>>12105
>It is closed source
>It has a few decent security features
Are you sure it actually has them?
>Spyware Watchdog
It's a schizo's blog, ignore and spam "kys faggot" when the owner advertises it.
>there seems to be a paid version of the browser
>I'm currently hesitant to use it
Anon, I appreciate that you actually tried to do some research and came asking for opinions instead of jerking yourself over your clever find, but the browser you're talking about has more red flags than an USSR army parade.
Seriously, there's a reason why open source stuff like TOR, SQLite, and even the Linux kernel is very common in high security applications, and that's because being able to see and change how the code works is necessary if you want to trust it with your precious data.
To help you in your search for a privacy-focused browser, it would be useful to know more about what's you threat model and what you want to do on the web: you'll get very different answers if you mostly want advertisers to fuck off instead of wishing for your text-only anonymous chats to be outside of the police's reach.
Very general advice would be to avoid mainline Firefox and Chrome, the latter for obvious reasons and the former because it's controlled opposition paid for by Google, and to use TOR where possible and where no account is required (but not for obscure stuff you'd like to also do outside of TOR).