I am assuming the reader has experienced these terms before
>niggers, kikes, spics, poo in loo
Humor in these terms aside, I feel that these terms are all representative of fallacious strawmen, scapegoats, and crux derailments.There is no purpose besides difference, an instilled
My proposal to you is that the issue with domestic conflict is one of culture, and not race.
To illustrate this concept, I feel that it is necessary to begin with a viable example that I see quite frequently.
>the white black guy
>redpilled jew
>woman who has her head on straight
>Americanized muslim
The pretexting phrase (redpilled etc.) indicates that these hypothetical cultural minorities see the world through a lens which is similar to that of oneself and others who they believe to be competent politically, socially, and morally. This further indicates that they prescribe to a perceived notion of reality based on empirical evidence and conglomerate experience. I don't feel that it is inherently wrong to use these labels, however, I believe that these labels are used because the individual using them is unaware of what I believe to be a mass logic slip in modern narrative. IE: what I am proposing, that domestic conflict is one of culture and not race.
Further, I propose that government, religion, and propaganda repetitiously prescribe a reality which promotes acceptable social, moral, and economic boundaries to be followed so that the masses are able to interact amicably. This mechanism is also sympathetic, and at necessary times, advantageous to those in power who wish to remain in power. This should come as no secret to those who are actively perusing the truth of power, however, I felt it important to mention because it is an associated facet of the aforementioned.
The fact that multicultural nations fail, is paraded through current popular tPost too long. Click here to view the full text.