>>1695 continue.
> I'll give you a response after this one day.
If define being alive as just having a beating heart, that's a very simple example, but…
Can say truly living by remaining Monopoly pawns, by remaining blind (including to selves) to the problems and 'deliberately caused injustices' that pervade our world?
Since you're allowed to pretend to be the Savior (Christ), I'd love to see what ideas you come up with to make the world a better place.
And more.
Otherwise, you'll either become a false prophet yourself, as you call them, or end up being nailed to the cross again.
(It seems that some saviors come back to life even after dying)
Since participating in this movement, I have seen many people who call themselves Jesus Christ or some sort of savior.
You're not the first time.
The problem with these things is not only dogmas and blindness, but also creates a state that forms a cult.
Furthermore, this also leads to group sinks.
For another example, if you are a say join of the 'Q' movement, but your actions contradict what 'Q' posts, doesn't that amount to disparaging the movement?
I do not tolerate dogmatic, blind behavior, and I also consider it a problem to implicitly tolerate problems despite discovering these problems.
I think that 'Q' has taken issue with dogma and blind behavior in the past.
I agree with 'Q's' past points,
and I have not seen any drop where 'Q' corrects its views on these issues.
But if you still join 'Q', I think you'll need to provide a justification(accountability) for your dogma and blinding others.
I am also join this movement, so if I do not object to these issues when I discover them, I think that it will lead to delays in this movement.
Is it constructive to blind others using dogmas and group sinks?
Or is it correct?
I think it's fine to identify yourself with some kind of savior if you like, but I think it comes with a weight and responsibility.
For example, consider the perspective of another Christian.
Will there be accountability?
If your actions are justified, there is no reason or need to flee.
It's not about 'signs'.
And that is inevitable, and conversely, words based on critical thinking can also lead to improvement.
As mentioned above, this post is a counter to your move.
And, I am writing this post with consideration not only for improvements to the problems that have already occurred, but also for what may happen in the future.
Also, I don't want people like you to be silenced.
Even if your savior story doesn't work, I think that reexamining the problem, improving it, and creating good ideas for the world can be very constructive for the world.
^This is for those who have been killed by their own stories.
^ >>>/qresearch/23336593 quote(ex)
Since joining the 'Q' movement, I have seen many mysterious beings.
((())) said, "It is we who are manipulating you.
We are in communication with the universe and know everything you are doing, and therefore you are being manipulated by me."
As we were watching a video related to this movement together, ((())) said, "Look, I can see JFK's spirit body here, and this is a video sending me a message specially for me."
((())) said, "I am a messenger from God, so please follow me.
And please like and retweet me."
I think, if you are controlling me, why don't you do something yourself?
So, if the theory of alien control from space is valid,
those who commit heinous crimes today are victims and, in some cases, should be exonerated?
They would say, "It wasn't intentional," or "My consciousness was being manipulated."
Certainly, even those who say such nonsense would be prosecuted legally today.
Would cases change if the theory of alien control from space were valid?
Are there any ideas that create misunderstandings?
The reason they fear individual ideas is because they will lose control?
In other words, because their own (((something))) will collapse?
Is being able to control chance proof that you are controlling others?
So what? (Lick your feet?)
If you have time to pretend to control someone, wouldn't it be more important to build freedom and peace as soon as possible?
Or perhaps researching/pursuing freedom and peace, etc. So let me ask you, with such foresight, why didn't you do more earlier?
Would you have proposed any other methods?
Or put any other methods into practice?
How many unnecessary sacrifices were there?
Is God's will the only excuse for needless pain and sacrifice?
What a convenient way to use God's name.