No.167 [View All]
My target is an invisible enemy.(Think: dimensions)
It is very easy to recognize harmful matters.
They try to put on a good face while behind the scenes they try to take you in harmful directions.
And now here comes the problem/question.
At what point does it become good or bad/evil/harm?
Q: 'Reconcile using logic'
Define: True LOGIC.
What is the direction of that LOGIC?
What is the direction of its ideology?
What are you ultimately trying to connect it to?
Q: 'Smoke & Mirrors'
And why do ((())) try to avoid revealing things?
Why do ((())) misrepresent?
Why don't ((())) answer the questions?
How do ((())) spend their time?
Do actions contrary to truth and justice create the potential for harm?
Does logical thinking clarify things?
'No deals'
00
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.480
>>476
Is it important to expand freedom of speech and ensure personal safety and anonymity?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.481
>>476
Which environment is 'Q' most likely to post in now?
Do bother to check the trip code again on the outside platform?
Why not just use 8kun/ch to check the trip code?
>>>/projectdcomms/
Wouldn't getting people to 8kun/ch make it possible to check 'Q' posts directly?
^This I talk to about the constructive and certainty of information expansion.
>>479
Or do need to direct people to blog/group and for all to collect donations/followers?
^This is in reference to the personal donations, etc. of the participants of this MOVEMENT.
>>480
This is an 'word' arising from critical thinking.
What I want to know is the justification and validity.
P.S.
When I learned about 8kun, I already thought there was no space for me here.
I used an outside platform.
Thanks to this, I can hardly see my records anymore.
I tried a lot of things, and as a result I chose 8kun/ch.
Most of what I have left behind here is left behind.
I believe that is one fact.
Thank you 8kun/ch.
Patriots.
Anons.
Bakers.
BO/BVs.
Admin.
America&World.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.484
Have ever considered the impact that statements and actions can have?
Aren't words and actions, humanity and common sense/ethical viewpoint important too?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.485
Here, good luck and keep proving the validity and legitimacy of your statements.
Or are you just trying to make a point?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.486
The gravity of a black hole is said to be large.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.487
>>486
The weight of words and actions.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.489
>>487
Certainly there will be opportunities to generate new ideas by posting your thoughts.
But is there a degree of Best Effectiveness. or constructiveness to this 'opportunity'?
What is the quickest way to expand true freedom and peace?
Are words and actions related?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.491
>>490
Slow and steady wins the race.
Something like that.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.492
>>491
Don't think that the Emperor system and the Monopoly system have different clear method?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.493
>>492
Do think there is a difference in the way guns are perceived and handled in countries where guns cannot be handled compared to countries where can be handled?
Something like that.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.496
Either way, whether it's a test or not, it just proves it.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.497
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.498
>>497
Can't escape from oneself, though.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.500
How would answer justification and reasonableness when accountability arises for test actions?
^This is not me.
>>496
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.501
>>500
This is an 'word' arising from critical thinking.
Does (((they))) not like being asked questions because it reveals their own thoughts?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.502
>>500 Further clarification.
>This is not me.
^ To the World.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.503
>>502
Did 'Q' consider accountability important?
If so, what impact does evading accountability have?
This is my opinion.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.504
>>503
When it comes to accountability, does Q+anonymous style/form work/functions effectively?
There may indeed be some unnecessary accountability.
But doesn't accountability also fall on those who demand unnecessary accountability?
Wouldn't many things then become even clearer?
Hence, wouldn't it be constructive/effective to have a reason or clarification？(Validity/justification)
^Wouldn't this also have an effect on the speed of recognition and understanding?
Q: 'Everything has meaning?'
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.505
>>504
Even with detailed explanations and clear proof, further questions will arise.
Ex: 'So what'?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.506
>>491
>Slow and steady wins the race.
^It is when are in a hurry that take a detour.
<The more urgent the situation, the better it is to take the safe and sure path rather than the dangerous shortcut.
<Rushing into anything increases the risk, so it is important to remain calm and take steady steps.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.507
>>506
But at what point is it decided that it is a detour?
Does a method exist to derive the best?
Or just a definition?
Constructive/Effective = quick/fast?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.508
Taking things seriously is fun.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.510
Learning may make it less likely that the same mistakes will be repeated.
But, Sometimes it is difficult not to repeat the same thing.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.511
>>509, >>510
Why do need the trust of others?
Approval from others?
Trust creates validity and legitimacy?
or Does proof of validity and legitimacy lead to trust?
Is 'Q' unreliable without POTUS?
Would it be a not 'Q' if POTUS is not involved?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.512
>>511
It's like watching repeat story from the past.
CBTS & The Storm repeat?
I thought were done with that theory?
In summary, Will you stop this movement when 'Q' is no longer reliable?
I think It's not just the reliability of the 'Q' only postings.
Trust is also established because of the words and deeds of the patriots who have joined this movement.
(For this reason, I also think that the words and actions of each and every participant in this movement are very important)
It is neither blind nor dogmatic.
And I think that the efforts of these anon/patriot(Q)s are what make this movement what it is.
Is trust something that can be lost in an instant?
Trust is a very good thing.
But isn't it also important to look not only at trust, but also at the things that are done?
Can create facts?
Can win trust with the facts create?
What would be important in this case?
Will logs be important?
What was proven?
Before trusting 'who', isn't it important to see what kind of behavior is trustworthy?
Because trust can be gone in an instant, right?
Then need to see every moment?
In other words, it is important what you accomplish.
And wouldn't it be easier to compare/contrast by summarizing those logs?
Now how far will your proof go?
I'm looking forward to it.
Your own 'Q' is proven.
That could be very nice, but I think 'this is not a game'.
Because I know people who have been hurt by this one thought.
God bless.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.519
If actions alone are unclear, wouldn't language or something else bring us closer to clarity?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.520
>>519
Certainly it can be difficult at times to clarify things in words.
Still, don't you think it is possible to reach a best through dialogue?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.521
>>520
Would that also be some sort of proof?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.522
>>520, >>521
Example.
As an example, let's say you have a complaint against the government.
Is it really legitimate to hold a rally to air your grievances?
(Is there any danger?)
Is rioting effective when dialogue is not possible?
(This is not intended as a recommendation)
Do you expect that by complaining and cursing over and over again, you will make a change?
Discussion is to derive problems and remedies?
What is the difference between disagreeing and just complaining?
Is rational discussion/reasoned argument constructive in deriving justification, validity, problems and remedies?
Are statements evidence/fact?
What is the moment when a statement becomes evidence/fact?
Is it a significant piece of evidence/fact depending on the degree of impact of the statement?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.523
>>522
>Do you expect that by complaining and cursing over and over again, you will make a change?
Expand your thinking.
What is the difference between stepping up for dialogue and discussion and spamming?
The difference between what you want to talk about and what you don't want to talk about?
The difference between what you want to see and what you don't want to see?
Is the difference between when you can hear an opposing view and when you can't, the degree of compromise or acceptance?
^ Cognitive dissonance Occurrence problem?
Define: Cognitive dissonance.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.524
>>477
And the next step is to connect catalogs to catalogs？
Create validity and legitimacy for XYZ?
I'm already looking at this.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.525
If the theory that everything is not coincidental is all valid, then..,
All beings who have participated in this movement are to be commended, and can define what they say as true and legitimate?
Is this extreme?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.526
What is the problem with DOGMA ideology?
Promoting blindness?
Or to make them stop thinking?
Could this lead to the creation of a new DS system?
Why do you want to build a DS system?
To create a new mind control?
Did they reveal any negative actions or explanations for these?
If appearances can be deceiving, does clarification, clarification, or proof matter?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.527
If freedom of expression deprives others of their freedom or causes harm (inconvenience), is there freedom there?
Doesn't the act of giving priority only to personal freedom not apply to freedom?
Does deriving these issues and true good choices lead to true freedom?
or create an opportunity to articulate true freedom?
It is very easy to just claim freedom.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.528
Remedial measures when dialogue does not take place?
Could post what you were trying to say at the time of the dialogue produce the same effect or impact?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.529
To what extent can the butterfly effect be clarified?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.623
>>621
Is there a relevant between DOGMA and transparency?
Blindness?
Is there a relevant between obscurity and transparency?
hidden?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.748
That's a lot of noise.
It's not easy to make an effort to come up with a solution.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.752
Appeal to technology if you can't use language and logic?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.754
>>752 edit
>technology
Rely on false?
Q+anonymous Is style a way of pretending to be something you are not?
No, it is not.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.755
>>754 edit.
Q+anonymous Is style there to fake?
>No.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.756
>>755
>>754
Q+anonymous Is style there to fake?
No, it is not.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.757
>>756
What is a name in the first place?
A list of words necessary for personal identification?
ID = Name?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.766
If you have faith, you know that God is watching what you do.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.768
How about a little perspective?
However, there are many cases where a change in perspective does not change the conclusion.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1793
>>1792
In other words, even if you have been victimized unjustly, or are an absolute victim, victimization is still victimization.
(I respect those who fight bravely, showing their faces and names)
(but, victimization is still victimization)
(However, I don't think that proving a face and name will give you absolute legitimacy)
(As a result, I think words and actions matter)
This may affect some people and give them reason to remain silent.
(I also think that being cautious is a very necessary skill for survival)
But wouldn't making full use of this minimal proof method help to reduce the risk of violent behavior from irrational beasts?
(Of course, this is just a possibility)
(It's not a guarantee of absolute safety)
Is this democratic?
Will it be painful for some people to no longer be able to remain silent?
I have no intention of holding responsible those who have been hurt up until now, but what I have felt through this movement is that the time has come for people to make a choice(think so)
To be even more clear, I think that a clear choice is now required.
And I think it has to do with what do with time.
We now have a great deal of freedom in our environment, so isn't it important to consider what leave behind?
Why does a topic exist?
What is the purpose of a focus?
Dissenting opinions are welcome,
I think it helps to bring some clarity.
Of course, these are just my thoughts as I research this movement.
And I want to let you know that I am writing these posts as part of expanding this movement and pursuing true freedom and peace.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1794
>>1793
In other words, what can learn from those who fought bravely and died?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1795
>>1793
>I respect those who fight bravely, showing their faces and names
>>1794
<In other words, what can learn from those who fought bravely and died?
^This point
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1800
>>>/qresearch/23684772
^This
>>>/qresearch/23676371
>“Anonymous, online or keyboard complaining is not worthy of a warrior. It is cowardice”
Hello, I'm leaving a message here to respond to what you're saying.
Of course, I think you are only focusing on those who are only complaining, but I will say something in case that is not the case.
I certainly don't think complaining is cool.
But that's also true.
I think the true anons here have the skills to filter out that kind of noise.
I generally don't filter things.
This is because I think that even if complaints or opposing opinions arise, a clear response to them can also create an opportunity to clarify things further.
And on the issue of cowardice, Anons who fight only with words and the information have are not cowards.
(Anons is no need to brag about the number of friends have or how good-looking or bravery)
Also, from another perspective, I think it's effective/constructive for quickly responding to actions that don't improve, don't take accountability, or don't provide a legitimate explanation, despite the opportunity to clarify problems by being able to ask questions anonymously and having your mistakes pointed out.
It also leaves a log of questions and opposing opinions being ignored.
This may be an opportunity to prove something else.
And just look at @state for example.
What's going on?
And is it truly constructive?
Is outside system working properly?
Is Brainwash affecting it?(people's)
When a debate arises, one side of the argument may be justified, while the other side may be problematic.
It's good that this has come to light.
However, there is a possibility that this could have further repercussions.
I think that this could also affect the family of the person who caused the problem.
Of course, it's easy to say that the person who caused the problem is to blame.
But once a label has been applied, how long will it take for subsequent words to become legitimate?
Of course, you could restore it by changing the name, but…
Even as I've typed this far, can you see that there is a lot of noise (potential for problems) being created?
Also, concerns about physical attacks on individuals.
Mislabeling resulting from mind control.
etc.
(&I also think there are methods to use these as excuses to create an unclear situation)
Of course, even if you post anonymously, the risk is not zero.
However, wouldn't it be constructive for the future to alleviate those concerns and leave a message?
I also think that brainwashing may be related to the occurrence of mistakes or problematic behavior.
Therefore, I think that pursuing this in an anonymous environment is effective in achieving quick improvement, without creating time for unnecessary damage.
Of course, I think it is important for the person to have the intention to improve, but I also think that proving that they refused to improve despite being given the opportunity makes something else clear.
I think that there is meaning in making things clear leaving true feelings in a space like this.
I also think that by investigating the problem/issue and presenting ideas for improvement, can prevent the problem from recurring or apply the ideas to other problems/issue.
And I see this anonymous platform as a constructive platform for clarifying things.
Furthermore, because this site houses archives of past records and information by patriots, and because there are people who preserve this information and present theories derived from it, I think it is a space where comparisons, considerations, and things can be made clearer.
I certainly think that if you want to shout, an outside platform is more constructive.
You may end up repeating the same things, but I think 8kun/ch is an effective platform for making things clearer and more quickly.
Will also have the opportunity to ask questions that find difficult to ask, or to seek help for SOS or other issues that feel can't talk to anyone about.
I think this will also be an opportunity to clarify the invisible parts.
The only thing that remains the same whether you shout in person or post anonymously is that you are using words.
8kun/ch is excellent at getting the most out of those words.
This is It focuses on creating thoughts constructively and effectively.
This platform, protected and built on logic by the patriots and anons who have fought here until now, is a wonderful platform with a high degree of freedom of speech.
And truth and logic always wins.
It's okay to make loud noises afterwards.
continue
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1801
>>1800
P.S.
I thought I'd already made clear the importance of this platform and anonymity, but thanks to you I've realized you still more to it.
Thank you.
Of course, opposing opinions are welcome, and have a space specifically for opposing opinions, so come and discuss together how to create a truly constructive and effective world.
(This is made to avoid getting in the way of researchers)
And my logic isn't finished yet.
I'll continue to make things clearer, so please come and see if you have the chance.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.