No.5991
why dont you believe in synthetic theory of evolution?
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5992
Probably because I don't even know what that is.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.5993
>>5992
it is a modern theory of biological evolution, very important for biology as a science, it is espoused by all respected biologists
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6001
>>5993
How is it different from Darwin's theory of evolution?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6003
What does this have to do with monarchy?
Forum sliding
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6004
>>6001
darwin did not know about genes, hamilton's rule etc
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6005
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6008
because scientism is big gay
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6012
>>6003
if evolution is real there is no god
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6013
>>6012
Alright, let me help you out a bit and flesh out your argument, because as it stands you're not even putting in enough effort here to even be trolling properly, which I think is why nobody is really responding to this thread seriously. If this isn't how you would flesh out your argument, then I would suggest putting a bit more effort into your posts.
1 - Support of a monarchy depends on the divine right.
2 - Divine right depends on a religion with a creation God.
3 - A creation God is contradictory with the notion of evolution.
There's a hole in every one of these points.
1 - There are more arguments than simply religious or divine rights reasons (see the about page). Ironically enough for you, arguments for monarchism that emphasize its political stability as the main reason to support it are typically given using an argument by political evolution (e.g., this thread >>1859) .
2 - Because every eastern religion apparently doesn't exist. The current King of Bhutan is a nice example.
3 - Deism or 'clockwork' theism, for example.
Please lurk a bit more.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6014
>>6013
The King needs to dub you Aristocrat for this service to the fatherland.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6029
are most monarchy supporters theists?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6031
>>6029
They certainly cannot be atheists.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6046
>>6031
isnt Curtis Yarvin an atheist?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6059
>>6029
I do not know, but there certainly is a strong connection between religion and monarchism. There are some pretty interesting older threads on the board you might want to dig up.
>>6031
It's possible, hard, but possible.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6066
>>6059
>I do not know, but there certainly is a strong connection between religion and monarchism.
yeah and there is strong connection between religion and not acknowledging theory of biological evolution
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6069
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6071
I think the worst part that evolution relates to politics is how political radicals view biotic change to represent their ideals. I remember arguing with a feminist and saying, "Because micro-evolution and microbes evolving, we need communism. Human nature is constantly evolving." Lest we forget this takes more than centuries to happen. I think revolutionary dogma is inorganic even from an evolutionary standpoint.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6072
>>6066
Whilst true, people should be ashamed of being related to apes.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6073
>>6029
The more monarchy is secularized and made "of the People", discarded from virtue, belief, and religion, the institution becomes immediately subject to scrutinizing of the intellectual class and oligarchs who want power and more towards demagoguery in terms of politics. A successful monarchy needs to be anti-egalitarian and for the monarch to reign above the political class there needs to be a higher virtue from the classical standpoint. All traditional civilizations have had monarchies with a close relationship with priesthood and superior virtue invested in the monarch: from ancient Egypt with the power of pharaohs and its priesthood, to china and the mandate of heaven, to Japan and Shinto, the monarchy triumphs with an overflow of cultural emancipation from intellectual demand for the rule of the few. An element of the sacred is important for monarch with reverence for certain values. This dates back to Aristotle and the idea that for a monarch to rule in a civilized society, the monarch needs to be extraordinary and not equal with the peers. This is tempered with Alexander the Great and Augustus seizing divinity. It doesn't help that republicans played politics so well to damn the name of monarchy forever and any form of it. This begins to necessitate something special for monarchs.
>that's political hampering!
Before you say that, anon, the political elite that aspire towards the rule of the few and condemn other forms of government have their own crutches. They depend on "the People" to be legitimate. For the republic, this is their exalted status whether "The People" constitutes anyone at all.
It is no mistake that monarchies and religion are closer anyways because monarchy is the natural form of government in the true sense of the world "being born" and because it's the most cultural and distinctive form.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6074
>>6029
If that isn't sufficient, you could always listen to the economic apologists for monarchy and Hobbes.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6075
>>6073
The rule of the ivory tower intellectuals/politicians is almost immediately susceptible to their worst fear. The tyranny of populists. Those who appeal to the masses and actually try to galvanize "the People" – the real People – and this is why they vilify democracy on one hand, which is the direct rule of the People, and tyranny on the other – which is the same root as monarchy.
Politics is like a tug-of-war between different political groups and their aim of the game is to vilify the other, call it unjust, and namecall. It's one of the reasons I don't take accusations if tyranny, historical or current, very seriously anymore. It is another word spewed from the other end of the political game… tugging the rope in this tug of war.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6076
>>5991
>that video
>ebin Halo maymay
Why are you a 15-year-old?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6080
>>6076
are you talking about that video game?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.