/qhaos/ - dARQhaos

>>1838

Definitions and clarifications can shed light on certain darkness

The same is true for unclear movements, &/or words left over from the past can have a similar effect

In other words, this place is…

To be continued,,,

>>1838

>>1876

Now then, could a span of empty time also serve as proof?

You chose 'it'

First of all, if you're going to specifically name someone and claim they did something, wouldn't evidence be required?

Of course, I'm speaking here to those who read and participate in the 'Q' posts, so I haven't bothered to bring screenshots, and I don't think it's necessary for people who seem to have everything to bring it

Also, I believe that even if you try to exclude individuals, the fundamental problem of ideology remains, which is why I'm focusing on the realm of ideology

If you claim to have learned something, clearly stating it can reduce confusion and ambiguity, 'Q&A' ​​is effective in further clarifying things and promoting understanding, and wouldn't preserving that exchange be beneficial to others?

And doesn't that also reveal who you are?

By the way, did you know that if you trace back deleted logs and try to view the deleted content, it displays 'bad board'?

Isn't this a very interesting irony?

It almost feels like it's asking what freedom truly is

In other words, being able to maintain a state without censorship or deletion means,,,

Of course, this includes making posts that would be deleted, but aren't the essential aspects of both of these very important?

Let's consider this from a different perspective

Why is censorship and deletion considered a problem?

Isn't it related to the fact that they have been hiding things that are inconvenient for them?

And, in conclusion, doing so means acting in the same way they have

Of course, people make mistakes, but improvement is very important, and wouldn't leaving those mistakes as examples of improvement, or even as ideas for someone else?

How is that different from you continuing to use the tripcode used by the real 'Q' of the past?

>>1878

I think the tactic of impersonating someone in order to discredit them is already being employed

(Does that include the color of the fabric?) >>1860

Isn't that precisely why it is important to use or create your own tripcode?

Or, if you claim that a particular tripcode belongs to you, just consider this: how did the real "Q" conduct themselves?

Naturally, if you appear to possess inside information, you can expect a response to your actions.

Wouldn't revealing the truth increase the chances of saving many lives?

Conversely, what kind of consequences might arise from causing delays?

Oh, and the topic of vaccines has resurfaced recently, hasn't it? To use that as an example: I came across information clearly indicating the dangers of vaccines, so I ultimately chose not to get vaccinated

As I mentioned previously, it seems there are already moves even on outside platforms by individuals claiming to be "Q" in order to line their own pockets or to discredit the real "Q"

Of course, I am well aware of the concept of "We are Q"

However, does that mean everyone should use the tripcode that "Q" used in the past?

And wouldn't that lead to further ambiguity?

Wouldn't there be less risk of misunderstanding if individuals created and used their own tripcodes?

And the questions continued(progressing): "So what?"

>>1828

What has changed for theys?

Before get into the question of who is in control or not, what do they currently stand to prove?

If your proof is someone else's control, what does that prove?

So why not prove it yourself?

And even if you did, what would you prove then?

And why can't you prove it now?

(about unacceptable ideas)(?)

I have no intention of becoming a 'Q' like you

and I publicly state that I am not a 'Q'

I do not use half-trip codes like you do

Sure, using the 'Q' tripcode and posting as a past 'Q' might create vague validity and some impact, but again, you can't run from yourself

And above all, aren't the things that emerge from facing oneself the truth?

As the phrase "We are Q" suggests, whether you call yourself Q or Anon post on, I think what you accomplish is important

However, I also believe that carrying the Q comes with a certain amount of responsibility.

Also, this is something I've thought about from my time in this movement and seeing all the different people who have called themselves 'Q'

So it would be easier if you could prove it using your own trip code

So what have you proven?

I'm looking forward to seeing what comes next

I am a participant in this movement and I am participating because I thinking it can truly change the world.

I am simply offering my thoughts and ideas.

and And this is something I've seen in all sorts of techniques.

(For example, you belong to me because I control you etc)

>>1852

Does the concept of "ethical" not encompass bringing things to light and choosing the truth?

Does it not include the rigorous inquiry required to reveal the facts?

Let's refine the details a little further

Wouldn't the clearest, most reliable way to verify authenticity be for Q+ to prove their identity by linking a post using a tripcode to an external platform?

This is slightly similar to the methods the real "Q" used for verification in the past(As a quick example); however, proving a connection to a specific account would offer more certainty than merely matching numbers, wouldn't it? It would likely establish even greater credibility

Furthermore, since there is now a button for voice input, voice-based(This is an even simpler example)verification might also be possible—or Q+ could simply specify a particular tripcode

I think this will also serve to eliminate the various adverse effects arising from unclear situations

Of course, there are already phenomena that Q+ may well be keeping an eye on within this movement

In that case, I suppose there is at least a non-zero possibility that "Q+" might act in the manner described above

After all, the genuine "Q" from the past simply needs to provide proof—and do so repeatedly

So, what is the reason or necessity for reusing the old tripcode now?

Incidentally, I do not post in environments with high levels of censorship or content removal, because I focus on the heart and ideas rather than the fabric or the colors

If this settles into the same narrative(movement)trajectory as theirs, isn't that within the realm of imagination—and something the real 'Q' has already stated in the past?

Was true freedom nothing more than a game of Monopoly?

I don't think so

And I state this because Q+ has already triumphed.

Furthermore, do you realize that this movement has already gone global?

And do you sense it?

Is there a change in words and actions when victory is certain?

Now, try seeing if you can time-travel 17 seconds into the future

This anon is thinking about expanding this movement

This anon believes that if more people participate in this movement/platform(8kun/ch), there will be more opportunities to come into contact with more truths

This anon wants true freedom

Therefore, I am expressing my questions and thoughts

>>1797

Well, isn't the impact of the 'Q' Word one of proof?

>>1798

Well, this may also depend on how people feel.

So what if someone who doesn't understand English looks up DJT words and is moved by them?

At what point does that become true?

(or At what point does it become the right emotion or 'most IMPRESSIVE'?)

How is that provable?

^Ongoing/Underway.

^Of course, Well, this may also depend on how people feel.

Posting in case it's an attack.

>>1753

So is this time stamp a coincidence?

How much can the effects of deception be?

>>1750

It's happening across other catalogs too.

Coincidence? Or?

>>1744

>why can't citizens engage in dialogue?

^ Of course, this is for ((()))

>>1703

>Conversely, in the case of a legitimate attack,,,

This will personal discretion, but the degree of discretion will also be evidenced.

I think that proves something too.

>>1706, >>1707, >>1708, >>1709, >>1710 (not me)

Even if you don't start playing 'riddle games' like this,

If you leave your own thoughts, theories and further questions in your own catalogue,

I don't think you'll need to go to QResearch to assert yourself.

Furthermore, a compiled/aggregatory post not only makes it easier to read, but I think it will speed up and deepen your understanding of your posts.

If the thing you post is legitimate, then others may start quoting or doing research.

^Using a trip code is one of the proofs of your posts, so it will be easier to confirmed your thoughts and intentions if accountability arises.

This is not about emotional theory, but about efficiency.

It also saves time for your post to be deleted without being considered legitimate.

>>1714

Also, I would like to say this to you, what is your purpose and reason for doing it?

If you value the information you have, how would you treat it?

A variety of observations occur with just one action.

>>1706

>NOTE TO ALL KNIGHTS: This post is rules + example.

>You are not to create a new Q >Drop from this unless specifically ordered with a Q Drop number at the top of the command.

>Always look at the very top of each Commander post to see if a specific Q Drop number is assigned.

>If none is present, process the message as operational instruction, not as a live drop to release.

^ I don't really understand this.

What are the Advantages?

What's the trip code?

Or what is the intention?

>>1700

^Oh 1700

Oh well.

What's more, it has proven that you haven't said anything big, and that you don't understand this situation!

Don't you know what this is?

The simple explanation is increased transparency.

Can your little brain understand that?

To give you another example, it's okay to send spam here!

And what does this mean?

You no longer have to spam your own catalog.

But, Currently, the spam for catalogs is quiet.

>>741

Prove it.

>>744

Looks to be a Trailer Park.

Don't you realize that this Bump just a diss talk or just an opinion post is not much different?

>>1357

Well, so I thought I should just put up a MEME, but it would be a waste.