/32/ - Psychopolitics

Don't forget that 'those in power' act as placeholders for globalist factions.

Sustainable Development

Common Purpose

World Wide Interdependence

>>2882

I understand what you are saying OP and I understand that this is one of the high IQ boards, however, I have to point out that composing your post in a way to sound like a research paper may make you look smart, but it makes it harder for everyone else to read so please show some mercy when you make another thread.

To be blunt, your whole post can be summarized as:

>dindus act like dindus because of gang culture and not because they are black, the reasons why I think so are x, y and z.

That aside, I completely agree with what you said.

>to what ends do you/we work?

I lean towards nationalism in these matters so my solution to domestic conflict would be:

a) Decrease immigration to a minimum, regardless of whether immigrants can or can't assimilate.

b) The immigrants who did arrive must learn the language and customs of their host country, in this sense they must assimilate.

c) Immigrants should not be able to become citizens of their host country and should not act like they are nationals of that country, in this sense they cannot assimilate.

d) It is acceptable for a particular group of immigrants to have their own culture which differs to that of the host country (eg: Chinese people living in the US) but when a foreign culture proves to be troublesome then it must be eliminated (eg: black/gang culture in the US) and its people must either assimilate or be imprisoned or deported.

>If you possessed the ability to inform and manipulate the masses, how would you go about this?

You would have to have some serious power in politics or in the media to be able to do this. Preferably in the media, in democratic countries the media is more powerful than the government.

Maybe you'd be right if we lived in a world where race actually was just skin color.

>>2884

I wasn't trying to compose it in any sort of specific fashion meant to impose a certain feeling. I used direct language in order to compose propositions that were clear and inherently direct in nature. Maybe that is why research papers are written thusly.

I appreciate your response, but "dindus act like dindus" leaves much of the constructive reasoning behind why this phenomenon exists, and what the mechanics of it are. That is why I outlined it. I believe the solution of the problem lies within understanding the problem itself, which is why I chose to use the title "pervasive logic slip"

Defense of my construction aside, I think you bring some really good ideas to the table as far as immigration is concerned. However, my opinion does not match yours on the subject of nationalism. I believe the Information Age is quickly narrowing the national or cultural experience into one, generalized form. I believe that phenomenon was bound to happen organically, however, there are many institutions which maliciously inject their own brand of reality into our culture. Further, from what I understand, nationalism as used here in a cultural sense is the rallied defense and pride in ones culture which causes war. If we are to ever enjoy world peace someday, I believe one earthly culture would be the answer. However, human nature dictates that there will always be dissent. There is one flaw that I think can be expanded upon.

>>2885

Great response. Very well thought out and meaningful.

Read my post again.

>>2907

So you reject the bell curve, in which, for instance, there are a percentage of blacks on the right-side tail who match other ethnicities in IQ, but a huge chunk are lacking in IQ?

>>2906

The one earthly culture question must figure out how not to go so lowest common denominator that quality aspects of cultures don't get eroded and eliminated by so much crass and indulgent aspects, like what we are seeing presently with the global order.

>>2906

Readability is something to consider when making a post, simple terms make it easier for both parties to understand each other. We must keep in mind that however intelligent we or the people we are reaching out to may be, not everyone enjoys densely-verbose literature and mental gymnastics. But in any case, intelligent discussion here is hard to come by, I welcome an opportunity to have a Socratic argument with the goal of extracting truth rather than simply insulting someone or trying to prove to them why my opinion is better than theirs, so please bear with me if I may seem challenging, my intention is only for both of us to understand the truth in this subject.

>"dindus act like dindus"

I wasn't clear at all in my previous post, so here is my constructive reasoning: The problem exists within the context of cultures and nations. What is a nation? A nation is a territory on which a culture is free to thrive however it wants. What is a culture? A culture is a tribe, humans are social creatures and naturally we are also collectivists since by instinct we all feel the need to belong to a tribe, what's more, in any multi-cultural community, people always gravitate towards those who are the most similar to themselves (same race, language, way of doing things, etc...).

A culture is basically a very big tribe. In some nations (ie. territories), there is only one culture (ie. tribe) and the concepts of nation and tribe are very close if not the same, however, in other more "individualist" nations there are many different tribes (multi-culturalism) either because the people or the leaders of this nation are individualists who don't believe in concepts such as tribes but instead believe that each human exists independently of any collective and should be "Judged by the content of one's character" and not the tribe they belong to.

Keep in mind that back in the caveman days, different tribes warred for the same territory. Protecting your territory, it's resources and it's people was a tribal duty and is instinctual to us human beings. You can only understand the problem within this context.

I believe the source of the problem starts here: a nation/territory is shared by different tribes, certain individuals begin to feel alienated and start to revolt because they are not part of the dominant tribe/culture of the territory/nation they are in, the "Pervasive logic slip" as you accurately put it is very evident in those alienated individuals who do not even know why they are so discontent and are unable to pinpoint the source of their problem. A black man in the US might ask himself "why do I hate these [white] people so much?", he doesn't know why he has a natural dislike to them but he does and since he fancies himself a rational human being, he sets out to find a reason, at the end of the day he justifies his hatred towards white people as a logical thing to do because they are "racist" or whatever closest logical reason he can find, they probably aren't, but that's the closest he can get with logical reasoning to justifying his instinctive dislike towards another tribe within what he believes to be his territory.

It should also be kept in mind that there are a lot of blacks who are even able to get straight to the point and identify that it is "white culture" that they oppose, and to them any black man who tries to get a career, an education or even a proper middle class life is "a white nigga".

I welcome you to challenge my argument and point out wherever I may be wrong.

>I appreciate your response, but "dindus act like dindus" leaves much of the constructive reasoning behind why this phenomenon exists

How would you reason why some demographics fail to behave appropriately compared to others?

>I believe the solution of the problem lies within understanding the problem itself

Knowing is half the battle after all, how do you understand it?

>I believe the Information Age is quickly narrowing the national or cultural experience into one, generalized form.

I agree with you, but the question of whether it is a good thing still remains, although this can be a different subject on its own.

>>2911

IQ is not necessarily determined by race or genetics, even IQ is determined by culture, blacks don't want to learn or go to school because "muh white education" or some other bullshit, whereas in Japan and China their dedication to being educated is reflected in their high IQ. If you want to say that IQ is determined by race, then to be objective you have to be prepared to say that Asians are smarter than white people too.

>>2911

I made sure to address the fact that different races harbor physiological (cognitive, physical) differences, however, we are all able to prescribe to any culture. I think you're a troll.

>>2912

How would you define a quality aspect of culture? Purity? Tradition? These are things that are liable to change even under the most superficial consequences of globalism.

Where the crux lies I believe, is would we be willing to accept cultural change in exchange for peace and universalism?

Would an one earthly culture take the form of something like the British Commonwealth? Or are we looking at a shared culture without so much the centralized political aspect? Or would it require a centralized world government with governors and administrators who can administrate directly within their respective territories?

>>2948

Sorry for the double posting, but should we think of that one earthly culture as something more like the spread of a religion like Christianity and Islam or an ideology that isn't bound by the political

>>2882

OP, I'm confused what this sentence means:

>Remember, without constantly destroying our reality due to conflicting fact, we are no better off.

Do you mean: exercising a fluidity of reality, constantly modifying and adapting to confront inevitable dilemmas and dissent?

Or: making sure to minimize as much as possible reality being distorted by conflicting facts?

The sentence reads very awkwardly to me, but I want to say my first guess is more correct because you earlier mention "repetitiously prescribing a reality". Cheers!

>>2882

Sound like social science garbage.

"I believe that my proposal is founded on truth and logic", False, truth and logic are scientific terms. Your claims are your personal opinion.

>>2915

>Asian are smarter than white people

False, they are better at following instructions, basically all modern fields of science were invented by mainly white men.

This reads as a classical kike post disguised as "academic" babble.

>>2918

>I made sure to address the fact that different races harbor physiological (cognitive, physical) differences, however, we are all able to prescribe to any culture. I think you're a troll.

Jesus christ you are a retarded double thinker.

You admit that cognitive differences exist in all races, yet you go on to claim they can all exist in any culture. This is contradictory because different cultures require different levels of mental capacity.

For example, blacks are not capable of living efficiently in white or asian cultures, due to their low impulse control, aggression and mental limitations.

>>2882

I largely agree with what you have to say, but you don't spare verbosity. I am always for a heightening of the dialogue; how something's said is often almost as important as what is said. Having said that I admit I am a gut-instinct, intuitive person without mucy capacity for debate. I am individualistic and believe myself to be influenced by Anglo-Saxon self-interested individualism as part of the American experience. I am also nonwhite and so would be an easy target to crucify were this is not an anonymous discussion. Some may paint me as self-hating, but I merely see the sad reality of life. Few ethnics are redpilled. I believe you to be one of compassionate character and applaud your humanity. If had the media blitz perk, I would see to educate with stern, rational sincerity especially not based on hate. Seeing as how all of us should understand human culture and internet memes in particular, it should be harder to hate people considering they (and us) have been misled since day one. If the day of the rope comes, I still do not expect to be spared.

>>3072

I'm not a stormfag, but it's not that hard to get caught in the crossfire if there happens to be racial unrest. So it would seem with the so-called Asian aka Chinese century, but we are a product of our time and it may well be that I will become the reactionary as individualism fades away.

>>2882

>IQ is not necessarily determined by race or genetics

How many more centuries does sub-saharan africa need before it gets its shit together? The only chance africa had was Lybia and france and bill clinton's wife put an end to that.