>>511
It's like watching repeat story from the past.
CBTS & The Storm repeat?
I thought were done with that theory?
In summary, Will you stop this movement when 'Q' is no longer reliable?
I think It's not just the reliability of the 'Q' only postings.
Trust is also established because of the words and deeds of the patriots who have joined this movement.
(For this reason, I also think that the words and actions of each and every participant in this movement are very important)
It is neither blind nor dogmatic.
And I think that the efforts of these anon/patriot(Q)s are what make this movement what it is.
Is trust something that can be lost in an instant?
Trust is a very good thing.
But isn't it also important to look not only at trust, but also at the things that are done?
Can create facts?
Can win trust with the facts create?
What would be important in this case?
Will logs be important?
What was proven?
Before trusting 'who', isn't it important to see what kind of behavior is trustworthy?
Because trust can be gone in an instant, right?
Then need to see every moment?
In other words, it is important what you accomplish.
And wouldn't it be easier to compare/contrast by summarizing those logs?
Now how far will your proof go?
I'm looking forward to it.
Your own 'Q' is proven.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.