Yea, um, hi.
I'm wondering if I've been doing something wrong because there doesn't seem to be any point in archiving and compressing files.
The Test Results:
Test 1
> Collective size of original files before archiving: 2,934 Kb
> Number of files: 4 ( 2 x .jpg | 1 x .png | 1 x .gif )
tar.bz2 = 2,933 Kb -0.03 %
tar.gz = 2,926 Kb -0.27 %
tar.xz = 2,888 Kb -1.56 %
Test 2
> Size of file: 113,036 Kb (.mp4)
tar.bz2 = 112,517 Kb -0.45 %
tar.gz = 112,206 Kb -0.73 %
tar.xz = 111,964 Kb -0.94 %
Test 3
> Collective size of original files before archiving: 579.4 Mb
> Number of files: 581 (Mostly pictures but also some videos)
tar.bz2 = 574.4 Mb -0.86 %
tar.gz = 572.2 Mb -1.24 %
tar.xz = 570.5 Mb -1.53 %
(Note: The .xz format reduced the file size the most but took significantly longer.)
So is there any reason to compress files, besides wasting time?
Or am I doing it wrong?