[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/monarchy/ - STOP THINKING LIKE REPUBLICANS

They're just LARPing, right?...right???

Catalog  Archive

Name
Email
Subject*
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload4 per post.


IN CASE 8CHAN IS DOWN: http://txti.es/monarchy FOR NEWS ABOUT WHERE TO REGROUP

File: 26aeb8fc3f221e2⋯.jpg (150.4 KB,796x796,1:1,Prithvi_Narayan_Shah.jpg)

 No.7803 [Open thread]

Hey guys, I've always been interested in Hinduism and therefore had an interest in Nepal. It was the last Hindu kingdom, before the commies took over.

pic related, Prithvi Narayan Shah, the first king of Nepal. I'll give you guys a back history, Muslims and British were coming into India and so Prithvi saw this as a young man and did not want his people to be terrorised too. He managed to conquer all of the smaller principalities, and then unify it as Nepal.

He then shut off the border and prevented Nepal from being Muslimified or colonised by the British. Mission accomplished eh?

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7812

It's sad what happened to them recently. They held off against the Maoist rebels for so fucking long.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7854

>>7812

Yes, it was very unfortunate. The maoists are now trying to sell Nepal to China. I think India is a better and more trust worthy friend than China.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 14d213a123c493d⋯.jpg (101.72 KB,900x593,900:593,architecture birmingham.jpg)

 No.7747 [Open thread]

Would it still be possible for loyalty to a monarch to unite vertically those who will not, or should not, be united horizontally? The British Commonwealth, for instance; could that still move toward greater unity (in terms of foreign policy, money transfers, international trade deals…) or are people too nationalistic now, and resent any international sovereignty?

Looking at history, monarchs used to be an international force, speaking French and maintaining difference from the local culture, but nationalism collapsed most of the international Empires, and those that were left assimilated, to take advantage of the protection nationalism gave them. Unfortunately this assimilation sets a limit on the scope of the kingdom and abolishes what seems to me a unique method of international governance ideally balancing autonomy with central government…

3 postsand3 image repliesomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7763

>>7747

The international empires were cancer.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7780

File: 46451f8db404c8d⋯.png (561.27 KB,800x1000,4:5,800px-Royal_Coat_of_arms_o….png)

>>7763

Even nations owe their identity to empires and monarchies also pursued the path of nation-building. Look at Serbia and the influence of Byzantium and the cross on the coat of arms.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7788

>>7780

I'll amend. The international empires were MOSTLY cancer.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7790

>>7788

You've given me, canca.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7809

>>7749

What are some of these emperors that were the incarnate of evil?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 791aa09b9ba258a⋯.jpg (177.13 KB,990x550,9:5,russian-empire-ussr.jpg)

File: 8f68529af405d66⋯.jpg (430.76 KB,611x900,611:900,Feats_of_Staff_Captain_Nes….jpg)

 No.7751 [Open thread]

I'm looking for a few good source materials and apologists for the Russian Empire. I want material on industrialization and sources to make counter-arguments against the average attribution of industrialization only to Soviets. I also want evidence of Russian advances in technology and facts. This isn't only for industrialization, but pro-imperial stances on life there in general and an anti-Soviet hub.

>often overlooked, the Russian Imperial Air Service

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_Russian_Air_Service

Also, a few positive outlooks on the recent Tsars of Russia.

This thread will also be open to argumentation and refutation from opponents, but the primary goal is uncovering information and sources.

It isn't too common for the average pro-Soviet to make Imperial Russia seem like the Flintstones and cavemen. They often tout Russia as backwards, reactionary, and stagnant. Half the problem with this and industrialization is with all the land and wealth, the Russian terrain and infrastructure was still in development. My pov is that industrialization was partially forestalled because infrastructure and rough terrain made access to wealth difficult and infrastructure was more important for the Russian Empire. This is why the construction of railroads and other accomplishments matter and were progressing around the 1900s. Improvements were inevitably coming.

1 postand1 image replyomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7754

I use this article a lot, you can use the sources that the author cites to great effect:

https://mises.org/wire/how-communism-survived-thanks-capitalist-technology

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7758

File: e86f2d3cd13ae28⋯.png (469.3 KB,1600x1332,400:333,1557785717.png)

>>7751

>I'm looking for a few good source materials and apologists for the Russian Empire

Most of the information I get is in Russian. These pages are in Russian too, but lot of what they cite are from English sources if you're willing to research them yourself:

https://sputnikipogrom.com/history/empire-economics/86685/ee-1/#.XQI8UxYzbiw

https://sputnikipogrom.com/history/empire-economics/86872/ee-2/#.XQI8WBYzbiw

You could also maybe run it through Google Translate and see what you get.

>attribution of industrialization only to Soviets

The commies as usual took credit for something they didn't do and claimed the Empire's achievements as their own. The economy was industrializing rapidly before the civil war, but when everyone got back to work again after the war, the Soviet government paraded this as some kind of miracle of communism, that a country at peace is economically better off than a country when it was fighting in World War 1 and a civil war.

Also, even if we assume that Russia wouldn't have industrialized at all, why would this necessarily be a bad thing? Finland didn't industrialize until the 70s and they were always wealthier than us. Other countries also industrialized without having to murder and enslave their population.The whole industrialization thing sort of makes sense if you're looking at society from the top-down like some sort of farm full of cattle with unrealized potential and that everyone is dependent on the government in order to live a good life, but if you look at society from the bottom-up and assume that people should be free to earn money and live how they want without the government's help or hindrance (as was pretty much the case in the 20th century empire after Stolypin's reforms) it doesn't really matter if the country is industrialized or not, it just means thePost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7772

All you need to is point out Japan's industrialization and current status despite having access to far less resources than Russia.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7773

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7775

File: 49e68815f3c30c5⋯.pdf (317.67 KB,TsaristEconomy.pdf)

I'll throw in a PDF I found too.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 6848635d9d324fe⋯.png (250.95 KB,317x385,317:385,ClipboardImage.png)

 No.7239 [Open thread]

Monarchy is the ultimate final victory for a batch of genes, representing a family's domination of an entire national region after centuries of struggle. By celebrating a monarch you celebrate the fact that their genes beat your genes. It's the ultimate cuckoldry.

First these superior genes dominated the local village and the family who had them got to become landlords. They extracted tithes from the peasants who did all the work, turning them into slaves. Then they dominated neighbouring landlords. Finally they dominated all the other lords and became the ruling family.

Climbing to the top, the genes showed they were better than everyone. If your landlord is weaker than a bigger lord who submits to the monarch, you are proven to be weaker than the king. It's a badge of shame to be ruled over by a monarch, not something to celebrate.

I admire monarchs, but only a thoughtless peasant could ever submit to one. You are showing yourself to be part of the slave race. Happily in your place. Just the traits that allowed you to be dominated in the first place.

Seriously, how could you be happy in kneeling before a (genetic) master? Are you a cuckold?

Monarchy is the celebration of your genetic cuckoldry.

21 postsand5 image repliesomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7463

>>7455

>Smart

Technerds get the rope

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7465

>>7463

The only reason Gates (and you) deserves the rope is because he is a leftist, aside from pushing retarded /leftypol/ ideology, he creates jobs and goods and is a productive member of society (unlike you).

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7725

>>7239

Wouldn't it only be cuckoldry if you were not allowed to reproduce and they were? You could easily have more children than the current Queen of England for example and if your children also reproduce successfully then really you have beaten her by at least one metric.

>First these superior genes dominated the local village and the family who had them got to become landlords. They extracted tithes from the peasants who did all the work, turning them into slaves. Then they dominated neighboring landlords. Finally they dominated all the other lords and became the ruling family.

Citation needed.

>Climbing to the top, the genes showed they were better than everyone. If your landlord is weaker than a bigger lord who submits to the monarch, you are proven to be weaker than the king. It's a badge of shame to be ruled over by a monarch, not something to celebrate.

Here's a good example of why that's bullshit. Robert the I, Duke of Normandy was a vassal of the King of France. He produced William the Conqueror, future king of England. If Robert had flipped out about paying taxes and submission and being a "cuck" then the King of France would have taken him out. Instead he raised a great military leader who was able to rise to the rank of king and not be a "cuck" to anyone. If you are going to have offspring and raise them to be more successful than you then why worry about being the subject of a monarch. Have you not by definition succeeded?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7730

>>7239

Also let's follow this "cuckoldry" rabbit hole to it's very end and see where it gets us.

>1. We Are Subjects of a Monarchy

You've already explained why you think this is cuckoldry so let's have a revolution and replace the monarchy with a Republic.

>2. We Are Subjects of a Republic

Now we could theoretically become the leader of the country ourselves. In practice this is not the case. Business owners and industrialists have all of the power. They employ us, they have the resources to educate their children and they are the only ones able to actually afford to run for office. We submit to the President who likely comes from either a family of industrial elites or a family of political elites and has shown through his charisma that he is genetically superior to us. Let's have a revolution and replace the Republic with Communism.

>3. We Are Subjects of a Commune

In this example Communism has somehow actually worked and we are now living in a Commune that is part of a network of Communes. We all share the wealth equally and are not forced to work if we choose not to. Our name is Steve and we have two sons. We work long shifts at the local (worker owned) Car factory. Bill, our neighbor has five sons and he doesn't work at all. Bill is great at telling jokes so everyone loves him while we go unnoticed by the community. Let's have a revolution and instate a two child policy.

>4. We Are Subjects of a Commune with Limited Reproductive Rights

Bill's three surplus sons have been liquidated. Unfortunately, in the struggle, our sons and our wife both perished. In order to not be "cucked" by Bill we need to find a new wife but we can't. The solution is simple. Let's have a revolution to enforce state mandated wives.

>5. We Are Subjects of a Commune with Legal Rape

Now I have a wife and two sons again. Unfortunately my wife is ugly and dumb and so are our children. Bill's wife is hot and smart and so are his children. Fuck you Bill. Let's have a revolution to enforce wife sharing.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7731

File: 5e1d0e92375a41c⋯.gif (741.67 KB,360x202,180:101,alpha_as_fuck.gif)

>>7730

Bravo, anon.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

 No.7723 [Open thread]

Live from Horse Guards Parade in London, Huw Edwards introduces one of the world’s most esteemed military displays, to celebrate the official birthday of Her Majesty the Queen.

This year the 1st Battalion Grenadier Guards are providing the Escort and their Regimental Colonel, HRH the Duke of York, has spoken exclusively to Huw Edwards. Huw will be joined by military and royal experts to guide us through the meticulous parade, a balcony appearance by the Queen and the royal family, and the traditional RAF flypast.

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7724

Grand Duke Jean used to be part of this.

._.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7728

I always enjoy watching these every year.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 901ecefaf80cceb⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image,217.57 KB,728x1092,2:3,901ecefaf80ccebffdc77ccd89….jpg)

 No.7671 [Open thread]

nice feudal estate.

BE A SHAME IF SOMEONE REDISTRIBUTED IT.

greetings from /marxism/

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7672

File: d22881bcaa03e5c⋯.jpg (204.81 KB,1200x800,3:2,08012840128054081208120840….jpg)

>>7671

Watch out, OP.

People like you typically are seen being shipped to Siberia.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7673

There is already a Marxist thread, please see >>950.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7677

File: 2f72ea4394594db⋯.jpg (79.29 KB,668x500,167:125,2f72ea4394594db1119ac625f9….jpg)

I hate landlords too but come on.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7688

>>7671

The land ownership element of feudalism is certainly outdated, but elements of the political structure were quite good. A multi-layered proto-federalism, in a way.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



 No.7657 [Open thread]

A Sad Instant message Received for CA and Dad's Girls

Multiple MSM outlets in Multiple Cities received Calls Calls and more Calls from Anonymous Sources disclosing GES, our Holograms, Staged Events etc. Multiple Glitches occurred during MP speech in "VA" as well and I Guess a bunch of audience members saw.

Most of all that F'in Scares me, our Interior Innermost Bunkbed access #s, locations are Known Somehow.

Dan J. Truman Better Do Something F'in Fast bc ITS HAPPENING, and Many More are Picking and Piecing Together.

The Piers Morgan Vault I'view, entire Family/Children Photo was the worst F'in Idea. We Will Never Ever Ever F'in See the Sun again if we [4,10,20] don't make something happen.

Boring Bunkmate Getting scared. dc

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.


File: d1101853e94e1a3⋯.png (495.48 KB,500x503,500:503,F.png)

File: a967597cd683547⋯.jpg (118.52 KB,822x960,137:160,22489975_1527625587259857_….jpg)

File: 519204859f71fc7⋯.jpg (68.58 KB,850x400,17:8,mozart.jpg)

 No.7421 [Open thread]

Here we morn the absolute insanity of this world we live in where a death cult took over the entire world and re-built it in its God forsaken image.

>No liberty, no responsibility, no accountability

>No soul

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LArdrbBUIU

I used to rule the world

Seas would rise when I gave the word

Now in the morning I sleep alone

Sweep the streets I used to own

I used to roll the dice

Feel the fear in my enemy's eyes

Listened as the crowd would sing

Now the old king is dead! Long live the king!

One minute I held the key

Next the walls were closed on me

And I discovered that my castles stand

Upon pillars of salt and pillars of sand

I hear Jerusalem bells are ringing

Roman Cavalry choirs are singing

Be my mirror, my sword and shield

My missionaries in a foreign field

For some reason I can't explain

Once you'd gone there was never

Never an honest word

That was when I ruled the world

It was the wicked and wild wind

Blew down the doors to let me in

Shattered windows and the sound of drums

People couldn't believe what I'd become

Revolutionaries wait

For my head on a silver plate

Just a puppet on a lonely string

Oh who would ever want to be king?

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7655

File: 2dc5c186c2c1697⋯.jpg (175.46 KB,936x570,156:95,29471204912790441729049702….jpg)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 6defacb2c495c71⋯.jpg (13.63 KB,220x292,55:73,220px-Angela_Merkel_Juli_2….jpg)

 No.4888 [Open thread][Last50 Posts]

Remember that women aren't fit to rule since by their very natures they are not truly members of any tribe. They are heavily selected by nature to smoothly transition from one tribe to another by marriage or warfare. White knighting them by allowing them to lead is foolish since women have no nation. They do not care where higher status men come from and they'll absorb the language and customs of wherever they happen to end up.

>muh blonde goddess

That blond-haired, blue eyed goddess who can do no wrong just will fuck the swarthy Mongol who burnt her village and slew all her Darwininan loser brothers.

49 postsand10 image repliesomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7600

>>6343

Don't use reddit and leftypol is an sjw fag circus. I'm from /fascist/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7602

>>7600

>fascist

>supports Niggers

Sure, cuck.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7625

>>4937

Wow, you can name five (5!) competent female monarchs. Women are emotionally unstable, less intelligent and are essentially big-children. They will never earn the respect from men that a charismatic and powerful man would in her stead.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7632

All other things being equal, a daughter inheriting the throne is preferable to a brother inheriting the throne. The daughter is descended from the current monarch. The brother is not.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7650

>>7632

You'd be wise to avoid any Saudi embassies.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: e4869e9668e8567⋯.jpg (35.57 KB,680x578,20:17,6c29b9bd7c41ca6002481de72f….jpg)

 No.4708 [Open thread][Last50 Posts]

rescue me from this /liberty/ 2.0 hell. thought this place was for being 'above politics' and for the restoration of monarchies. more and more the peasants bother about the best way and how and when to start killing kings. it should be sacrilege to toy with traditional authority and the idea of regicide. it should be as non-conformist and unwelcome as being statist on /liberty/; but on /monarchy' there is a strong inclination towards regicide rather than restoration.

53 postsand38 image repliesomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7537

>>7532

>That's what this is all about, you insufferable moron.

I'm aware of what the overall topic for the thread is. My post was in concerned with the contents of what it was replying to.

>You implied.

No, I didn't.

>I would be very content that the seeds are still planted

Cool. The backstabbing section wasn't specifically about you or anyone else. It's about a repeated trend in movements that change the entire political system.

>when I think of a perfectly moderate king like King Louis XVI, who was an absolute monarchy – but accepted reform with patience, I remember how much I hate you faggots. Even a perfectly moderate king drags down your goddamn ire because it isn't the most liberal monarchy as the anons allude to.

You don't know me. You don't know what I stand for. Literally the only fucking thing I have advocated in this chain of posts was that policy/system-based solidarity is a bad idea. I'm not in favor of the lunatics who started lopping heads off left and right during the French revolution. They were among the worst tyrants France has ever seen. Them marginalizing the moderates and seizing power was one of France's greatest tragedies.

>You need to understand, as I told about, that regicide is repulsive to all monarchists

In my experience that's simply not true.

>and envisioning it will bring MY TYRANNY to YOU. If you're going to be an upstart about it, I will gleefully bring out the nooses, the torture devices, and the firing squads right away.

All shit like this does is discredit the idea of monarchism in the eyes of the average person.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7538

File: 804ef1bebaf4638⋯.jpg (49.07 KB,705x433,705:433,Autism #002.jpg)

>>7537

>All shit like this does is discredit the idea of monarchism in the eyes of the average person.

I don't care about how you autists refer to it as "our movement". You have gained discredit in my eyes.

>In my experience that's simply not true

You would be just as revolted if I talked about killing your ideal king, most likely.

>It's about a repeated trend in movements that change the entire political system.

If what you have to say isn't about anyone, then I don't care. Don't tell me you're one of those horseshoe faggots in pic related always reverencing it as 'our movement'. I don't care what the average person thinks about quote-on-quote 'monarchism'. I'm not aiming for popular opinion because I don't give a damn what the many people think in the first place. I don't even think their mass opinion even matters.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7569

>>7538

>you autists

Again, you're just assuming you know where I stand and who I align myself with. Fuck off. You don't fucking know me. Acting like a raging autist and threatening to fucking execute people is about as counterproductive to convincing people that a monarchy should be established as you could possibly get.

>You would be just as revolted if I talked about killing your ideal king, most likely.

Based on your reaction earlier, no, I wouldn't, and either way you're shifting the goalpost. Regicide is not killing someone's ideal monarch, it's killing a monarch, period.

> Don't tell me you're one of those horseshoe faggots in pic related always reverencing it as 'our movement'

No, I'm not. For fuck's sake, stop making fucking assumptions about what I stand for.

>If what you have to say isn't about anyone, then I don't care.

Then you're a fucking idiot.

> I don't care what the average person thinks about quote-on-quote 'monarchism'.

Then you're a fucking idiot.

>I'm not aiming for popular opinion because I don't give a damn what the many people think in the first place.

Then you're a fucking idiot.

>I don't even think their mass opinion even matters.

Then you're a fucking idiot.

Violence is the ultimate source of power. All else being equal, the larger group of people is capable of more violence. Numbers fucking matter. If the average person is resistant to the idea of monarchism, you will not achieve monarchism. Doesn't matter what kind of monarchist you are.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7608

File: 6eb8ed2d7993765⋯.mp4 (11.14 MB,480x360,4:3,Liberal Trad Monarch.mp4)

Here's the lib trad monarch who 'had what was coming to him'.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7640

File: a7355f47d6d3697⋯.jpg (1.21 MB,2897x2280,2897:2280,ThinMan.jpg)

>>7608

Once again, it's the rich who are envious traitors with impure motives for revolution. This is like watching the Thin Man all over again, except a much less original version where the butler is always the murderer.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 5338b092039b45b⋯.jpg (39.1 KB,630x630,1:1,2495238_0.jpg)

 No.7027 [Open thread]

Because when it gets too trendy to bash 'capitalism' and praise socialism, it is the perfect time to hate communists.

13 postsand17 image repliesomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7618

ITT triggered Christcucks who aren't proving anything.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7619

File: 18144fdc7f9e3d1⋯.jpg (11.89 KB,300x100,3:1,1553125761671.jpg)

Tories have nothing to do with Monarchy either.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7620

File: d93a7b8bacd6fec⋯.jpg (1.34 MB,2400x2991,800:997,Sir_Roger_L'Estrange_.jpg)

>>7619

Have you the Oath of Allegiance?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7621

>>7616

Tolkien also supported Franco.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7622

File: a5847348d2431fc⋯.png (18.38 KB,1200x726,200:121,1200px-Bandera_CNT-FAI.svg.png)

>>7621

You know who didn't support Franco?

These autists.

Gosh, I hate gommies

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 372bf1e33f308a1⋯.jpg (58.14 KB,447x656,447:656,0d502ad5d0ac573598c69a807c….jpg)

File: 71da36e470150a1⋯.jpg (94.41 KB,416x534,208:267,DPeqZm1UIAAo8pe.jpg)

File: 06d1ea1c9878dc6⋯.png (82.23 KB,521x576,521:576,Maistre_savages.png)

File: a52c27afe754f75⋯.pdf (6.44 MB,Against Rousseau - Maistre.pdf)

 No.3886 [Open thread]

Someone needs to honor this man for being the reactionary arch-nemesis of Rousseau. Academics call him the proto-fascist Isaiah Berlin. Others call him a shadow of the Dark Ages. Maistre and Counter-Enlightenment figures deserve a place somewhere in our hearts for stepping in the light of Progress and stomping it out.

I recommend reading Maistre's Against Rousseau. The place of origin for this PDF fell apart. I am keeping it here because it is an important piece and deserves a read. I am also recommending http://maistre.uni.cx/sovereignty.html this read.

>Against Rousseau

Deals with the leftist 'noble savage' and the Left's consistent belief that human nature is benevolent and happy in the state of nature. Deals with institutional belief and property. It is a remarkable relevant read for monarchists/reactionaries alike.

35 postsand12 image repliesomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7591

he's not bad, prefer Hobbes. I do like Rousseau but for reasons more tied to Pentti Linkola than any anprim.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7597

File: 77761c1a1dbd413⋯.gif (8.09 MB,649x366,649:366,xvfTaWa.gif)

>>7591

>prefer Hobbes

I don't see how you could prefer one or the other. Both make useful monarchist arguments. Yet Bodin still emphasizes the family and has the merit of being older than Hobbes. Try Bodin.

>>7343

>That's one of the reasons Hoppe considers monarchy to be the least bad form of government

I think I have been too hard on Hoppe. With Hobbes and Hoppe, people think almost as though they were polar opposites. An absolutist social contract theorist and an Austrian school libertarian. Yet both make the case that even a monarch's self-interest could benefit the common good. That was a big point from Hobbes, who stressed that even a self-interested monarch can benefit the common good.

Everyday, we are so close yet so far apart.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7598

>>7597

I got the book now so I will. I hate Hans-Hermann Hoppe because of his eugencist arguments against the poor. No Christian man would follow such a bastard.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7599

File: c7da86009c4044e⋯.jpg (187.31 KB,850x845,170:169,cc0ac314ea07b49d2abb584f4e….jpg)

>>7598

>I hate Hans-Hermann Hoppe because of his eugencist arguments against the poor.

The only thing Hans-Hermann Hoppe suffers from me is painful neglect. I'm sure that as a monarchist thinker, Hoppe is all right. Even if it is the case that monarchy is the 'least bad form of government', that's still a huge compliment coming from anarchists. I wouldn't complain there.

>against the Poor

I wouldn't know about this. It is often the case that libertarians are pushed into the "muh rich people" camp, but they have also been against corporations being in bed with the political class and their lackeys. That is the least I would know.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7603

>>7598

>because of his eugencist arguments against the poor.

Hoppe makes no such argument. At worst, he demonstrates through argument that the poor tend to be higher time-preference, more present-oriented people. However, he makes no normative suggestions as to what, if anything, should be done about this fact of reality.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: c23a4ece74f70aa⋯.jpg (157.86 KB,300x391,300:391,holyromanempire.jpg)

 No.7408 [Open thread]

it was by far the best form of gov humanity ever had

6 postsand4 image repliesomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7498

>>7492

>t. The (((enlightenment)))

Ftfy

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7508

>>7492

Serious question.

Why is it called Roman when the majority of the states are actually German?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7512

>>7508

Pope Leo III gave Charlemagne the title of Emperor of the Western Roman Empire, even though it had been 3 centuries since the title was in use. This title passed down through his descendants

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7519

>>7492

>if you support the enlightenment you have to support Voltaire

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7548

>>7491

okay but seriously, there was civil war, civic disunity, what was so great.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: d469a9d7d36a4a3⋯.jpg (592.14 KB,1000x562,500:281,gene-wilder-willy-wonka.jpg)

 No.7029 [Open thread]

>You will never run your own country as a whimsical eccentric Willy Wanka type character. Keeping my people happy with pure imagination and a nack for industrialism

6 postsand4 image repliesomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7077

>>7056

Yeah man.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7091

File: 55e289807c87fcc⋯.jpg (3.13 MB,2336x4160,73:130,IMG_20190428_095045.jpg)

Shipping in moar future homes castles.

>>7077

How are you? I just visited this castle today with the additional family bickering and arguing back and forth.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7097

File: 305dd8798780fca⋯.jpg (472.46 KB,1280x853,1280:853,ZRHR3IU6dv4.jpg)

File: ee7a3295e9461d9⋯.jpg (523.44 KB,864x1080,4:5,ZtaogKiZJQU.jpg)

File: 4a7972c77786401⋯.jpg (235.38 KB,720x960,3:4,tE4aeKZxLQw.jpg)

File: e234c28a1007d29⋯.jpg (376.38 KB,1200x800,3:2,y1Q5I-q2RqQ.jpg)

>>7091

I'm fine, thanks! Must've been fun to go exploring it, I still haven't visited the castles and palaces in my city…

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7099

File: 9a3cb351b60dae4⋯.jpg (4.27 MB,2336x4160,73:130,IMG_20190428_165253.jpg)

Daily castle.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7541

File: 5db2723ee84b0c4⋯.png (320.61 KB,637x654,637:654,1493915531494.png)

tfw no Constantinople

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: f6895ade892e915⋯.jpg (165.23 KB,1527x868,1527:868,Police_photograph_of_Geoff….jpg)

 No.5755 [Open thread]

17 postsand10 image repliesomitted. Click reply to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.6239

I believe a king should rise to rulership through proving that he could handle the task of political leadership just fine. Hereditary system only gets you so far before a weak and inept heir gets to the throne just because his father was good at being a king.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.6240

>>6239

Thing is, even a genetically "average" heir is still being schooled from birth on etiquette, negotiations, and the intricacies of sovereignty. And the problem with a selection process, any selection process, is that it encourages sociopaths and sycophants to rise to the top, as all the candidates jockey with each other for the approval of whomever it is that chooses the heir, whether it's "the people" or the current ruler. Rome had an appointment system for the emperors, and look at how that turned out. If someone is the heir by the accident of birth, by contrast, they have no incentive to develop sociopathic and sycophantic tendencies.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.6630

File: c4cd593de6bb64c⋯.png (3.09 MB,1200x1584,25:33,ClipboardImage.png)

File: 48ee4b5dcdf6b96⋯.png (9.62 MB,1800x2291,1800:2291,ClipboardImage.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7500

>>6239

Meritocracy is easily exploitable by talented sociopaths

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.7516

>>6240

>Would you rather be ruled by someone who maybe wants power, or who definitely wants power?

To me, this is a short argument, but the one I find the most convincing. In fact, it puts me on the borderline between admiring demarchy or monarchy.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



Delete Post [ ]
[]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]
| Catalog | Nerve Center | Random
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]