I Agree that it's the only Aryan teaching, other than burgeoning neo-paganism. But why do you say this uncompassionate sectarian,
>If it's not Theravada it's heresy
Japanese dispersed from the Vedic Conquest of India and are simply the Aryans who emigrated East, while the Germans emigrated West. Japanese founded Zen, and Japanese are Eastern Aryans, therefore Zen is Aryan. Now Zen comes from the Mahayana, and if you blaspheme the Lotus Sutra you go to the Avici Hell. If you preach Buddhism because it's Aryan, and Zen is Aryan, and the Eastern Aryans saw fit to build up on Mahayana emptiness into thus-like, why are you calling Mahayana and Zen heresy? This seems like pure ignorant sectarianism. But I could be the ignorant one. After all, Zen doesn't even say anything, it's about coming to the self-realization stored in the Kosmic-Memory of the Spirit, so how could it be heresy, as if a pointing at the moon could be simply generated by an evil-doer?