>>216
Pluralistic/polyphyletic might be more correct than the expression "international".
It may have more entropy than "deepdigs"
This place is in a more intangible state than many of the QR boards currently visible.
Critical thinking and discussion are sometimes treated as the enemy.
or inevitably become opponents.
In other words, me consider that the increase in entropy will affect the original title and guidelines for that space.
In some cases, critical thinking can facilitate the expansion of thinking and provide an opportunity to generate new ideas.
I also think that there may be an opportunity to clarify the real problem/issues at hand.
In some cases, however, this could potentially lead to the erasure of critical thinking submissions.
An example is that if you start discussing math in a class room where you are teaching a history class, it may interfere with the history class.
Of course, this metaphor is so far off-topic that it would be more efficient to have separate classrooms, but if the subjects were closer, the story would be different.
What may be offensive to others on that subject may be very good to others.
It could also be used to elucidate issues such as the above.
There are also patterns that do not go as far as clarifying the problem or intentionally behave in a way that does not allow the problem to be clarified.
The importance of the issue depends on individual views, and there is no end to the number of problem/issues that can be raised, but I think it is very important to solve the problem.
This is because there are some conditions and situations that are perfectly acceptable.
I guess it is like that.
The above is just an example, this board can be used for other purposes as well, but that depends on the situation.
Well, anyway, it might be easier to understand that the problems that come up in expanding freedom of speech and freedom of expression are swallowed up here.
or absorption.
Finally.
Thanks for posting this here.