/qhaos/ - dARQhaos

>>133

If you think this is a hateful environment, it may be the hate in you that is the problem.

I feel as if I am losing self-control of my hatred when I should be able to control my mind.

To what extent is it permissible for good to destroy evil?

Since I joined this movement, I have seen many good guys versus good guys.

goal here is to create the best out of a constructive and critical Word.

I also hope to help improve old agendas by building on them.

And furthermore, thought it would be more clear what were not even discussing properly.

What is a proper discussion?

Chain association game?

I believe it is constructive to leave the discussion moving in the best direction.

It is an image as if I are moving our thinking from the Word to the best direction.

>>134

Examples are easy to understand this kind of thing.

As soon as you create a place like this, you say this catalog is a board for slides.

But there are times when another place is given special treatment.

This alone reveals human nature.

I think it works well for QUICK TRIALS.

Because everything is recorded.

It is easy to see who is creating enemies and starting fights.

>>135

of course

Some would say that the very creation of this environment is a slide.

But it happens in 8kun that even if you think you are doing the right thing, you can still be excluded.

As a result, I think it is constructive to achieve the best performance in an environment where you are free.

And the possibility that the words that come out of that best performance will lead to an opportunity to strike someone else's heart is better than in a state of oppression.

Well, repressed fear may also be a crisis, but which do you think creates more constructive possibilities?

>>134

I feel as if I am losing self-control of my hatred when I should be able to control my mind.

By nature, people should be able to self-control their hatred.

Why do reasons exist why cannot face the truth?

What is this convenience based on?

At what point does the enemy occur?

On what is the determination of the enemy based?

Harm against what?

>>126

Critical thinking？

At what point is an ally an ally?

At what point is trust established?

At what point does it become justice?

Is there any reason why more environments for best performance would be a bad thing?

>>137

I'll leave you with the fact that I may not be able to come for a while.

>>131

Phenomenon = post/drop('Q'movement relevance)

But here is a case where there are those who would take advantage of this movement

In that case, archives, records and logs become important?

>>128

In other words, is what are doing or what choose to do one of the criteria for decision?

>>129

On the criteria for judging good/bad.

And that the logs that selected them will be proven?

.

>>112

And I also don't think I've had true freedom or peace yet, and I don't think the best is yet to come.

If it's all going to work out anyway, what's wrong with hoping for the best?

>>106

Oh, and by the way, what would happen if the best opinions on critical thinking and critical thinking were gathered here?

Those who come later and don't know will be slower.

It would save time and clarify the best, don't you think?

>>115

I think if are aggregating with so vests and so much information and so many ideas, it will be easier to see the evil, the harm, the problems right away.

>>108

pol ＝ pnd

>>>/qresearch/19432346

You're harm to mankind when you're posting things that lead to a negative impact on free speech.

Freedom of speech doesn't exist in QR?

If you want free speech, come here.

Why post shit on QR when you can say all you want here?

Oh yeah, the ones who are bad for free speech.

Can't just delete them all?

>>>/qresearch/19432778

Q Isn't this a space where you think about peace in the world or something in the movement?

If you need the fucking post too, why would you turn it off?

>>58

I'll post your spam here.

I'll delete your past spam posts.