/32/ - Psychopolitics

>>1855

Not OP, but I googled "memetic energies" and got this:

>Memetic energy is energy produced by the effect of sentient organisms on the quantum fabric of the universe. To put it susinctly, thoughts have power and that power can be harnessed. There's also a hell of a lot of it, and it doesn't obey Conservation Of Energy at all. It literally comes from nowhere, like zero point energy. It's an extremely potent energy source.

Memetic energy was first harnessed by the Aincient Stephinians more than a million trillion years ago. It was what contributed to their extremely fast technological development in relation to their cultural development. It is the foundation of most Stephinian technology, expecially the SDW cannons and their womhole drives. The New Stephinian Empire was formed due to a lack of memetic energy and the subsequent crash of the starship Rocinante on Stephinia.

lol...OP do you subscribe to this definition?

>>1855

>Fat acceptance, which is a way of discouraging individuals to take part in lifestyle changes that decrease their fat body mass, includes the ridicule of individuals who take part in physical activities because they are traditionally associated with a shallow pursuit of an idealized appearance. One could argue that this discouragement also -if not primarily- targets the populations cognitive abilities. Now you've got me wondering about the effects of diets on the mental and neural development on individuals...

Very interesting point anon - the powers that be want to fatten people up so they are weak and controllable. It's really the only explanation for the increasing gluttony of our society, which by most respects makes us less productive and harms the environment.

>>1916

or youknow, its not a conspiracy, but just that sugar is a superstimulus, maybe?

>>1941

It's easy to get carried away. People often see what they want to see.

>>1858

yes but the imbuer controls the potency of energy

दो सौ घोड़ों की शक्ति इस कल में है।

ईश्‍वर हमें शक्ति दे।

हमें विध्वंसक शक्ति का प्रयोग करना पड़ा।

>Who doesn't control the society as much as Christians? Burning a Christian bible will cause a worldwide outrage

I think many would have no problem. A Qur'an however...

>Interesting that this is the only religion overly criminalized

If by 'interesting' you mean a reflection of the fact they infiltrated the US government.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Snow_White

>>1891

what?

Interesting observations anon. I would say that the motivations for war are becoming increasingly economically focused, and it's unsettling to note the many private military contractors playing the big roles in the Middle East right now.

Now to the actual psychopolitical analysis. Most of the effects you're seeing now are more likely caused by withholding information relating to the actual goal and interests involved with the current wars, or at the least swaying the public to be inclined to believe that any current war benefits the country. The patriotic conditioning is of course tied to respect for the military and nation and any disapproval of the war will be tired, often by popular consensuses, to being unpatriotic.

In response to the second question it is certainly indicator of underlying commercial interests not only prevalent in warfare, but also in politics as a whole. I wold not say this is necessarily a logical development of warfare.

Low-income, males, usually from ages 17-28 are the most reasonable targets for military recruiting for a number of reasons. The first being that there are limited opportunities for employment or education given the lack of money available. Poorly educated men for low-income backgrounds may see this as a means of upwards mobility that would not require getting a degree. It's highly unlikely given the commercial focus of the upper branches of the government and military that this demographic is being chosen for any other reason except for their susceptibility.

Well that's my attempt at analyzing.

It seems erroneous to think that modern wars are not motivated by the well-being of a nation's people while the ones of earlier times were. Firstly, because the economic factors that can act as causes for hostilities between nations can also be major factors in the well-being of those nation's populations. In fact, one can trace a good deal of the most common problems that a society faces to economic causes. The problem arises when the well-being of a handful of companies is confused with the well-being of a country's economy in general: certainly very few people would try to save a studio that made snuff films with the justification that letting any media company go under would incur great loss to the film industry in general.

The second problem is that economic motivations have been central to warfare for a very long time, just look at the Punic Wars. Despite the notions of nobility and honor, our ancestors were men such as we, and equally likely to be motivated by greed and pride.

Thus, a discussion can be started not only on your questions, but on your subject. The search for what makes a war "just" has been going on for as long as there has been war, and is likely to continue for as long as it exists. Notions of justified use of violence between nations vary according to the historical and cultural context in which such conflicts take place, but it is generally accepted that war is less advantageous for all parties involved than being in peace. Yet, all throughout history nearly every nation has been at war at one point or another, and while many have not initiated such conflicts, the choice of violent resistance over peaceful submission is still one that should be looked over. This can be attributed in part to the fact that societies, by nature, are managed by small groups of individuals, who are usually a minuscule fraction of the total population. This obvious observation has as a consequence the fact that one does not need to convince the whole group of the necessity of war, only the smaller group in charge of making decisions to whom the rest of the society has agreed to transfer control over themselves. Without going much further into what is one of the central psychopolitical matters, those who are in control of a society usually have a great influence on who they share their influence with and who will succeed them, as such, it iPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>1936

(2/2)

>Is the increase in the use of private military contractors an indicator of these hidden interests, or is it a natural and logical development in warfare?

Both. Hiring a top-tier private army can be more effective than maintaining larger armed forces, and better than having to resort to a draft. There are undoubtedly situations where it makes no only financial but tactical sense to use PMCs.

>Is the targeting of young, low-income, poorly educated men by the recruiting apparatus morally reprehensible, or are they merely offering another option to a demographic that has few of them?

I see any effort to make men overcome their most basic instincts and become able to kill other human beings in an industrial scale as a deeply disturbing thing, regardless of the social placement of those men (or women). The young and poorly-educated are targeted because of how well they react to the conditioning, and the fact that they are poor is usually tied with the second, as well as being an extra encouragement from them to take any stable employment they can get. I am currently reading "On Killing" by Lt. Col. Grossman, and the mental toll that falls on humans when they are forced to commit acts that go against their very nature is testament to how abhorrent system that is currently in place is.

I agree with the previous poster in the sense that honesty would be a refreshing stance to be seen from our rulers, not only when it comes to matters of war. Truthful and accessible information would be perhaps the solution of a great deal of political and moral problems, not only when it comes to nations. But that is another discussion. Something related to that is the idea of men going into war out of their own volition, and conscious of the reasons behind the conflict. Two situations come to mind: mercenaries and religious fanatics.

Mercenaries choose to fight purely for personal gain, both in the sense of the money and their search for adventure. They have no illusions about their reasons to fight, and do so fully aware of the futility of trying toPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>1934

>the patriotic conditioning too strong in most people

>natural and logical development in warfare

>both morally reprehensible and offering another option to a demographic that has few of them

the only solution is to wipe out every aggressor until it is known that no digression from the norm is tolerable

>>1868

>revive this board

We've never been this lively to begin with. Think of it as being on life support.

>>1876

What are you theories as to why the quality dropped so much and so fast?

I think it had to do with the large influx of people during the Second Exodus (that was because m00t nuked 4/pol/, right?), which only stopped using 4/pol/ because it was unusable as a platform for "political" (and I'm using the term as generally as possible here) discussion. The fact that they stayed even after it was obvious that the platform was being censored shows that they either chose not to believe in the evidence (which shows naïveté) or that they didn't care as long as it didn't involve jews and they had a large enough audience for their shitposting.

Also, do you have any of those beaverposts saved? They could make for good discussion here, depending on the topic.

>>1924

not working for me

>>1924

>>1925

Nevermind, it just saves to desktop for some reason

>>>/bmw/ for development of political memes & trying them out in the field. Practical Politics & memetic warfare.

test, ignore

While it is possible that the USA has had some divisions, they are likely historical. Observers have noted distinction across American cultural groups for a long while now.

Generally, scholars have noted an opposite trend. A growing homogenisation of the English-speaking people generally. Funnily enough, one article you linked tried to defend America's lack of foreign-language ability but failed to notice than NO english-speaking country has good foreign=-language skills. Similarly, while Americans are supposedly is ignorant of foreign-places, it failed to point out that the UK doesn't fair much better either. British people are incredibly ignorant of Europe and much, much more knowledgeable of the USA, Canada and Australia.

Perhaps these new subdivisions show something different. There has been a growing global elite, most of who are English-speaking. Perhaps the elite, disconnected from national-borders, have caused national connecxions in the Anglo-sphere to collapse. This could explain why people feel the USA has broken up slightly culturally and why the home nations of the UK are also falling apart.

Perhaps the modern world we live in will see a pan-Anglo transformation that encourages English-speaking identity formation outside of the traditional nation-states.

newfag here. this is provocative stuff.

i studied Russian and am pretty familiar with the country's history. I would say that even the current Russian Federation is still an empire, containing quite literally conquered peoples all over its enormous land mass.

An issue, however, is the dependency of some of these regions on the central muscovy-st petersburg state.

This is a tough issue. I mean, what is to be gained by having states fall apart into smaller component sections? Who benefits from the current set-up and who would realistically benefit or trigger a split up?

Other countries that have similar issues of diversity are India and China

>>1786

you raise some excellent points.

further, i think the pan-anglo transformation is well underway, for good or worse. Worse being that american consumer culture is usually the biggest thing being transferred. second is literal english language learning, which is prevalent in many countries

>>1729

>Atlanta as part of the Deep South

kek

>>1919

I am probably being a bit to liberal in my theories, but for the most part I am just trying to make a case about the feasibility of ET existence. What is insane about my theories?

I'm with OP on this one. People against the UFO angle need to substantiate their argument. So if the UFO phenomenon is one giant psy-op, for what purpose? If so, it's the most successful psy-op of all time, one of the first great modern memes, and the progenitor of COINTELPRO that uh...is 1000000x more successful than anything we know as COINTELPRO has accomplished.

Is it a psyop gone out of control? Is the government concealing anything? Is the government selling something? If so, what?

>>1938

no government on earth could do a global ufo psyop

more likely advanced societies in the universe and galaxy are projecting force

One thing is for certain. Watch the film straw dogs. The rape in England is intwined within the fabric of society. Its like as common as a gf cheating on you. And of course there is very unadressed masonic and royal themes to such acts of sadism. So not only is it rape its rape riddled in the allowed nuances of the public consensus on fraternal orders and cults as a whole

>>1737

>>1737

>So, how to bring forward the class and racial identity?

Normally this would have happened/ be happening in any other time throughout history.

The biggest difference now is that so many white males have been raised in front of plastic screens, separated from family, separated from nature and their natural biology. This is the main reason why leftism can only thrive in the new digital age. Why counter your own destruction when you can just jerk off, play video games, drink, do drugs, vape etc. etc. instead. The only thing that will wake up white males in separating them from their current plastic screen masters. I don't see that ever happening.

>cunning marketing,

Nope, not enough. Gonna need the full artillery here folks, no looking back now. Nothing short of a complete disconnect from the digital umbilical cord, coupled with a mass awakening spiritual movement will do the trick.

Maybe convince white males that computers aren't cool after all and the internet (wifi) is actually killing you? Take that idea, couple it with a tough mudder / GoRuck style group, throw in some newbridge church and we are starting to get somewhere...

>>1741

>The only thing that will wake up white males in separating them from their current plastic screen masters.

Gonna have to disagree with you here anon, as someone mentioned earlier in this thread the best way to give people a sense of racial/cultural identity is to make them realise what amazing and incredible shit has been accomplished by their nation/race is the past, these accomplishments don't even have to be true.

For example, instead of someone watching Roots or other such films/programs, have them watch Zulu. It's not so much about media as a whole being the bad influence as much as it is about common more publicly available media being so, Zulu probably wasn't the best example to showcase this mind. Think of it as an incubation period for nationalistic pride, some neckbearded beta as fuck white guy starts to learn about the things he ancestors did that he should be proud of and they'll start feeling ashamed and want to change that... eventually.

The key as I see it isn't about stopping them falling prey to white guilt propaganda, it's about having them fall prey to the opposite.

>>1728

>"There is no class associated with whites except evil ceo's/executives etc. or weak, puny kuk's"

Yet here in the UK there are teenager/young adult white memes such as "cheeky nandos" and "lad culture". Popularized through Facebook such as theladbible and dapperlaughs, "Cheeky" and "Banter" are labelled as white words.

>people against lad culture

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuLAHKKjqYI

>banter viral video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Us9W07b4A08

>explaining lad culture to an American

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYF9WleGEPk

>What is the best method to break this fearful mentality that seems to grip white people?

OP, i was a coward for most part of my life (i grew up mostly with no religion, and my dad was absent).

I changed once became a Christian and i acknowledged that God hates cowards, and that what i should crave in this life is God respect, not human respect.

Good bread. Required reading for this topic:

http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/0013/common-core/1-common-core-lighthouse.htm

http://www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com/blog/?p=13825

In April 2000, the participants of the World Education

Forum in Dakar, Senegal, adopted the Dakar Framework

for Action “Education for All: Meeting our Collective

Commitment”1. They reaffirmed the vision of the World

Declaration on Education for All2 adopted ten years earlier

(Jomtien, Thailand, 1990) and committed to the attainment

of six goals, supported by 12 strategies, in order to meet

the basic learning needs of all children, youth and adults.

In September 2000, world leaders came together at the

United Nations (UN) Headquarters in New York to adopt

the UN Millennium Declaration, committing to reduce

extreme poverty and setting out a series of targets that have

become known as the Millennium Development Goals

(MDGs). The MDGs included two goals related to universal

primary education and to gender equality in education,

acknowledging the pivotal role of education in human

development.

Today, it is widely recognized that the Education for

All (EFA) agenda and the related MDGs have led

to significant advances for the right to education.

The mobilization and investment which they triggered has

yielded unprecedented progress, notably in access to

formal schooling and in gender parity in primary education.

However, major education challenges still persist in all

countries and regions of the world. Some of them – notably

equity, quality and learning opportunities for youth and

adults – have not received the attention they deserve and

new ones have emerged since 2000, such as the need to

improve the development of relevant skills for life and for

work, for all age groups.

'Sustainable developments' is the sustainable development plan for the human race if anyone wasn't aware of it. It is mentioned on the last line of the last paragraph.

The rhetoric had changed since the 70's because the European populations of America and Europe went into decline thanks to overworking of the populations, and their subsequent demoralization.

Now we will be forced to embrace 'cultural diversity' in all of our homes.

>Building on and continuing the EFA movement, Education 2030 takes into account the lessons learned since 2000. A key lesson of the past years is that the global education agenda should work within the overall international development framework rather than alongside it, as occurred with the separate EFA goals and education-related MDGs.

>The agenda’s focus on inclusion and equity – giving everyone an equal opportunity, and leaving no one behind – signals another lesson: the need for increased and special efforts to reach those marginalized by factors such as gender inequality, poverty, conflict and disaster, disability, age and remoteness.

>The focus on education quality and learning recognizes the danger of concentrating on access to education without paying enough attention to whether students are learning. The fact that the EFA goals have not been reached carries a further lesson: ‘business as usual’ will not bring education to all. If current rates of progress continue, many of the countries lagging furthest behind will not reach the new targets by 2030. This means that it is of utmost importance to change current practices and mobilize efforts and resources at an unprecedented pace.

Very unfortunate that college is basically a necessity nowadays.

>>1828

>I have been watching a few jordan maxwell videos

His real name is Russell Pine and he's a pathological liar and a fraud. He was a butt buddy of Manly P. Hall, he reveres Blavatsky, has get-togethers with George Lucas and his "teachings" were instrumental in creation of the first part of Zeitgeist, which has been debunked thoroughly, even by atheists. Recently he even got on the lizard people bandwagon just to make a quick buck to pay off his debts. Do not ever trust anything that comes from his slimy mouth.

Typical low-life shill, just like Jones, Icke, Gunderson, Watt, Springmeier, Patru and that what's-his-name balding satanist faggot with a half-ponytail. Holy fucking shit, it's like a circus out there. All they need is a bearded lady and a chimp that shits in the hat on command. Well, scratch that - they already have Rense and his wig, kek.

As for the symbols, It's really not that complicated. You just have to remember how the elements are color-coded, what shapes represent the rule "as abowe, so below" and understand the gnostic doctrine when it comes to fallic symbols and eyes in triangles. Also it doesn't hurt to study alchemy and know what it says about androgyny and the perfect merger of the elements, because a lot of symbology comes from that shit. Hell, they make movies based on this shit every year and it's getting really fucking boring. But hey, no originality when there's psychopathy, right?

All in all, top fucking kek.

>>1830

I understand he reaches quite a bit but some of the stuff he said made sense. Thank you I will look into alchemy

>>1819

>there were maybe 2 or 3 /intl/ users tops

There were about 15 of regular posters judging by presence in saturday movie streams.

I find the whole event intriguing to observe, at least; it shows how gullible average poster is to information from authority. The whole thing of course translates into real life as well...

>>1823

On the other hand this constitutes slander, and the average poster could simply be using the authority's word as an excuse.

I don't follow drama between boards at all, and only check a few boards. If what you say is true... thats sad

I stay out of drama so I have no idea what happened, but wouldn't the OP be an ironic example of "mass manipulation" in itself? who is to say the post is 100% true? where can one go to even confirm this sort of information? I'm not saying he's lying, I really don't know. but how much information that we consume can we really say is without doubt an unbiased first hand source? and even if it was first hand, how much can we confirm to be truth? I understand the OP is referring to a leadership and subordinate dynamic, but I hope my point will still be clear.

manipulation happens, to an extent, within every communication shared by two or more individuals. most people would choose to "frame a narrative" in their favor, sometimes not even 100% consciously. there is so much to interpersonal communication that is often overlooked by individuals, and without even thinking most people "fill in the cracks", per say. words and phrases conjure up images in a person's mind. it's practically magick if you think about it.. neuro linguistic programming and the like. with enough knowledge of an individual's thoughts, feelings, behaviors, experiences, etc. one can very easily manipulate a person through word choice alone, forget adding in emphasis, gestures, tonality, touch, facial expressions, etc.

something as simple as "golden arches" can conjure up numerous smells, tastes, sounds, feelings, etc. in a person's mind. "I was robbed" and "I was mugged" are two very similar phrases and arguably can be referencing the same exact event, but they conjure up (at least for me) very different mental imagery. someone who was mugged was surely robbed, but simply being stolen from does not mean a person was "violently mugged". I could be pick pocketed and declare "I was mugged once" and garner sympathy from my audience even if no literal violence occurred.

I know it's not the best example but I hope I got my point across at least somewhat. language, while serving it's purpose, is fundamentally flawed. very intelligent people can easily convey their thoughts to others in an easy to consume fashion, but even they are limited by words. and if all of the words in existence weren't enough, they're further limited by words their audience understands. I wish I was one of those people bPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>1829

>I'm glad to have found this board

I'm glad you did. We need people like you.

So I assume you're basically doing what the MRAs who sold 'male tear' mugs to feminists are doing? Donate the profits to MRA organizations?

>>1765

Did they really do that? I can't find a reliable source on that.