there someone else who has any strong opinions on this? I am really curious about any other philosopher who has spoken out, since it seems like a important topic.

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

47d19c No.5064

File (hide): b8bd29d99bfba80⋯.jpg (125.93 KB,480x608,15:19,1470977992232.jpg) (h) (u)

Cynicism and existencialism both focus pretty strongly on this, with varying degrees of cheap cop-out answers and the more subsantial ones have been mocked into being considered "egdy". But the (very superficial summary) goes something like:

Cynicism: The goal of life is eudaimonia and mental clarity or lucidity (ἁτυφια) - freedom from smoke (τύφος) which signified ignorance, mindlessness, folly, and conceit.

Kierkgarrd: We can only be truly free in God (his arguments are pretty decent but I can't help feel he just found a "cheat" freedom because there is nowhere to go from there, therefore there is no choice and only in the whole immutable perfection there is freedom)

Sartre: Your freedom lies in your choices no matter how deterministicaly confined they are (existing as a mammal and thus having chemical feelings for instance), even a man coerced has the option to face his inevitable demise should he truly chose it, therefore man is always as free as he can be yet blames all else for his choice and finds comfort in being unfree, this is what he means by acting in bad faith.

Nietzsche: pretty much pic related with a more tangible resolution, man is free when his will is absolute. Like a dancing childlike god-quasar. So pretty much after we defeat the anti-spirals and take on pretty much the universe itself, but even he admitted that we would pretty much just be dust in the wind because it would be impossible even if all mankind nutted up to it let alone if we are all normies by nature (disputable).

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

47d19c No.5065

>>5059 (OP)

And for your first question, I would say that people should think there are two kinds of freedom, to be free from and to be free in.

Think about buddhist abnegation as in to be free from this world and desires (Will>will).

Think about a little kid in a toy store he owns, he can play with whatever he likes. (will>Will)

It even applies to reason, when you are humbled by not knowing something although you learned (Will>will), when you get a theory down and it seems you have sucessfuly studied the natural (will>Will)

So man can be free in varying degrees and different ways, but can only be absolutely free when (will=Will), which is only feasible when man is an adaptable platform, ever evolving, ever optimizing, never content until the very epitome is achieved. So I think we'll just end up creating a fucking sentient being to do it because we are too busy sending outraged tweets and starving to death.

tl;dr: Just do your best and tell people to do it as well, it's the least and the most we can do.Or make a rogue AI, it's all the same in the end.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[–]

e34a25 No.5063 [Open thread][Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

📃🤔🎯🎓

☦️

📯⚰🚸🇬🇷

☦️🎇☦️🎆

☦️🎯🤔♻️

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.


[–]

c0aefb No.5013 [Open thread]>>5037 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

Does intelligence correlate with critical thinking? Is it reasonable to think people who believe in stupid ideas due to poor critical thinking skills are stupid?

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

c0aefb No.5014>>5037

2x yes

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

c0aefb No.5022>>5037

No, it's not reasonable that someone who holds a stupid opinion is stupid. An idea isn't merely a product of the mind, but also of the amount of information available and also of how much energy people wish to employ in it. These two factors confound the direct effect of intelligence on an idea.

Alchemists, for instance, had a crude conception of chemical processes. But at the same time, because they had only crude tools to work with (glass was expensive and improper for experiments, substances were often filled with impurities, recipes weren't clear) the data they were fed back from chemical experiments didn't warrant any more sophisticated theory.

As another example, consider an specialist. Specialist often have very little knowledge of any area besides their narrow field of interest, yet that has nothing to do with their intelligence. Being smart doesn't prevent someone from being an idiot when it comes to another field.

As for "critical thinking", I don't know what that expression means or refers to and I'm not sure whether or not whatever it refers to is a skill or not.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

c0aefb No.5037

>>5022

Both questions were centered around the notion of critical thinking. Unless you're saying that specialists or intelligent people with subpar means at their disposal reaching conclusions is an example of forming 'stupid' ideas *because* of poor critical thinking, you haven't answered the questions.

>>5013 (OP)

there are generally two reasons why someone doesn't apply critical thinking (I'm assuming you mean this in the sense of 'being non-dogmatic as well as attempting to form opinions while being as informed on the topic as reasonably possible' - do specify if you are thinking of something else). One is a simple lack of resources, which is mostly either time or energy, and another is the outright incapability of doing so.

In both cases, when you form opinions as a result of trusting the authority of someone you percieve as competent and worthy of your trust, I do not think that it is fair to call the people in question stupid, even if, to you, their trust in these particular people may seem particularly badly misplaced.

But I would agree with you that, should they have arrived at their opinions on their own, without having the ability or invested the resources to investigate it thoroughly, while *also* holding on to their opinion *as if* they had foolproof reasons to do so, are deceiving themselves either willingly or unwittingly. the latter I would consider stupid, since I have no other word for people who feel unjustifiably competent regarding a matter, in which they know full well they have invested little to no effort, but nonetheless fail to notice their feeling of certainty is unfounded. the prior group is more willfully ignorant or obtuse than stupid, but I have no problem with people like >>5014 calling them 'stupid' for that.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f332d5 No.5300

Lots of smart folk don't profess any smart ideas.

The human brain should be Turing complete. The only question is how long it takes for a particular specimen to think critically. It's probably not worthwhile for sub-150 IQs to attempt to think critically, because even if they try full time, they won't learn how until middle age, and then they hardly have time to actually apply the method to anything significant.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File (hide): d973ac737fc9218⋯.gif (1.81 MB,387x291,129:97,qCJWrDL.gif) (h) (u)

[–]

b207d0 No.5031 [Open thread][Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

How the fuck hasn't the Krusty Krab been closed down by the fucking Sanitation Department like what the fuck Bikini Bottom are you just going to allow this mother fucker to fuck the town over like he has been doing. Open your fucking gills you retarded fish do you even know what goes on at that fucking kitchen. How has this restaurant not been shut the fuck down holy shit fuck Bikini Bottom what a shithole. This has been a letter to the good people at the BBHD to shut this motherfucking place down

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b207d0 No.5036

you'd be suprise :^)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b79909 No.5301

If the customers can't work out they're being fucked over then they deserve to be fucked over.

Assuming you're not some callous altruist who is only pretending to want to help (99% likelihood) then all you're doing by getting 'Sanitation' involved is enabling their gullibility. Now, instead of being fucked over by the relatively limited Krusty Krab, they'll be fucked over by 'Sanitation' as soon as regulatory capture runs to completion. Good work asshole, die in a fire.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File (hide): 04319e3257ac321⋯.jpg (36.55 KB,600x300,2:1,voltaire 3.jpg) (h) (u)

[–]

789c96 No.4999 [Open thread][Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

I want to read Voltaire

Which book would you recommend for a good reader but beginner in philosophy

I want to read him he seems to line up with my views very well,

Thanks

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

789c96 No.5012

His writing and works aren't anything extremely complex or hard to understand so just choose whatever. I would only spend like 20 min pre reading.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

789c96 No.5026

Start with Candide, then read his treaties and other writings, not difficult imo

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File (hide): 79bf90c4a93b785⋯.png (40.17 KB,510x530,51:53,1470517982407-1.png) (h) (u)

[–]

1467cb No.5007 [Open thread]>>5017 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

I've tried to find both "The First Philosophers" and "The Pythagorean Sourcebook" but for fuck sakes its not online at all, unlike other works form non-greeks.

I know I'm missing important things like their dialogs in first place but some things just can't be done.

Why am I being forced to use a flag jesus fuck I'm not even a existentialist

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1467cb No.5017

>>5007 (OP)

I've just started with the Greeks and it's pretty comfy tbh. Start with Plato's dialogues, the easy ones first.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/cla/plato/index.htm

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1467cb No.5019

A post form this thread is gone already

Like tears int he wind

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

17c75c No.5303

Almost everything good from the greeks is still floating around, as that's what being influential means. Have to figure out how to filter it out, though, and I don't know how hard that would be for you.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File (hide): 63e4c223775bae6⋯.jpg (27.49 KB,232x321,232:321,DSC01027.jpg) (h) (u)

[–]

8957eb No.4994 [Open thread][Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

stop barking

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d417cf No.5302

Okay.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d417cf No.5429

No, you stop barking.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File (hide): e33f6cded70e8fc⋯.jpg (111.71 KB,419x604,419:604,osho.jpg) (h) (u)

[–]

031019 No.4982 [Open thread]>>4985 >>4989 >>4990 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

Start fucking

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

031019 No.4985

>>4982 (OP)

No

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

031019 No.4989

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

031019 No.4990

>>4982 (OP)

i cant i have phimosis

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

736cda No.5304

Pass.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

736cda No.5430

Since OP is a faggot, he's probably looking for a top. Who's thirsty enough to top for a faggot?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File (hide): bc611b936b0af29⋯.jpg (42.14 KB,500x488,125:122,memefarmer.jpg) (h) (u)

[–]

4b8fbc No.4983 [Open thread]>>4984 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

In his 1962 work, "The Savage Mind", Claude Lévi-Strauss lays out the dichotomy of the bricoleur and the engineer. A bricoleur is one who practices bricolage, which is a sort of improvisation; bricoleurs 'tinker', they creatively use whatever tools and materials are at hand to complete various odd jobs as they arise. For Lévi-Strauss, the bricoleur has the 'savage mind' and engages in mythological thinking, while the engineer has the 'scientific mind' and engages in scientific thinking. What we're talking about here is different ways of creating and disseminating meaning through the manipulation of signs. Quoting Lévi-Strauss:

>"The 'bricoleur' is adept at performing a large number of diverse tasks; but unlike the engineer, he does not subordinate each of them to the availability of raw materials and tools conceived and procured for the purpose of the project. His universe of instruments is closed and the rules of his game are always to make do with 'whatever is at hand', that is to say with a set of tools and materials which is always finite and is also heterogeneous because what it contains bears no relation to the current project, or indeed to any particular project, but is the contingent result of all the occasions there have been to renew or enrich the stock or to maintain it with the remains of previous constructions or destructions. The set of the 'bricoleur's' means cannot therefore be defined in terms of a project. It is to be defined only by its potential use or, putting this another way and in the language of the bricoleur himself, because the elements are collected or retained on the principle that they may always come in handy. Such elements are specialized up to a point, sufficiently for the bricoleur not to need the equipment and knowledge of all trades and professions, but not enough for each of them to have only one definite and determinate use. They each represent a set of actual and possible relations; they are 'operators' but they can be used for any operations of the same type."

Furthermore:

>"Mythical thought, that bricoleur, builds up structures by fitting together events, or rather the remains of events, while science, 'in operation' simply by virtue of coming into being, creates its means and results in the forPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

4b8fbc No.4984

>>4983 (OP)

Now, in "Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences", Derrida criticizes Lévi-Strauss' notion of the engineer, arguing that the engineer must actually be a myth of the bricoleur, another bricoleur himself in fact, as no individual can be the absolute origin of their own discourse. And furthermore, the bricoleur gains its meaning through its difference with the impossibility of the engineer. Whereas Lévi-Strauss argued that neither the bricoleur nor the engineer necessarily supersedes the other, Derrida argued that there are only bricoleurs. But this is orthogonal to the subject at hand, which is memes.

Memes have become an internet cultural phenomenon, lately bleeding over into real life. Some people refer to 2016 election as the "Great Meme War", and a presidential candidate even referenced certain memes in a high-profile speech. There even exists a veritable encyclopedia of memes along with numerous sites that simplify the creation of memes. There are even memes about being a 'meme farmer', which sounds a lot like being a bricoleur.

In fact, the very term 'meme', coined by Richard Dawkins in the 1976 book, "The Selfish Gene", was, as he explains himself, 'hijacked', and that while the original idea meant a random mutation spread by a form of Darwinian selection, 'internet memes' are altered deliberately by human creativity. The 'bricoleurs' repurposed the scientific concept of 'meme' for the mythological concept of 'internet meme', and thereby became 'meme farmers'.

How does a meme farmer tend to her memes? She maintains a collection of images and videos, characters, situations, reactions, concepts, tropes, one-liners, quotes, references, symbols, etc. She plays with them; she mixes and matches different elements until she creates a rearrangement relevant to whatever happens to be her subject of interest. Different elements applied to different structures relevant to different events.

Now lets looks at Lévi-Strauss' explication of the work of the bricoleur:

>"The elements ofPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File (hide): 82b5ee23fb8be7f⋯.jpeg (12.35 KB,200x230,20:23,H_E_R_D_E_R.jpeg) (h) (u)

[–]

72e068 No.4969 [Open thread][Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

A reflection of physical surroundings? A tool to orient oneself among peers? Who explained it best?

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

72e068 No.4971>>4973

culture are the things that oppose nature

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

72e068 No.4973

File (hide): eefd98a33c55ddf⋯.png (11.9 KB,1123x71,1123:71,goethe.png) (h) (u)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

72e068 No.4974

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

be003f No.5305

Humans have a lot of options for how they'll live their lives.

Culture is a group which all make the same decisions. So, as a stupid example, one can choose to admit lots of foreigners or none at all. The first culture will develop means of dealing with contrasting belief systems in an orderly fashion, and will shy away from institutions that require homogenous beliefs. The second culture will have lots of institutions that require homogeneity, but will have simple, crude methods for dealing with heterogeneity.

Hunter tribes don't need psychologists because their lifestyle doesn't put great strain on the human mind. City tribes need a plethora of support systems for the mind, because humans are maladapted for the city environment.

For less stupid examples, there's more than one way to organize a city. Different cultures can choose different, incompatible ways, and still end up with a thriving city as long as their decisions are relatively consistent.

Culture is a conflated thing. Cultures develop, or previously had, a particular character. One can see the character puts a bias on how these decisions are made. It also affects the character of the culture's art. Similarly, the art's themes will be applicable to the relevancies of the culture - decisions to still be made, or difficulties the culture has in living up to its own decisions. But, strictly speaking, the set of life decisions is a different thing than the arts a social group creates.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File (hide): 4e4f62d9b969653⋯.jpg (325.56 KB,900x900,1:1,karma.jpg) (h) (u)

[–]

7a4f50 No.4966 [Open thread][Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

Okay /philosophy/ please bare with me.

How does a King or anyone of the such hold the "Form of Good" within him, according to Plato?

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

7a4f50 No.4967>>4968

plato was a pidor

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

7a4f50 No.4968

>>4967

Being that I'm Bosnian, I'll throw in a "Plato was a peder".

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

7b038f No.5306

Plato was wrong. We can work out what he meant, but there's no point.

Plato's forms are a primitive understanding of how definitions work. Now we know how definitions work, and Plato's forms are little more than a historical curiosity.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File (hide): 1459360238749.png (69.44 KB,300x100,3:1,1459287422385-boards.png) (h) (u)

[–]

ffe648 No.3837 [Open thread][Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

>>>/logic/ and it's child boards

>>>/logicpol/

(/logic/ isn't claimed yet so sorry about the shit posting)

What do you think of the idea?

15 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

ffe648 No.4800

>>4483

Now I can accurately guess that the people here don't

He's just a caricature of someone who's just learned about logical fallacies and doesn't entirely understand them.

Which brings us to the last comic:

>>4511

You're right that things still have a truth behind them but what the fuck, everyone except the most brainwashed post modernist knows that.

If you can't argue your point without shooting off a fallacy what is the fucking point of arguing with you, dumbass? The point of this description is to refute people that think that, because a earlier argument used a fallacy, further arguments towards the same point are invalid because the user is fallacious.

Guess what?

This shit has nothing to do with it.

Nobody wants to argue with logical fallacies because there's nothing to argue.

Go fling your

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

ffe648 No.4948>>4959

>>4527

I'll teach logic for free if anyone wants to learn.

(ProTip: nobody's willing to put in the effort.)

(Throw the horns for Socrates.)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

ffe648 No.4959

>>4527

I picked up logic from statistics, baysneian truth statements in applied calculus or algebra, and fallacies from a philosophy class valued critical thinking. I took a few programing classes but I didn't learn anything except writing procedural code within some rules, maybe I didn't study it long enough. I don't think you need a class soley for logic, all you need is enough classes that delve into it and rely on it.

>Sophistry

I learned how to argue and do research from liberal arts classes. Science coursework is strangely hung-up on rote memorization of formulas and write-ups; they don't usually make students research a topic, memorize arguments for a prompt, and then verbally debate or aggressively question each other like lawyers. Take for example the pre-med majors who memorize a ton of facts, names, reactions, and diagnoses, but remain cultural bound and never need to question things like their own biases to get a degree, which is why they're the most likely of the "STEM matter race" to keep their religion.

>>4948

Teach us your secret.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

ffe648 No.4976

>>4509

Ad hominem.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5f474c No.5308

>>3863

>The problem with focusing on fallacies is that a lot of people tend to misidentify them.

The major problem being misidentifying them on purpose or accidentally on purpose. Even the most objective arbiter will end up finding more fallacies in arguments they disagree with.

This is why the Catholics have a Pope. Someone has to decide, meaning someone has to have final authority. However, having only one Pope is degenerate in several ways. To do the fallacy-banning thing properly on 8chan would require a board-of-boards. Each board would have their own Fallacy Pope, but there would be a meta-board with the combined thread feed of all the boards. Alternatively, OPs would all have banning privileges within their own threads, though they would need to identify their ruleset, which would be equivalent to namefagging.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File (hide): 1464181108193.jpeg (81.31 KB,800x517,800:517,image.jpeg) (h) (u)

[–]

3c5aa3 No.4106 [Open thread][Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

List the heroes. Aside from Socrates there was a female neoplatonic philosopher/astronomer who was murdered by the Christian mob centuries later:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypatia

10 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3c5aa3 No.4500>>4501

>>4362

But how that murdered for philosophy if Hypatia as murdered for politics? It seems like neither of them are a martyr by your standards.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3c5aa3 No.4501

>>4500

Socrates did not advocate anything political. His inquiries, however, made fools of the citizens of athens and the professional politicians who claimed to know things yet were left baffled and unable to give any positive answer to Socrates' questions.

This spirit of complete free inquiry was catching on with the noble youth who, thanks to Socrates, were beginning to see that the adults were ignorant and really did not know any more than the youth themselves. This destruction of faith and its consequences is why Socrates was put to death, and it is why he refused to accept any wrongdoing or punishment. He knew he had done nothing wrong and had revealed the ignorant for what they were: ignorant.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3c5aa3 No.4951

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3c5aa3 No.4962

-) Anicius Manlius Severinus Boëthius

-) Giordano Bruno

-) in a way also Blaise Pascal (his religous beliefs killed him)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

7e5f08 No.5310

If you admire martyrs so much, kill yourself.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



All
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25]
| Catalog | Nerve Center | Random
Michael
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / ausneets / cyber / fit / kpop / pen / random / tingles / wtp ][ watchlist ]