>>330331
Okay, never mind, cancelling this.
>>>/v/12130500
>I don't see any reason to make a video about gamification, and honestly I don't think you have any particular understanding of it. What you produced is basically sub-Extra Credits style stuff where it seems really shallow and misleading to people more familiar with the subject. The inexplicable preoccupation with gamification by some pro-GG people has never really made sense.
>>>/v/12130621
>Actually, yes, I do have to agree with you on not knowing why GG people are so motivated to take down Gamification. Actually looking up articles on it, numerous people are already coming out and saying…
>It doesn't work!
>So, then, what is it that we're fighting when it comes to gamification? Is it edutainment? If that is the case, why write an episode on it when supporting games that do it right (Or even making your own) would do just as well to fix it?
>>>/v/12130694
>>>12130621
>It works in a few limited areas, but yeah it obviously didn't live up to all the hype from when it was a fad.
>>>12130641
>That's not gamification, you can't gamify games. Gamification is introducing game elements to non-games, like cheevos and points. The closest thing to gamification of games is manipulative phone games and social media games that try to gamify external acts like "shill this shit to all your friends for an in-game reward".
>The SJW Mario fangame that's a parody of (and similar games) are propaganda and the author and their supporters signaling about their politics. It's no different than shitty propaganda movies or books that are typically low-quality but get boosted up, like Crash winning an Oscar. It isn't about gameplay elements, and indeed many of them are barely games.