Maybe I'm wrong to say this, but from my experience so far, men are more sentimental than women.
I don't mean "sentimental" as in "overtly emotionally reactive".
Men seem to feel more deeply about anything than women. Or rather, they take things (and themselves) too seriously.
Most conversations with men, they always wanna tell me what they think the world is, what it should be, who should be in it, and how it should be it run.
They have homemade "profound" quotes they always spout out when proving a point.
Even when talking about favorite stuff, it can easily go into "I once read a book/watched a movie about (insert semi-related political subject here)."
They're also awfully picky about what they find beautiful in a woman. Not just physique, but her fashion, tastes, and vocabulary.
Every piece of pop culture or hobby or habit of gesture has to have "deeper meaning."
>If you like X, you're gay
>If you like Y, you're boomer
>If you like Z, you're a psychopath
Whether it be the "miscegenation is daddy issues", "video games make mass shooters" etc.
Yet, women are allegedly the producers of the status quo. No, they're merely the judiciary branch. Men are the legislators and executives of status quo.
It's men who mostly use politics and philosophy as a moral compass.
Women just ride along with it.
Women can also be sentimental like this but they don't get so heavy into like men. And the women who're like that are either not really feminine or are too self-shallow.
Women don't actually care about what their male candidates hobbies are. All they worry about is if it may become a glaring problem.
Same with neurodivergent men. Women don't give flying fucks about that.Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
