855d39 No.671
Source:
https://rumble.com/v5unpk2-censorship.html
https://socialmediafreedom.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Bollinger-DE-1-filed-complaint-bearing-actual-case-number.pdf
In the heart of the American legal system, a case has emerged that could redefine the boundaries of free speech in the digital era. Cancer Step Outside the Box, LLC, along with its principal owners, Ty and Charlene Bollinger, have filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee against an array of defendants, including major U.S. government agencies, tech giants like Meta, Google, and X Corp, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) like the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) and Media Matters for America (MMA). At stake is nothing less than the very essence of the First Amendment rights in the age of social media.
The Allegations: A Coordinated Attack on Free Speech
The Bollingers allege the existence of what they term a "Censorship Industrial Complex," a network ostensibly comprising government bodies, tech platforms, and NGOs, collaborating to suppress dissenting voices under the guise of combating misinformation. They claim that this complex has systematically worked to silence their business and personal expressions, particularly around alternative health narratives and political discourse, through what they describe as government coercion of private sector censorship.
The lawsuit accuses these entities of using Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act to shield themselves while engaging in anti-competitive practices. Section 230, which provides legal protections to internet platforms for content posted by users, is central to this debate, with plaintiffs arguing its current interpretation has been misused to allow for unchecked censorship.
A Battle Beyond the Courtroom
This case doesn't merely challenge legal interpretations; it's a cultural and political battleground. The plaintiffs paint a picture of a "shadow governance" where the "Establishment" manipulates narratives to maintain control, drawing parallels with historical movements against tyranny. They suggest that this scenario echoes the reasons the American Revolution was fought, highlighting a modern-day struggle for freedom of expression.
Legal and Constitutional Implications
The core of the lawsuit rests on First Amendment violations, asserting that the government cannot circumvent constitutional rights by pressuring private companies to censor on its behalf. It seeks to redefine how Section 230 is interpreted, pushing for a return to its original intent where platforms are neutral conduits for speech, not censors acting under government influence.
<Moreover, the case touches on economic fairness, alleging that the government's partnership with tech giants creates an uneven playing field, where these platforms benefit from legal immunity while smaller voices are systematically silenced.
The Broader Impact
The implications of this lawsuit could be profound:
Free Speech:A ruling in favor of the plaintiffs might lead to stricter regulations on how platforms can moderate content, ensuring that such moderation does not become a tool for government censorship.
Public Trust:This case brings to light the often-opaque relationship between government and tech entities, possibly leading to demands for more transparency in content moderation practices.
Global Influence:Given the international presence of the defendants, the outcome could influence global perceptions and policies on digital freedom of speech, affecting how other countries approach similar issues.
Conclusion
As this legal battle unfolds, it's clear that more than just the Bollingers' rights are on trial; it's about defining the future landscape of digital discourse. Will this case mark a turning point towards greater openness, or will it reinforce existing power structures? Only time, and the courts, will tell, but one thing is certain: the conversation around freedom of speech in the digital age has reached a critical juncture.
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
Post last edited at
855d39 No.672
Source:
https://x.com/JasonFyk/status/1877065713485017465
>>671
>The core of the lawsuit rests on First Amendment violations, asserting that the government cannot circumvent constitutional rights by pressuring private companies to censor on its behalf.
The government's strategy wasn't about fighting "misinformation"—it was about silencing dissent. Facebook provided "vaccine - hesitancy" data directly to and at the request of the White House, which then directed the CCDH to create a hit piece targeting American citizens, timed perfectly with a preplanned Congressional hearing.
In light of Mark Zuckerberg’s recent admissions about Facebook’s biases and systemic issues, the scope of this collusion raises serious questions. Could Zuckerberg now face criminal investigations for Facebook’s role in this government-backed censorship scheme?
Sedition:The U.S. government, by collaborating with foreign entities like CCDH, ISD, and GDI, is accused of engaging in activities aimed at suppressing free speech, which could be considered seditious as these actions seek to undermine lawful authority and incite rebellion against constitutional protections.
Treason:The allegations extend to suggest that these actions might constitute treason, defined as betraying one's country by aiding its enemies or acting against national interests. Specifically, partnering with foreign organizations to censor American speech is seen as a betrayal of the U.S. Constitution, prioritizing foreign influence over domestic liberties, which could be interpreted as giving aid or comfort to enemies or acting against the nation's interests.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
855d39 No.673
Source:
https://x.com/JasonFyk/status/1877363526890623269/
>In a joint effort between the U.K. and U.S. governments, the White House conspired with Facebook, Twitter, state attorneys general, Congress, and the CCDH to meticulously craft and execute every aspect of the CCDH censorship campaign. From requesting and providing Facebook’s "vaccine-hesitancy" data to the CCDH - to timing the CCDH report’s public release - to aligning it with the March 25th PREPLANNED Congressional misinformation hearing, this whole censorship operation was a PREMEDITATED calculated, multinational effort to target and suppress Americans' constitutionally protected speech.
>This wasn’t simply Big Tech silencing dissent based on misinformation—it was a state-sponsored conspiracy designed to crush opposing voices. The evidence is undeniable (see abreviated timeline): our government actively planned and collaborated with private organizations to suppress free speech and attack dissenting Americans.
>In other words, the CCDH didn’t just uncover some misinformation—it was complicit in manufacturing it for the government. This is huge!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
855d39 No.675
https://x.com/JasonFyk/status/1877719264053919971/
This case takes direct aim at the heart of the ENTIRE Censorship Industrial Complex. By exposing the coordinated efforts between the US government, UK government, foreign NGOs, and Big Tech to suppress free speech, this case stands as a stronger landmark challenge to the unconstitutional alliance that has undermined free expression in America.
Its strength lies in its ability to hold BOTH public and private entities accountable for their roles in this systemic violation of rights.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
855d39 No.687
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
855d39 No.688
https://x.com/JasonFyk/status/1878187088421810234
>Fyk’s case could be the decisive turning point. Once Section 230 is correctly interpreted, platforms will no longer be able to manipulate free speech under the guise of moderation. But the question remains: Is there any justice left in California?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
855d39 No.698
https://x.com/JasonFyk/status/1878551551452569691
>The 5th Circuit recognize the critical distinction between “shall not be held liable for [their] conduct involving third-party speech” and "shall not be held liable for [third-party] speech." It is the difference between treating a platform as "a publisher" of third-party content or as "the publisher" of third-party content. The Fifth Circuit’s analysis validates the argument we’ve made all along. I was right back in 2018!
>Put simply, the Fifth Circuit has now made our legal argument for us.If the Ninth Circuit refuses to grant our petition for rehearing en banc, it would suggest a personal vendetta against me.
It would suggest a personal vendetta against "We, the People".
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
855d39 No.722
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
855d39 No.723
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
a3406b No.774
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
7206e0 No.1044
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
7206e0 No.1145
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
7206e0 No.1146
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fa48 No.1952
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fa48 No.2333
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
7997aa No.4254
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
f7c18d No.7080
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
f7c18d No.7081
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
f7c18d No.7082
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
f7c18d No.7083
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
b84e6a No.7295
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
b84e6a No.7324
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
b84e6a No.7325
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
b84e6a No.7337
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
b84e6a No.7339
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
84a8d5 No.7657
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
84a8d5 No.7676
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
84a8d5 No.7892
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
84a8d5 No.8019
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
2ea2d3 No.8824
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
2ea2d3 No.8829
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
Post last edited at
2ea2d3 No.9004
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
2ea2d3 No.9005
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
2ea2d3 No.9006
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
2ea2d3 No.9007
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
2ea2d3 No.9008
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
2ea2d3 No.9009
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
Post last edited at
2ea2d3 No.9010
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
2ea2d3 No.9011
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
2ea2d3 No.9012
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
2ea2d3 No.9013
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
2ea2d3 No.9014
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
2ea2d3 No.9015
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
2ea2d3 No.9016
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
2ea2d3 No.9017
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
2ea2d3 No.9018
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
2ea2d3 No.9379
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
2ea2d3 No.9611
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
502ec7 No.10207
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
502ec7 No.10510
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
