>>2116343
>he doesn't really bring up stuff like the narrative structure of a film. That is how is the film constructed and why the writing is weak or strong because of that. Or film theory, which is all about the methods of story telling and writing that people making films use to direct a movie or inform their opinion on a film.
I agree. He would do a lot better if he could tackle movies that aren't shit and require a bit more understanding of structure.
>Lucas script
So changes made in execution to change the story, meaning they aren't separate. Understood. I guess either I'm wrong and he is too, or I've misunderstood his point.
>>2116345
>There's a problem in doing so because the impression stops being "oh, these guys are just countering points" to just flat out attacking people's opinions while calling it criticism.
>To be fair, it's more Mauler's gay furries who do that but he does partake in it.
>pausing it to scream "YOU FUCKING MORON DIPSHIT OBJECTIVELY IT'S NOT/IT IS!" They do it to nearly everyone they talk about.
I actually agree with this. EFAP tends to get derailed by the attack dogs. Mauler often tries to give the video they cover a fair shake, but more and more he's just letting Rags go at it. It's annoying trying to listen to them piece together their thoughts then suddenly go on a tangent because some fucker in chat said rhino milk. I know that Rags is one of the founders and hosts, but it doesn't excuse this decline into just attacks. I wish mauler do more with the brit crowd. They tend to be a lot more mellow.
>Why not just give effort? Their planning could be watching the video and discussing it.
Because muh streambux. That and I doubt many people would tune in to watch them plan out their thoughts. It's always more "entertaining" to see them tear into people, even if those people are undeserving. They fall into the problem of popularity, where they got popular due toPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
