>>405152
>Any nationalist beliefs are, at their core, completely incompatible with so-called "sexual deviancy" and minding one's own business. Traditionalism is a fundamental feature of it. It doesn't matter what people change or don't change, it is not nationalism without those qualities.
Completely untrue.
>>408889
Your ideas remind me a little bit of the alt left. I'm not talking about how GOP types butcher the term to refer to groups like BLM, but the original people to use the name. Are you familiar with them? They were a loose assortment of people into race realism (sometimes extending into white nationalism) but minus the ball and chain of "traditionalism."
I'm probably more right-leaning than anything (if still basically a centrist with strong in-group preference), but I'm sick to death of the right's sexual puritanism, blind adherence to religious traditions, and insecure chest-pounding about how ALPHA they are.
I might support pro-white "identity politics," but I'm not kidding myself that ethnostates are likely to come back in the West. The right makes a lot of valid points about the decline of social trust and the rise in anomie and rootlessness, but is there a practical remedy? Maybe North America will balkanize, but will there be leaders willing to really take on corporate power? And modern technology may have huge downsides, but Pandora's box has already been opened in that regard. I lurked the discussions of a site that regularly discussed these problems for years, and I really don't see much of a way forward for conservatives to remedy these problems.
