fb30cf No.1798
Whats the legal requirement/rule for make qutes of dead thinkers to refute them? for exampe, i quote Kant and his main works to refute him and his ideas; do i any need copyrights for this, or somthing similar?
More importantly, are works consisting of refutations of important works considered relevant?
>pic unrealted
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
fb30cf No.1799
>>1798
I'm not quite sure what you're asking but; you can quote anyone at any time in order to critique them. There isn't any sort of copyright protection protecting one from criticism.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
fb30cf No.1801
No point in pure negative critique. If you're not going to offer nothing new, nobody will care.
You can go against Kant thinking it's easy fruit, yeah, good luck.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
fb30cf No.1802
>>1801
by making a critique, im ipso facto proposing new ideas, since its logically needed to replace the "refuted" idea with a new one
>and actually im gonna critize "the world as will and idea"
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
fb30cf No.1803
>>1798
You don't need to worry. Copyright is not relevant after (I believe) 100 years since the death of the author have passed. A lot of important philosophers are ripe for the picking - only most of them already have entire fields of study dedicated to their criticism and improvement.
>>1802
>by making a critique, im ipso facto proposing new ideas
No you aren't. You are merely advising against an already existing idea. That does not a new proposal make.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
fb30cf No.1804
>>1803
I cant simply refute ,i must propose a new solution, by doing that, i AM actually creating a new, original idea, to replace the other one.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
fb30cf No.1805
>>1804
>New and original idea
>critiquing Schopenhauer
Bruv, I suggest you find a bigger target if you want your critique to actually have something new. Schopenhauer is widely ignored in academia precisely because he wasn't anything original in his own time.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
fb30cf No.1806
>>1804
That's not ipso facto. You criticise and then suggest your own ideas, but the two aren't connected by necessity. Though there might be a nunace to the term "critique" I'm unaware of.
>>1805
Philosophical academia isn't necessarily as linear as that though. Even 'discarded' ideas can be reevaluated or made fruitful at any given time, provided it's done well enough.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
fb30cf No.1809
I assume that the majority of copyright laws make exceptions to quotations in scholarly works, given that they are properly cited.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
b3531e No.5670
>>1798
CRITIZING BUMPS?! NOWAY!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
51e1a7 No.5722
>>1805
modern academia is full of "empowered wimmins" now. Schopenhauer would be a blow to their fragile egos.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.