/abcu/ - American Broadcasting CommUnity

First

Jim sent me.

>>3772

>>3786

Over achievers

>>3831

I just threw up.

>>3837

Me too.

>>3831

o7

Watching - fox was all borked so switched to Reuters feed less issues but still some…brace for impact(s)

>>3840

Gremlins

>>3831

gosh they all act like they're innocent

Why are they being so coy. they known they have several investigations concluded and ongoing against them all?

>>3845

Scripts are made to have a smooth flow until end of story.

>>3845

Crouching, terrified, ass covering, virtue signalling, messaging to their true believers

Zuck keeps coming back to how proud he is of their AI. Censoring content before anybody can even see it.

→ Who defines what is "hate speech"? or "disinformation" Central question

>>3849

> Who defines what is "hate speech"? or "disinformation" Central question

Sadly they fail to understand both of those are protected under the first amendment.

Hate speech is not real. It is only speech others hate.

The only words you cannot say are to incited acts of violence or to danger the masses with your words.

>>3849

>their AI

Except calling it AI is like calling a flat file a database

>>3850

My point exactly.

"Hate speech" is a marketing term.

That is, a new category that was invented for purpose of persuasion.

Marketers have long known that if you make up a term, you gain control over a market.

In this case the market is people's minds and belief system.

>>3851

A flat file is unlike a relational database.

However I don't know what their data mining and machine learning and analysis capability consists of.

These days everybody calls analytical and machine learning software "AI". Familiar with the true definition of AI as it has been proposed in IEEE and scientific literature over the years, I take issue with the terminology.

Just pointing out that Zuck took great care to use the term repeatedly as an attribute of his company. Perhaps for marketing purpose, i.e. "Trust our sophistication"

>>3852

Marketing making up new words. Automakers are into this.

E.g. there used to be automobiles, sedans, station wagons, buses (like VW bus). Also pickup trucks.

Then they invented Hatchbacks.

Then Sport-Utility Vehicles (SUVs).

And Mini-Trucks.

The company that wanted to create demand for a new category of vehicle invented the term to define something that they, alone, manufactured.

Then they spent a fortune on advertising to create mindshare and consumer desire for these new flavors of vehicle.

All the marketers do it, and have been doing it for a very long time.

[They] weaponize language against us.

Do we solve it by also inventing new terms?

Or by educating people to recognize when words are turned against them?

The education hasn't worked.

>>3854

>assume its already on Trumps list.

Hoping almost all of the corruption is at the least disclosed.

Even if there are some concessions as to how far it can be revealed.

Have to maintain the security of the Country and the world, while balancing transparency and truth.

>>3856

>Hoping almost all of the corruption is at the least disclosed.

Definitely not all.

Review Q[l]ues.

Enough to make change. But not all.

>>3856

>Have to maintain the security of the Country and the world,

Correct.

May not get some other counties subversion info unless they are cooperating with our plan.

As we cannot start a WW in trying to expose truth. It would do no good but only set back the movement.

Anyone have an OK pepe.

Doing the OKAY hand symbol?

>>3858

Yes - sorry I'm late. Food. Searching warehouse, sure we have some

>>3859

>>3860

That's good Thank you!

>>3862

<3

Trying to get Matt Gaetz to give an OK for the board!

>>3862

I have about 1500 pepes in a folder

Not always tagged for easy finding tho

>>3865

Let you in on a liddle secret. I joined the chans on Nov 4, 2017. Never did anything like this before. Saw instantly that it was necessary to have a decent repertoire of Pepes to be taken seriously. So went around assiduously collecting them from across the web. After I had enough, I felt secure to start posting. "Lurk moar"? I lurked for about 3 days.

Since then added many of course, in my regular duties collecting graphical content.

Yours are way cooler than mine tho. :-)

>>3866

Recount: 2132

>>3872

I was there part of the time. Then had to break away and regain my sanity. Trying to write a short article on Unpopular Truths. Maybe anons would like to collaborate on the article. I know what I want to say, but am not expressing it well enough. The text is still taking shape. It would get better with frens' input.

>>3873

Here is a 528-word draft editorial. Feedback and improvements are invited.

UNPOPULAR TRUTHS

An Editorial by Anon

Philosophers have long debated whether there is such a thing as objective truth. Facts are observed by our senses or instruments. Yet human senses can be fooled, and instrumental measurements can be falsified by better instruments.

The American Heritage® Dictionary defines truth as "Conformity to fact or actuality." And it defines unpopular as "Lacking general approval or acceptance." So "unpopular truth" is a contradiction.

Let's say you are driving a car through an intersection when you see a child bicycle across. You MUST take evasive action to avoid a crash. There is no debate over truth, only a child, a vehicle, the potential for a dangerous collision, and hopefully enough time to swerve or brake. In this situation, people share a commonsense understanding of truth.

Or consider a hot stove. Children quickly learn not to touch, or suffer a burn. If this truth became "unpopular", would touching the hot stove suddenly become safe for believers? Obviously not.

So what is an "unpopular truth"? A fact that is disliked by the majority, to the point of rejection.

But truth is unaffected by popularity or unpopularity. We can't make sound judgments without a pool of true facts to reason about. Disliking a fact doesn't make it any less true. Rejecting facts is a characteristic of mental illness.

These days our culture is pervaded by lies that are promoted as true. Language is distorted beyond recognition to support new dogmas. We are told that "men" can have menstrual periods and bear children. That censorship of conservatives by Big Tech isn't censorship, if it serves the interest of globalists. That cross-dressing or surgery changes a person's sex. That burning down a federal courthouse is a peaceful demonstration. That corrupt and demented senior Joe Biden could run the country. That Islam is a religion of peace. And many believe.

Political correctness is a form of intellectual terrorism. Your language must conform to certain false dogmas, or you will be shamed.

But "hate speech" is merely speech that others hate. The First Amendment protects all speech (except for inciting acts of violence or endangering the masses with one's words.): "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

The political left and their laptop mainstream media parrot their globalist masters' script. Universities and businsses pander to the same ideology. Will incessant repetition gain acceptance for the lies, and unpopular truths be forgotten?

A splinter minority hopes to overrule the silent majority. And if we remain silent, they might. We are angry at being muzzled and demonized for speaking the truth. It is time to become vocal. Our Constitution empowers us with freedom of speech. We need to reject the lies and insist on the truth, in our private interactions and in all public discourse. We need to be loud.

In rejecting "unpopular truths", our society has become mentally ill. Truth is the only cure.

>>3875

Thanks. Found a couple typos. Will wait for additional feedback.

lapdogs not laptops, kek

sativa, indica, or hybrid? kek Perhaps I'll joint you.

Let me think on this. 3 wildly different opinions from 3 anons (one at home didn't much like it).

Personal critique: My intro was weak and not a grabber. Some rough sentences due to trimming verbiage to stay near 500 words.

I'm not opposed to a jointly authored article. If you are right, ]you[ should not hesitate to write.

>>3880

> indica

Some silly name. From the store.

>>3874

>>3879

>I think you can elaborate here deeper and have a smoother transition into your main points.

I agree.

>These days our culture is pervaded by lies that are promoted as true. Language is distorted beyond recognition to support new dogmas. We are told that "men" can have menstrual periods and bear children. That censorship of conservatives by Big Tech isn't censorship, if it serves the interest of globalists. That cross-dressing or surgery changes a person's sex. That burning down a federal courthouse is a peaceful demonstration. That corrupt and demented senior Joe Biden could run the country. That Islam is a religion of peace. And many believe.

The concept of inversion could be emphasized here. That policies and institutions that were put in place to protect and serve people are being destroyed in exchange for accommodations for exaggerated constituencies.

For instance, your points about cross-dressing and sex change. They don't just want us to support a person's right to cross dress, they want us to allow a cross dresser to read to preschoolers at the local library's story time. They don't just want us to support a person's right to a sex change, they want men to compete in women's sports. In both cases two large groups (kids and women) that were previously protected are now undermined. Kids are being robbed of their right to an innocent childhood, and female athletes that have trained for years are losing their opportunities as men take over their sports.

Just some ideas. The main point is the paragraph above can be crystallized a bit more for greater impact.

>>3882

>indica

Same. I call it sleepy weed from the weed store.

>>3883

>>3884

Thanks for feedback, frens.

I don't want to launch into my bottom-line belief that it's a satanic conspiracy to invert everything decent in their futile attempt to repudiate the Deity. But obviously that lurks underneath because it's what I believe.

Will revisit in the A.M. and again, thank you all.

>>3890

The 7/19 is nice. Funny I just posted on QR, simul. >>>/qresearch/10121020

>>3894

Great Anon. Looks like you have your facts and ducks in a row!

Look forward to the results!

seeking feedback for 3500 word article, its split into ~800 word sections, not sure if I should post it in parts or whole.

https://pastebin.com/gdPx3kmH

Had planned on it being a full article but then I started editorializing. sources will add later and some paragraphs on the end, any suggestions are welcome.

How do you get in front of a Narrative?

>>3897

How do you focus attention on planned fraud?

>>3899

working on it…

>>3902

P.S. I did not know how drug pricing works. The Medicare Part B 6% commission incentivizing the use of the most expensive drug, the inability for Medicare to negotiate prices, etc. Did know that USA is subsidizing the entire pharma industry's R&D. These explanations are simple and it's good that you emphasize them.

The EOs can be characterized as restoring true free market capitalism to rein in a grossly bloated giant and restore fairness across nations.

The pharma industry and the research labs at the universities contain deep corruption, anon has it from a postdoc acquaintance who worked in the industry for a long time and witnessed infiltration by unqualified Chinese grad students whose goal was to steal others' ideas and results. The person also witnessed cutthroat behavior of longtime US researchers also trying to claim credit for others' work and hopefully get that blockbuster drug that would make them "made men" on patent royalties.

The whole system of perverse incentives cascaded throughout the entire industry. Fixing the medicare reimbursement system resulting in ridiculous product pricing is but one step toward rooting out the corruption, but a necessary first step.

>>3904

https://twitter.com/TyrannisCave/status/1288867291980075008?s=20

>>3896

First things first. Good job. Enjoyed the read and the content was great.

Just did 1 read through.

I noticed the following.

> Small errors No real need to change

can't >> can not

couldn't >> could not

don't >> do not

he'd >> he would

it's >> it is

> Punctuation and spelling or grammar

line 34.

In conclusion Cohen writes, erroneously, that the orders are not immediately-enforcable >>> immediately enforceable

line 10.

insulin every month, which the .

Needs finished.

line 22

Also Free Market Capitalism. >>> Also, Free Market Capitalism.

line 24

these kind of changes: >>> This kind of changes OR These kinds of changes

line 56

course, and >>> remove comma unneeded.

line 58

litigated and in the meantime, >>> litigated and, in the meantime,

line 84

And so they attack, and moralize, trivialize >>> And so, they attack, and moralize, trivialize

The content was great. I am NOT worried about the perspective shift either as Cee stated.

>>3902

Not repeating Cee points. except the unfinished sentence.

As stated by Cee a nice conclusion to wrap it all up tightly and summarize your perspective or goals would be nice. Or end with a question to continue the thought provoking nature of the article.

Great Job and keep up the great work fren.

>>3905

>>3904

Glad to see you completed it!

Great job.

Shared!

>>3908

o7

Was considering converting to an Op-ed but hard to do with the images that tell half the story

>>3907

>can't >> can not

> > > cannot

>>3910

KEK. Yep.

No coffee. Yet. Have no food have to go to the store. So not making coffee just gonna go get some.

>>3912

Correct!

We have been sending that for 4+ months or so.

>>3911

Coffee is one of the basic food groups.

Eat well, my fren.

Working to write an entirely new Unpopular Truths.

>>3896

This is absolutely fantastic. Excellent work.

>Bush’s would-be party successor John McCain campaigned on drug importation, like his opponent Obama, and likeObama McCaingave legitimacy to the phony safety concerns, saying “drug safety will take precedence in determining this policy

Do you need a comma between Obama and McCain?

What do you all think about breaking it into multiple parts for distribution? This would allow the content to gain momentum with an initial post introducing and describing the problem, followed by each section bringing the reader along. The full piece could be posted on medium and linked to at the end of each part.

Such as:

In part two we'll look at how the press is covering these executive orders. To read the complete analysis, go here. (medium link)

In part three we'll review the legal precedent. To read the complete analysis, go here. (medium link)

>>3915

Yes yes yes. Make it digestable. Give the [C] a trail of breadcrumbs they can follow with each one leading to the next. Plus each section can be promoted independently on social media, providing more avenues to reach the same content.

>>3902

> Why spell PhRMA not Pharma

I believe this is deliberate.

PhRMA Org | PhRMA

https://www.phrma.org

Patient support and assistance is the top priority for PhRMA's member companies, who are working hard to improve patients' lives through the discovery and development of new medicines and treatments.

>>3874

Total rewrite. 634 words.

Burning Books One Word at a Time

These days our culture is pervaded by lies that are promoted as true. Daily, the Left introduces new distortions of language to support their latest ideology. The debasement of language is not accidental but purposeful. A insidious agenda underpins this trend.

People cannot make sound judgments without a pool of true facts to reason about. When deprived of facts, the resulting cognitive cage is no less a prison. The subversion of language could enslave our minds. Unless we are vigilant, America could be defeated not with a bang but a whimper.

Children quickly learn not to touch a hot stove, or suffer a burn. If new words were substituted, would touching the burner suddenly become safe for believers? Obviously not. Unpopular truths are facts disliked to the point of rejection. But disliking a fact does not make it any less true. Rejecting facts is a characteristic of mental illness. Liberal ideologues want to prohibit consideration of objective truths that do not fit their agenda. “Unpopular truths” are on the chopping block, to be replaced by new “politically correct” expressions.

The mainstream media parrot their globalist masters' script, while universities and businsses pander to the same ideology. They hope incessant repetition will gain acceptance for the lies, and unpopular truths will be forgotten. We are told that “men” can have menstrual periods and bear children. That censorship of conservatives by Big Tech isn't censorship, if it serves the interest of globalists. That cross-dressing or surgery changes a person's sex. That burning down a federal courthouse is a peaceful demonstration. That corrupt and demented senior Joe Biden could run the country. That Islam is a religion of peace. That victimhood is a noble and desirable condition. And many believe.

Schools, libraries, and other publicly-funded institutions boost the new dogmas. Grotesque transvestites are displayed as role models. Abhorrent sexual practices that our grandparents could never have imagined are introduced to first-graders by mandated “diversity” curricula. How can we teach our children right from wrong, when the TV mocks us for explaining that burning down public buildings and rioting are not good ways to solve problems? Should parents yield control over raising our children to cultural Marxists?

One of the most powerful neologisms is “hate speech”. This category is used to terrorize people into self-censorship. Once an idea is branded “hate speech”, those who speak it can be demonized and even prosecuted under unconstitutional laws. But “hate speech” is merely speech that others hate. Our First Amendment protects all speech: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” The only exceptions are inciting acts of violence or endangering the masses with one's words.

What is at stake is only our free will, national independence, and right to personal uniqueness. We must not be coerced by “politically-correct” language bullies. We need to embrace the truth. While crying “diversity”, the globalists promote conformity. The trend to homogeneity of thought and language flouts everything that past generations of Americans fought to preserve. A free society is one in which vigorous debate flourishes, not the monoculture of ideas that the Left would compel under the insincere banner of “diversity”.

A splinter minority hopes to overrule the silent majority. And if we remain silent, they might. It is time to become vocal. Our Constitution empowers us with freedom of speech. We need to reject the lies and insist on the truth, in our private interactions and in all public discourse. We need to be loud. We need to overcome our reticence, and speak out. Truth is the only cure.

>>3918

>A insidious agenda underpins this trend

A >>> An

>while universities and businsses pander

businsses >>> businesses

Great job!

>>3919

>>3918

Corrected (thank you!) and posted in Op-Ed >>3920

Will push to QR right now.

>>3902

>>3903

>>3907

>>3915

Thank you for the thoughtful comments and reading the whole thing kek.

>What do you all think about breaking it into multiple parts for distribution?

>Such as:

Yeah, I'll do this. I was planning to make a zerohedge account and see if they let anyone publish blogs or you need special permission.

>>3917

Correct, PhRMA is the AIPAC of pharmaceuticals.

>>3903

I didn't know it either. It's crazy isn't it?

>The EOs can be characterized as restoring true free market capitalism to rein in a grossly bloated giant and restore fairness across nations.

I like this, I'll add it near the top.

>>3918

Well done.

Crisp.

>>3923

Thanks. Sometimes it takes a couple of tries, kek.

thats funny, I posted the word AIPAC and my vpn started malfunctioning.

>>3918

Brilliant title, you articulate this well. Most people outside the chans have never read arguments like this or even aware its an issue, I think that proves you right.

It could help to vary the pacing, I struggle with this at times.

>>3926

Here's what happened. It's that magic that we sometimes call intuition. Wrote the 1st draft yesterday and got comments from 3 anons, right? Knew the article needed rewrite and different slant and better focus on key issues. Mulling it over in the back of muh mind. Got up late, I was brushing my teeth or something, thinking about my core issue - the weaponization of language against us - and the phrase Burning Books One Word at a Time popped into my mind. Came back to my desk and realized that was the title for the article.

I swear, it was not my idea. The idea just popped into my head without warning.

/\

>>3927

I call it alignment with infinite intelligence.

You relaxed and let the answer flow in.

>>3928

>>3927

the muse

Anybody willing to tag muh article as notable (again) so it will get into wearethene.ws?

>>>/qresearch/10130317

>>>/qresearch/10130370

Reposted in QR because it was marked notable in #12963, but then we lost some notables.

>>3932

I responded to one of the shills. Pathetic.

I ran into a similar dynamic with the You Be The Judge post. Mine was longer which made it worse. After some anons finally looked at it, it got some positive reactions.

Notables are tough and I'm not sure they entirely matter. We should just be prepared to repost articles across multiple shifts as well as off the board.

I think a good format given the ADD nature of the board is to provide the full article as an image or two, and provide a teaser as the post content. I've seen other sites where the teaser is actually the title and first paragraph of the article followed by continued…

That puts the onus on us to write an attention-getting first paragraph, which is the right thing to do anyway.

These are my lessons learned.

>>3933

Yep. I just tried something: broke the article into 9 posts and didn't say it was an article.

We shall see what reaction is…

>>>/qresearch/10131087

>>3933

the night shift IMO is a better place to post. Not sure what nightshift times are more busy, I don't spend a lot of time on qr anymore.

>>3934

Thanks for promoting our articles, Cee.

>>3938

Thank you fren.

>>3938

>Always forget you are not to twitter.

Guess I should follow your account in a tab.

>>3940

>>3938

Nice twitter acct. I will try to keep up :-(

@babyfist twitter is a wonder to behold.

Visit @babyfist if you want to renew your energy and enthusiasm.

https://twitter.com/babyfist

Deep respect, Patriot.

>>3944

Thanks. Cee. I just assume all yous already see it.

I try to walk to the line between getting banned and speaking facts along with encouraging patriots to do their part.

If more looked they would understand I plant ways to avoid the censors. Creating new #tags. Word choice ETC.

I cannot directly tell them. Or they would censor those as well. They will learn many big names steal and use my ideas often. So eventually it gets out.

>>3948

The sad thing is that Twitter wants to force everybody to have Twit acct. Previously, you could follow in a tab and the tab updated as notification when new. No more. Twat changed API, tool reverting to old Twat api to preserve notification feature no longer worked, now unTwitter anons have to refresh tab to learn if anything new. Harder to follow.

>>3953

Read quoted text in pic 5 closely, fren. It does not mention HCQ, only ribavarin and interferon alpha-2b. The filename is misleading.

>>3954

Reposted >>3904

Since posted while Q was posting yesterday, then internet down for 12+ hours

will try again later

https://youtu.be/NI_An1Ned_w

Live with ninja

Sorry thought I posted here

>>3958

Watching. Came in late.

Enjoy!

>https://youtu.be/fDddyo08aDk

Corb Lund - Student Visas

>https://youtu.be/c3rANplXiCM

>>3966

>>3967

Thank you for your hard work!

<3

Always keep and edge on your knife!

>https://youtu.be/8RQJjeCPENA

>>3968

Working on the ABCU|8 shows and layouts right now.

P.s

New maxwell docs today if you guys are archiving them.

>>3974

I haven't been. Hope somebody else is.

>>3973

>All while shitposting

I'm all over that action

Jim just went live!

https://youtu.be/li3vf6PkhKw

Should be a short show. They have to go for Revolution Radio

>>3971

The rectangular shape is for what medium?

>>3978

I just took a screen shot

this is mock up some other, with the skills is doing it!

>>3974

Link(s)?

>>3975

I have all of the docs from yesterday

jdownloader ftw

>>3981

same link on court-listener

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/giuffre-v-maxwell/?order_by=desc

>>3982

Ahh thanks was grabbing them from voat last night copy pasta jdownloader grabs them

>>3983

>>3982

Looks like stricken documents except top 2

>>3984

Anons were unredacting many this morning (10-12 hrs ago). Scraping hidden text from PDFs and pasting into their word processor.

>>3985

Yeah did the same last night for a bit to validate for others

>>3986

I'm sorry I'm not helping. Did so much writing & memestuff yesterday & this morning, needed to catch a break.

>>3989

>multiple competencies

One weird thing: I actually have not used 2 of muh core competencies on the chan. I dare not, lest I dox myself.

>>3990

I know that sounds shitty.

But it's true. We deal in truth here, no apologies.

>>3989

>I wish I knew. We're in it to win it, no matter what.

<3 facts.

>>3989

>>3990

>>3991

Its good to have personal things. We all use anon board for a reason we like our own things. Or the freedom of not being know or XYZ… … … … … ..

Listening to Jim on Rev radio

http://revolution.radio/

>>3993

o7

Exercise and rest needs some work. kek

>>3990

>One weird thing: I actually have not used 2 of muh core competencies on the chan. I dare not, lest I dox myself.

I grow less concerned by the day personally, but I've always hidden in plain sight.

Plenty of things no one group knows about that I do or have done.

Not famous, nor have any interest in publicity or fame. Just freedom for all.

In the end may slip back into the forest…drop by now and again to see how things are.

Big state, lots of room to stretch.

>>3958

Did you bitchute your talk with Jim before they shoahed it? qrd?

>>3995

I had some of the

> publicity or fame

when I was younger. I totally don't care anymore, but still don't want to get doxed.

When Q started up, for the first year or so there was a not-sane person we had known in the past, who was stalking us on the chan, who could have caused a lot of trouble. So we had to be really careful until that person went away. Fortunately they were pretty recognizable when they posted.

Just a secondary reason not to get doxed.

>>3993 These are really good words.

<3

Love you frens. It is good to have frens and support one another.

>>3996

I have a hard copy.

Uploaded it now. May still be processing.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Hm8xF9jryZc7/

>>3997

>It is good to have frens and support one another.

Definitely!

>>3999

I'm just about to get started.. have a good night

I'm working to prepare anon's article

THE GREAT DIVIDE >>4010 Op-Ed

for posting.

>>4015

Posted at >>>/qresearch/10151770

I see several anons' articles making the rounds via twitter etc. Thank you very much!

>>4030

Colorado where I live has all registered voters get a ballot in the mail. But you must be registered and have a valid ID on file to receive the ballot.

I still always drop mine physically at the drop location.

Not sure it will differ per state as to what the best action should be.

>>4031

>I still always drop mine physically at the drop location.

Same. At least that eliminates the potential for postal fuckery. Our county is heavily red, so not too worried about the county election official.

>>4033

>Our county is heavily red, so not too worried about the county election official.

Ditto, 2A sanctuary county

Didn't some states pass laws to give all their electoral votes to the nationwide popular vote winner?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/03/16/another-state-signs-popular-vote-bill-that-could-decide-presidential-election/

March 16, 2019 at 7:59 a.m. MDT

Colorado has joined a list of states that plan to allocate their electoral votes to whichever candidate wins the nationwide popular vote.

Gov. Jared Polis (D) signed the measure into law Friday, uniting Colorado with 11 other states and the District of Columbia in the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, whose members pledge to use their electoral votes on whichever candidate wins the national popular vote.

The bill will only take effect, however, if the law is passed by states representing at least 270 electoral college votes, which is the amount needed to win the presidency. With the addition of Colorado, that number now sits at 181.

Other jurisdictions that have enacted the legislation include Rhode Island, Vermont, Hawaii, Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, Washington, New Jersey, New York, Illinois, California and the District of Columbia. New Mexico, whose senate approved the legislation earlier this week, could be the next state to join.

Because Republican-controlled legislatures haven’t embraced the effort, changing the electoral college delegate procedures in enough states to reach the 270 combined electoral votes needed to become president could be difficult, Reed Hundt, chairman and co-founder of Making Every Vote Count, told The Washington Post last month. The remaining states where the initiative may pass are smaller and left-leaning, he said.

Under the Constitution, states have the power to determine how they award their electoral votes in national elections. Most states have winner-take-all laws, which award all of its electoral votes to the presidential candidate who receives the most votes within the state. Two states, Maine and Nebraska, split their electoral votes.

Because many states are dominated either by the Democratic or Republican party, the winner of a presidential election is a foregone conclusion in those states. Also because electoral votes are reflective of the representation within the U.S. House and Senate, some states have very large electoral college contingencies, while others are much smaller. As a result, a handful of “battleground” states are where candidates often focus their attention. Still, candidates prefer to win as many states as possible and the popular vote to establish a public mandate for their agendas.

Five of the nation’s 45 presidents have taken office without winning the national popular vote, including Donald Trump. Electoral college losses can be narrow: If Sen. John F. Kerry had 60,000 additional votes in Ohio in 2004, he would have won the election, even though President George W. Bush was 3 million votes ahead in the popular vote.

Because of changes in state demographics, elections are now fought in a tiny number of swing states, Hundt told The Post. In the 2012, 2016 and 2020 elections, nearly 40 states, with about 80 percent of the country’s population, were or will be ignored by both candidates, he said.

"This is a new American demographic, which shows that the electoral system of the 18th century doesn’t work anymore,” he said. “No one at the time the Constitution was written thought that 80 percent of the population would be irrelevant.”

I should know this, but I never saw this compact before:

https://www.nationalpopularvote.com/sites/default/files/one-pager_0.pdf

…"The bill has been enacted into law in 11 states possessing 165 electoral votes, including small states

(RI, VT, HI, DC), medium-sized states (MD, MA, WA), and large states (NJ, IL, NY, CA). The bill will take effect when enacted by states with 105 more electoral votes…."

So it's not in effect yet. I thought it was.

>>4035

PBS I know but:

SCOTUS rules presidential electors must back their states’ popular vote winner

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/scotus-rules-presidential-electors-must-back-their-states-popular-vote-winner

>>4036

That's doesn't solve the issue does it?

States "can" require, but it doesn't say states "must" require…

>>4037

Right plus rogue electors.

Still hoping to see 506 for DJT…been saying it since 2018.

Silent Majority + Landslide

>>4041

>or maybe there is rising acceptance that ABCU

Or maybe some anons know how to test and probe to verify. ;)

>>4042

;)

>>4041

2, Admin, Director I don't talk to unless they talk to me. Sgt B is "working" so to say.

Whenever that is concluded surely he will have some things to say.

>>4035

I would be funny if they pulled this off and Trump won the popular vote.

>>4044

"Whatever you do don't throw me in that briar patch!" ;)

>>4045

kek I had to look this up

Imagine the salt…

>>4047

>kek I had to look this up

God I'm old

>Imagine the salt…

I'd be "muh sides"

>>4046

o7

Would certainly not be the first time either, have watched it happen plenty

>>4050

>>4051

>>4049

o7

Enjoy the rack time.

>>4053

Love it

https://twitter.com/ABCU_8/status/1289959758003240963

Gotta pretend to be a mechanic. Today!

see you guys later. Will show you some samples of videos soon.

Been working on the format to make ease of recording!

>>4053 Beautiful & TYVM.

>>4055

havent tried this pasta yet

thought i might meme the phrases

What you hear, Tell.

What you see, Say.

What you know, Show.

Use your ear · For the [C]

Have no fear · You are FREE

What you hear · What you see

What you SAY · It's the KEY

Time is here · Say and show

Tell the [C] · What you KNOW

Find a fact · Set it free

Tell or show · Time to ACT

Make a leap · On your own

Feed the sheep · Lead them HOME!

Oh good you saw the new recruit who wants to write with us!

>>4068

Yes. I did.

Many will soon. Like Minds like Like minds.

Almost ready for our video content to start coming out.

>>4070

>Like Minds like Like minds.

Yes they do. Anon has noticed that, kek.

Click the ## in the button

Or this link : https://8kun.top/abcu/res/3770.html#4070

If you are new to images boards check this out!

>>8 Newfag general

>>4055

Hope the vehicle is moar comfy now.

>>4084

Start here:

"Staff" works

>>22 SB OP-ED Journal

Then Anon works:

>>23 SB OP-ED General

Sub to YT:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-95EvMWU4X2qXPxkTZjwSA

Bookmark:

https://abcu8.co/

>>4084

Twitter if you do that:

https://twitter.com/ABCU_8

We push stuff there.

Also look out for the news to say what we say but to few days later.

<3

But trying keep the cart behind the horse.

Wow just had a badger in the yard. Couple days ago it was a solo bear cub.

>>4091

>Couple days ago it was a solo bear cub.

Mama is near!

>>4092

We know. Caution required when going out.

>>4088

>on the hairy edge

By choice

Request for comment

Is it worth engaging?

Problem: Some big Q connected Social Media accounts spreading information that is blatantly false and easily disproved (not Q related).

Misleading some into believing a deception. This is common on the internet in general, and can easily be dismissed by those that can discern.

Solution(s): Provide factual dig evidence disputing the deception head on.

Ignore it smh and move on (allowing people to possibly learn to trust only themselves to find the truth, rather than another popular name/acct).

Not worried about blow-back personally. Mostly the reference is to some famefags that put out bullshit (won't specify which currently).

In the current case it is also an insult to veterans, and good people.

WW(Y)D?

[I tend to tackle it head on regardless of who it is, and damn the consequences]

>>4100

Suggest kicking it around with social media warriors on >>>/warroom/4178

>>4101

>Suggest kicking it around with social media warriors on >>>/warroom/4178

There is a reason started here (something F). ;)

Take social media out of the question (see below).

>>4103

>I hope that its a simple mistake on them and they will correct their errors.

They have been pushing it for awhile.

It is a complete and easily (20-30 minute dig) disproved idea.

Most likely because of the fame level of the individual pushing it could blow up.

–

Below

It is imho more about the reason we got into this situation we are fighting against in the first place.

Few stood up and said Bullshit to the big names in MSM, politics, hollywood, and "authority" in general.

Also imho the citizens forgot their duty to be the Balance against tyranny.

My understanding is that the movement is about truth, exposing lies, and teaching people to think for themselves.

Not replacing a failed MSM with another vehicle which may in the end prove the same susceptibility to being compromised.

It is a measure of how awake people are to see so many support a message without researching to see if it has any basis in fact.

It is about right versus wrong.

In general I will engage regardless of name/fame/imagined rank, or other factors.

The problem is doing so may either increase influence or completely devastate it.

Is it worth engaging a falsity and risking influence.

>>4103

>>4100

I've thought about this, I don't know. Infighting is a bad look but so is being wrong.

Like the pic on one of these welcome topicals about famous people changing their names.. it's real but I've seen that pic on half chan and looked it up, some of those names are the person's given name and they found a jewish person etc in their family and lilst that as their real name. It makes the whole idea look wrong if it catches on, but a lot of people will think you're a shill if you call them out so it confuses people and Idk if it's helpful. A lot of this shit never makes it out of the circle anyway.

>>4104

If it's a topic that abcu writers have overlooked (mea culpa, I miss a lot because trying to juggle several things at once), doesn't hurt to bring it to our attention.

Who knows? You might inspire somebody to write something.

>>4104

True but the MSM pushes stuff they know to be wrong, most of these guys believe what they post IMO

>>4105

>>4104

>>4103

In terms of what to write about, I don't have an agenda.

TRUTH is my agenda.

Have noticed, after writing several short articles for /abcu/, that what usually motivates me to drop all else that I'm doing and write, is when I get mad enough about something. Getting mad is what puts me over the threshhold and impels corrective action, namely writing about it. (Or sometimes memeing about it).

And sometimes I just don't want to get mad so I avoid immersing myself in things that make me mad! Does that make sense? Because we all have strategies to keep our sanity and sense of balance.

When our balance is off, that's when we take corrective actions to attempt to influence others? Some can do this day in and day out (@babyfist! most impressive) and some perform in a more intermittent fashion.

Just my personal introspection on the matter. Your mileage might vary.

Found a draft article that anon never completed or published. Needs more digging on the legal implications of platforms choosing the role of "publisher" by editorializing (censoring) certain users but not others.

>>4111

Meant to paste the draft

The American Cyber Civil War

The wikipedia article actually provides a bit of an introduction:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot-com_bubble

(more at link).

Some Dot Com companies were extraordinarily overvalued (in the sense of stock market parlance). They had virtually zero earnings. Their debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio was sky-high and their earnings per share (EPS) was negligible. The ridiculous valuations made no sense whatsoever, in terms of concrete investment metrics. Yet their stock price kept levitating as hot money rushed into the new sector in a speculative frenzy, creating a bubble that kept inflating. Stock market commentary hyping the potential of these companies was everywhere.

The bubble was deliberately created and its entire trajectory planned. It enabled certain insiders to cash out, instant trillionaires. More importantly, it enabled certain individuals and organizations to secure present and future control (utter domination) over a key communications sector. This is especially interesting in light of the known and proven government funding that provided seed capital and promoted the expansion of dozens of key companies in the telecomm sector (think In-Q-Tel, LifeLog,…) Who knows which 3-letter agencies are still entrenched there, burrowed in deeply like a blood-sucking tick and lurking in the shadows while subtly exerting control?

With President Trump's May 28, 2020 executive order declaring internet companies as "publishers" (Section 230) when they use their extraordinary powers to regulate speech and inject their own editorial bias by suppressing conservative speech, we are now seeing the next phase of information warfare play out.

The stranglehold that companies like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc. had over information flows played a huge role in political victories by the Radical Left, that resulted in the presidency of Barack Obama and the continued domination by leftist governors, left-controlled House of Representatives, etc.

It should never have happened.

Who let it happen? Who caused the Dot Com bubble? Who profited from it (financially)? More significantly, who gained control of information flows as a result? Who planned the takeover of worldwide media?

Will President Trump's order to restore Americans' first amendment right of free speech be effective in returning our society to a more balanced posture, where voices from both the Right and the Left have equal opportunities for debate and discourse?

'Mistakes to you are roadmaps to others.'

>>4112

Saw this on QR. I believe it is publishable. Do we need to ask anon's permission?

>>>/qresearch/10171401

Cognitive dissonance

Normies are undergoing a severe existential crisis brought about by the co-existence (in an identical but impossibly incongruent space) of two opposing and competing sets of information simultaneously claiming a FACTUAL LABEL - and presented to them by the very people they have traditionally long trusted.

This happens when what appeared to be facts on the ground does NOT MATCH what their TRUSTED long-time Pundits (seen as "Friends") are saying - The traumatized Human mind will go into a powerful existential protective mode in order to maintain even a false sense of sanity - even if it is only to their own minds.

Friends or Loved ones who have long put their trust in the pundits on Mainstream Media and have believed that they are ALWAYS truthful are traumatized Now when it is very clear (to the awakened) that the MSM is lying about literally everything

Meantime, Those who continued to TRUST them - and who simply cannot reconcile all the glaring externally verifiable but contradictory facts with what is being STATED to them Those who cannot fit the glaring contradictory facts on the ground into the same Mental space occupied by the mendacious words of their beloved "Pundits" find their precious but now factually-deficient "World View" forced into an impossible situation sharing the same enclosed space with outrageous Lies and they see only two forms of escape:

One avenue of escape allows them to keep their flagging world view and one will destroy their world view forever and change their lives.

Either they must Lose their religion (and failing world view) and admit to existential devastation and choose to see the truth ( admitting they have been LIED TO) or… They must cling to their failing reality at all costs become completely and insanely BLIND to the obvious. Those whose trauma (or Fear) exceeds their ability to choose the former will descend into cognitive dissonance. They become blind to reality no matter how glaring the incongruity may be or how obvious it is. It is a type of temporary insanity.

It helps (Helps those who love them or those who witness this astounding descent into insanity) to realize that it is actually a sort of CRUDE MENTAL and even spiritual survival tactic and a product of our incredibly creative Human Minds.

For example it would actually serve a severely Traumatized child very well (temporarily at least) - in allowing an innocent child to go through incredibly horrific torture relatively unscathed as far as visible scars go. In fact this type of drastic emergency mental protective measure is precisely described by MKUltra mind control techniques and is understood VERY WELL by those in the Main Stream Media and the Deep State and the CIA. Torture is inflicted on a subject and then a MENTAL "OUT" is provided to the victim by the torturer. The child TAKES the "out" because it is their only means of escape. They can mentally at least – float above their torture.

It is an example of Devils forcing Angels to use a last resort tactic.

We can see DELIBERATE and calculated intentions by the Dark Forces to force people into a state of cognitive dissonance on every single Main Stream Media Newscast. Where the smiling "friendly" icons purporting to be our "Allies" will deliberately state things which even the most cursory examination of facts on the ground proves to be false and yet the LIES are calmly stated with absolute conviction behind masks resembling absolute perfectly manufactured false sincerity. This forces anyone who hangs onto false hope straight into cognitive dissonance which effectively shuts down ANY information contradicting the desired narrative.

Juan on "The Five" with Greg Gutfield (Fox) is a prime example of cognitive dissonance.

And this is exactly the effect intended by those who are deliberately perpetrating the cognitive dissonance.

I'll just leave these thoughts here. Since many people have difficulty understanding WHY so many appear to be insane these days.

>>4110

>Still have no idea what "topic" you brought up initially. Sposed to guess? Or sposed to stay in the dark?

Topic was left out, more of a question of is it worth it to engage these accounts that say they are part of Q or let them expose themselves I suppose. Some do right away others have a huge following and would be immediately recognized imo.

Trying to avoid adding bias with to much detail.

Think in general terms of subjects like D.U.M.B.s/rescuing children/EQ or Wayfair…lots of other BS pushed out there by famefags

or even more generally "Fantastical claims, no sauce" yet people gobble it up

>>4111

^^^^ Look at those digits.

>>4112

I figured he would update as well.

Seemed eagar to tackle big tech

>>4113

<3

Facts. I see many mistakes that continue to adjust our roadmap.

>>4115

Not all big accounts will stay true to the fight.

[sleepers]

Will be testing the live stream / Recorded content today. Did a small test last night. Seemed good

>>4116

>Not all big accounts will stay true to the fight.

>[sleepers]

Crossed my mind.

The other reason asked here initially is this doesn't just apply to social media in the 40k view.

I knew what the answer I wanted was, and remained vague as to details to get the most data.

ex.

[Search: Bob]

vs

[Search: Robert Mueller]

I know, I'm weird

>>4118

Some big accounts were never and in the fight and only uses the movement to gain clout. <Insert many names HERE>

They use us like the other power players do. If it is about power and control they have lost the ideas of the movement.

It is about TRUTH as stated by cee.

Only justice should be blind!

>>4116

>Seemed eagar to tackle big tech

My content. Yeah I better finish it. Dated May 29. No idea how it got lost for so long, kek.

>>4114

This anon had no objection to our publishing their work. I'll copy to Op-Ed thread >>>/qresearch/10171606

>>4118

>ex.

>[Search: Bob]

>vs

>[Search: Robert Mueller]

>I know, I'm weird

I tried I got similar results for both via LORD GOOGLE.

Did not do a deep dive.

But I am not a fan of the brave, honorable and great Mueller.

>>4120

>>4114 Gonna edit just a bit (seems author might be German?) will take a while with POTUS news conf coming up, will notify when ready for publish

>>4123

Dont know if it told you.

Someone on medium "stole" your article!

https://medium.com/@burseblades/burning-books-one-word-at-a-time-b049b52c07db

>>4114

>>4123

The anon's article is ready at >>4126

>>4125

I saw it get published there!

Thank you stronk frens!!

I am following 2 of your twitter accts now and more visibility into what's going on now.

>>4129

https://twitter.com/ABCU_8/status/1290410492976984065

too late. Just tabbed back.

>>4132

Just pushed on QR

Will I get into a lot of trouble if the new article delves into In-Q-Tel? Using publicly available information.

>>4135

Doubt it, In-Q-Tel is public and only some of their projects are classified.

>>4136

Well I find myself diving right down a rabbit hole, inquiring about what oversight exists over the CIA and whether past abuses ("if any") have been rectified. So here goes.. … … … … .

My thesis, if I can prove it, will state:

The dot-com bubble was not an organic phenomenon. From the outset it was planned and executed with a more sinister purpose: the takeover of worldwide media. By whom, you may ask? Did they succeed? This article will attempt to prove that the bubble was deliberately created, and its entire trajectory planned, to give certain highly-placed insiders absolute control over what has arguable become our most key communications sector.

If I can't prove it, then I will change the focus of the article.

>>4103

Responded with facts to each post in a long thread felt needed an alternate viewpoint, as the viewpoint presented was off.

Gained two new anons in process and probably didn't cause any harm to either of us.

Offered a valid opposing view, with sauce (unlike their thread).

>>4137

I agree with this. My observation is that the dotcom bubble coincided with Y2K. Another manufactured, fear-based crisis that caused the MAJORITY of businesses to update their systems in unison. Think about that. Significant infrastructure expenditures across the Fortune 500 coordinated around a common date.

Not only did this cause spending to be routed to certain "cool" startups to upgrade old legacy based software to new Internet architectures, it also caused synchronicity across companies within each sector making collusion and price fixing easier.

When the bubble burst, everyone blamed the insane multiples assigned to companies with no revenue, but they never tied it to Y2K which was the initial fuel.

>>4112

>Who let it happen? Who caused the Dot Com bubble? Who profited from it (financially)? More significantly, who gained control of information flows as a result? Who planned the takeover of worldwide media?

Just saw this post.

I think we know the "who" – the elite compromised insiders that manipulate mankind for power and personal gain. +++, ++, +, Yale grads, Harvard grads, Wall Street, politicians, CFR, etc.

Y2K was the fuel for Silicon Valley creating disruption and transferring billions/trillions of dollars from established businesses to tech companies.

The 2008 financial meltdown was another liquidity event that allowed "the players" to move the chess pieces around the board. Lehman Brothers was demolished and Jamie Dimon scooped everything up. (((They))) created the subprime mortgage crisis in order to have a liquidity event. Robber barron playbook.

>>4139

I have insight about the things technology companies had to do prior to Y2K that I cannot discuss here. Your suspicion is to a large extent incorrect. There were very legitimate concerns, which fortunately got rectified in time. A lot of code was written and deployed. Legacy systems were fixed well in advance of Y2K.

>>4140

Agree with

>The 2008 financial meltdown was another liquidity event that allowed "the players" to move the chess pieces around the board. Lehman Brothers was demolished and Jamie Dimon scooped everything up. (((They))) created the subprime mortgage crisis in order to have a liquidity event. Robber barron playbook.

but I'm not going to go into that in this article.

*

The draft has already turned into a tome, over 11,000 words. (4-part article?) and isn't finished yet.

Maybe you will review the draft when it's ready. I would value your feedback.

>>4141

Playtime. Anon too tired to complete the article tonight.

>>4149

Special memes! Never seen either one before.

<3

>>4137

there used to be this series of youtube vids about the gov or dod funding silicon valley from the beginning, via universities, I'm sure there is cia overlap there. They are really long though if you can find them.

Assange's article about Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen might be helpful to tie into todays tech.

>>4152

Always think about the crumb about Unicorns.

They do exist, all of the big tech startups "in the garage" Gulag, Amazon, Apple…would be surprised if it was all C_A with tax dollars…we own all of it.

>>4155

3036

Trust POTUS Appointed AG William Barr

Q

!!mG7VJxZNCI

Tue Mar 12 2019 15:50:23 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/03/report-barr-gave-mueller-permission-to-indict-trumps-three-adult-children-and-jared-kushner/📁

Re_read drop:

>>[MUELLER] sealed indictments installed [DC] prior to [RR] loss of >>power?

>>Sealed indictments [DC][blockade last resort] installed post >>SESSIONS departure & WHITAKER assumption?

>>Sealed indictment count [DC] post_SESSIONS departure?

>>Sealed indictment count [DC] pre_WHITAKER assumption?

>>Power of BARR?

>>Can a sealed indictment be pulled post filing?

Did POTUS just install a rogue AG who allows for the indictment of his children based on false pretenses?

BARR Senate vote?

54-45

Do UNICORNS exist?

Q

Video premiers in ~5 mins

https://youtu.be/xFpqSQZi8mc

>>4159

Nice work videoAnon!

It is short and sweet.

Full of info.

I hope they do not ban it.

>>4159

Looks great, shared it

>>4160

Yes, Ty Anon!

>>4162

Ty.

>>4165

https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/271036346

>>4167 It is fucking IMPOSSIBLE that what I posted at 10:30 last night, upon retiring, appears at 8:18 AM MDT the next day.

Or is it?

I am digging, and writing.

Shadilay.

>>4169

The article has gotten very long and deep. I think it will be finished in hours! It's hard, but having some fun here with the power of words. Here's a taste

THE AMERICAN CYBER CIVIL WAR

The current battle over social media censorship can be traced back to origins in the CIA’s Project Mockingbird. This article will argue that Project Mockingbird did not terminate after the Cold War but continued when the dot-com bubble enabled social media tech giants to pick up the mantle and continue campaigns of social influence.

sections:

CIA’S NON-PROFIT TECHNOLOGY PARTNER, IN-Q-TEL

HISTORY OF CIA ABUSES: PROJECT MOCKINGBIRD

DARPA LIFELOG: TRANSFORMED INTO FACEBOOK?

REINING IN SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP

>>4170

When you finish. I look forward to it.

This story is OLD so dont force it due to time.

Reminder: "The Truth Cannot Tell Time."

I will try to do our first long Expose style show on this topic once you complete. Now that most the things for recorded and live content are ready for the channel.

All video have been created by others so far. Or just me as a guest with others.

P.s. I think i will be on with Jim today. Live from Nigeria

Might need an assist with some edits.

>>4171

Draft just posted. Take a look. >>4172 Op-Ed

https://www.rightwirereport.com/2020/05/05/dr-fauci-at-the-nih-with-effective-choroquine-study-in-2005-now-forgets-in-2020/

Dr. Fauci at the NIH with Effective Choroquine Study in 2005, Now Forgets in 2020

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/energy-trump-biden-chuck-devore

Chuck DeVore: Trump energy policy key to reviving economy — Biden plan would destroy jobs, raise energy costs

https://youtu.be/yXjTQ5HEBow

Devin Nunes: Case against Flynn ‘is a never-ending story’

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/04/09/doting-letters-donations-raise-eyebrows-over-dr-faucis-devotion-to-hillary-clinton-906695

Doting letters, donations raise eyebrows over Dr. Fauci’s devotion to Hillary Clinton

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/03/stunning-development-2005-us-nih-study-found-chloroquine-was-effective-in-treating-coronavirus-infection-so-why-is-dr-fauci-questioning-its-use-now/

2005 US NIH Study Found Chloroquine Was Effective in Treating Coronavirus In Primates — Why Was This Ignored?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/08/two-charts-put-dr-fauci-prison/

These Two Charts Should Land Dr. Fauci in Prison

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/

'We report, however, that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage. In addition to the well-known functions of chloroquine such as elevations of endosomal pH, the drug appears to interfere with terminal glycosylation of the cellular receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. This may negatively influence the virus-receptor binding and abrogate the infection, with further ramifications by the elevation of vesicular pH, resulting in the inhibition of infection and spread of SARS CoV at clinically admissible concentrations.'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Seventh_Fleet

'The Seventh Fleet is a numbered fleet of the United States Navy. It is headquartered at U.S. Fleet Activities Yokosuka, in Yokosuka, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan. It is part of the United States Pacific Fleet. At present, it is the largest of the forward-deployed U.S. fleets, with 60 to 70 ships, 300 aircraft and 40,000 Navy, Marine Corps personnel, and Coast Guard support personnel.[1] Its principal responsibilities are to provide joint command in natural disaster or military operations and operational command of all US naval forces in the region.'

https://www.nydailynews.com/coronavirus/ny-coronavirus-two-chinese-boys-die-face-masks-gym-class-20200507-ruyinz7czjbqde3tprx647q3dm-story.html

Two Chinese boys reportedly die within week of each other while wearing face masks in gym class

https://ahrp.org/nih-scientists-caught-concealing-millions-in-royalties-for-experimental-treatments-ap/

NIH Scientists Caught Concealing Millions in Royalties for Experimental Treatments – AP

"According to records obtained by the AP, among the 51 NIH scientists currently involved in testing products for which they secretly receive royalties, are Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and his deputy, Dr. H. Clifford Lane who "have received tens of thousands of dollars in royalties for an experimental AIDS treatment they invented [interleukin-2]. At the same time, their office has spent millions in tax dollars to test the treatment on patients across the globe." '

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-conserving-restoring-majesty-americas-public-lands/

President Donald J. Trump Is Conserving and Restoring the Majesty of America’s Public Lands

https://youtu.be/a-mfhjaPvsM

President Donald Trump Inaugural Address FULL SPEECH (C-SPAN)

https://bgr.com/2020/08/03/coronavirus-transmission-prevention-who-tedros-social-distance-face-masks-handwashing/

WHO just reminded us of the worst-case coronavirus scenario

https://www.rightwirereport.com/2020/05/05/dr-fauci-at-the-nih-with-effective-choroquine-study-in-2005-now-forgets-in-2020/

Dr. Fauci at the NIH with Effective Choroquine Study in 2005, Now Forgets in 2020

https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles?query=Chloroquine+is+a+potent+inhibitor+of+SARS+coronavirus+infection+and+spread.&volume=&searchType=&tab=keyword

2 result(s) for 'Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.' within Virology Journal

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/may/06/blog-posting/dont-fall-conspiracy-about-dr-anthony-fauci-hydrox/

'An April 27 article says the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases has known since 2005 that hydroxychloroquine, a drug used to treat conditions like lupus and arthritis, is effective against coronaviruses like the one that causes COVID-19. '

'Don’t fall for conspiracy about Dr. Anthony Fauci, hydroxychloroquine '

https://web.archive.org/web/20200506140801/https://onenewsnow.com/perspectives/bryan-fischer/2020/04/27/fauci-knew-about-hcq-in-2005-nobody-needed-to-die

Fauci knew about HCQ in 2005 – nobody needed to die

BOARD VOLUNTEER C EDITED 2 URLS BELOW TO MAKE THEM NON-CLICKABLE as I suspect they are here for IP Harvesting and no other reason

/ƃɹo.ɹǝʇuǝɔןds.ʍʍʍ//:sdʇʇɥ

/ɯoɔ.ʍousʍǝuǝuo//:sdʇʇɥ

>>4174

TY I think.

>>4175

I love the content. But please drop in the correct thread for each topic or we will move it at a later time.

There are no Notable for CHAT thread.

>>4176

>we will move it at a later time.

do whatever you want