[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/monarchy/ - STOP THINKING LIKE REPUBLICANS

They're just LARPing, right?...right???

Catalog  Archive

Name
Email
Subject*
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload4 per post.


IN CASE 8CHAN IS DOWN: http://txti.es/monarchy FOR NEWS ABOUT WHERE TO REGROUP

File: 064cf20fced63e8⋯.jpg (28.58 KB,306x421,306:421,3.jpg)

 No.1400 [Open thread]

Alright lads,

first of all: Great new board. It's awesome and the extraordinarily high quality is lit.

Now here comes the question: How would we bring about a monarchy today ? Like, given the absolutely degenerated and un-dignified state of society, what do you think would it take to instate a monarchy ?

For this Gedankenexperiment we're open for everything, but I ask you to stay civil and not play the "genocide"-card. [just in case]

18 postsand3 image repliesomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.2062

>>1456

>muh shekels

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.2068

>>1452

>There are two kinds of ancaps on this board.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.2069

File: ff87bccc92c70cf⋯.gif (2.07 MB,512x338,256:169,1500843177981.gif)

>he doesnt already have a monarchy

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.2070

>>1402

do it

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.2077

>>2069

Not until I move to Britain…

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: ce09c99a01a15e6⋯.png (25.71 KB,604x643,604:643,Maghrebin.png)

File: 23288060b767436⋯.jpg (48.84 KB,647x610,647:610,YUGE MOROCCO.jpg)

File: a4bd9e08979608a⋯.jpg (127.34 KB,1143x613,1143:613,HASSAN THE CANNIBAL.jpg)

File: 9d2ae58adc9fbd3⋯.png (203.7 KB,460x245,92:49,hassan ii and son.png)

 No.1418 [Open thread]

Any other moroccans in here? We have the classiest monarchs in existance, and the only ones who aren't keked by any "parliament", as well as not being a country stuck in the 1400s.

ALLAH, AL-WATAN, AL-MALIK!

8 postsand1 image replyomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1634

>>1633

As if you ever met one.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.2010

>>1429

Holy shit, there are Liechtenstein lurkers in here. Give me a fuckin' job mate.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.2021

>>2010

This forum is chock full of hidden agent monarchists. It gives me hope that in every country with a monarchy, there's a very sullen, silent majority willing and waiting to follow.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.2075

>>2021

Psst… there are.

Soon actions will be taken.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.4656

>>2075

Joining the hidden agent monarchist club.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: b521d257825fdaa⋯.png (118.1 KB,1575x2528,1575:2528,liberty or equality - do y….png)

 No.1085 [Open thread]

I stumbled over this thing again and found it to be accurate. Nazism is progressive, make no mistake.

5 postsand3 image repliesomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1761

>>1760

I mean, while the nazis invaded other countries, their civilians were raped and kidnapped? From fucking Serbia or what? Partisans raped German women in Serbia?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1765

>>1761

>their civilians were raped and kidnapped?

Yes

>From fucking Serbia or what?

Among others, yes

>Partisans raped German women in Serbia?

Yes. Most Serbian partisans raped German women in Slovenia in particular though.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1774

>>1759

>Looks at that mess of a picture.

Looks like you're the reason why oekaki is not enabled.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1775

>>1774

It's meant to be a mess. It's a persiflage of the OP image

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1778

>>1775

Kek, now that's actually kinda witty.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 666eca838575b95⋯.png (171.4 KB,553x553,1:1,Middle_East.png)

 No.1531 [Open thread]

For example I read that contrary to the claims of the Ayatollah's regime and its apologist that the ones made against the Shah have been overstated. If so, then should Iran have stayed a monarchy?

Should the Middle East have gotten one big Caliph decades ago?

8 postsand1 image replyomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1677

>>1676

Who would be the king of the Kingdom of Jerusalem?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1678

>>1677

JEB!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1680

>>1678

Shit taste, he's not even a descendant of David.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1739

The thing with Shia Islam is that it is kind of like a monarchy of its own type. It states that the Caliph (supreme leader of the Muslims) must be descended from Mohammad. Iran, with its parliaments, assemblies, and Shura councils, is more of a Republic than a Monarchy. But technically one could consider Shiism a monarchy with a massive royal family. As for his regime and how it suits the Persian peculiarities, that is tough to say. It is certainly more befitting to them than the Shah's regime was; however, it seems to flirt too much with revolutionary-proletarian rhetoric.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1772

>>1676

>Pretending Assyrians aren't more indigenous to Iraq.

>>1677

Better let some Samaritians rule then.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 786c1fe991ce5b3⋯.webm (1003.47 KB,1280x720,16:9,Trump Asshole.webm)

 No.1617 [Open thread]

Remind me, why does the alt-right trust him so much? Last I checked, the consensus among them was that his constant concessions to Israel don't make a lot of sense, but that Trump works in mysterious ways. I don't see how anyone can hold that up after he has acknowledged Jerusalem as the capital city of Israel and moved the US embassy there.

Jerusalem is holy to all three abrahamic religions, and it's also one of the most culturally important cities in the world. Trump has not just strengthened Israel, a Jewish nationalist state and the single most bellicose state in the Middle East, he also took a giant shit on every single Christian in that region, as if they needed that after being outnumbered twenty to one by Muslims who literally overran them.

31 postsand4 image repliesomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1713

>>1712

You do not seem to fully understand this. You being a possible boomer means that you are more susceptible to common boomer diseases such as being a complete cuck, an arrogant prick and being unthankful for the civilization your ancestors handed you that you didn't even bother to preserve. Being a boomer is a bad thing. If you are a boomer you need to explain your boomerness away in order to remain a valid person in any kind of conversation. It's like when someone is caught next to the border in your freemasonic union, and he's wearing a sombrero and speaking Spanish then you should check for his papers. This is more urgent with him than with the white American next to him. The same principle applies to boomers.

>explain

k

> Fascism recognizes the real needs which gave rise to socialism and trade unionism

Classical Liberalism destroyed the foundations of society post French Revolution and replaced it with something that's not sustainable, that is Liberalism. Socialism tries to deal with the problems that arose out of it. Which is correct.

> giving them due weight in the guild or corporative system in which divergent interests are coordinated and harmonized in the unity of the State.

Fascism tries to solve those problems differently. And since Fascists are Fascists they argue of course that they did it better.

So you really are a boomer that probably thinks the values of the French Revolution and classical Liberalism are a good thing and not the root of the problem?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1714

File: 4833b73a55fcd52⋯.jpg (96.14 KB,502x417,502:417,autism intensifies.jpg)

>>1713

>You do not seem to fully understand this. You being a possible boomer means that you are more susceptible to common boomer diseases such as being a complete cuck, an arrogant prick and being unthankful for the civilization your ancestors handed you that you didn't even bother to preserve. Being a boomer is a bad thing. If you are a boomer you need to explain your boomerness away in order to remain a valid person in any kind of conversation. It's like when someone is caught next to the border in your freemasonic union, and he's wearing a sombrero and speaking Spanish then you should check for his papers. This is more urgent with him than with the white American next to him. The same principle applies to boomers.

I still cannot believe you really typed this out. Not sure whether I should be impressed or disturbed.

>So you really are a boomer

If you ask me five more times, maybe I will respond.

> that probably thinks the values of the French Revolution and classical Liberalism are a good thing and not the root of the problem?

What is "the" problem, and how new are you? And why are you too dumb to respond to a simple question? Explain to me how state management of the economy, which is what Mussolini defended in the quote I gave you, is not socialism. Judging by the diatribe you wrote above on boomers, you clearly have the time to do so.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1717

>>1714

>Explain to me how state management of the economy, which is what Mussolini defended in the quote I gave you, is not socialism.

It does not fit the definition of socialism. Clearly boomer school taught you lots of wrong things.

>Judging by the diatribe you wrote above on boomers, you clearly have the time to do so.

Making that post did take me maybe 5 minutes tops kek. I can type fast, I don't have your old boomer hooks for fingers like you gramps

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1719

File: 2a25b15f6b4b272⋯.jpg (95.4 KB,1024x790,512:395,Go_Team_Retard!.jpg)

>>1717

>It does not fit the definition of socialism.

Good. Why not? What definition of socialism do you use, and why?

>Making that post did take me maybe 5 minutes tops kek.

>I can type fast

It's not about the time you wasted, it's that you wrote all this shit down, looked at it, and then thought:

>"Yes, this is a good work. This post is a worthy contribution to this board."

>BOOMER BOOMER BOOMER BOOMER BOOMER BOOMER BOOMER BOOMER BOOMER BOOMER BOOMER BOOMER BOOMER BOOMER BOOMER HAHAHAHA LOL XD

Clearly not mentally deficient.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1747

>>1617

Habitual liars are still continuously denouncing him, and that'll have to do. Enemy of my enemy and all that.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 7df50508ffa4e1d⋯.jpeg (95.33 KB,334x250,167:125,charlemagne-hero-AB.jpeg)

 No.1236 [Open thread]

How bad were the Middle Ages in Europe really, /monarchy/? The consensus seems to be that they were pretty brutal, but how much compared to muh peaceful Muslims and muh noble savages is not so clear, or even compared to modern times. Of course, democide numbers were far lower, but so was total population, so that doesn't tell us all that much.

30 postsand1 image replyomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1520

>>1436

>>1461

The video "communism vs. national socialism" was extremely Kosher

>Well it's okay because (((Russians))) never said sorry for it (^:

>communism was never tried in (((international courts)))

>If you murder over a hundred million of people because of malice, negligence and mismanagement it's worse than three hundred thousand jews dying as a result of supply lines being bombed

>everyone who died because of communism belonged to the same nation as the communism

<well except everyone killed in Katyń, but poles are terrible jew-eaters and frankly Soviets did the world a favor, (^: it's not as if (((Berman))) orchestrated Kielce Pogrom (dawn to dusk non-stop slaughter of jews, police was too scared to intervene) in '46 because soviets failed to pin the blame for Katyń on Germans

Sage for not medieval

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1550

File: dc552dbde7bbe5a⋯.jpg (1.99 MB,2302x2478,1151:1239,echoposters tbh.jpg)

>>1520

Echoposters shall be put to death by the sword, verily.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1555

>>1519

not an argument

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1556

>>1555

not an argument

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1567

>>1556

Oh, oh! I know this one! Fallacy fallacy!

What are you two doing? Can I join in on the fun?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 10fa8dc490461ba⋯.jpg (9.49 KB,243x208,243:208,angelic doctor.jpg)

 No.1317 [Open thread]

I'll start this with a personal recommendation:

>Solved the mind-body-problem before Descartes was even born

>Hylemorphic Dualism is the most impressive word you'll ever say

>Delivers juicy teleological metaphysics and btfo's reddit atheists that didn't even exist back in the day

>Exposed the is-ought-fallacy so bad, Hume would've lived in a dumpster had people realized this

>Five proofs that your pagan völkisch larping is fucking retarded

5 postsand2 image repliesomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1341

>>1338

i dont like aristotle anyway

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1342

>>1341

Have you read anything by him?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1367

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1371

>>1317

Are you talking about aquinas?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1374

>>1371

Yes, him.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: abe52f39bed5797⋯.jpeg (94.68 KB,1024x576,16:9,rawls.jpeg)

 No.1150 [Open thread]

I hereby declare that John Rawls is the culmination and the pinnacle of everything that's bad in modern political philosophy:

>Creates a huge, incredibly complex system of ethics without ever backing up his central premise

>Blatant apologist for social democracy, even went back and declared time-preference to be irrational (lol wut) to accomodate the environmentalists

>Created a bastard child of utilitarianism and egalitarianism and thought it was a good idea

>Couldn't cut to the damn chase

>Incompetent in economics

>Somehow redefined justice as fairness and got away with it

11 postsomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1286

>>1283

>>1285

>In the kingdom of God on earth, God finds it very easy to make sure NASCAR drivers are paid less than truck drivers. No one can disobey God. He assigns us to our roles, he directs our every movement. If God tells you to turn left at the next light, you don't hang a right.

>The question is: what relevance does this have for the actual problem of government? The answer is: none. As Madison put it, if men were angels, we would need no government at all. In Rawls' kingdom, we are not angels, but we are governed by angels. The great engineering problem of designing a system in which fallible humans can govern each other and get along simply does not exist in Rawls' philosophy.

>Of course Rawls does not actually say this. He just encourages it. By setting up an ideal of righteousness that only divine rule can achieve, Rawls supplies the perfect distraction to help his readers forget that in reality, men are governed only by men, and history knows only two kinds of government: those based on law, and those based on violence.

>For example, in the NASCAR-teamster example, what sort of law would ensure a Rawlsian result? Do we have wage and price controls, Nixon style? The odor of medieval Christianity is unmistakable. You can almost taste the sumptuary laws.

The atheist and statist faggotry aside, he is pointing at the right direction here. The kind of philosophy Rawls came up with is the equivalent of a kid drawing his perfect magical castle. It doesn't inform us at all how we should deal with the world we actually live in. We don't know what individual conduct is moral or immoral, at all.

And from the comment section:

>I think Rawls' importance is over-rated. It is really mostly libertarians who talk about him, and then only because of Nozick's critique of him (and Nozick doesn't even seem to be that popular among libertarians).

He's right on all counts. Yes, Rawls is overrated, in fact he'll probably be forgotten in aPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1292

>>1286

I may be wrong, but it sounds to me like you're severely underestimating the importance of academia and the impact it has had on plunging us into on the mess we're in. The primary reason Westerners are so hostile to personal sovereignty today and so open to collectivist ideas is their education and its life-long, prole-friendly extension, the media. Rawls is a symptom rather than the cause of the rot, but it is worth noting that the people who end up "punching Nazis" (and to whom a monarchist is just a Nazi in a funny hat) are taught explicitly rawlsian morality at their universities.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1293

>>1292

Didn't want to make this impression. Of course, academia is very important, but not necessarily as it presents itself. Rawls is mostly important for being there, I think. Through him, social democrats and so-called liberals can claim that their theories are rational. The actual content of his theories, on the other hand, is relatively unimportant.

Nozick, likewise, is important for being there. He wrote some good critiques of mainstream political philosophy but by and large, he's non-threatening and cozy. It's like controlled opposition, except it arose naturally. Nozick, like Milton Friedman, is incapable of dealing a serious blow to the prevailing political climate because he never pulled their values out from under them.

The people who really had an impact, who are the cause and not the symptom, are others. The Frankfurt School, for example, and before them the Fabians. Rawls codified the moral code and the worldview that others before him came up with.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1294

>>1292

>rawlsian morality

what do you mean by that?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1300

>>1293

>Rawls codified the moral code and the worldview that others before him came up with.

Right. Moldbug summarized his role rather pithily with something like (not an exact quote)

>Rawls wrote a book in the 1970s to excuse a coup that happened in the 1930s.

The coup was, of course, the New Deal.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 685960fb7dc4a3b⋯.jpg (886.72 KB,3532x2049,3532:2049,(((diversity))).jpg)

 No.1152 [Open thread]

Everything bad in our society can be sum up with 2 simple explanations:

>normalfags did it because jews told them to

>jews want to dominate the world by turning the whole planet into Brasil

9 postsand2 image repliesomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1188

>>1152

I wouldn't sum it up like this, no

At least for Europe i believe like many here that the downfall happened with the enlightenment and its progressive insertion and radicalization in our societal fabric

So, if we really want someone to blame i would look for the nation that embodies such ideas and more than anybody else worked to propagate and impose them on us, and that is, the United States of America

We are used to think of Europe and America as colsed friends, but that is far from historical truth, Ever since the first settlements the colonists grew a profound resentment for the monarchy and everything else that reminded them that old continent they hated so much they so desperately wanted to escape it

As such, the American Revolution was notoriously heavily drenched in the ideas of the enlightenment, and the newly formed american republic served as an example to imitate to all those who shared these sentiments back here in Europe, as well as a sign that a similar thing was possible in our countries too

It's not a secret either that the French Revolution was also heavily influenced by what the Americans did a few years earlier, some people like La Fayette even fought in both occasions

I think it's not too farfetched to say that the French Revolution was the first step to the americanization of Europe

And so, the propagation of the revolutionary principles and the perception of America as a model republic easily spread through all Europe, as we started murdering our kings, desecrating our churches and spitting on our ancestors in an attempt to resemble more and more that shiny new ideal country overseas, until eventually the americans themselves stepped in, starting with Woodrow Wilson, and began actively meddling in our affairs and push their way of life unto us

In fact, they went on meddling in our affairs so much that in WW2 they placed their bases in our countries and never left, making us de facto militarily occupied dominions

And i don't think i need to explain how damaging this dominion has been in the last 70 years, making degenerate hedonisPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1228

>>1188

Wikipedia isn't the actual source. It summarises academic sources. Opposition to wikipedia is often the last refuge of a beaten man who doesn't want to acknowledge how fringe and unsupportable his view is

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1229

>>1228

this

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1239

>>1228

Wikipedia is notoriously a questionable source especially when it comes down to controversial articles due to unqualified editors, the sources used and how they are reported are entirely up to the editor's bias

Secondly, i don't see how that description of a "beaten man" applies to me in this thread, where was i "beaten" and in regards to what? we didn't even have an argument, i simply pointed out to you a more deep source if you truly are interested in what you were talking about

You're of course completely free to ignore that source and label it as "fringe and unsupportable" without having even read it, however one may point out the irony in the fact that in modern society many people would have the same reaction when you talk to them about monarchy

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1272

>>1228

wikipedia can also be actual source at its own

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



 No.988 [Open thread]

Monarchy is a form of discrimination, like racism and sexism; it creates the idea that some people are better than others because of how they were born. Intersectionality teaches us that different forms of prejudice are related: victories in one sphere soon lead to another.

The collapse of most of the monarchies was what ushered in a rising tide of social victories in all spheres of life.

Why would you want to reverse tihs trend? I'm talking to the people on this board who are not racist / sexist /e tc

15 postsomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
Post last edited at

 No.1045

>>1041

I does not address it because one can accept that definition of egalitarianism, and still apply the argument from >>1033.

Although, I would argue that there really is no functional difference between the two definitions, and that trying to achieve 'equality of opportunity' (whatever that even means) results in a program of 'equality of outcome,' and vice versa. Moreover, I still don't even agree that 'equality of opportunity' is ipso facto a good thing. Egalitarianism in any form is an intellectual poison, and a false siren to prosperity.

>>1043 Says the commoner.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1046

>>1045

I didn't say equal opportunity either. I'm talking about equality under the law and equal treatment by society.

You could say that's also impossible and will create endless disturbances which make society worse, but I see the goods as outweighing the bads

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1142

It's not based on race or such, it's "individual" "racism" if you want to call it that, not at the scale of groups. We're not all born equally, treating us differently makes sense.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1172

Go to back to /feminism/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1252

File: 90392e53d0c3484⋯.png (113.9 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Thonkang.png)

I'd like to remind everyone that Racism became a boogeyman along with fascism around VII Communist Internationale meetup

A race which by 1400's hasn't developed beyond pre-stone age tools deserves to be discriminated.

Around the time Gutenberg created a printing press

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



 No.1077 [Open thread]

Should monarchs maintain or put themselves more into a religious role?

Historically, the Emperor of Japan being linked with Shintoism.

The reigning monarch of England still maintains heavy connections with the Anglican church.

The Grand Duke of Luxembourg renounced some of his functions for essentially religious beliefs regarding euthanasia.

Is the separation of church and state anathema to monarchism?

16 postsand1 image replyomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1147

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1151

>>1147

im not a leftist

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1161

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>1133

Return of HRE when?

>>1127

> but with the invention of the ideals of equality and public government

I'm not sure that the French Revolution was necessarily the start of those ideals…

>>1131

>the city environment isn't good for me.

It isn't good for ANYONE. Mouse utopia, etc., etc..

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1162

>>1161

>I'm not sure that the French Revolution was necessarily the start of those ideals…

Well, true. Culmination would be a better

word.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1213

>>1096

Protestantism surely is a disgrace, but it's far from being the end of European Civilization

As this gentleman here said >>1127 that came with the revolutions fostered by the enlightenment

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



 No.984 [Open thread]

Testing.

13 postsand2 image repliesomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1094

>>1090

What were you trying to do?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1105

>>1065

r u a pole?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1108

>>1105

Only ancestrally. I'm yet another burger.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1110

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>1065

Here's the uber-patriotic version.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1113

>>1108

now i understand why you idealize polacks

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 386765f5c849f71⋯.mp4 (1.57 MB,308x360,77:90,386765f5c849f71f19318f3fa6….mp4)

 No.683 [Open thread]

why do you support monarchy?

20 postsand2 image repliesomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.798

>>746

What? I don't see how what you said is relevant to my post. Re-phrase it please.

>>773

?? whats the fallacy? I just said I would be committing treason to not support my Queen.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.799

>>798

treason relates to laws doesnt it?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1030

>>774

what is hoppean nonsense?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1032

>>1030

Given the context, I believe he's referring to argumentation ethics.

Incidentally, that response is a good response to what I assume is your post in >>1025 .

Also, why are you being a commoner?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1051

>>1032

testing my aristocracy

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: d74cfa4bd60af42⋯.png (176.61 KB,567x685,567:685,Democracy - The God that F….png)

 No.827 [Open thread]

Reminder that it was the worst invention in legal history. If we still operated under the assumption that the law was something given, not created, people would both respect the law more and be less eager to change it for their pet project.

9 postsomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.894

>>885

> there should be no selection pressure for it?

[citation needed]

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.895

File: 4d4dea8b60a5037⋯.pdf (203.04 KB,Ludwig von Mises - Economi….pdf)

>>885

My wording was misleading:

>Why would evolution select for the traits that allow higher, freer, more virtuous civilizations to exist when there should be no selection pressure for it?

It's actually not a matter of trait selection at all. The problem is that in a society with no property rights and no freedom, no rational allocation of production goods is possible (pdf related), and so it cannot achieve prosperity. Such a society would also be unethical and reprehensible, and this coincidence is what you simply cannot explain with evolutionary biology. Whether the pricing mechanism works, and whether it is the only allocation mechanism that works, has nothing to do with any traits that evolution could or couldn't have selected for.

>>894

Still, no pass for you. This atheist tendency to invoke muh burden of proof whenever their own view is questioned is fucking annoying. There are no such things as "positive claims" except in a formal sense (in which it can easily be evaded and shifting by just rephrasing what you're saying), or in a subjective sense.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.900

>>895

even animals have property rights

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.901

File: e08500e8c8083eb⋯.jpg (25.1 KB,1023x307,1023:307,3840_logo.jpg)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.914

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 6b159d97ff3f98e⋯.jpg (57.91 KB,480x473,480:473,return to forever.jpg)

 No.503 [Open thread]

We are going to make this board active from now on. Whenever you browse this board and there are no new posts outside of here, make a post to revive this board! Everything from general banter, smaller monarchist thoughts or just what happens to be on your mind. We will create a community if everything goes right.

To get this started: How did you become a monarchist? For long have you been one? Do you live in a monarchy currently? Or anything else you want to talk about?

36 postsand2 image repliesomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.793

>>792

Case in point:

>"Nothing gets me like when the first knock comes. When Parliament is in session, the doors remained closed; no one is to leave but also, perhaps most importantly, no one is to enter. When Parliament is formed, Black Rod, in the name of the Monarch, slams on the door and demands it to be opened. The Members of Parliament must immediately stop what they are doing and have the door opened, then leave for the House of Lords, where the Monarch is awaiting their arrival. There's only one human alive for whom that door would open, because there's only one human alive who would ever knock on that door. The Monarch may not step foot in the House of Commons. To do so is an act of aggression on the representative rights of the House, and the government would immediately be cast into a Constitutional Crisis. By doing so, Charles III here has committed that ancient act of aggression. However, Parliament is so taken-aback by the action that no one seems to realize it. The fact that Charles has chosen not to call his ministers to the House of Lords but instead to enter the Commons is as significant as the entire action itself; to dismiss His Majesty's Ministers in their own House has not been heard of since Charles I. In some ways, calling the Ministers to the House of Lords reminds them of their common nature, of their positions as subjects. However, by entering the House of Commons, Charles in this circumstance does not demean himself, but has, instead of lowering himself to the Commons, projected His will upon them and reminded them of their place. The commoner is so low that Black Rod, mouthpiece of the Crown, does not lower himself by addressing the peasants, but instead will only speak to the Speaker of the House. Furthermore, listen to the stark difference in education, heard purely in the words of the Prime Minister and the King; the Minister's words are quick and to the point, but the King's, as if from a play written by Shakespeare himself, are masterful in their art of conveying meaning with total understanding and justification. The House of Commons is traditionally loud, exciting, and full of the heat of "ayes" and "nays", as democracy is. But all falls silent when the Rod hits the door. You can see it in the Speaker's face, the sudden realization of all herebePost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.795

>>734

wtf are black wymin doing as representatives of England?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.800

>>795

(((cultural enrichment)))

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.804

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>737

This is for the /liberty/ lurkers out there.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.903

File: e02a1128001be28⋯.webm (1.76 MB,360x280,9:7,e02a1128001be28ca6fa775ac….webm)

>>503

>How did you become a monarchist?

I wouldn't call myself a monarchist per say, but lately I have been peering over the fence from libertarianism, which I've been an advocate of for a number of years, and have found monarchy to be more suitable for the needs of a healthy nation than a republic. The Mad Monarchist, as well as Hans-Hermann Hoppe in particular has been largely responsible for this shift in my ideology.

>Do you live in a monarchy currently?

As I currently live in burger land, the most well known "republic" in the world, I would say that this is not the case, and it will most likely remain so barring a complete and utter collapse of the government. Even then, the installation of a monarch would be nigh impossible, as most would find it to be completely alien. It is a depressing thought, but perhaps we might go the way of the Roman Republic instead.

>Anything else you want to talk about?

Sure. What do you guys think of cynicism, or the thought that dogs are the supreme animal over all, including humans?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



Delete Post [ ]
[]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]
| Catalog | Nerve Center | Random
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]