>>11109
Well first of all I doubt that sodomites have anything valuable to contribute to right wing. Especially spiritually since their actions defy the nature itself. Looking back I read the book because I saw it on chans/it had a cool cover and I thought it would somehow change my worldview.
I am not going to re read the shit, I will search it briefly, I got notes on every book I read so when I find them I might add something here and there but…I write only quotes that hold some meaning to me. If I found some chapter to be a pile of bullshit I probably omitted it from notes.
Masculine traits:strength, courage, mastery and honor. I agree. mostly however:
"Mastery is a man’s desire and ability to cultivate and
demonstrate proficiency and expertise in technics that aid
in the exertion of will over himself, over nature, over
women, and over other men."
Man should not exert his will over nature because the nature's laws are superior to human will. Maybe this was not meant this way but it kind of implies man can change nature(this is the basis of leftism)
Moreover the mastery here does not refer to self mastery which is an essential part of masculine archetypes as put by Evola - man the warrior and the ascetic. But I understand that sodomy itself is a negation of nature, the ultimate rejection of it an example of "man exerting his will upon nature in order to fullfil his hedonistic desires." So that's why sodomy and self-mastery do not go hand in hand because the sodomite is a slave of his passions.Man must be able to control himself before leading others.
Then the chapter "honor" makes little sense because of the lack of "mastery" Donovan considers mastery to be simply some ability to do something - set a fire, produce a weapon, play the music
Another chapter is moral relativist masturbation, as expected from the likes of the author.
>There is a difference between being a good man and
being good at being a man.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.