/qhaos/ - dARQhaos

Wish I could have checked more things.

Now here's a question.

What do you think will become clearer with the creation of this space?

Have fun.

But if you're going to say something, you might as well say something constructive.

I think the fact that this place has been created will help reduce the number of shitposts, don't you?

There is a reason for the title, isn't there?

Now here's the question.

What happens when you talk about something completely unrelated there when the title exists?

Even people who don't know the Q movement are welcome here.

Tell us anything.

That's one way to think about it.

A pattern that dares to encourage shitposts.

You might think that if there is a shitpost, it must be a threat.

but it's just noise.

A better solution?

Oh, yeah, if we create a space dedicated to shitposts, there will be no more noise, right?

Why do we have to talk about it here?

If we want to chat, we can do it in the chat room.

I don't understand how chatting is unity(WWG1WGA?)

I'm here to work.

Or are you killing time with idle talk about what's coming next?

Now the question.

Who can prove what?

What do you think would happen if built a Word like this and it made sense?

See, you can easily spot a fake.

What's fake?

‘IT’S NOT WHAT YOU KNOW BUT WHAT YOU CAN PROVE'

How would you behave if you thought about these words?

have nothing to do with (something)

each his own

Then you don't have to do anything.

That's right.

The rest is just mindless normies.

I'll just wait for them to go fuck themselves.

Saving the World?

Now the first target is the >>>/hivemind/

Did you quit the Q movement?

You even disparaged the 8kun.

So when are you going to get rehabilitated?

Thanks to you, the division is symbolic.

Well, have you been out of sight?

Well, now that you've made you invisible,

I see another problem.

I think it's time to get serious and get some more people in here.

Why don't people come?

You know a little bit about that, don't you, after all the divisive behavior you've done?

Lack of unity a problem?

And you're involved in that?

Or is this some kind of test to make us think for ourselves?

Whatever.

I'm trying to make 8kun national.

I'd appreciate it if you could help me with that.

I remember when you came to play on my board.

So I'm returning the favor.

demonstration of something like

>>3

Oh, okay.

If you shitpost on QR, you'll leave shit on QR ch, is that what you're going for?

>>8

No fame, right?

Anon is…

Define > Pattern of pretending to be Anon.

Isn't this the model in its best form?

ex, >>>/midnightriders/ and >>>/qrb/

I think clarifying the weirdness would be an effective way to improve it.

Of course, if you've got time to do that kind of time, you'd better do your research.

So who are these people who are just saying that?

Why are you here if you're not doing research?

Ex: QR etc,

>>19431982

Sure, expressing the stupidity of potato could be effective in making an impression.

But isn't this the same thing as slander that kids do on websites?

I think it's essentially shining a light in the darkness, not shining a light in their face.

I think it would be more effective to bring in open sources of corruption and incriminating images.

>>23

Well, it might be effective in terms of bringing awareness to the issue.

But is it my imagination or is there more to it than that?

test.

>>>/qresearch/19434970

Is this a strategy to make us lose sight of the essence of what we're doing with our shitty definitions?

>>6

Is this your plan to sneak back into QR again and erase all the posts and pasts that say bad things about you?

Is that why there are so many deletions?

Hiding past mistakes?

The space is ready.

Now it's just a matter of choice.

Considering Effectiveness and Impact.

.

>>40

>>42

The moment you guys can help bring some peace to this world.

HAHAHA

>>44

It doesn't matter if you guys spam it.

The logs of those who came before us will just continue to remain at the top.

Just spamming here leads to many opportunities

That's why people who shitpost don't want to post here.

>>51

Just repeating the same posts?

That's called spam.

coming here makes it clear what you're doing.

What do you accomplish in the face of this log?

The logs of our predecessors will remain forever as an opportunity for freedom/peace in this world.

>>52

What makes Filter so effective?
To advance your own research?

If not?


Wouldn't it be more constructive to respond to spam and shitposts with valid theories about improvements?

Or do you watch porn?

.

>>62

>The idea of gambling, etc. is already over.

>>58 >>63

>What do you think will be the effect of your spreading such ideas?

All products of the Monopoly system.

First, what impact does the use of money have?

You want to spread these ideas in a world where people can't even talk about money and are too busy thinking about what they will eat tomorrow?

What are the chances of this being identified as a detriment?

What are some of the cases in which this is the case?

What if a quick trial had begun?

Your postings will be recorded.

Think about it.

Threat to intellectual freedom? - Q

Only when information [truth] becomes FREE [uncontrolled] will people awaken to the levers of control placed upon them. - Q

>>69

>we

The state of thinking becomes apparent.

What do you mean, "slow to plan"?

What do you think the plan is?

If Q specifies that the plan is to bake bread, would you do it?

>>74 add

If I present an extreme view, am I a fascist?

Is stating your opinion defined as projection?

Is the guy who created the definition normal?

At what point are things deemed legitimate?

I've given you my theory that it's what you've done that counts, right?

>>75

>I've given you my theory that it's what you've done that counts, right?

Isn't communicating something most of us in the world can do?

Wouldn't it be more effective to Word what you know?

>>76

>Wouldn't it be more effective to Word what you know?

or MEME etc,

This is not about 'to comply' or 'not to comply'.

I don't know you.

I try to know you, but I only feel like I do.

I don't even know if you're a good guy or a bad guy.

At what point is it possible to determine if someone is a good guy or a bad guy?

In that case, what has been done is one of the determining factors.

At what point good and evil is determined, I don't know either.

Isn't that why it is so important to be on our best behavior in this world?

I'm one of them.

I define the Q movement as a quick trial.

I've already told you what I can tell you.

The rest is up to you.

The patriots have given you many opportunities.

The clock is ticking.

Good luck and best wishes to all.

.

That's nasty.

And this isn't even talking about expediency.

I'm talking about the possibility of spreading freedom and peace by bringing clarity to good and evil.

Well, it's good for the wicked to do good deeds to amend their sins, isn't it?

Still, then, there is the possibility of the spread of good, isn't there?

>>81

I'm sure there are those of you who have already noticed.

The 8kun timeline is different.

Under the current circumstances

Don't you think it's already becoming clear who specializes in certain spaces?

Including those outside the 8kun.

Everything is going to be proven.

There is no room for deception.

When is your best time?

I don't know your timing.

I don't even know what's best for you.

That's something you know for yourself.

Your choice is yours.

Good luck and best wishes.

>>85

I knew this would happen.

That's why created several spaces.

There are going to be a lot of new dogma makers out there.

I'm looking forward to it.

Go ahead, be a messiah, be some god, be a hero, whatever.

Give us true freedom and peace.

If you think you can call yourself Q just because you can use Trip Code, you're wrong.

This is not a game.

If justice were to prevail in this world

What will happen to those who spread evil?

I give you an opportunity, and you squander it.

You have so many choices, and you don't even choose them.

Some fail to recognize the opportunity.

That's why every moment, every moment is so important.

>>91

How happy would we be if we could recognize the opportunity?

I too am looking for opportunities and the best.

That's why I was thinking about it so that someone else might be able to pick up on something I'm not aware of.

Imagine the many influences that can be spread throughout this world depending on the time chosen.

I want you to imagine that your postings create many impacts.

What would you post?

If you value your time and use it constructively, how much more positive impact, freedom, and peace can you bring to this world?

If you can't take care of yourself, you can't take care of others and make them better, can you?

It is a very sad world to think that this may represent a part of humanity today.

Why fear the dark?

When did darkness become evil?

Where did evil originate?

From the point of deciding to be evil?

Do you think they can handle free space if they can't control evil and darkness?

Where there is light, there is shadow/dark.

That's all.

What is justice?

Do you think you can offer freedom and peace to those who cannot take justice, freedom, peace, etc. seriously?

The problem is not just about controllers.

Humanity,

The choices you make now are very important.

As more and more information comes to light, turning a blind eye to these issues will create indifference, and what will spread further?

MAGA&'Q'movement

This is not a game.

This talking about human evolution and the survival of the world.

You don't think so?

Then is it possible to build true freedom and peace with this movement?

>>100

If you think this movement is just another campaign movement I will tell you.

Think big, what can you do with this movement and this space (8kun)?

What does transparency create?

Don't you know that too?

Then I suggest you look at Qmap and the logs of many of the participants in this movement.

>>102

>>103

What do you think would happen if freedom and peace spread throughout this world?

Do you think death would improve?

In my country we would definitely build choices that would improve death.

What do you think would happen to those who have harmed this world in that case?

Don't you think their suffering would be naturally longer?

More choices further magnify the thought.

Imagine the various causalities that would ensue.

((()))doesn't want you to imagine it.

That's why he creates DOGMA.

((()))doesn't want them to think.

((()))doesn't want us to derive many possibilities.

Simply put, if the best logic, theories, and ideas swallowed this world, it would no longer be consumed by darkness, right?

HAHAHA

>>105

he

((()))

What makes the truth harmful?

Why do reasons exist why cannot face the truth?

What is this convenience based on?

At what point does the enemy occur?

On what is the determination of the enemy based?

Harm against what?

>>126

Critical thinking？

At what point is an ally an ally?

At what point is trust established?

At what point does it become justice?

Is there any reason why more environments for best performance would be a bad thing?

>>137

I'll leave you with the fact that I may not be able to come for a while.

You are only you.

You yourself are important.

You will be proving yourself.

God Bless.

>>141

What is the selection point for this improvement based on?

What is the reason?

.

>>143

Is the reason for the choice based on ethics, world happiness, peace or freedom?

What are the reasons why this is provable to be true?

And even if it is true,

So what?

ALL TALK, AND NO ACTION.

NO TALK AND ALL ACTION!

-DJT

.

To what extent do you think transparency works?

HAHAHA

>ハハハ

>>153

Is the behavior proven that you don't want to believe in transparency?

Is the behavior of not wanting to see the truth also revealed by choice?

Melania Trump

July 14, 2024

I am thinking of you, now, my fellow Americans.

We have always been a unique union. America, the fabric of our gentle nation is tattered, but our courage and common sense must ascend and bring us back together as one.

When I watched that violent bullet strike my husband, Donald, I realized my life, and Barron's life, were on the brink of devastating change. I am grateful to the brave secret service agents and law enforcement officials who risked their own lives to protect my husband.

To the families of the innocent victims who are now suffering from this heinous act, I humbly offer my sincerest sympathy. Your need to summon your inner strength for such a terrible reason saddens me.

A monster who recognized my husband as an inhuman political machine attempted to ring out Donald's passion - his laughter, ingenuity, love of music, and inspiration. The core facets of my husband's life - his human side - were buried below the political machine. Donald, the generous and caring man who I have been with through the best of times and the worst of times.

Let us not forget that differing opinions, policy, and political games are inferior to love. Our personal, stnictural, and life commitment - until death - is at serious risk. Political concepts are simple when compared to us, human beings.

We are all humans, and fundamentally, instinctively, we want to help one another. American politics are only one vehicle that can uplift our communities. Love, compassion, kindness and empathy are necessities.

And let us remember that when the time comes to look beyond the left and the right, beyond the red and the blue, we all come from families with the passion to fight for a better life together, while we are here, in this earthly realm.

Dawn is here again. Let us reunite. Now.

This morning, ascend above the hate, the vitriol, and the simple-minded ideas that ignite violence. We all want a world where respect is paramount, family is first, and love transcends. We can realize this world again. Each of us must demand to get it back. We must insist that respect fills the cornerstone of our relationships, again.

I am thinking of you, my fellow Americans.

The winds of change have anived. For those of you who cry in support, I thank you. I commend those of you who have reached out beyond the political divide—thank you for remembering that every single politician is a man or a woman with a loving family.

Q: ‘It's not what you KNOW but what you can PROVE.'

If justice is not served first, then this world does not deserve to exist.

If justice and truth do not work, this world does not deserve to exist.

If it is right to allow this world to be built on lies and destruction, then can eliminate at once all the non-useful and non-constructive things that exist in the present.

This will only be a matter of time.

>>161

Define: 'DISINFORMATION'

Directions become important? or degree of damage?

Is it computable?

Well, to put it simply, in the current situation, they can get away with a lot of things.

It is an easy state of affairs to make excuses for.

So wait until you are in a situation where there are no excuses.

And if everything is being recorded, then the liars in the current situation should have been identified long ago.

And if it is not going far enough,

It only reveals the extent of the problem.

Whatever the case, the illogical ones will already have been identified.

Of course, not all the correct logic is clear.

> So wait until you are in a situation where there are no excuses.

> Think timing?

< Double Check.

>>163

or

Never interfere with an enemy in the process destroying himself.

>>164

Q: Reconcile using logic

Think Best timing.

Watch: Logic direction.

Ex: Qについての事柄ならQの思想方向？

Ex:

The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).

When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.

"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.

etc, etc, etc.

>166

Delete this post.

The reason is because it has a phone number on it.

I don't know if this phone number is working properly, but even if it is, I believe it increases the likelihood of harmful occurrences.

Deletion.

If you have any comments, please post again and let us know the need for this post.

>>168

And if you want to show such images, it would be more beneficial to me, to you, and to the world if you post them in the most appropriate catalog.

>>168

amendment.

>166

^This submitter is responsible for any harm that occurs later.

This is a free speech space, so please consider that you are responsible for any problems that occur in this free space.

>>173

If you think you are protecting this, you are mistaken.

Once the harm is clear and becomes a problem, it is easy to eliminate them.

The clearer the issue, the harder it is to escape.

HAHAHA

>>174

Or keep the problem or harm hidden?

Now, if you have to repeat the process and eventually hold them accountable, it's the same thing, isn't it?

What could happen to the delay in pursuing and facing responsibility by hiding it?

Q: 'TRANSPARENCY [DISCLOSURE] AND ACCOUNTABILITY [JUSTICE] IS THE ONLY WAY FORWARD'

>183

^This poster is in no way related to the BO/BV of this thread.

>>190

I am amazed at the spirit with which you save this image on your own computer.

Can you print this image on your own clothes and wear it?

Well, it only proves that you are just an animal of low wisdom.

You can do that in an environment where the whole world is watching.

Your lack of awareness or your stupidity makes me want to vomit.

Have you ever thought about how that lack of awareness might affect you?

Well, from the beginning, you have no desire to save the world.

Or are you thinking about saving the world or making it better?

Then don't you think it's important how you should spend your time?

You ever consider transparency?

Have you ever considered the scale of transparency?

If the whole world could see you, would you still behave this way?

This speaks to human nature.

Isn't it the words and deeds of each and every one of humanity that matter today?

If you know that the whole world is watching and you still don't change your choice, can you explain how this has a beneficial effect on the world?

I'll tell you this much.

There will be freedom of speech and quite a lot of freedom of expression here.

With so much freedom, doesn't it make one's own behavior all the more important?

Isn't the result of doing whatever you want because you are free also reflected in this world?

For better or worse.

I think too many things have been revealed or opportunities for improvement have emerged because too many bad people have done what they wanted.

If you think that this movement is only for celebrities or those who have done too much wrong, and that you are not involved, you are underestimating the importance of this movement.

Think about it.

The power of many collective consciousnesses.

If the whole world were to pursue you for your deeds, how far would you go to prove your legitimacy?

To what extent can proof be provided?

Are you ready for it?

>>192 mistake.

Tora3 The Best.

>>142

Collaboration/Coordination.

>Doppelganger theory.

^Isn't this logic finished?

Why are some people still pretending to be operation coordinators?

I'm just leaving what I've learned, though, right?

Why don't you leave what you've learned yourself?

>>194

This is about the constructiveness and preciousness of individual time.

Isn't it best/constructive that the best/constructive individual times are aggregated?

AND

Already won, haven't?

If you're comfortable or in good shape, then why not focus on making the best time for yourself in the present?

Also, wouldn't it be constructive and beneficial to those who will join this movement to leave behind what we have learned in the present?

If concentrate what have learned from our predecessors and the best intelligence on the 8kun, won't it naturally lead to access?

What is the difference between diffusion and dispersion?

In other words, I think that the best option is to submit your full research to 8kun.

Wouldn't that make it easier to connect to the information left to us by our predecessors?

Wouldn't it be a good comparison in the best sense of the word, by leaving the best time for yourself?

And this is about one of the choices, that if there is a study that you can focus on, you can work on it.

If I can't focus on my research, I think I should do Baker or make a meme.

I am not recommending any particular thing.

I think each of us has our own strengths and weaknesses.

This post is not only about own research and other constructive talk,

It is also meant to be about coordination and control.

>197

Do you think it is possible to see intentions and thoughts as well?

Slow.

Sleepy.

[NOW]

Biblical control theory.

Next phase?

Abrahamic Family House.

>>199

>>204 edit/add.

>Biblical theory.

Love expand theory?[HAHAHA]

Would you say?[projection?]

This is not love/peace.

This is not justice.

This is not truth.

or 'confuse'?

Q: 'Divided by RELIGION'

>>205 add.

[ENOU[G]H IS EN[O]UGH]

>>206

Calvary or [Go]lgotha.

Do think building another cross will bring peace to the world?

>>207

This is about a biblical concept.

And this is the opinion I have learned and thought about from the biblical stories.

Let's try a different expression.

If nailed the Savior to the cross one more time, would there be no more sin in the world and peace?

What have learned from the backs of our predecessors?

I sent a Message.

Q: 'History will not REPEAT itself this time'

I sent a Message.

Q: ‘IT’S NOT WHAT YOU KNOW BUT WHAT YOU CAN PROVE'

>>209

What is the title given to you?

What impact or chain of events does it create?

How long can it continue(sustainable)?

"Achilles and the tortoise"

Is it too early or too late now?

What is it based on?

Q: 'No coincidence'?

What is that moment given to you?

What kind of chain of events or effects does it create?

I sent a Message.

Q: Is it based on logic?

>>209

I do not know what you know.

Your logic won't let you off the hook and will always follow you.

>>211

Q said the world is watching.

To what extent do you mean the world at large?

I sent a Message.

Q: 'NO ESCAPE'

I sent a Message.

Q: WHO = dogmatic/symbolism?

513

Jan 08, 2018 11:29:38 PM EST

Q !UW.yye1fxo

IMPORTANT:

NO PRIVATE COMMS past/present/future.

NO comms made [outside] of this platform.

Any claims that contradict the above should be considered FAKE NEWS and disregarded immediately.

WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL.

PATRIOTS.

Q

>>213

Why do they try to take actions that lead to dogma?

Building new controls?

What is the state of dogma?

Does Good dogma or propaganda exist?

Why do they prioritize 'WHO'?

What is the difference between a republic and a monarchy?

What is the reason you do not want to clarify these?

Who created the devil?

Where did the definition of the devil come from?

They don't want to articulate(Clarity) the evil?

So they can't talk?

Why did Q post that made you think about dogma&symbolism and mind control?

and system control?

To what extent are the above issues related to the root causes of the various adverse events that are currently occurring?

What are the percentages?

The reason you don't want to make things clear is because you want to mix the good with the bad?

Let'swordance.

>>221

A republic is not the same as a monarchy.

[Examples]

Definition

At what point does a defined matter become correct or legitimate?

Why do they scoff at a serious attempt to clarify the question?

Why don't they want to reveal things?

Is it transparent? Or is it non-transparent?

What do these questions matter for what is currently happening?

Why do you have a problem with the normal functioning of truth, justice, transparency and clarity?

What are the reasons why you cannot clearly explain what you are doing?

Why not rather clarify?

What situations or conditions would you define as good control?

Is it dogmatic?

Or is it logical?

>>221

At what point does 'who' become important?

Will words and actions matter?

Where does it look from 'where' to what point?

Are accomplishments important?

Is it important to have a direction that creates good possibilities from the past and present to the future?

Does visioning and ideating for the future clarify the direction?

The present proves the past and the future.

To what do these questions work constructively?

Pray.

Toward Justice and Truth.

>>230 edit.

Toward Transparency, Justice and Truth.

>>230

>>231

[0:10 sec variance]

>>232 edit.

[0:10 sec variance]?

>>229

What is important to focus on when there are matters that fabricate facts from the past to the present?

What is important to focus on, even if the facts of the past have been fabricated or falsified?

Does accountability reveal the direction of thought?

Is it possible to hide direction/thought by not making things clear or transparent?

>>234

Could actions that do not allow truth and justice to function properly create new truth and justice non-functioning influences?

Time was off.

Access error

Proof that don't want to let the focus point?

-10

>>236

2177

Sep 15, 2018 8:55:33 PM EDT

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title3-vol1/pdf/CFR-2010-title3-vol1-eo13526.pdf

Executive Order 13526

Sec 1.7

"Classification Prohibitions and Limitations. (a) In no case shall information be classified, continue to be maintained as classified, or fail to be declassified in order to:

(1) conceal violations of law, inefficiency, or administrative error;

(2) prevent embarrassment to a person, organization, or agency;

(3) restrain competition; or

(4) prevent or delay the release of information that does not require protection in the interest of the national security."

Q

>>237

Concerned that logical pursuit or clarification will affect current matters?

The logical result is "4.10.20" right?

Who, in spite of all this, is still creating excuses for silence?

Could that be misleading in the opposite direction?

Isn't just asserting that this is the right thing to do, without giving a clear reason, akin to propaganda?(The act of only claiming to be right without articulating reasons or logic)

Logical clarification does not change the answer.(Too Big To Rig)

If you look at the facts and don't try to understand those facts, is it constructive to offer a logical explanation?

If you still choose not to look at them, isn't that a cause for not focusing on the issue?

Does clarifying the reasons for what say and do lead to further clarification?

[]が使えない。

>>239 edit

[] > 000000

>>249

>What is the purpose of the cross?

or What is the cross used for?

>>249

Is the symbol of the inverted cross a statement of intent to oppose the use of the cross as an instrument of capital punishment?

At what point are they defined as bad?

At what point does it go bad?

At what point does the matter define as bad become the correct definition?

Is the act of mixing the good with the bad a state of uncertainty?

or Are you saying that you are intentionally keeping it unclear?

Is this Word a Word that goes into obscurity?

Or is it a Word that moves toward clarity?

Confused?

Does memory, experience, thought, etc. play a role in confusion?

What caused it?

Q: 'Questions reveal Answers'

This is like a simple butterfly effect.

>>249

>>252

Are these two the same program?

闇を直視できずしてどうして光が直視できようか？

How can face the light if cannot face the darkness?

>>262

Why did use the word?

Why did insist on it?

Why did use the image?

Does accountability also fall on those who pursue accountability?

Counter question?

Q: 'SILENCE IS GOLDEN'？

Q: 'Operators never divulge'?

never divulge = No accountability?

I sent a Message.

Q: 'Transparency brings accountability'

The World Is Watching

Phones have Eyes

The calm before the storm

The plan is in motion

Prepare for the storm

Get your supplies

The storm is upon us

Knowledge exposed

Start a storm

Wake them up

Nothing can stop what's coming

Time for destiny

The great awakening

Consciousness is god

Trust the plan

Ignore the lies

We are Q

I am you

Think mirror

Reflection is clear

Logical thinking

I am here for a reason

Expand your thinking

Open my mind

Timelines change

Consciousness relives past and future

It's not what you know but what you can prove

I am not alone

Can we prove it

Evidence exists

You have more than you know

Ability

The clock is ticking

I am getting old

The choice is always yours

Action or procrastination

Dark to light

Reveal the lies

Justice is coming

They never got away

Future proves past

Character from adversity

Do you believe in coincidences

We share the story

No coincidences

To many that share

How many coincidences is mathematically impossible

It will all add up

Together we win

We must unite

This is all of the words that came to my head. How did I get here, why am I here? Not a cult we have all been tortured only some survive, only few are sane, and I am one who remains. When they hear the stories they will cry aloud, the predators exposed, punishment alas. Tell me Q what is the mission, do I expose myself to empower? Am I crazy?

>>369

> I am you

^ I do not know you.

How far can you prove me?

>I expose myself to empower? Am I crazy?

Wouldn't it be constructive to leave your thoughts?

But do you think there is a most effective way to do it?

>>369

>This is all of the words that came to my head

How do you use those wonderful words that come to your mind constructively/effectively?

Wouldn't it be constructive to leave your thoughts?

Consciousness outside conscious

But do you think there is a most effective way to do it?

We are the effect

How do you use those wonderful words that

I do not think

>>370

> Am I crazy?

If someone calls you CRAZY, perhaps it is an opportunity to look at yourself.

Or it may be an opportunity to find another challenge.

>>372

What do you want then?

If someone calls you CRAZY, perhaps it is an opportunity to look at yourself.

Or it may be an opportunity to find another challenge.

Lost for long, the question has fade, until I am here my purpose feels clear.

Thank You

I must to process

>>375

God bless/speed.

>>381

edit.

> And Isn't to escape from oneself, to try to escape from facing oneself, is to lie/denial to oneself?

If the word "transparency" is mentioned, and yet you are impersonating people, etc., does that mean you are acting in denial of transparency?

This is not to say that you should reveal your own name.

Whatever character (Q) you play.

You cannot escape from you are.

Therefore, isn't it important to do 'Q' to the best of one's own original ability?

Of course, doing so will inevitably lead to a counter consisting of critical thinking.

Of course, not only talking about playing 'Q'

I think it is rather better that whatever character you play, if there is an error, there will inevitably be a counter.

It helps us improve and learn.

That is why anonymity(Q) is so important.

Consider the impact that occurs when the importance of the information or word being handled arises.

Doesn't the more important it is, the more potential for danger it creates?

And consider that this movement has already spread to other countries, not just the US.

The President was miraculously saved, but what about the citizens?

Even if this were a movie or a fiction, what message would it convey?

What can think of?

What can learn and how can use it?

I think Q is also in a state of no face and name and fame.

Of course, in this digital world, it would be easy to identify individuals.

But if intentionally reveal name and face oneself, there's no excuse, right?

This is not just talking about individuals.

And I am not talking about personal preparedness, etc.

This speaks to what I have learned from the movement.

I consider this movement to be important, hence I will state here what I think.

I've jumped from the initial impersonation to something else, but..,

'We are Q' is not assimilation, but independence.

^That's what I think.

Isn't that why my 'word/action' is so important?

What I'm trying to say is that I'm talking about my thoughts on the impact and importance of transparency and anonymity(Q)

And the importance of personal existence/time and thought.

Don't think that clarifying inconsistencies, questions, and unclear items can lead from improvement to expansion?

>>383 edit.

>Isn't that why 'human' 'word/action' is so important?

>>384 add.

> I've jumped from the initial impersonation to something else, but..,

^ About the change in topic.

> But if intentionally reveal name and face oneself, there's no excuse, right?

^ There is no excuse for a counter to arise.

Counter mode.

^ A pattern in which the word intentional is applied to a matter in which there is 'no coincidence?'

Certainly the wind might make wine if the theory of the butterfly effect is used.

But what is important here is not only to prove it.

Conclusively so what?

So what is your point?

Certainly, noting what have learned from others is one of the constructive actions can take.

But isn't it important what is left in that case?

Do priorities exist?

Saving the world?

If so, would proof in the direction of making the world a better place be constructive?

Will that own proof reflect your own thoughts and lessons learned?

Or does it reflect a condition of mind, etc.?

What does transparency mean and what is important to be transparent about?

Face, name?

Marks for identification?

How is 'trust' built or lost?

Q: Proof are important.

Is it constructive/effective to prove or keep a log of one's own thoughts and learnings to reveal whether or not they are legitimate or reliable?

I think accountability comes to doppelgangers as well.

^To what extent is transparency reflected in the above accountability?

>>391

Isn't it constructive/effective to prove one's own idea/thoughts from what one has learned?

Raise counter level?

>>393

Repeat the simple example.

There is trash on the ground and picking it up is constructive in making the world a cleaner place?

Or is it constructive not to pick up the trash, but only to comment on how bad it is that the trash is falling?

Or is it constructive to pick up trash as it falls and then insist that it not be thrown away?

>>393

Increase resolution?

More clarity?

Anyone can do the flow work once they learn it.

It is difficult to create one's own new best.

(Work/Action to face oneself)

If you were to focused on me and say the words you might understand what I am saying.

>>396

Is this movement to create legitimacy and credibility for his statements by attracting followers?

>>397

Is taking power return to the people about creating and controlling slaves?

>Q: The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).

When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.

When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.

>"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.

So words/actions that contradict the above are false?

Is there the most constructive/effective option?

Are there attributes or directions depending on the crumbs?

>>397 edit.

> Is this movement to create legitimacy and credibility for @ statements by attracting followers?

>>366

Outside Platformers.

follower get > After that?

Get numbers(followers) > After that?

What are the dots connected to?

What have you already connected the dots to?

What did you connect the dots to?

^These have already been messaged in a separate catalog.

>>399

Ex?

philogeometric

>>400

Hasn't the critical thinking logic regarding outside platforms already been discussed outside of this catalog?

>>399

Q: 'If majority thinks XYZ - XYZ must be true'

Are numbers effective in making xyz?

Leaving a clear word for the reason for the follow-up reveals a lot, don't you think?

Is it possible that one of the reasons the enemy wants to take away people's time includes depriving them of words that clarify their thinking?

>>402

Of course, the numbers may reflect this if awareness is focused in the right direction.

But in this case, isn't it constructive to express a clear reason for the follow-up, not just the number?

Is there a possibility of eliminating false follow-ups and truly constructive reasons leading to clearly better follow?

Is clarifying the legitimacy of following this movement as an example constructive in expanding this movement?

>>403

Proof = Join or 404?

>>391

>Counter mode.

Counter logic.

What impact or chain of events does the question or countertheory create?

Is there any chance that the truth will come out?

Hence, attribute and directions important?

If you're going to do a 'Q', you might as well at least make a shape, right?

>>495

^Correction.

Consider the meaning and effect?

Easier said than done.

>>509

Are they doing a fire sale?

Sleepy.

Can't they see that it's really basically a boomerang?

Can't they see that contradictions create new contradictions?

Yall gay as fuuuuucccckkk.

Anyways here how to tell if your neon sign is a quality sign.

This board looks like a Best Buy Employee meeting. Toodaloo mothefuckers

NameFag

Yall gay as fuuuuucccckkk.

Anyways here how to tell if your neon sign is a quality sign.

>>643

HAHAHA

You guys aren't talking straight!

Just like what you did with QR!

I'm busy today!

Keep Digging for proof post that you keep spamming QR!

>>643

Is this a game where if you get a cool number, it's clear?

HAHAHA!!!

>>646

It's a little disappointing!

Repeat images identified as spam!

How biblical!

>>647

The Bible isn't a tool for willful blindness, is it?

>>648

It seems all they can do is rely on time stamps.

About the evidence for their legitimacy.

Instead of repeating the same image, did you prove its validity and validity?

Any other point of view?

So what!

How biblical!

No.

>>649

Looks like CBTS vs The Storm all over again!

What did they learn?

Miracles are only for me!

HAHAHA!

>>650

Repeated and repetitive theories!

They haven't learned?

They didn't read it in the first place?

>>651

So I still can only read Jim's name and use repeated images!

I'll keep posting anon next time and use the time stamp that stuck!

Once I have a timestamp I will spam it again with an image of it!

Oh my god!

>>652 edit.

So still they can only read Jim's name and use repeated images!

>>643

>>653

>>654

Oh, they don't want to let 'Q' & trip code, do they?

They mean they want to do Only 'Q'?

>>655

I mean, if the 'Q' was legitimate, it would be inevitable, right?

No need to spam and repeat images and call Jim names.

HAHAHA

They did it back, so they made a picture of this catalog page too!

Even though they were the ones who started it in the first place!

>>654

I think 'Q' said!

They call them names!

Names are what they attack!

They sometimes even use their name as a tool to victimize you!

They are 2D!

Oh my god!

Morning exercises.

>>658

Even if create an opportunity for name-calling, the content is the issue!

And if it is too bad, name calling is not an option!

But they seem to be using it just for name calling!

I'll name anon's post!

This is the problem.

If it's a post with a name, it certainly creates a risk of being called names, but…,

They name it without even saying their name!

>>660

They don't see the content or substance issue!

Only the name!

That's the problem.

It is the same with worship!

How biblical!

>>661

So now you've switched to anon style.

And use the timestamp, which you got with anon status, to 'Q'

>>662

Sure, this may be a safeguard, but then wouldn't it be more justifiable and reasonable to do it with a trip code?

>>663

No, I think are appealing to the legitimacy of the time stamp they got with they anon status.

That way it is easier to go from anon status to 'Q' status.

Based on that, the use of used trip codes from the past.

Maybe there is a possibility of sliding to a half chan.

>>664

I think they changed the trip code in the half chan.

Is this treason against 8kun?

>>665

I don't care what platform you use, but going out of your way to commit treason against 8kun here seems to have an agenda.

Well, but the original 'Q' also moved from 4chan to 8ch, and they may be trying the opposite pattern.

>>666

But there is no reason to do this now is there?

The real 'Q' says nothing about trip codes or about /pdc/ etc.

Perhaps this is a false prophecy event?

>>667

In the end, it may be a problem of who wants to be control and who wants to follow.

Maybe they want to obey because they don't want to do so when they can already prove it themselves, etc., or vice versa.

In the end, do they want to escape proof?

>>668

Sure, it's hard to build a catalog and maintain it.

So it would be very helpful to have a bakery, but I think it's not only important, but it's also important to have a personal free space.

Ship called a catalog.

That way they don't have to lament that they were erased.

But they did not do so and lamented.

If they hadn't archived it offline, they might never get their records back again.

They created that risk.

This is not a game.

Theories that are long overdue.

Rather, they don't understand that there is no absolute safety in this digital WORLD.

But, And I'm not just talking about the Only digital WORLD.

[Boiling Frogs]

I've left out the importance of proof and they don't seem to see that either

If have ears to hear, please listen?

HAHAHA

>>670 edit.

If have ears to hear, listen.

Biblical?

HAHAHA

>>669

Already /CM/ said the ultimate theory.

They can build they own ship of freedom.

Are they lamenting the fact that they can't maintain they ship?

I thought autism was good at playing alone?

Certainly it is important to unite, then just get together in QR.

While owning your own ship.

If you can produce a good piece on your own ship take it to QR.

And then just lament because you got screwed up?

Why can't continue?

Maybe fundamentally thinking differently.

But if have time to lament, wouldn't it be more constructive/effective to keep making proofs?

I've already demonstrated it!

HAHAHA

>>672

Now let's go make it!

See you soon!

>>673

Or do you want to continue?

What else would you ask?

Follow the numbers!

Or worship the numbers?

HAHAHA!

They do not mention this trip code(!!Hs1Jq13jV6) in the first place!

I questioned them, they couldn't answer!

They don't even mention the proof of /pdc/!

I'm just saying that everything was blocked!

So what kind of legitimate and valid proof would the real 'Q' give of oneself!

Just numbers?

>>675

The order of business would be to check this trip code, right?

If you can't confirm this, you may need to check with /CM/ as well.

What about past records?

Is all they want to do is slide on the outside platform after all?

>>675

Wow!

I got 17 on this!

This is the truth!

This level.

Time stamps are important!

HAHAHA.

>>677

Then what about this?

I feel that there are several types of symbolism.

I think these are related to blindness.

>>641

Yours started it, I am just responding.

Panic?

HAHAHA

>>679

I'm not on the QR committee, just supporting QR

Being a QR BO/BV must be very difficult.

I don't think you can simply say anything is OK because it is freedom.

What do you think you can do if you are free?

Do you think freedom does not come with responsibility?

Do you think freedom is freedom without responsibility?

Freedom to take away the freedom of others would not be freedom.

Did they consider true freedom or the best way?

But aren't you people just lamenting the fact that your contributions were not accepted?

Shouldn't they have continued to provide further proof?

Shouldn't have continued the dialogue?

If won't talk, why not keep adding more proof?

>>680

> Freedom to take away the freedom of others would not be freedom.

The image of an expanded rate of freedom and peace.

So what is true freedom?

Can have both freedom of speech and freedom of expression if catalog them?

So why should we complain about QR?

Are you lamenting because pointed out the lack of proof?(or not enough)

>>681

Why not just keep proving what is right or wrong?

Wouldn't that naturally reveal the truth?

And isn't it inevitable that there will be a counter or response during the process?

Or if there is a counter or response, doesn't that naturally bring closer to the truth?

>>682

And the conclusion, just need to focus on continuing to prove it.

And if that doesn't reflect well?

Just think of further moves.

This catalog itself is an example.

I respect the catalog(Just keep on proving)

I was just countering what they started.

>>680

Didn't QR BO tell them to spec /comms/ on their threads and studies?

Now, what's the reason for the complaint?

>>684

Maybe they can't even feel the joy of being able to post freely on 8kun.

frigidity.

>>685

They are unable to be moved by the miracles that are being given before them.

How biblical!

>>685

This also speaks to a constructive/effective space.

What made 'Q' choose this place?

Why did 'Q' move from half-channel to 8ch.

Why did 'Q' update trip code to '##'?

>>687

/pdc/ is still alive and well as a catalog.

What does this prove?

>>687

'#'Goodbye?

HAHAHA.

>>689

This is what they're doing, right?

>>687

The US is winning, so why bother going to an outside platform?

Is it still a slide?

>>691

Don't care which platform you use, but isn't sliding still treason?

There's a difference between a catalog expand and a slide.

I think.

>>692

Yes, so one of several questions in this issue.

>>693

All they had to do was just keep proving it.

All they do now is the same kind of thing as in this catalog.

Well, if they can pick up a good time stamp, they can post it again with graphics, right?

Ah, knew it, stopping they thinking just to see if it's fake or real.

What happens when disinformation comes out?

>>695 edit.

They only see fake or true.

>>696

As an example, about DJT being shot in the past, was that true or fake?

Either way, what can you make of that event?

What is the message?

What is best?

>>697

What can only find out from that event and act on it?

>>698

So they immediately start calling it DS or clown!

Oh, so sleepy.

>>699

I am only questioning and responding to what they have started!

Are they having a logical dialogue?

Do they have a clear explanation?

What's the problem?

What's wrong?

What is the solution?

What is the essence?

8kun/ch already gives us the opportunity for free speech/expression, doesn't it?

In the first place, isn't it possible that QR exists and that can freely create catalogs here?

Even if your own catalog is a failure, you can simply return to QR and get back to work.

Isn't it out of the question to try to undermine that?

Of course, there will be times when it is deemed not appropriate for QR and cannot be posted.

If that is the case, should ask them why, etc., and if they are still not convinced, can simply catalog them and prove their legitimacy and validity.

Well, now you have own catalog.

Congratulations.

Now you are even busier.

What do you have to prove?

ticktack

See, you are done.

These posts are not by a bot.

If I prove it, you are done with that catalog?

Oh dear.

How biblical.

They do not want access to much of the information here.

They are not logical.

Logic is important to this movement.

Among the catalogs gathered above, there is one that is trying to move to an outside platform.

They don't want to improve, they don't want to give up that catalog.

This catalog shining a light on it.

What will they do when these 8kun become maximally important?

>>709

And as I say, I am taking issue with them.

What about them?

>>706

Your way is no different from what happened a long time ago.

Are you repeating yourself because you haven't learned?

Or are you the same person?

By biblical, do you mean blind?

Is this a bot post?

IMHOOMAM

>>710

I think you only believe what you want to believe anyway, even if I show you!

>(You)

Or would you do something if you were shown!

>>712

Proof of the importance of 8kun/ch and QR.

>>710

It's over when you even expose the image of the catalog here and say it's a bot.

>>714

Rather, what impact will that Word they identify yourself with have?

Huh?

What is the spirit of the right cheek, then the left cheek?

Now you know why built this catalog, don't you?

We have long ago created a catalog without censorship or deletion.

HAHAHA

Rather, I've already explained to them that it would be beneficial for people to do their own cataloging.

(This is the result of learning 'Q'.)

So what is complaining about Jim and QR?

You mean retarded?

Is a Bot an animal that is blind or incapable of reason?

Biblical, right?

>>716

They could have created transparency without complaining to Jim and QR!

Hmm?

Then why did they make this move?

Slide?

attack？

>>717

What is the appropriate behavior or way to deal with an animal that is not rational?

I am taking counter action to what they have started.

>>716

If you're listening to the sound of my breathing, they know I'm not a bot, right?

But they spoke out against it.

By all means look into it, techs.

I am doing this because I have discovered an aggressive move against Jim and QR, who run this place.

>>733

I attempted dialogue and discussion but they did not respond.

Ultimately, the only criticism they had was of Jim&QR.

No discussion or dialogue about solutions or improvements.

Hence.

>>735

Or is it effective to destroy (slide) the space (QR) where the 'Q' post has been so far?

Can't just keep it up without destroying it?

If there are multiple topics, can't just post in each one and not risk being identified as off-topic?

And if it works for a topic, why not just share it?

This is time efficiency.

Above all, being able to post here on people own time in the best possible condition allows to use personal time to expand the space of free speech, don't think?

Isn't all they are doing is lamenting that their submission was not accepted?

Is this a plausible denial?

Or talking about efficiency or positive ideas?

>>736

Wouldn't it be rather nice to have more environment for 'Q' to drops?

Wouldn't an expanded environment of free speech encourage more people to join the movement?

Of course, there will be an increase in entropy here, but isn't this, 8kun/ch, also effective in clarifying the truth?

This is also why have a this place where can address issues such as entropy and deletion of catalog topics.

(Well, not really. can solve this problem by making oneself own catalog)

Is my hand constructive?

Is it effective?

I am hoping for a worldwide expansion of this 8kun/ch&QR.

Why did you erase your proofs!

Nothing really disappears.

Or did you make them invisible?

Do improved logs provide proof of learning and legitimacy?

Is it destruction of evidence?

What is transparency?

>>739

I have made many mistakes.

That is why I only tell the best I can do.

If you have erased your proof by yourself, it is to kill your own past.

It may be easy to avoid seeing yourself in the past.

But isn't there an opportunity for improvement because of past foolishness?

May never get it back.

But if stop trying to improve, don't think that would be the end of it?

All I want is the pursuit of truth, true freedom and peace.

continue.

WRWY

>>743

Is not accepting the fact of failure the same as not being able to handle the truth?

>>745

So what is failure?

When give up on improvement?

>>751

Does transparency mean that even the smallest mischief will be revealed?

>>740

This post has been submitted to other catalogs, but this me is not involved.

>>758

Or is this something you are currently doing?

Or is this a message to me?

>>760

Or is it an excuse to run away from facing yourself?

This is about oneself research.

I sent a message.

It will not be necessary to repeat the explanation.

>>762

This message also affects catalogs that may be related to (((they))) catalogs.

Don't they realize how strange it is to come all the way to a platform they don't like and complain about it?

A state of being so confused that you can't be objective about yourself?

Can they explain their justifications/reasonable reasons and motives?

Are light and clarity related?

Are darkness and blindness related?

Is this a play on words?

What did you communicate using that logic?

What would the directions and attributes point to?

You are right, No escape!

HAHAHA

>>775

If you develop a logic that only suits you, you will naturally receive counter logic and questions.

It may even come across dimensions.

>>776

It was as if words and thoughts were chasing.

>>778

Did they offer a solution before they complained?

Did they continue to articulate methods and further better ways?

Isn't the importance of transparency to reveal the truth, to expand awareness and understanding by increasing the resolution of things?

Of course, there are other aspects of transparency that are important, but above all, isn't it important that the parts that are invisible or intentionally made invisible be made clear?

So at what point do faces and names become important?

>>778

Let clarify why smiling?

Why do they keep trying so hard to make a point without answering the question they are running away from?

Why are they so desperate to evade the question and at the same time divert the conversation?

I find it very funny that they seem to be floundering because they can't answer the question.

Can they explain why they are having fun?

What are they happy about?

Do they want the collapse of 8kun/ch so badly?

Is the loss of free space so desirable?

Isn't it inevitable that questions will arise on matters that are unclear?

Wouldn't answering the question rather prove more legitimate?

So why do they avoid the question?

Is there something they do not want revealed?

They press questions and answers to others but do not answer questions to themselves.

>>785

No answer?

No response?

Because it would reveal they intentions?

If it had not been via vpn, it would have been dangerous.

I'm sure Anons know this, but please be careful when posting.

You guys want to make dogma to avoid accountability?

Do you really think you can get away with it?

>>794

Why do you think they don't give evidence right away?

Dance harder!

>>795

Are you so well bred that you've never felt the pain of having a lie revealed?

The world is watching, right?

Those words will come back to you just like that.

And God is surely watching.

Truly, God is merciful.

Do you play the victim when asked tough questions?

>>797

This is a good example.

If you think you can hide because you are anonymous, you are mistaken.

>>798 edit.

If they think they can hide because they are anonymous, they are mistaken.

>>797

At best you can play the victim, I'm especially busy today.

Can't they even see that they have also been proven to have evaded accountability?

Is evading responsibility the norm?

The harm that comes from not being able to face the truth?

>>806

Cognitive dissonance?

Now it's time to get to work.

Are you really that scared?

Talk about Q!

HAHAHA!

Have you even caught up on what my other jobs are?

I talk a lot about Q too!

>>1170

FIRE

.

>>1174

Why aren't they erased for not talking about things concerning Q?

Don't tell me this place has something to do with Q?

Is that what you mean?

Thanks!

But I will never forget being erased and van by you guys!

>>1172

break time.

Rational behavior toward a non-rational animal is constructive, but there is no need or reason to be rational.

Is it intentional that you don't delete posts that are slamming Jim and QR?

Huh?

What's the reason for the van and deletion?

Huh?

No 'Q'-related talk?

Don't they see that the pursuit of contradictions and questions against yourself has already arisen?

When will those contradictions become poison?

I would puke if I were you.

HAHAHA

Enjoy Freedom!!!

>>1258

It's not hard to understand why want to cry.

HAHAHA

>>1258

Basically, everything boomerangs,

That's me too.

The words you spit out come back.

>>1322

The world is watching?

HAHAHA

THIS IS NOT A GAME

Are they saying that they claim to want to gather followers now that they have the numbers?

It is no different for FAMEFAG.

Well, I hope you will get your followers to 8kun/ch, but are they really going to do it that way?

After all, they are hitting on QR and Jim.

>>1358

> FAMEFAG

In the end, it's a matter of follow-up points.

>>1360

They not talking about Q just bringing up the time and Q posts on the account?

The delta in the anonymous post? They claims that it is, and…,

Well, Newfag seems to have a good bite.

So?

[psych 101][echo-chamber][group think]

'If majority thinks XYZ - XYZ must be true' - Q

>>1362

and Coordinated.