/newbrit/ - /brit//politics/

>>351914

>-60

>>351918

tbh

>>351919

>what appears to be an attractive white woman but if you look it up she's actually 2% jewish

>>351920

You're so ignorant it's not even worth countering your point.

>>351920

I'll tell you once: You literally only think with your dick. It seems your only sense whether someone is attractive is if they're physically beautiful, but whether they've got a nice content of character doesn't have any play in your motivation at all. It's literally just 'muh dick', and I have no respect for that.

What is beautiful about a jewess, other than their obviously (((divine))) appearance, is their sense of tradition and family. It's sharing in the whole family's close ties to eachother; a tie that preserved jewishness since the destruction of the third temple to the rebirth of Israel.

You will never understand this form of beauty.

>>351922

based

FRESH

>>351932

>>351933

>>351935

>tfw no autist daughter to eat breakfast with on a sunday morning

Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Will Durant, co-author with his wife, Ariel, of the best-selling “The Story of Civilization,” died in 1981. Before his death, he mentioned several times a new book he was writing. However, no one could find this mysterious manuscript until last year, when his granddaughter discovered it in a box in her attic.

So here at last are the celebrated historian’s opinions about life, the universe and everything.

Things start promisingly enough. Mr. Durant’s writing voice is modest, warm and wise, like a beloved grandfather. In his preface, he states, “Here I am, going on 95 … at my age, a man is deeply rooted in the ways or views of his youth, and is almost constitutionally incapable of understanding the changing world that assails him … .”

If only he had listened to himself. His opinions on African-Americans, women, education, the future, the past … all are hopelessly outdated, the pronouncements of a well-off, self-satisfied and cranky old man.

His thoughts on religion: that everyone should adopt the principles of Christianity, behaving as if all men were brothers. “It is difficult to imagine how anyone could improve upon this outline of a faith for the modern soul,” he writes. Unfortunately, in making this assertion, he seems to belittle other faiths by implying that Christianity is the first and only religion to hold this ideal.

On African-Americans, Mr. Durant makes generalized statements about their history up to the 1970s, writing that, “…[T]he progress of technology deprived most black men of a place in industry; they became dependent upon relief, or charity, or their wives — who cleaned white homes to maintain black hovels.”

He points to his involvement in a 1943 civil rights movement to establish his progressive credibility, never quite understanding that what might have been considered progressive in 1943 had been bypassed 20-plus years later. He also thinks the problems faced by black people can be solved by “extended and expanded education,” an idea for which he provides no detail. In short, his tone is patronizing, his description of problems over generalized and his solutions simplistic.

When he discusses women, he can imagine only one fitting occupation for them: that of full-time mother. “As for a girl, it will avail her nothing to know a foreign language, archaeology, and trigonometry, if she cannot manage a home, a husband, and a child; fidelity is nourished through the stomach, and good pies do more for monogamy than all the languages that have ever died. One tongue is enough for any woman, and a good mother is worth a thousand Ph.D.s,” he states.

Girls should study separately from boys, he writes, and their teachers should only be “educated mothers.” He does envision them learning nature, literature and science. But boys, taught by “educated men or gentlemen,” should learn history, science, religion, philosophy, friendship, nature, literature, art, patriotism, carpentry, plumbing…everything except foreign languages because Mr. Durant didn’t like studying them and therefore sees no use for them. He did not foresee that knowing foreign languages might be critically important in the future, as the world became more interconnected.

On politics, he is an apologist for communism, excusing the millions of people murdered, starved and worked to death by Russia’s communist government on the grounds that communism brought Russians “to a level of prosperity unknown to them in Czarist days.”

He ponders “whether state control of production in communist countries would allow sufficient competition … to realize similar benefits to the consumer” as capitalist production. History has provided an unequivocal answer to that question: no. And he is an uncritical advocate of the welfare state, not acknowledging its vulnerability to abuse without accountability.

Mr. Durant does predict the future in one way: the electric car. Beyond that, however, his outlook is short-sighted, his perspective outdated, his tone condescending and his language often bordering on the affected. He is a product of his time and place, and all his erudition can’t save him from it.

https://www.post-gazette.com/ae/books/2015/02/22/Fallen-Leaves-A-posthumous-Will-Durant-tome-was-better-off-undiscovered/stories/201502220028

He strums the sensibilities of my being wonderfully, lads. Everything except his prioritizing industry over the the lives of millions of people hits home with me.

good knight