No.422 [Last50 Posts]
Post ITT every time you visit /monarchy/, so that we can generate more activity on this board.
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.423
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.424
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.427
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.429
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.431
Bhutan physically removes communists.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.433
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.437
Waiting for the day that the Grand Duke regains more of his powers than just promulgation.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.438
Friendly reminder that absolute monarchy is the system currently in place in Heaven.
If it works for our Lord and Savior, we're blessed to have it.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.441
First Ron Paul and the libertarians meme'd themselves into existence.
Now it's Trump.
Maybe eventually people will get around to the monarchists…
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.443
>>438
many burgers will shout
> Give me liberty or give me death
before Christ when they realize he's a monarch.
Anyways the question is what is the difference between monarchy and absolute monarchy? The ratio of power between the King and the aristocracy?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.444
>Anyways the question is what is the difference between monarchy and absolute monarchy? The ratio of power between the King and the aristocracy?
The degree of separation of powers between the monarch and other branches of government.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.462
>>441
Trump's victory has finally gotten more of the liberal crowd to question the validity of democracy. Hopefully some good will come out of it.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.484
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.485
>>462
Neoliberals are better than communists
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.491
Why does anyone want to become a monarch? The crown is just way too heavy.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.492
>Writing /minarchy/ instead of /monarchy/
This is it. I'm going to transmute into a Libertarian.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.493
>>443
I think there is a book called "The Myth of Absolutism" that argues that Absolute monarchies were actually less authoritarian than we often presume.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.494
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.495
>>493
Well, if you look at regional autonomy and ethnolinguistic decentralization in France, there's a clear and unquestionable loss of freedom in the transition from absolutism to republicanism. The Ancien Régime's internal borders followed ancient regional divisions and often allowed local political institutions to exist; for instance, the Basques had considerable fiscal and legislative autonomy. Then came the revolutionaries and flattened all these distinct institutions that developed organically over time, replacing them with a system entirely centralized in Paris. pic related: there was even a proposal to have square internal borders to definitively wipe away regional loyalties. The division adopted in its place (the departments that exist to this day) respected geography a bit more, but followed the same principle and does not accept regional identities. And the Basques had their autonomy stripped away in the name of "equality and fraternity".
Similarly, France's linguistic diversity declined only after republicans enforced standard Parisian French and cracked down on the use of regional languages in schools (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vergonha).
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.496
>>495
This is kind of why I'm starting to think that nationalism and monarchism are wholly incompatible with one another and why I really dislike some of ethnocentric neo-reactionaries trying to join the monarchist camp as if it's the same as fascism.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.497
>>438
One still has to refute the argument presented that only God can be king.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.498
How many people are active here? Is it worth getting into this board?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.499
>>498
/monarchy/ regular reporting.
Unfortunately, I don't think there's a lot of people on this board. It's more of a once a day/week kind of board.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.500
>>498
I've started to lurk now
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.501
>>498
I try posting a few times a week these days.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.516
Am I the only guy on the board who appreciates constitutional monarchies over absolute ones?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.519
>>516
I think it depends on context. Some societies may be fine with a constitutional monarchy or a more ceremonial monarchy. Some societies may need an absolute monarchy because the nature of the society demands it.
I think the problem is when you operate under the assumption that "we need a constitutional monarchy because (insert Enlightenment spook here)"
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.522
>>519
Holy shit, that was a fast response.
For one, I feel like a constitutional monarchy really shouldn't be that big of a stretch. Because for example, in the U.S. you have a Supreme Court justice who's unelected and has a lifetime appointment. I don't know, that doesn't sound too far removed from a monarch to me. So the idea that you just swap the justice and executive branches, and suddenly it's backwards and regressive and repressive? It just doesn't make much sense to me.
Secondly, it feels like people really understand the points of the checks and balances in a government when you have a monarch. Particularly much more so than when populism rules the day.
Thirdly, it really doesn't feel that different from older feudalistic monarchies Only instead of the ancien regime of the aristocrats, monarchs, and the Church keeping each other in check in a rather loose, culturally dependent fashion; you instead have it just explicitly written on paper.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.523
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.526
>>522
>Thirdly, it really doesn't feel that different from older feudalistic monarchies Only instead of the ancien regime of the aristocrats, monarchs, and the Church keeping each other in check in a rather loose, culturally dependent fashion; you instead have it just explicitly written on paper.
That makes sense. Again, I'm not really anti-constitutionalism or pro-absolutism.
For me the issue is a matter of justice towards the monarch and his rights, which must be respected so that everyone's rights can be respected. When the monarch's rights are undermined under false pretenses, than it opens the door for everyone's rights to be undermined., especially when concerning property and sovereign authority. My feeling is that constitutionalism, if it is desirable, should emerge naturally as a result of the king recognizing the self-sufficiency of his subjects that he chooses to take a hands off approach and this eventually becomes the tradition of his successors. The problem I think is when you have a bunch of people know they'd get their heads cut off for trying to destroy the monarchy and use clever and subversive tactics to undermine the monarch in the name of things like "liberty" and "human rights" when they're just looking out for themselves and trying to find a way to tie the monarchy's hands
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.533
>>526
>The problem I think is when you have a bunch of people know they'd get their heads cut off for trying to destroy the monarchy and use clever and subversive tactics to undermine the monarch in the name of things like "liberty" and "human rights" when they're just looking out for themselves and trying to find a way to tie the monarchy's hands
If Yuri Bezmenov has taught me anything, it's that those subversive types are a problem regardless of the government type.
>>523
Sup?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.537
>>533
The point is I think that the problem with constitutionalism has been that the people who advocated for it were mostly just looking to imprison the monarch for their own ends. While that was always a problem with corrupt viziers and officials manipulating ignorant, naive or hapless kings, because the king still formally was the sole ruler, he could easily throw anyone he suspected the slightest bit of corruption in the dungeon and wasn't obligated to justify himself to the people before he did it. But with constitutionalism, the king was reduced from the sole de facto owner of the kingdom, a personal leader of a personal estate, to just the head of state of a country that was owned by "the people" or "the nation" not himself, and who could be held accountable by the state and its ruling parties for not abiding by the constitution which was mostly drafted by people who had little taste for kingship at all, having been largely influenced by anti-monarchical ideas that had come out of the Enlightenment.
The idea of constitutionalism as a way of the king writing a contract, guaranteeing his people certain rights before God which will also be binding on his successors is not really a problem. It's constitutionalism that is a result of a group of people of less than pure heart or faith grabbing the monarch's hand and forcing him to basically sign a piece of paper that relinquishes his rights and turns the monarchy into mere pageantry
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.542
>>537
I don't know, the idea of plutocrats gradually morphing a system of government into a nest of iron triangles that satisfy their whims seems to me to be something that happens to nearly every government, not just constitutional ones.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.544
>Suddenly a flurry of posts late Friday continuing into Saturday on /monarchy/
Well, it's confirmed, /monarch/ists have jobs irl.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.548
What's the relationship between monarchism and religion? Not only does nearly every powerful monarch in the ruler have a population with a strong homogeneous religious disposition. Bhutan is nearly completely Buddhist, Saudi Arabia Muslim, historically you have the HRE dominion, ancien regime, even today the emperor of Japan as the head of Shintoism and Queen Elizabeth at the head of the Anglican church. Why is religion so important to monarchy?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.549
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.552
>>548
I think it's cause nearly all religion, if not every religion, has always seen the heavens as a monarchy. The terrestrial monarchy is merely a shadow of the heavenly monarchy. And from the point of view of pure reason, it is difficult to justify any one man or family's authority over everyone else except through some kind of religious worldview where God or the gods favor them for their own reasons which no one except one of equal or higher rank (a fellow royal, noble or saint) is allowed to question.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.905
>>497
He is the king of kings. Nonetheless, we need a living leader serving God, to unite the people in working for a common goal, and not divided in tribal warfare. A multinational empire, instead of international "democracies".
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1097
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
What are you /monarchists/ doing this weekend?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1099
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>1097
Not much really. Just trying to come up with ways to get more posters on this board without it suffering a reduction in quality.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1100
>>1099
It's like a Thucydidean Trap. You want a wall. How do you finance a wall? Well, you need ships to trade or plunder to finance a wall. How do you get ships? Well, in order to build them you need security and a wall. So, you want a wall–
You want more quality OC. OC requires quality posters. How do you keep quality posters? By having more quality OC. So, you want more quality OC–
Just advertising for more users won't get you anything if there's nothing to keep them to stay. Maybe a better plan would be for us to become better people and posters, so that way we can gradually get better
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1101
>tfw no Vic2-playing monarchist gf
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1102
>>496
I'm in the same boat with you. I'm over here from /pol/ originally, but as I've matured ideologically I've started to think that racial nationalism is incompatible with Christianity, with monarchy, and heck, with the very nature of human society. Even the Duginist idea of a "pan-racial" diverse society spread out over huge geography under a single imperial head seems preferable to tiny republican ethnostates.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1103
>>1102
> I've started to think that racial nationalism is incompatible with Christianity, with monarchy, and heck, with the very nature of human society.
This is interesting. Continue, please.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1104
>>1101
>monarchist girls
are they even real?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1109
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1111
>>1103
"Ethnonationalism" as it is known today is fundamentally a liberal idea. The liberal revolutions of the 19th century were founded on an anti-imperial kind of republicanism; they wanted to establish ethnically-homogenous republican bureaucracies in direct opposition to the central monarchs and emperors who ruled over heterogeneous states. Best example would be the Austrian Empire, which constantly had to deal with nationalist sentiments from Croats, Czechs, Germans, and others.
Even modern-day ethnic nationalism is usually republican in nature. The nature of the traditional, Christian state is for a king, anointed by God, to rule over a wide swathe of land that he is charged by God to rule, while individual homogeneous communities have some degree of local autonomy. Ethnic nationalism is really the opposite; it denies the authority of the emperor or monarch, but also denies the local autonomy and chooses to centralize authority in a bourgeois-democratic republic.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1112
>>1109
she is a monarch not monarchist
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1118
>>1104
>are they even real?
Why not?
I'd be satisfied with a paleolibertarian or an-cap one, though.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1119
Anyone else here? Report in, faggots.
It goes without saying that the King is here…
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
Post last edited at
No.1120
>>1119
I come here every day
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1123
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1125
>>1119
Aye, visit every day.
We really should take the "post in here every day" command seriously.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1126
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1134
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Hello off-topic thread. How was your week? How y'all doing?
I got off work today and I kind of feel like I got what I want out of life, and now I'm just waiting for death to come by already. This is all getting rather boring.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1135
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1136
>>1134
Doin' alright, all things considered. Have a bump.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1137
I stole this from elsewhere, I thought /monarchy/ might like it:
>One of the reasons why an aristocratic class has always been vital to Western society.
>You need a group of people who aren't influenced by the bottom of Maslow's Pyramid by wealth or by heritage because it helps you make superior big picture decisions. The loyalty is to the future generations, not merely the presently existing.
>That is why the House of Lords exists. Today the only people who appear to still understand this are the reactionaries, a tiny number of monarchists, the Royals, and the descendants of the original aristocrats.
>The truth is that you could close the Parliament tomorrow and nothing would change. The same is true of Congress. These organizations produce about as much positive effect as a random number generator.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1139
Found this, thought it might interest you guys: http://edwardfeser.blogspot.de/2017/10/liberty-equality-fraternity.html
As a libertarian myself, I don't know how much of it I will adopt for my own philosophy, but I will certainly consider it. I already moved away from the idea of purely negative freedom. Still, negative freedom beats positive freedom, hands down. It doesn't take more idiotic than claiming
>>1137
>The truth is that you could close the Parliament tomorrow and nothing would change. The same is true of Congress. These organizations produce about as much positive effect as a random number generator.
Actually, a lot would change, but for the better, and in the longterm. There is absolutely no need to have ten thousand laws in place. I don't mean paragraphs; laws. As in, fucking books filled with hundreds of paragraphs or articles. Without Congress or Parliament, at least this number would stay constant instead of rising. Add to that that modern legislators, despite all being trained lawyers, apparently have no idea how to craft a law. Modern laws are inconsistent, unclear, way too complex, and too detailed. Legislators seem to forget that their job is to make abstract rules, but applying them to concrete cases is the jobs of judicative and executive.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1143
Monarchism is kind of the only thing that guaranteed freedom at the individual level, as you had the thing that it was hard for the king and his workers to administer everything in the kingdom. I fear that with modern communication devices local autonomy has been killed for good, and that with so many people so concentrated administering everything is easy, as you do not have to have everyone else working.
In essence, freedom is kind of a thing that comes with the absence of electricity or fast communication devices, with mass produced communication being even worse. Check the Five Eyes and NSA scandals for a confirmation.
I fear that it's not a thing of political power and stuff, though I do favor monarchism in that regard, but that it's a thing of primitivism vs. modernism. Technology has made us miserable.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1184
How can we leave the next generation in a better state than other generations have done?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1186
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1225
Lots of recent posts, glad to see that this board isn't dead. I consider myself closer to an anarchist than a monarchist but I like to entertain all schools of thought and you guys seem alright. Now if only /liberty/ wasn't dead.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1226
>>1225
/liberty/ hasn't been the same since Orthobros confession. We also lost a bunch of other regulars. At least Formal Logic Man is still posting, that is nice.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1227
>>1226
Oh man, I forgot about that.
You keep your internet life and real life fucking separate. Is that that hard?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1230
>>1184
>caring about future generations
cuck
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1243
>>1226
>Orthobros confession
Wuzzat?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1247
>>1243
Some Christ-flag-faggot who was sort of well-known in /liberty/ posted his whole sordid life story in full cringe detail.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1406
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1407
>>422
Looking for a Papal Monarchy, didn't find one yet. Please help creating a great kingdom !
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1408
>>494
Didn't his soccer playing son deny inheriting the
KANGDOM
and decided to still play sportsball?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1471
The monarchy must be absolute in order to be effective and quick.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1473
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1503
>>1471
I think it's a given that when we talk about the benefits of monarchy on this board we're talking about real monarchies with ruling monarchs and not crowned republics.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1505
>>1503
There's also the early medieval monarchies, before absolutism came along. They're further removed from republics and democracies.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1508
are most people on this board former /Hoppelibertarians/ ?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1510
>>1503
Speak for yourself. I support my Duke.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1511
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1516
>>1511
I kinda hope it happens, the Saudis are a bunch of pigdogs. Only problem - and it's a big one - is who's going to follow in their footsteps.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1526
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1565
>>1508
I am one, but I have a soft spot for monarchies.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1566
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1649
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1650
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1651
Despite being fairly young and quite anti-establishment, it always seems to surprise people that I am in support of the British Monarchy. While I don't directly like many of the individuals within the family, the sheer history and status of the Monarchy is worth holding onto. If we were to get rid of it, we would be cutting a distinct link to our past and character as a nation.
I just wish the royal family themselves would realise this and stop allowing politicians, corporations and jews to corrupt and distort what it means to be British.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1656
>>1651
After they abandoned their German heritage, their name, and let the Romanovs get slaughtered in Russia, I am not gently disposed to them. They're not incapable of reedeming their house, but I don't see them trying. Such a pity.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1657
>>1656
I am now imagining the British crown as some sort of political sleeper agent. Waiting quietly until they can retake the reigns of government.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1658
>>1657
I really hope this is the case. I do like to LARP that the Queen is actually pulling a lot more strings behind the scenes.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1659
>>1651
Brtitish Monarchy is kept around as a cruel joke by the jews
>oy vey goyim, look at the bastard prince racemixing with a >woman older than him
you should do it too
>goyim, look at how weak and pathetic they are, that's all monarchs btw.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1660
>>1659
That said, i hope they uncuck themselves, or cease to exist to pave the way to actual monarchies.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1663
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1664
>>1663
Kinda alive. We're still growing.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1665
>>1104
Depends on how well they were informed. Some of the most powerful women in the west happened in monarchy.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1666
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1670
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1673
>>1663
There's maybe a handful of posts made each passing day.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1682
>>1663
I've actually been dead since the start of this year. I'm only now just starting to get well enough to use a computer again.
I would really like to start this year over again.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1898
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1914
Hey, visiting from /pol/.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1919
>>1904
>Gotta have a limiting document to protect the prole from an abusive king or aristocrat. Bad apples in every bunch.
But who is going to protect this document from reality? And who is going to protect the prole from the document debiliting his protector?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1921
I'm just fulfilling my posting requirement.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1924
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>1919
>And who is going to protect the prole from the document debilitating his protector?
Well, historically speaking, Kings named Charles.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1948
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1953
How compatible is Ancapism to monarchy? From what I can gather, the king relies on the people for power (a la if no one acknowledges the king's power, he has no power). It is an voluntary exchange; the people are lead and protected and the king leads and protects for money and power. Bad kings can and are replaced by the people.
Inform me if I'm wrong.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1954
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1955
>>1953
A common belief is that Kings didn't have the power to make laws at all, but they simply governed according to the traditional laws of the land. If so then it's fully compatible with the libertarian conception of anarchy.
I do like the idea of monarchy as simply a kind of regional 'religion' where everyone is loyal to the monarch without the need for any compulsion. It is definitely a kind of purified monarchy. However I don't know if it would really work.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1956
>>1954
>what is anarcho-monarchism
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1957
>>1924
I really hope Prince Charles predeceases his mother. All the best British monarchs were named Charles and I get the feeling he just wouldn’t live up to his regnal name.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1962
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>1957
The current Prince Charles does leave something to be desired.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1964
>>1957
Is there any reason not to name your first son Charles?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1967
>>1964
You give your son your own name.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1982
>Roman Catholic
>threatened to veto an act that would have legalized abortion in Liechtenstein
>warm to the idea of divine rule
>Father is the Prince, who is known to be a libertarian nationalist
>he will likely be the Prince in the next 10 years
>he married the eldest niece of Franz, Duke of Bavaria
>his wilfe will likely be the heir to the Stuart throne in the next 10 years
>22 year old son that would inherit both thrones
This might be the last chance to save monarchy. It is no secret that the left in Britain wants to get rid of the Monarchy, which would be a huge loss. If we can unite all of these factions together we can implement an absolute/libertarian Roman Catholic monarchy in Britain. If we can unite the next generation of Liechtenstein citizens, monarchist Brits, Catholic brits, and sympathetic catholic, libertarian or monarchist Europeans and Americans. If we went far enough we could possibly make Liechtenstein, the United Kingdom, and the rest of the Anglosphere, including the United States, all under the same monarchy. I’m 19 and I️ believe that my generation and the generation born after me will be the last chance to save monarchism as well as all that is going on in Europe and America to save our countries. If we could somehow unite all of these groups together under one banner we can save western civilization.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1983
>>1982
Liechtenstein is a village m8. You can easily walk from one end to the other before having breakfast. Britain becoming a Catholic monarchy? Does Catholicism really need another cucked inner enemy? Do we really need another Belgium? I am all pro Liechtenstein though, pretty based probably only second to Habsburg. You do not need to 'save' monarchism btw because monarchy is natural. As soon as all monarchies die they will reemerge after SHTF and the race war against the jews
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1984
>>1953
>Bad kings can and are replaced by the people.
You are wrong.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.1998
>>1984
Well, obviously not peacefully anyway.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2023
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
What are /monarchy/'s thoughts on The Dismissal? Did Kerr do nothing wrong?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2024
>>2023
I wanna hear Mr. Constitutional Monarchist's thoughts on this.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2027
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2028
>>2027
I love how England is a jew
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2029
>>2027
The real losers in this picture are the Ottomans.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2033
>>2027
This image is from a long bygone era when no one knew what levels of treason Italians are capable of.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2037
sup, fams
Restoration of the Brazilian Empire WHEN?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2039
>>2037
As the flag says, "Pedro II: Best Monarch."
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2067
Random questions:
- How did the HRE function? Can someone give me a rundown on the basic civics structure of their government? (is Luxembourg technically still part of the HRE?)
- Kings ruled by divine right, so wtf happened when they declared war on the Papal states? How the hell does that go down when your army is heavily religious and you tell them, "We're going to fight the Pope." ???
- What differentiated Ivan the Terrible who could impale people's heads on stick, and some German King who had to hear some yeoman yell at him that he would take him to court for stepping on his lawn or whatever?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2071
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2081
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2083
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2086
>>2067
>- How did the HRE function?
The Holy Roman empire lasted for a thousand years making it one of the longest existing governments in history. The early empire under Charlemagne had little to do with Otto's tribal union, and even less with all that happened after the Golden Bull. If you can be more specific I could try.
>(is Luxembourg technically still part of the HRE?)
Luxembourg is a fraction state of the former Kingdom of the Netherlands, that consisted mostly of what today is Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg. It was created as the successor of the Batavian republic(the name of Napoleons client state in the Netherlands) after the Congress of Vienna in 1815. The Netherlands became independent of the HRE in 1648. So no.
>- Kings ruled by divine right, so wtf happened when they declared war on the Papal states? How the hell does that go down when your army is heavily religious and you tell them, "We're going to fight the Pope." ???
Divine right is mostly a renaissance concept. Medieval ideas about rightful rule were more closely related to something called 'Königsheil' in German. The ruling noble family is a personification of the state, states whose rulers fall from the grace of God will soon fall into decay (until a new line emerges). I am sure you have watched Lion King. When the evil, effete brother of the rightful king murdered his brother and took over his throne the whole theme of the film changed, the Pride lands wither and themselves reject the false king. This is basically the medieval concept of rule. (And not by chance, Lion King is based of Hamlet of course)
Now the pope is on the one hand an extraordinary bishop, and on the other hand, like many medieval bishops, also a prince and ruler. His domain was not holy, nor was he (unlike his office), so it was possible to be at war with the Pope or some archbishop while still being Catholic and believing in all the doctrine. Much like now, where you do not have to like and endorse every statement made by certain popes, but must respect the sanctity of their office and their authority in matters of doctrine.
>- What differentiated Ivan the Terrible who could impale people's heads on stick, and some German King who had to hear some yeoman yell at him that he would take him to court for stepping on his lawn or whatever?
Different law systems. The princes in the Rus were basically despotic rulers that would unite all the power of the state in their person. German princes (and the emperor) on the other hand were bound by imperial law made by the Reichstag and common law. Since 1663 the Reichstag was a permanent institution situated in Nuremberg and called the Eternal Reichstag, in anything but name the first Supreme Court. Although it worked completely differently than what we'd today understand as a supreme court.
>>2081
It succeeded in achieving its goals for the most part for a thousand years. Defended the independence of its members and the rule of imperial law. It was of course never intended to be some megalomaniac centralist state, but it was probably the only state where a knight could defend his rights against an emperor.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2087
>>2086
> situated in Nuremberg
*Nuremberg was traditionally an important city of the Reich and held the Reichstag several times, but the Eternal Reichstag was held in Regensburg of course.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2089
I think we should link out sister boards /liberty/, nu-/pol/, /soyboys/ and /r9k/
shitpost somewhere else, famalam.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
Post last edited at
No.2211
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2214
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2218
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2223
>>2211
Reminder that this picture is the literal proof that Frederic II was a faggot according to (((historians)))
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2243
Reminder that democracy is NOT a natural evolution of monarchy. Democracy has existed since at least antiquity, and was phased out virtually everywhere in favour of monarchy, including the Roman Empire
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2244
>>2223
Well, he was a faggot. History is written by the winners and sometimes, regrettably, these winners happen to be protestants.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2272
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2276
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2278
>>2223
(((historians))) like to claim that Tesla and Newton were faggots because they were virgins.
>>2272
>Napoleon.
FALSE PRETENDER GET OUT REEEEEEEEEEE
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2305
Have you guys ever met with any of your country's royalty, be it from a dethroned or currently reigning family?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2307
>>2278
i hear that fags value virginity pretty high after all ufufufu
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2319
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2342
I have been lurking on here for a few days, it is interesting to read all of the posts you have been making. I haven't read it all yet, and I am enjoying reading through your threads. Maybe I don't agree with everyone but the level of discussion here is higher than I have seen it on any other board on the site, so I can feel confident that every post is worth reading and considering.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2688
>Long weekend
>Suddenly a bunch of new posts and threads on /monarchy/
Huh. Is this the adult board where everyone who posts is a functional human being and has a job?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2692
>>2688
>/monarchy/ is filled with normalfag redditors
Nothing surprising
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2693
The Queen is a cunt & jew
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2694
>>2693
Hey now!
She's not Jewish.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2695
Any of you guys interested in a Monarchist discord server?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2696
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2699
Who is best candidate for sovereign absolute monarch of European Union that answers only to the God and even then only on Sundays?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2717
>>2699
Uh. The Pope?
Was this a rhetorical question?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2718
>>2699
>European Union
No… Scrap it. No EU. The EU is no friend of sovereignty.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2750
>>2717
Theocrats aren't Monarchs, and the (((EUSSR))) is pure cancer. Burn that shit to the ground and give it to a real monarch like pic related
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.2983
If we want a unified Europe, I say bring back imperial dynasties. Although a political impossibility today, it might start somewhere.
Maybe a confederation of kingdoms is acceptable too.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.3009
>>2983
>Maybe a confederation of kingdoms is acceptable too.
The old German kingdoms used to have customs unions, didn't they?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.3078
>>2983
Europe is not homogenous. Every language deserves It's own state.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.3178
HookTube embed. Click on thumbnail to play.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.3180
HookTube embed. Click on thumbnail to play.
Has anyone seen "Grace of Monaco"?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.3181
>>3009
Lol. Most kingdoms were themselves not even a customs union
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.3190
Anybody seen this?
>>>/pol/11846064
Wat think?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.3191
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.3194
>>3191
Some guy trying to create a monarchy political party. I didn't cap it and dude had no contact info.
He had a couple PDF's with position papers.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.3201
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4036
Hello. I am from /fascist/, and after browsing this board for several hours I am very intrigued. It seems that monarchy is essentially the same as fascism (in its base form) except that it has much more potential for longevity.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4038
They have the same platitude towards authority and the state. There are minor differences. As for fascism, it arises with the rise of republican power and the downfall of monarchical authority. The republican individualist mentality sought to dismantle the nation as invaluable. The fascist resolve was to take the vigor of monarchy and combine it with the fraternity of nationalism. As for fascism and monarchy, certain academics label Action Française as proto-fascist. Tbh, they label a lot of monarchists as proto-fascist.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4043
>>4036
Fascism is an inherently reactionary ideology to the failures of democracy, the former cannot exist without the implementation of the latter. Ultimately, it tries to capture monarchical aesthetic and some of its superficial qualities, but without correctly identifying those fundamental aspects of monarchy which makes it functional. Fascism's track record of instability doesn't lend it many favors, either.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4081
HookTube embed. Click on thumbnail to play.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4111
>>4043
If fascism is agianst democracy and trying to get rid of it, wouldn't that make it revolutionary and not reactionary?
Case in point: Hitler's Germany, trying to form a different government that is different from the Weimar Republic before it. Wouldn't a reactionary want to presserve that republic or go back to the Kaiserreich?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4114
>>4111
>If fascism is agianst [sic] democracy and trying to get rid of it, wouldn't that make it revolutionary and not reactionary?
Perhaps you could say that, but at that point you're just arguing semantics. Fascism is reactionary in the sense that it is a reaction to the problems created by democracy and internationalism; fascist states and fascist thoughts are only ever birthed within democracies. The term "revolutionary" could in some cases include fascism, but that's a far more generalized term, and sends very different connotations. It's certainly not a label I'd give to either Hitler or Mussolini, as both were democratically elected, not placed on the seat of power through revolution.
>Wouldn't a reactionary want to presserve that republic
You could say that, but I'm talking about the movement as a whole in a more macro sense, not whether individual people are acting or reacting. Because fascism cannot exist without the trappings of democracy is why I call it reactionary.
>go back to the Kaiserreich?
That would be a traditionalist.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4117
>>4114
>not placed on the seat of power through revolution.
Thats a good point, those labels are making more sense to me now from that.
Thank you for clearing that up for me.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.4122
>>4081
disculpe, no entiendo :(
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5842
>>1100
Are you an actual homosexual? I'm asking for a friend.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5843
>>1134
I think that you completely failed your life. Please look into it for your own good.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5847
Based monarchist groyper reporting in for duty!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5850
>What do monarchists in the U.S. do?!???!?!??
Fuck that, what do monarchists in the U.K. do?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5854
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5964
>>3178
>normalfaggot A E S T H E T I C S cancer
I would have thought the aristocracy would know better.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5965
Not entirely accurate, I think the USA has one or two of saints now, but basically pic related.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5970
>>5964
>I would have thought the aristocracy would know better
You would be surprised how much they don't.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6061
There's a monarchy v democracy debate going on in >>>/liberty/96531 .
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6062
>>5965
None of the US saints have ever been heads of state.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6063
>>6061
>debate
All you need to do is point out how big of a clownshow Rome and Athens were compared to the Incas, Persians, Mycenaean Greeks, Egyptians.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6079
>>422
lol enjoy your wars of succession LARPers
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6081
>>6079
Succession Wars are always far less deadly than the total wars that democracy brings everywhere it goes.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6087
https://archive.is/IWRo7
The Queen is pro-Brexit?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6105
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6106
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6193
>>6079
I will, those are the best knowing how much of a nightmare they are to scholars
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6194
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6196
>>6106
4chan is strong in the usa, it entered into politics for good
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6352
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6356
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6359
If you guys could install a king in any of the more powerful democratic nations, who would you pick? Should countries like Canada and the USA have their own kings or should they submit to British rule again?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6366
>>6359
The US, as it represents the most pervasive and influential peddler of democratic ideals in the world today. France would be a close second, as it was the birthplace of the intellectuals that got this whole mess started, and seeing return to monarchical rule (after five kriffing republics) would have a certain symbolism. Canada, the US, and the other former colonies would likely be best off with monarchs of their own rather than under British rule, for the same reason Luxembourg, Switzerland, and Lichtenstein don't need to become part of the Holy Roman Empire once again–the needs, wants and sensibilities of these lands are divergent enough from their parent kingdom that they would benefit from a local monarch privy to these distinctions. Further, imperialism and White Man's Burden BS were ultimately responsible for hastening the end of monarchy and propagating republican ideals. Combined with the colonies being a net financial burden on the Empire, this is sufficient reason for England not to have control over them once again.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6370
>>6366
I agree, on symbolic reasons alone, I would say France or the U.S.. I would say France as they have pretenders they can choose from, and it would be such a symbolic blow that perhaps the rest of Europe would become more willing to give back to their respective monarchs.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6399
I kind of feel like all that could be said on this board has been said now.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6658
>>493
This 100%. Post-enlightenment philosophy has the odd notion that equality = freedom, when the exact opposite was usually the case. I mean, in feudal society, even a lowly serf only had a three-day workweek, and the political structure was built around decentralized home rule. But nope, let's throw away thousands of years of philosophy for "muh hungry people"
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6664
>>6399
Then why are we still talking?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6667
>>6664
That's my point, I kind of feel like we aren't. Of course, there are little tidbits here and there, but I don't feel like there's anything major happening.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6669
>>6399
It's still nice to talk with other people who share our fringe opinions.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6671
>>6667
I think that's mostly from how few of us there are, rather than something particular to the subject itself. For as few people as we have, we talk about a lot–for comparison, both /monarchy/ and /liberty/ are at 2 PPH, but /liberty/ has six times as many IDs posting.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6680
I'll comment, greetings from >>>/christian/
This board looks interesting and niche, I might stay
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6718
>>6680
I think the British Royal Family is the Tops!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6725
>>6718
Why are you responding to him?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6726
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6734
File: c872db6cd052673⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image,6.39 MB,2645x3679,2645:3679,44d83bad32e05134d21b4390f8….jpg)
>>422
The Jew/cuckess Elisabeth the Rothschild pawn should be executed for treason to the Realm. The British people have declined in number and the realm has shrunk in size massively under her 'reign.' Under her 'rulership' Britain has gone from master of the world, to being the world's rape victim slut.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6735
https://archive.is/C0RzA
On the importance of the ceremonial aspect of monarchy, with love, from Japan.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6750
A whole board for monarchism. Nice.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6753
I came here because I am perpetually sad about St. Tsar Nicholas II. Ora pro nobis.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6755
>>6753
I know your pain, brother.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6758
>>6753
>>6755
Misery loves company, friends.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6764
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6770
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6772
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6774
>>6772
Wasn't Savinkov and anti-monarchist?
and No I don't read Vodka, im just a dumb Burbon
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6775
>>6774
>he thinks it has something to do with that socialist rat
lmao "More memes — more strong and developed culture." Do you even read vodka?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6784
>>6758
>>6755
I'm back, I'm happy that there are others who share this pain. Maybe some day the wrongs will be made right, in spite of the desperate cries of the (((West))).
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6785
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6786
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6787
HookTube embed. Click on thumbnail to play.
>>6786
NOT EVEN DOOM MUSIC.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6788
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6789
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6810
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6812
>>6810
Wait, fabricated diaries?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6832
>>6812
In Russia commies always say "but what about Nicholas' diaries?" when arguing with nationalists. These diaries are full of stories about Nicholas II torturing cats and having the time of his life when there was a revolution going on, typical of a bourgeousie aristocrat who doesn't care about the proletariat… Besides whole pages copy-pasted from other sources, the diaries read like some badly written internet fanfiction.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6835
>>6832
tfw no monarchist gf
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6851
>>6810
>National Populist
>Not having paternal autocrat Tsar Alexi
I SHIGGY DIGGY
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6852
May God bless /monarchy/.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6855
>>6851
What's the problem? Are you a bolshevik?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6871
>All these burger threads about burgers whining about not having burger king.
Any advice for any of us living in a country where the monarchy exists, but has been stripped of power?
Is there anything we can do to help our Georgian and Nepalese brothers to restore their monarchies?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6894
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6921
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6934
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6937
>>6934
>Sputnik and Pogrom
That's a nice touch.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6943
>>6937
Do you read Supchik and Prokorm?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6962
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6985
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6986
Russians are mongol rape babies, the product of the most violent chinks and the most loser swedes. Our boy adolf himself call them subhumans. They where the first to fall for communism and the only whites to completly fall for it. They are dumb as fuck and literal snowniggers.
And Kelly is brazillian.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6987
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6988
>>6987
Happy Easter to you too. Glad someone remembers to the resurrection of our Lord too.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6989
>>6986
You shut your filthy socialist mouth, Kelly is a Russian girl.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6994
>>6988
>>6987
Christ is risen, brothers!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6996
>>6994
Indeed he is risen!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6999
>>6987
>>6988
ARE YOU THOSE """EASTER WORSHIPPERS""" I'VE HEARD SO MUCH IN THE NEWS LATELY?!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7000
>>6999 (checked)
Lmao, you know there is an old exorcist saying:
>demons physically can't say the name of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ
Espically in regards to all the spirit cooking republican elites like HRC and Obummer are implicated in it is starting to make a whole lotta sense.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7002
>>6999
Absolutely checked, also that's the most faggoty thing Obongo has ever written on his twitter, which is saying something.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7005
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7009
Can anyone suggest any good monarchy v democracy debates? Preferably an Oxford-style debate.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7010
>>7005
Do you post on /k/? If so, do you have an acute obsession over lever-delayed blowback and the FNC?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7013
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7026
>>7010
Nah, I don't have any funs yet, so going there is a bit of a cocktease for me until I could afford them. Which funs do you own?
>lever-delayed blowback and the FNC
I just had to google that. I think I'd prefer something lightweight like an MP5, but in the long run it might be more practical to get some kind of AK, since that's the type of gun everyone will use here when SHTF, and it will be easier to find ammo.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7035
>>7026
I've got an AR-15 that I put together, and a customized CZ P-07 in .357 SIG. I ask because there's a poster on there with a Russian flag, who really likes Hoppe and has taken it upon himself to design his own SMG.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7039
>>7035
I thought this is /monarchy/, not /k/. nice guns btw
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7047
>>7035
Nice. btw, our guy Mikhail Svetov is trying to arrange for Hoppe to come to Russia, so I might actually see him in person.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7050
>>7047
Very nice. You're probably more likely to see him than we are in the states, actually, now that he's moved to Turkey.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7079
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7098
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7127
HookTube embed. Click on thumbnail to play.
I forgot to mention this, but RIP his Highness Grand Duke Jean.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7135
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7146
>>1111
>if it was believed by men in the past, it must be true
This fallacious reasoning will not allow you to integrate the advanced made in the realm of philosophy foremost, as it relates to constitutional law, common law, aretaic ethics and so on.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7147
>>7146
>t. liberal
Go back to your cuck porn.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7148
>>7147
I'm not content with >>1111 or >>7146 either. Yuck.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7151
>>7127
>You will never be part of the Irish Guard in 1944.
>Fighting alongside the Prince's contingent in the battle for Caen.
>Day-by-day you get closer and closer to Luxembourg.
>You fight through Brussels
>In the next two months you liberate Luxembourg in his command.
>Fucker wants to keep going into Arnheim.
>Calm down, you did it.
>You're back home bud.
Funeral is today.
>You're home now.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7153
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7160
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7174
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7195
For tradition and national
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7196
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7198
RUSSIANS FORWARD!
RUSSIANS FORWARD!
RUSSIANS FORWARD!
RUSSIANS FORWARD!
RUSSIANS FORWARD!
RUSSIANS FORWARD!
RUSSIANS FORWARD!
RUSSIANS FORWARD!
RUSSIANS FORWARD!
RUSSIANS FORWARD!
RUSSIANS FORWARD!
RUSSIANS FORWARD!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7214
>>7195
>Marching 24/7
Kek !
>>7198
Is there a Libertarian movement in Russian general right ?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7221
>>7214
To my understanding, the libertarian movement in Russia is very much like the libertarian movement in Brazil: still very much a minority in mainstream politics, but a very vocal and active minority, and less of a minority than the other fringe groups.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7224
>>7214
Like he >>7221 said.
The liberals are basically the most popular among those who are actually politically active, followed by libertarians, and followed by nationalists/monarchists. This is ok though, we are still the fastest growing movement of them all, our party is very effective despite not having any of the funding that liberals have, and most importantly we use Rothbard's strategy of shilling for key libertarian goals which are hard to disagree with instead of trying to sell the whole package of libertarianism all at once, so at the end of the day, everyone has this neat symbiotic relationship with us where they're working for us even though they don't agree with the rest of the shit we say.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7229
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7261
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7262
This last one made me kek.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7364
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7461
What discussions would you like to see more of in /monarchy/?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7462
>>7461
Bullying leftists/neetsocs.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7464
>>7462
Why do you repeat yourself so?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7467
It's a nice board, some siegeposter faggots aside.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7471
>>7464
>>422
>Post ITT every time you visit /monarchy/, so that we can generate more activity on this board.
Also, I don't think his images and message are that bad.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7472
>>7471
Thanks anon, but I presume he refers to the "leftists/neetsocs" part of my post, where he clarifies the fact that they are both one and the same, and that a distinction should not be made. (To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand cossack. The humor is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of Misesian praxeology most of the jokes will go over a typical lurker's head.)
As for why I repeated myself, in my previous post I was compelled to add an extra layer of redundancy to remind our neetsoc guests that they should not consider themselves exempt from judgement, and that I speak in the broadest of terms in regards to "leftists" so as to inflict the maximum possible amount of anal pain with such a post.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7473
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7475
>>7472
He speaks the truth. Picrelated, it's me.
Godwilling the feds don't screw up our visas again, I'll be visiting the homeland for the first time in years in a couple weeks. Any suggestions for places in St. Petersburg to look up besides the usual tourist stops?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7476
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7477
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7483
>>7475
Wow, that would be really cool, how long are you visiting for? Maybe we can go for some beers or pizzas or something if you're not too paranoid about meeting strangers from Mongolian basket weaving forums. As for cool places to check out… man, I wish I knew some, but I still haven't done much serious exploring since I moved here myself.
Definitely visit a banya, it will be like a hotspring episode like in the animes, but with fat naked old men instead of cute anime girls. Nevsky Prospekt is the obvious place tourists go to, but it's also cool to stray from it and get lost in the city centre, I actually stumbled upon Dostoevsky's apartment this way. There's also a nice beach at Park 300-Letya, you can pick up a qt there to take back home with you.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7485
>>7483
Sure, I wouldn't mind that if you're in Petersburg. Shoot some contact information to temp123@tempinbox.com and we can discuss further details.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7495
reporting in, good news, American stock market is faltering.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7502
>>7485
Cool, so I sent you my contact info. Who else here wants to come to St. Petersburg? Tsarist Gang assemble.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7503
>>7502
Fugg, didn't seem to work. Try kanonforward@gmail.com
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7515
>>7502
Fuck me, /monarchy/ is going to have a goddam meetup. I want to be in St. Petersburg too :(.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7549
>>7515
I wish you were in St. Petya's burg too, anon. It would be fucking cool if a bunch of us got together.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7595
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7605
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
RUSSIANS GO FORTH! ☦
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7613
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7614
>>7613
Bannerize this shit.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7615
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7663
Meetup went well, saw the sights of St. Petersburg. More of you should come next time, what better place for a /monarchy/ meetup than the Imperial throne city?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7665
>>7663
RUSSIANS GO FORTH
I am turning into a Russiaboo too lately
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7666
>>7663
Maybe you two can visit Lenin's Mausoleum and pose a picture there. We need to get one of /ourguy/'s over there.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7668
>>7663
It was fucking great, but we shouldn't have invited so many hot girls with their booze to our comfy anime party, it kinda distracted from the experience and the autistic discussions. :^)
>>7665
Based.
LE FRANCAIS AVANCE!
>>7666
Maybe on the outside, because you'll get raped by cops if you take selfies near Lenin's stinky corpse. Though it might not necessarily be a bad thing, a lot of female police officers we saw today were actually pretty cute.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7679
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7690
This lad here is Boris Kowerda.
On the 7th of June, 92 years ago, he assassinated (((Pyotr Voykov))), a literal terrorist and the organizer of the murder of the Tsar's family:
>Voykov was shot and killed on 7 June 1927 in Warsaw, at the Warsaw Central Train Station by Boris Kowerda, the 18-year-old son of a White Russian monarchist, and a student of the Russian Gymnasium from Wilna.
>Voykov had arrived at the Station to meet Arkady Rosengolts, who had just been relieved of his position as the Ambassador of the Soviet Union to the United Kingdom, on his way back to Moscow, when Kowerda approached the two diplomats and struck up a conversation with Voykov, which lasted several minutes.
>At a certain point, they said their goodbyes, and the two diplomats resumed their walk towards the waiting wagon, when Kowerda took out a revolver and shot four times at Voykov from close range, crying "Die for Russia!".
>Voykov was shot near the heart, and attempted to pull a gun from his inside pocket, but lost his balance and fell unconscious onto the platform.
>Voykov was immediately transported to the Infant Jesus Hospital in Warsaw where he was pronounced dead.
>Kowerda remained in place, and calmly turned himself in the police.
>Voykov's body was later transported to Moscow to be buried in the Kremlin Wall Necropolis.
>When asked why he killed Voykov, Kowerda replied: "I avenged Russia, for millions of people."
>The killing was later justified as vengeance for Voykov's role in the killing of the Tsar and his family, and many people in Poland regarded Kowerda as a hero; public opinion was full of understanding, and even sympathy for the assassin.
>A Polish court initially sentenced Kowerda to life imprisonment due to external pressure, but was successful in petitioning President of the Republic Ignacy Mościcki to commute his sentence to 15 years.
>Kowerda was later amnestied and released after ten years on June 15, 1937.
>Kowerda died in Hyattsville, Maryland on 18 February 1987, aged 79. He is buried at the Russian Orthodox Convent Novo-Diveevo in Nanuet, New York.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7691
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7692
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7693
>>7692
Also, kudos to the Polish for at least commuting his sentence.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7695
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7717
>>7690
Reminds me of Otoya Yamaguchi, the guy who probably single-handedly saved Japan.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7720
>Incel Antifa activist
<Hit a stranger on the street with a bike lock
<Really let loose your aggression on trash cans.
>Le Virgin liberty activist
<Go streaking at the libertarian party nomination
<I AM A SOVEREIGN CITIZEN
>Le chad monarchist
>Roman von Ungern-Sternberg
>>7690
>>7717
Monarchists are pretty hardcore.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7732
>>7720
>Le Virgin liberty activist
All libertarians are chads.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7756
>>7732
Unironically, there are more chads among libertarians than any other political ideology. There's a few reasons for that. Our philosophy stresses personal responsibility and decries envy and mediocrity, and philosophy does translate to conduct, contrary to what the neo-epicureans will tell you, who try to be nice (or to appear nice) even though their philosophy is ugly and makes you feel dirty.
We also go long stretches without seing hope for political change, so we focus on ourselves and our personal life more often than the Marxists or Accelerationists who can always glance the revolution just around the corner. It also instills the mindset that if you cannot achieve your final goals on this earth, you can at least strive to be better than this sinful world.
Libertarianism is a very healthy mindset. It sounds like it may foster degeneracy and eccentricity, but the latter can be a mixed blessing and the former seems more rampant among fascists and other leftists.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7759
>>7756
>the former seems more rampant among fascists and other leftists.
This. The aut-right is filled with closeted Jews and faggots, from Richard Spencer to kike Enoch. Speaking with NEETSocs on imageboards has been only reinforced the notion that many of them are just tsundere cuck fetishists.
>OMG I HATE THIS
>I WILL NOW DESCRIBE THIS THING THAT I HATE IN VIVID PORNOGRAPHIC DETAIL
>I WILL REPEATEDLY USE WORDS LIKE THROBBING AND PULSATING WHILE DOING SO
>I WILL BRING THING I HATE UP WHEN NO ONE ELSE DOES
You ever notice how /pol/acks always try to frame women voting for immigration as them wanting to get SANDED? When the overwhelmingly more sensible explanation is displaced maternal sympathy for muh poor refugees?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7769
>>7756
>and the former seems more rampant among fascists and other leftists
Holy shit, this. Fascists are fascinated by black cocks, they just can't shut the fuck up about them. It's unsurprising, being socialists they are weak, feminine men who take HRT pills, so it's expected that they would fetishize the things they are insecure about as a coping mechanism while also turning to extreme ideologies to try make all the bad things go away, it's really something to be pitied.
Same things can be said about other leftists too, you can never trust them as "comrades" or expect the socialist generosity that they talk about because they have scarcity mentality, they see everyone as a rival, to them it's impossible for one man to be happy without another man being robbed of his happiness, that's why they see every human interaction as exploition, it's also why they will try to cheat you whenever possible, because to them it's better to exploit than to get exploited.
All ideologies based on weakness and envy will always attract all kinds of human trash which will eventually be destroyed by their very own ideology, and unfortunately bringing other good people down with them.
>>7759
>/chadarchy/ and people who aren't insecure about their girlfriends:
>"racists" from /incelpol/: THROBBING AND PULSATING AND GLISTENING AND TWITCHING AND LEAKING TASTY SALTY PRECUM WHICH FILLS THE AIR WITH A THICK, DENSE FOG THAT MAKES ALL THE WHITE HOES IN THE ROOM GO WILD! MMMM…. t-take that you cucks!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7771
>>7756
>he can't name any lolbergs who talk about race sincerely and recognize how control is needed for non-Nigger tier society
>>7759
Recognizing that women by nature can't be trusted to be loyal to their volk is hardly being a cuck. Plenty of those "polacks" you speak of are leftypolfaggots and redditors and other degenerates.
>>7769
lolbertarians don't even oppose miscegenation seriously.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7777
>>7771
Hans Hoppe, Jared Howe, and Chris Cantwell all explicitly mention race.
>lolbergs are egalitarian cucks lel
The following is a list of cuckold behavior according to our esteemed, big-brain /pol/ack here:
>throwing commies out of helicopters
>banning niggers from your shop and restaurant
>branding faggots, then physically removing them after they trespass on your covenant community
>laughing at the starving NEETSocs in the street who waited for Daddy Oberfuhrer to solve their problems for them instead of taking responsibility for their lives
Imagine being this low-IQ.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7781
>>7771
>Recognizing that women by nature can't be trusted to be loyal to their volk is hardly being a cuck
So in other words you admit that you will never get a gf? lmao, that's so sad. Yeah, it's /incelpol/ alright.
>>>/interracial/
Here's a neat little place where you can play with your dick while crying about the Aryan whore, run along and don't bother us with what you think libertarians support or oppose, the rest of "the volk" is already there coping.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7786
>>7777
>can only old list theorists and an e-celeb
Actual Existing Libertarianism has no solid approach to the Race Question, being too tainted with liberalism.
>>7781
>being this big of a white knight
>muh dik
Please tell us how women would be just as loyal to their volk as men considering the ancestral environment to the rise of the state. Where women were either traded to build alliances or abducted in raids.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7792
>>7786
>Actual Existing Libertarianism has no solid approach to the Race Question, being too tainted with liberalism.
Tell that to my chad-network.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7793
>>7786
Observe the NEETSoc as he gibbers in confusion. The notions of in-group preference and self-segregation are implicit in the ideas of freedom of dissociation and the division of labor. These implications can be clearly seen by anyone that possesses even the barest hint of deductive reasoning. But this is too much for his impoverished, 70 IQ brain. If it is not bolded, underlined, then written in triplicate in a manifesto, he is unable to believe it exists. Besides, he tells himself, a priori reasoning is probably some of kind of Jewish trick anyways. Satisfied with this explanation, the NEETSoc returns to calling everyone around him a cuck, while he fantasizes about submitting his will and authority's to a masculine strong man. It is likely that the NEETSoc is unable to tie his shoes without following a pixelated jpeg infograph telling him the Redpill Approved™ method of lacing up.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7794
>>7793
Kek, had to save this! A-tier post, the rest is just on it for context.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7795
Also made this, so future generations can read our quality posts.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7799
>nibbe dibba bix nood
Just letting you know, countries like Singapore aren't lolbertarian paradises. Also, China has more hope for itself than Murica and West Europe (showing how little lolbertarians accomplish compared with the strong state).
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7800
>>7799
Notice that when the NEETSoc cannot answer a post, it pretends something else entirely was said, then quickly changes the subject. Unfortunately, it has only clambered out of one hole to start digging a second. The NEETSoc points to a country which prints money to build ghost cities as an example of strength. It gestures madly at a country of over a billion struggling to compete with a country of 300 million, proclaiming this to be the model of prosperity. This same NEETSoc will likely decry the Federal Reserve as Jewish moneyprinters for doing the exact same thing as the chinks but slower.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7804
>>7786
>Where women were either traded to build alliances
Wow. The incels made a real breakthrough this time! If women weren't loyal to their tribes or families, then it would be pretty useless to depend on such treacherous scum to maintain an alliance, now wouldn't it?
>or abducted in raids
And the raids… ahh yes, those were the days… when every week we rode into some shitty village, slayed the husbands in front of their wives, killed the children in front of their mothers, burned their homes together with the elderly, and after utterly destroying their lives, the bitches would welcome their new conquerors with tears of joy in their eyes and jump onto our BSCs (big Slavic cocks) to reward us for our genetic superiority. You learn a lot about evolutionary psychology from the professors at /interracial/ university, a bunch of unironic cucks with minds warped by a Jewish psyop have it all figured out.
Posting qts because goddamn does it feel great to know that I don't have to wait on chinks to make "artificial wombs" to have children, that I don't have to date azns, that I don't need the government to force a girl to be loyal to me, and that I don't shit my pants out of paranoia everytime I leave her for two minutes to do my own shit because she'll go suck nigger dicks without big daddy Hitler to stop her or something. Life's actually pretty fucking great when you choose to be chad instead of some blackpilled asshole.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7805
>>7800
>Notice that when the NEETSoc cannot answer a post, it pretends something else entirely was said, then quickly changes the subject. Unfortunately, it has only clambered out of one hole to start digging a second.
Yeah, and notice how he never really denied anything, he just sort of silently accepted all the shit thrown at him. It's a lot of fun gangraping one neetsoc brainlet with other lolbertarian degenerates lmao.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7810
>>7800
>The NEETSoc points to a country which prints money to build ghost cities as an example of strength.
It's way more Yellow than you are White.
>It gestures madly at a country of over a billion struggling to compete with a country of 300 million, proclaiming this to be the model of prosperity
It's not getting infested with Kunta Kintes like the West is.
>>7804
>Wow. The incels made a real breakthrough this time! If women weren't loyal to their tribes or families, then it would be pretty useless to depend on such treacherous scum to maintain an alliance, now wouldn't it?
>being loyal to your immediate kin (children namely) is being loyal to your volk.
Nobody here said they weren't. Your children aren't your volk. Women also didn't have access to little things like no-fault divorce, welfare, cops, etc. to make it apparently safer to ride the cock carousel and then marry a chode for money/baby once she's desperate. Women had the threat of violence to keep them obedient.
>war never happened before written history
Okay noble savage advocate
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7814
>>7810
>Your children aren't your volk.
LOOK AT THE NEETSOC
LOOK AT HIM AND LAUGH
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7815
>>7814
>I'm proud of my mulatto bastard grandmutt
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7816
>>7815
>he instinctively thinks of his children as mulatto mutts
That explains a lot.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7821
>>7816
Tell us more on how Jamal Jr. is as much your volk as your neighbor who's not a mutt.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7822
>>7810
>Your children aren't your volk.
kek, nah, my kids are my volk. Your kids are Tyrones volk, bruh.
>no-fault divorce
Another reason to be a liberchadian, so you can actually choose the rules of your own ideal marriage yourself instead of having it decided for you by Hitler or some faggot politician. I can't imagine what it's like to want another man to decide how you spend the next 60 years of your life with someone, and then not call yourself a cuck after that.
>welfare
Yeah, and neetsocs are always proud to tell you that "welfare" is something that national-socialists pioneered before any other country in Europe, and that that's what the "socialism" part in national-socialism means.
>The reason you don't see poor mothers with starving children on the streets anymore? You got Hitler to thank for that!
Thanks Cuckler!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7824
>>7822
Libertarians always play a losing game. They point out state interferences we object to, but then tell us against common sense and all reason that the only way to prevent these things is to give up state interferences we do agree with. For example we are against giving welfare to single mothers, and the libertarians tell us that we need to therefore get rid of all welfare. We are against no-fault divorce, so the libertarians tell us we need to get rid of state involvement in marriage altogether, rather than having stricter rules on marriage to encourage people into stability and responsibility.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7825
>>7824
It's a losing game. Only a few libertarians are 'for' liberty alone; the rest of us have concrete visions for what we wish to protect / encourage, so libertarians will never triumph.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7826
>>7822
>kek, nah, my kids are my volk. Your kids are Tyrones volk, bruh.
Go look up miscegenation and how many societies didn't accept children made from that.
>Another reason to be a liberchadian, so you can actually choose the rules of your own ideal marriage yourself instead of having it decided for you by Hitler or some faggot politician. I can't imagine what it's like to want another man to decide how you spend the next 60 years of your life with someone, and then not call yourself a cuck after that.
That's nice. Just about every society capable of making more than mudhuts regulated marriage and other interactions between the sexes. You think you'd be allowed to mingle outside of your volk and bring your mongrels into society?
>Yeah, and neetsocs are always proud to tell you that "welfare" is something that national-socialists pioneered before any other country in Europe, and that that's what the "socialism" part in national-socialism means.
Alright.
>Thanks Cuckler!
Leave it to an Amerimongrel/Russkie/Anglo to whine about Hitler.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7827
>>7824
What a worthless, low-IQ strawman. Almost every libertarian prioritizes certain policy goals over others. By definition they must, as that's the definition of ordinal preferences. For instance, I care much more about stopping the third world hordes from entering my country than I do about deregulating the fly fishing rod industry.
>For example we are against giving welfare to single mothers, and the libertarians tell us that we need to therefore get rid of all welfare
If you support any kind of welfare you're a worthless cuck. No one besides human garbage would be support policies that reward poor decisions and punish the productive.
>We are against no-fault divorce, so the libertarians tell us we need to get rid of state involvement in marriage altogether
Have you ever considered that those two things are related, you illiterate nigger? *Why* do you think no-fault divorce was able to occur in the first place? Alimony, fag marriage, and every other deconsecration of a sacred union would have been avoided if it remained sacred. Crazy how that works, right?
>Go look up miscegenation and how many societies didn't accept children made from that.
How sense do you have to be to miss the point this hard? Everyone here already knows what miscegenation is, dipshit. No one thinks it's desirable. The difference is that you, and only you, have so thoroughly internalized your cuck fantasies that you instinctively imagine your grandchildren as half-breeds, as you did here: >>7815 . Only the NEETSoc assumes that his grandchildren will be mutts, because the NEETSoc is too weak to keep his family well-behaved. The NEETSoc can't find a good wife on his own, so he asks Daddy Hitler to give one to him. He doesn't have the discipline to stop himself from fapping to trap hentai, so he wants Daddy Hitler to ban anime for him. He doesn't have the skills to get a job, so he asks Daddy Hitler to provide him with gibs.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7828
>>7827
>muh amerifat/liberal babble
Literally no great society that wasn't degenerate operated like libertarians say.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7830
>>7827
>Almost every libertarian prioritizes certain policy goals over others
But you leave the entire arrangement of society beyond the point of liberty to chance. No one else does. People always treasure religion, culture, nature, equality or something else more than mere freedom.
>No one besides human garbage would be support policies that reward poor decisions and punish the productive.
Being poor is not always a choice, and having made mistakes in my time I have sympathy with people who make bad choices.
>Have you ever considered that those two things are related, you illiterate nigger?
Did I deny they were related? Of course both are related to the involvement of the state in marriage. My point is, objecting to no-fault divorce I am not obligated to choose 'no state involvement'. I am inclined to choose that the state attaches real bonds between people, as in this era people value their freedom more than their responsibilities.
'State out of marriage' will not automatically bring back the old tradition of strong marriage that was once.
And please, don't fly off the handle insulting people, it just turns us against you.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7831
>>7830
>having made mistakes in my time I have sympathy with people who make bad choices.
By this btw, I don't mean people who repeatedly abuse the system and act immorally, I mean people who act in a human way, ie not taking perfect advantage of all systems available for self-improvement. There was some right-winger (economically) who wrote an article about what he would do if he was broke and living in the ghetto, all the internet courses he would do and what not to make himself a coder. I sympathise with poor people who don't do all that.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7838
>>7830
>But you leave the entire arrangement of society beyond the point of liberty to chance
Wrong. If you actually believe this you might be retarded. If you don't actually believe this, you're disingenuous. In either case a proper reply isn't worth my time.
And I'll insult whoever I damn we'll please, if you can't handle getting called a nigger when your behavior is distinctly sub-Saharan you really shouldn't be on imageboards. I don't particularly care if NEETSocs turn against me, either, so I have no particular interest in wining and dining you, or catering to your oh-so-fragile sensibilities. What could I or my goals in life possibly stand to gain from the approval of socialist burnouts?
>>7831
>I sympathize with people who don't better themselves and blame everyone else for their problems
Imagine my shock. You'll have to imagine it, because it doesn't exist.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7839
>>7830
>mere freedom
Freedom is nothing more than personal power, and in a libertarian definition it is the ability to achieve power without taking away from the power of others, transitioning society to a non-zero sum game.
People will almost always value power more than religion, culture, nature, equality, or whatever they claim to stand for, all these things will naturally become a means to an end, and the end being power. This is why so many popes and priests abuse the Word of God to become wealthy and live lavishly, this is why famous people virtue signal about importing more refugees while they themselves usually live as far away from them as possible, this is why the leaders of every socialist country are billionaires who live like kings and whose children post about their own luxurious lives in the West on Instagram, this is why every government based on "equality" ironically has more inequality than any country with evil capitalists and free markets. Even Hitler was a degenerate who had harems and lived in fucking castles.
A person's desire for power is why "corruption" exists, it's not a bug but a feature of all these democracies and republics, evil always breeds in ambiguity. A monarchy on the other hand is honest about the fact that the king is all about power, so this doesn't leave much room for ambitious politicians to fuck with our lives in order to further their own political careers.
>Go look up miscegenation and how many societies didn't accept children made from that.
>You think you'd be allowed to mingle outside of your volk and bring your mongrels into society?
>But you leave the entire arrangement of society beyond the point of liberty to chance.
Here you're arguing with yourself and with your own imagination of what you think libertarianism is about and going "AHA! That showed them!" when defeating your own strawmen with smug argmuments. After this shit you have the indecency to say "p-please don't insult me"? kek, get rekt, nigger. If you act like a subhuman, expect to be treated like one.
>There was some right-winger (economically) who wrote an article about what he would do if he was broke and living in the ghetto, all the internet courses he would do and what not to make himself a coder. I sympathise with poor people who don't do all that.
Honestly, I hate code niggers too, but if you put away all the feminine emotional bullshit that socialists exploit to guilt-trip you into supporting their ideology and do a bit of research on how these ghettos appear in the first place, you wouldn't mind being dead broke and thousands of dollars in debt in a country with no central bank kikery, and no one to tax or regulate you or the people you deal with. Ordinary life will be so much cheaper and survivable. All these poor people might not get rich in such a society until they start to provide value, but they won't be "poor" in the modern sense of the word that having no money is kind of like a death sentence, socialists make the simplest shit in life much more expensive than it's supposed to be, today even if you're a useful member of society, no matter how much you hustle it always feels like there's some kind of invisible force always keeping you down unless you have some inhuman ability to write code all day or you're an NPC who doesn't mind getting a boring-ass job as a lawyer or something.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7840
>>7838
>Wrong. If you actually believe this you might be retarded. If you don't actually believe this, you're disingenuous. In either case a proper reply isn't worth my time.
Wow, epic. But I don't see what's retarded about what I said. If you maximise the freedom of individuals to arrange their society, you leave the arrangement of society up to the freedom of individuals. There is no ruling force to protect your preferences.
>toxic sperging
It was for your benefit as much as anyone else. Being cancerous won't win you many followers.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7851
>>7839
>it is the ability to achieve power without taking away from the power of others
So delusion when you don't live in some bodunk tribe that accomplishes nothing or something like it. Tribes still use coercion by the way.
>Here you're arguing with yourself and with your own imagination of what you think libertarianism is about
>he thinks his decades old libertarian is the only libertarian
Please, the likes of Matt Forney openly advocate sex tourism and mingling outside of one's proper womenfolk.
>>7840
>If you maximise the freedom of individuals to arrange their society, you leave the arrangement of society up to the freedom of individuals.
Lolbertrains subscribe to some weird composite of homo economicus narrative and the noble savage.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7853
>>7840
Because freedom is not liberating. The strongest, most binding chain you can impose on a man is to make him responsible for his own actions. You want to be a bug chasing, fudge packing degenerate? Good luck with your AIDS and high-risk behavior making insurance costs skyrocket. You'll be barred from entry from any religious covenant community, as well as schools or any other building with lots of children. If your name is Tyrone, and you chimp out, trespass, or steal, you'll be be shot immediately, and no one will think twice about a man defending his property. No BLM protests, no fag pride parades, first because there's a no government for these parasites to influence and second because street owners won't allow it anyways. That is, assuming Tyrone even gets that far, since most businesses won't even let him through their doors, and most landlords wouldn't rent to him. Tyrone will be relegated to living in slums and ghettos with others of his own kind, far away from civilized men. Without the state serving as the civic religion, churches will rise to prominence once against, with all of the positive pressures that their commandments imply. Promiscuity is no longer subsidized by the state, but becomes socially unacceptable thanks to this. Instead of abortions, irresponsible young people will have no recourse besides shotgun weddings. The our of egalitarianism, imposed and enforced by the state, will be no more. The natural order will take its place.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7855
>>7851
>Please, the likes of Matt Forney openly advocate sex tourism and mingling outside of one's proper womenfolk.
And you're a big fan of this guy, because why? Actually now that think of it, /pol/ always did force the meme of asian women being better than white women, sometimes seriously, and sometimes just to spite the (non-existant) white women here on 8chan.
>>7853
But what if your name is Hans (fake name) and you're LARPing as a German, and you think you're a neetsoc because you like Adolf and his motivational speeches and the aesthetics of a collectivist totalitarian shithole (plus you want to be "white" and fit in with the /pol/ crowd), but you're actually an autistic nigger and you're closer to nazbol, and your Marxism/game design degree took you nowhere so you want to force other people to feed your lazy ass and pay for your bad decisions, and you also hate women because they are not the smart, logical men with vaginas that you saw in the Jewish movies you grew up on, so all the dating advice your mother gave you doesn't apply in real life, and you're depressed and frustrated and those anti-anxiety pills your government psychiatrist gave you aren't working but for some reason they made your balls shrink, and dank memes are the only thing that prevents you from an heroing at this point? How the fuck is ancap supposed to fix this problem, you whitepilled normalfag?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7856
>>7855
>How the fuck is ancap supposed to fix this problem, you whitepilled normalfag?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7866
>>7855
>And you're a big fan of this guy, because why?
>everyone who doesn't agree with me is one poster
>Actually now that think of it, /pol/ always did force the meme of asian women being better than white women, sometimes seriously, and sometimes just to spite the (non-existant) white women here on 8chan.
More like goons who watch porn with its Niggers, manchildren who watch Gook Toons, and effective liberals like you. Plenty of polacks called those posters out and mocked them.
>and the aesthetics of a collectivist totalitarian shithole
Tell us more on how Nazi Germany is a worse place to live in than modern Murica.
>nibbe dibba dooba bix nood
Keep it up.
PS: White knight womyn all you want. They have no actual loyalty to their volk that isn't from following fads imposed by high-status males.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7871
>>7866
White women are less likely to marry outside of their race than white men. Imagine believing the Hollyjew racemixing propaganda over the evidence, then calling other people NPCs.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7919
>>7871
that's probably because women that are filthy enough to betray their kind are too filthy to marry in the first place, and under democracy all women are made to be filthy
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7920
>>2717
the pope is the bishop of rome and doesn't hold a such power
the holy roman empire was created for the purpose of being the kingdom of god on earthen
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7923
Hey Russiaboos, are you Orthodox?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7924
>>7919
If you look at stats for all relationships, not just marriage, the results are similar. White women are much more faithful to their race than all other women, and slightly more faithful than men.
>>7923
I am, yes.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7932
>>7923
I wish I were, but I'm not.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7945
>>4043
>Fascism's track record of instability
There is no such track record. The fascist states of the past were very stable, up until the moment they were violently destroyed in war.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7948
>>7924
>I am, yes.
Got any neat-o "How I came to be in the church" story?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7950
>>7948
All right, you ready for this?
My mother is Russian Orthodox and so is the rest of my family.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7952
>>7871
>>7919
>>7924
Women use sex to gain wealth and power. White men are still a better source than other men. It's not hard.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7953
>>7952
No one disputes that. Women chase after attractive men, and white men are the most attractive. That fact wasn't what was being questioned, it was the NEETSoc's moronic "hurr all white whamens are trash" cuck fantasy.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7972
>>7945
>abloo bloo bloo, muh poor Germanic people!
Nggers and psychopaths are also very stable, up until the moment they start robbing and killing people around them, no difference with your shitty fascist states.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.7998
>>7950
I guess I was expecting semi-inspiring C.S. Lewis "I found God behind the couch" kind of deal, but nothing wrong with that straightforward approach too.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8239
I tried using talktotransformer to see if I could get any good pro-monarchist banter out of it. I've been plucking out bits from the about page to see if I can get anything interesting.
>There are folks who are just fine with having a monarch fulfill a ceremonial role.
>Just because you're on 8chan doesn't mean you have to have the most edgelord political philosophy available to you.
>There are folks who don't like that a royal may be a dictator and a king may serve as some sort of benevolent dictator. They view that as an insult. They don't like kings at all.
>I'm not even saying the monarchy doesn't have certain limitations as far as the king goes, but don't we all get to decide the nature of our king?
>Why should we just give a king the power to direct our lives?
Or
>Feudalism is an incredibly hierarchical society that is organized almost completely by birth and through ties to specific plots of land. Some appreciate either the incredibly hierarchical structure, or they appreciate the 'simple life.' It's actually much more of a pro-libertarian system than one might think.
>The best way to understand this system of hierarchy, though, is as a collection of social hierarchy systems to aid in maintaining. As people grow up and begin to develop their own identities, and those identities include personal relations. These relationships often begin with direct, verbal interaction and become more informal by interaction, in which case one might call them friendships, as those close to you might become your friends. This is where friendships begin to grow into the types of relationships that are found in much of our society. For both men and women, being friends can mean being the friend that most of us are meant to be. Many times, we may not even believe our friends are real. As individuals, we may even find ourselves unable to get along with those we have strong feelings for - those we are so attached to, that we would die if given the chance.
>In contrast to our current "ghetto society," in contrast to our current "reductionist" society, in feudalism we have no social hierarchy. No social caste or ruling class.
Or
>Monarcho-secessionism is really more or less supporters of the Liechtenstein system, and in particular as described in The State in the Third Millennium. Where political support for the Monarch and the power of the Monarch is simultaneously tempered by legitimizing secession, and secession is used as a political tool to support and foster Monarchy. Monarchism is therefore not the cause of the economic difficulties which have plagued Latin America as well as East Africa, in which it is the main state.
>Monarchism is neither the problem being confronted by the world's poorest; it is the problem being faced by Europe itself. This is not to say that secession does not have important political ramifications, and some secession can actually be positive; it can only be negative in terms of the resulting economic crisis.
I'm going to keep doing this for a while to see if I can make the damn thing write a pro-monarchist book for me…
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8243
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8245
>>8239
>in feudalism we have no social hierarchy. No social caste or ruling class.
what did it mean by this?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8254
>>8245
Bullshit High School cliques don't mean shit in feudalism?
In any case, I'm all for calling democracy "ghetto society." … I'm all for putting a word filter on the board to change 'democracy' into 'ghetto society.'
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8465
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8468
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8519
>Browsing /monarchy/'s archive.
A lot of these are surprisingly alright.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8520
Ah, a board for Don Quixote, not accelerationist thuggery.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8527
>>8520
This
Also, fun fact, (((accelerationism))) is only pushed by cowardly Political Animals because nobody will follow their craptastic ideas unless literally everyone is miserable in a post-apocalypse.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8568
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>8527
While also making the big assumption that they themselves will live long enough to make their big jackboot restoration happen. People on this board know better, and know that these things can't be rushed. It took a good few centuries for Rome's own grand experiment to subside into the Empire, after all.
As an aside, we could do with flags for the Roman Empire, the Kingdom of Greece, the Kingdom of Serbia, the Byzantine Empire, and other places in the East. Or would ancient and medieval kingdoms go beyond this board's remit?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8903
Her majesty queen has to witness her empire evolves from the world largest to NOT the smallest.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8904
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8907
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8908
Why do republicans always look so dead inside?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8909
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8910
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.8920
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.