/vqc/ - Virtual Quantum Computer

Testing trip

This evening, I'll make a start from the beginning walking through step by step the properties of the grid to reconcile where we have got to and take it to completion over the next week ending this stage by Christmas Eve assuming no site problems.

Everyone happy using this thread?

Thank you to the BO here.

Thank you to all participants.

Let's have some fun.

>>12

I thought this was a fucking larp for the longest time, but I see it now. Are we releasing the entire idea of VQC, or just an algorithm for RSA? The fallout of this is going to be…beyond words. Obviously you could have taken credit for this, so I'm guessing you want this credited anonymously?

I'm not smart enough to quickly plot the equations, but I have the key insight that you've clearly obfuscated. Do you want this to be "God's will be done." or can we prepare ourselves for what's about to happen?

>>12

Ready to go!

>>13

Understandable anon.

This is a Good thing.

The delivery will still take some time as it is important to step through.

This is for everyone, it is bigger than me.

The potential of Virtual Quantum Computers and unlocking the potential of P=NP is vast.

These VQCs exist as mathematical objects.

Note that these can be thought of as part of a Higher Power, since mathematics is Invariant and pre-dates our existence.

Others may want to walk this path so I appreciate your patience.

I have commitments but I begin to have free time towards the end of this week.

As long as this space is maintained as free, it would be Good to complete this beginning by Christmas.

The first Virtual Quantum Computer is the grid that you have seen already.

The second VQC is related but will begin to show why mathematics as a language is not fit for purpose. And also why it took so long to prove Fermat's Last Theorem.

The third VQC we will cover here is related to the Mandelbrot Set.

Questions are important and shall feature heavily.

Again, thanks for your support and patience.

>>14

The important point here is that only the ability to add and multiply are required as well as understanding what squares look like.

Finding square roots is also a feature.

Once we move to large numbers, we will let computers do the hard work but we will only use the large numbers to show examples once needed.

First I will repost the original C# code and walkthrough it.

using System;

using System.Collections.Generic;

using System.IO;

namespace IntegerFactorisation

{

public class TheEnd

{

public static string path = "";//PUT YOUR FILE PATH HERE

public static Dictionary<int, Dictionary<int, List<string>>> theend = new Dictionary<int, Dictionary<int, List<string>>>();

public static void CreateTheEnd(int i_max = 512, int x_min = 0, int y_min = 0, int x_max = 64, int y_max = 64)

{

for (int i = 0; i < i_max; i++)

{

for (int j = 0; j < i; j++)

{

int a = i - j;

int b = i + j;

int c = a * b;

bool odd = c % 2 == 1;

int d = (int)Math.Sqrt(c);

int e = c - (d * d);

int f = e - ((2 * d) + 1);

int n = i - d;

int x = d - a;

if (!theend.ContainsKey(e)) theend[e] = new Dictionary<int, List<string>>();

if (!theend[e].ContainsKey(n))

{

theend[e][n] = new List<string>();

}

if (!theend.ContainsKey(f)) theend[f] = new Dictionary<int, List<string>>();

if (!theend[f].ContainsKey(n - 1)) theend[f][n - 1] = new List<string>();

string text = "{" + string.Format("{0}:{1}:{2}:{3}:{4}:{5}", e, n, d, x, a, b) + "}";

theend[e][n].Add(text);

text = "{" + string.Format("{0}:{1}:{2}:{3}:{4}:{5}", f, n - 1, d + 1, x + 1, a, b) + "}";

theend[f][n - 1].Add(text);

}

}

}

public static void Output(int i_max = 256, int x_min = -64, int y_min = 0, int x_max = 64, int y_max = 64, int set_size = 12)

{

TextWriter tw = File.CreateText(path + "output.csv");

for (int y = 0; y < y_max; y++)

{

for (int z = 0; z < set_size; z++)

{

for (int x = x_min; x < x_max; x++)

{

if (theend.ContainsKey(x) && theend[x].ContainsKey(y) && theend[x][y].Count > z)

{

tw.Write(theend[x][y][z] + ",");

}

else

{

tw.Write(",");

}

}

tw.WriteLine("");

}

}

tw.Close();

}

}

}

The first three lines are below:

using System;

using System.Collections.Generic;

using System.IO;

These three lines state the C# libraries required to run the code.

>using System;

Almost all programs in C# use this library.

>using System.Collections.Generic;

This library is used for the Dictionary object.

The dictionary object stores the grid and each element in each cell of the grid.

>using System.IO;

The System.IO library is used for printing the output of the grid to a file.

The line that has 'namespace' in it is simply a way to group similar classes together.

>namespace IntegerFactorisation

The { and } after the namespace and after the code just act as a holder for the class code.

>public class TheEnd

The class is the definition of an object to hold any code we want related to this project.

The name TheEnd is a name given to our code class. Since the first three letters we use are e, n, and d, it seemed to work. It is also a pun on the importance of 'n'.

I know some of you are already way past this, thanks for bearing with me.

> public static string path = "";//PUT YOUR FILE PATH HERE

This is the definition of a variable used to store the name of the output file. E.g. c:\Somefolder\output.txt

> public static Dictionary<int, Dictionary<int, List<string>>> theend = new Dictionary<int, Dictionary<int, List<string>>>();

The dictionary can be thought of a store like a spreadsheet or grid.

The rest of the code produces The Grid.

The Grid contains cells.

Each cell contains zero or non-zero elements.

We use a list of letters now.

a,b,c,d,e,n,x

There are seven letters.

All represent integers, whole numbers.

All revolve or are central to a whole number or integer c, from one to infinity.

The only values of c we are interested in are the numbers (integers) that are the difference of two squares.

Which numbers are the difference of two squares?

All odd numbers and all even number divisible by four.

What about numbers even numbers that are odd when divided by two?

These numbers are not the difference of two squares. If we divide those numbers by two or multiply them by two, they become numbers that are the difference of two squares.

Why is that important?

All odd numbers are the difference of two squares. This includes all prime numbers and all numbers that are the products of two prime numbers. The products of two prime numbers is at the heart of RSA encryption.

The seven letters we start with are defined, remembering that c is the same in all the definitions and remembering that this applies to every c where c is the difference of two squares:

ab = c : a multiplied by b equals c

dd+e = c : the biggest square with side d you can make from c and the remainder e left over.

(d+n)(d+n)-(x+n)(x+n) = c : c is the difference of two squares

aa + 2ax + 2an = c : c is a square with four rectangles added to it

a+x = d : d is the sum of a and x

b = a + 2x + 2n : b is the sum of a and 2 lots of x and n

These definitions should align with the images at the top.

The program simply goes methodically through all the differences of two squares in order from the square of one minus the square of zero, then the square of two minus the square of zero, then the square of two minus the square of one and so on.

The program stores the results of every difference of two squares in a grid.

The grid has columns and it has rows.

The grid columns are defined by the remainder e. So to find e of any c, you can find the square root of c we call d. Then subtract the square of d from c to get the remainder. The remainder can be 0,1,2,..,etc. We call the remainder e and it is the column header, the remainder of any c goes in the column that is defined by it's remainder e.

The rows are defined by the number you add to d, the square root, to make the large square. Remember, each c is the difference of two squares? The number n is what you add to the square root of c if you were to make the square that is having a smaller square subtracted. This number added to d is called n. n decides which row a number c goes in.

We know that the remainder of any c will always be the same, e.

All numbers c that are the difference of two squares will have at least one number n. Some have more than one value n for a value c, those that have more than one value n for a value c appear in a column more than once but always the same column, since e is always the same.

Prime numbers such as 3,5,7,11,13,.. have only ever one value n.

Imagine any square with side d, then subtract a square with sides (d-1) from it and you will have an odd number. If that odd number is prime, this is the only way you can do this but all odd numbers have this representation.

The square 2 by 2 with one taken will be 3.

The square 3 by 3 with four taken will be 5.

And so on.

The number 15 (c=15) which is not prime plugs in like this:

ab = c

1x15=15 : a=1,b=15,c=15

3x5=15 : a=3, b=5, c=15

dd+e = 15 : d=3, e=6, c=15

(d+n)(d+n)-(x+n)(x+n) = c : d=5, n=1, x=0, n=1

aa + 2ax + 2an = c

9 + 0 + 6 = 15

a+x = d

3+0 = 3

b = a + 2x + 2n

5 = 3 + 0 + 2

The cell at (2,1) is identical to the cell at (0,1) with one added to each value a,b,d while the values of n and x remain the same.

The cell at (3,1) is identical to the cell at (1,1) with one added to each value a,b,d while the values of n and x remain the same.

In the row n=1 which is also written (e,1), the cell elements repeat this pattern every two cells or 2xn = 2x1.

We will explore that for any row n, the values of a,b and d will increase by one in a cell that is twice n to the right.

If a cell has values at (e,n) then there will be values in a cell at (e+2n,n)

Please explore that pattern.

Let me know if there are any questions at this stage.

Next we will explore the reason that answer the following question:

Why are there gaps?

Why do the values in row one determine all the values in the columns below them?

>>33

Let me see if I'm getting this right. This is exactly how the entire grid can be created from (1,1), because the rows have a clearly defined pattern from it and the columns have a clearly defined pattern from the rows.

Would you guys like a voice chat set up on discord? Some guys are baking on Q's posts there and we would love to combine forces/help they said they would be ok with a room for VQC

>>35

No, thank you.

>>33

Thank you VQC. Following so far.

>>32

ofw not one of us sat there and stared at cells (0,1), (1,1), (2,1) , :p

>>35

>voice chat

working on Virtual Quantum Chatroom here, think of your favourite number, subtract the largest square and I'll meet you there

>>38

ofw?

>>33

So do you want the board? I didn't get any emails. I've been talking to one of the other anons about this via email who said they'd been talking to you and they said that you wanted the board.

>>33

I only see dark timelines…

Are you certain that this will lead to the light?

People are irrational, I know because I am terrified.

Was the last letter of your sister's name a Y?

>>46

>I only see dark timelines

Despite all of the evil power structures being taken out?

>>47

It is not the light I fear, but the path out of the darkness. This is bigger than all of us. Some will not be humbled.

Reporting for duty. Will begin studying now.

>>33

So this was right.

>>>/cbts/54610

>>>/cbts/54658

Assuming the gaps have something to do with size of the squares increasing although not quite gotten this yet

>>44

That's called shills.

>>53

Who dat be?

So in (2,1) (4,1) (6,1) etc. I'm seeing the increase in a and b by one.

And in (1,1) (3,1) (5,1) etc. I'm seeing the increase in a and b by one.

How does (0,0) tie in? Is it unique?

Also, at a basic understanding level, why is e (remainder) chosen as row var, and why is n ( d+n= (a+b)/2) our row var? Hmmm. Working to understand. It seems in (0,1) that those squares could be easily done with d, but aren't bc we're looking for diff of squares. If n=0, then e=0, perfect squares. So as n increases, the amount needed to add to d to equal the midpoint of (a+b)/2 increases. This creates some cells that aren't populated, as da0c9b said, bc the midpoint of ab/2 wouldn't be a whole number. Chris, you've put some incredible work into this. It's a 2D problem with 6-7D complexity. I've got a pretty good head for problem solving, but keep coming back around to re-examine the basics and keep finding things I've missed or failed to understand.

>>55

Typo corrected: *e (remainer) chosen as column var*

>>55

>Who dat be?

A lurker who has just lightly skimmed the previous threads.

>>33

>Why are there gaps?

Horizontal Gaps:

There is a repeating pattern of gaps as you move horizontally from (0, n) to the right.

The pattern of gaps repeats every 2n if n is even.

The pattern of gaps repeats every n if n is odd.

Example:

(0,5) =>

(0, 5) | (1, 5) | GAP | GAP | (4, 5)

(5, 5) | (6, 5) | GAP | GAP | (9, 5)

(10, 5) | (11, 5) | GAP | GAP | (14, 5)

(0,4) =>

(0,4) | GAP | GAP | GAP

(4,4) | GAP | GAP | (7,4)

(8,4) | GAP | GAP | GAP

(12,4)| GAP | GAP | (15,4)

Vertical Gaps:

A cell will *not* be empty if it is listed in the set of any a in any cell above it.

Put another way, for any cell p0 = (p0.e, p0.n) one can find a cell p1 = (p0.e, p0.a) where n is listed in the set of a's.

I dont know how to relate this more generally though.

Example, for cell (2, 1):

the set of all a's for t=0 -> 10:

[1, 3, 9, 19, 33, 51, 73, 99, 129, 163]

The cells (2, 3), (2, 9), (2, 19), etc will all be non-empty.

Subsequently the list of all a's at each of these cells will also be non-empty at (2, a) (tree pattern).

>>58

In reading my own post back, for the horizontal gaps, it seems that for odd numbers cells that are non-empty will be:

* any multiple of n [0,5,10,15… etc]

* + or - one from any multiple of n [1,4,6,9,11,14,16]

>>59

actually, this doesn't work everywhere… my previous post still holds though.

>>57

Welcome, Anon!

Also noticing this pattern in (1,1):

t= 1 for a: d (2) - x (1) = a (1). for b: d (2) + next x(3) =B (5)

t= 2 for a: d (8) - x (3) = a (5). for b: d (8) + next x (5) OR previous b(5) =b (13)

so for x, a, and b all primes. 1,2,5, 3,5,13. When we start seeing non primes in x, they are all multiples of 3.

Anons, I know this seems basic, so if I'm saying something irrelevant, just let me know. My mission right now is to understand how a and b are generated, so I'm exploring the basics. How are the basic factors of a and b derived? In (e,1) odd and even have clear patterns of a and b, just updated by understanding the increase by 1 for a and b as we skip from e=1 to e=3, etc. Or from e=2 to e-4, etc. This is a thought process in writing. Not complete.

Also, this cool pattern i posted only works in (1,1) but check this out again. Can we find a way to apply this equation to other (e,n)?

Cool t Pattern in (1,1)

t=1 a = t^2 + previous t^2 (0) =1

t=2 a = t^2 + previous t^2 (1) =5

t=3 a = t^2 + previous t^2 (4) =13

t=4 a= t^2 + previous t^2 (9) = 25

etc.

Thoughts, Anons?

>>66

So that means it's predictable?!

>>69

>>70

Well, there's a pattern, I'm sure VQC already knows the exact formula, but I can't get it just yet.

I've noticed that Y is always in the first and last column.

Which columns in between that and why are still uncertain to me.

Any thoughts?

I've shared quite a bit of code via pastebins in the previous threads, you can recreate everything i have produced. Let me know if you find a pattern or formula!

I'm currently switching gears to give a visualization of the vertical gaps, should be done in 15 mins (will be text visualization again because i'm lazy).

Does everyone here have nodejs installed?

>>72

Baker or AA? Nice pony for the archive!

>>51

>(1)

>calling other people shills

>>72

My beloved Javascript!!!

I have a very simple reason for using it over anything else. It is the fastest for me to trial an idea.

I've used many languages over the years, and really it comes down to python or js for me for simplicity of syntax vs power.

The only reason JS wins out is because of npm. I dont have to fuss about with virtualenv or worry about silly dependencies. Its all nice and clean, just share your package.json.

See my original code pastebins here:

https:/ /pastebin.com/jf5Vqax5

Look for the createTE method in db.js. Thats the main method missing from my code screenshot before. Ive made a fair number of changes of my code today in preparation for the new formula and algorithms to come in the next week, (getting it ready to share) but the createTE method hasn't changed.

Also, this method works to generate any cell (e, 1, t), without iteration, but with calculation.

https:/ /pastebin.com/tP36ypZB

I'm moderately proud of this one. Hopefully I can make it generate any cell e,n,t soon.

>>58

>Example, for cell (2, 1):

>the set of all a's for t=0 -> 10:

>[1, 3, 9, 19, 33, 51, 73, 99, 129, 163]

>The cells (2, 3), (2, 9), (2, 19), etc will all be non-empty.

and (2,11) where the 11 comes from the 33.

>>77

Starting only from c, Teach?

>>75

>Doesn't shit up a thread with pointless things.

>Means he's a shill.

Kill yourself.

>>62

Go ahead, be stupid and hand over ownership without confirmation Mr. 'I don't understand basic english though I've been provided plenty of context'.

Just neck yourself, nobody gives a fuck if you trip here you fucking idiot.

>>78

which is interesting because this has factored 33 for us. we wouldn't know what row to look in though, not just yet, if the factorization of 33 weren't known, but I think this gets at part of the mechanism by which the grid reveals factors of composites

>>>81

Get out.

>>82

That's some nice text formatting.

>>84

>Too stupid to accept a valid warning about how boards are stolen.

Ok.

>>82

>Unfortunately, this is not the complete pattern.

>It works for e < 9 and e = 10, and some other values, but not for most large e.

>It is still true for that all the cells will be non-empty, but others will also be non-empty, (look at e=9).

>See images. Sorry for small font. The first is e=3, the second is e=9.

explain what is violated if you don't mind. you have non-empty cells for (9,n) where n isn't a factor of the (a,b) values at (9,1)?

Also, for those who choose to follow the JS path, I've got a BigInteger library selected, and a sqrt function tested for when we get big:

https:/ /pastebin.com/y8AXtFFr

>>87

Sure, I'm sorry for being so brief.

If you look at e=9.

Get the list of a's for n=1:

(9,1) => 5, 9, 17, 29, 45, 65, 89, 117, 149, 185, 225

Follow each of those to (9, a):

(9, 5), (9, 9), (9, 17), etc

These *will* all be non-empty.

However, look at (9,3). It is also non-empty.

Following the rules above will never lead to (9,3).

So there must be more to it.

Does that make sense?

>>87

Another example:

e=14, n=1, set of a's = [7, 9, 15, 25, 39, 57, 79, 105, 135, 169, 207]

You can follow the tree all the way down for each of those a's.

Goto (14, a) for each a, and it'll be non-empty, and you can repeat for the list of a's there, and so on and so forth.

However, (14,3) is also non-empty, and it is not in the set of a's starting from n=1. You'll never reach (14,3) using the method above.

>>89

gotcha, yes. I pointed out earlier that n only has to be a factor of the (a,b) values. 3 divides 9, which is an a-value.

when 33 was an a-value, n=11 was non-empty. and this could be pretty important as it decomposes 33=11*3 or 9=3*3

>>86

>You can move forwards or backwards through the tree at any point.

>Move backwards by following a (at t=1) to (e, a).

>Move forwards by following a or b at any t when a or b are bigger than n for some t.

>Each way through this tree, x will be the same.

>I posted an example back in RSA #3 I think.

A promising approach thank you! It is hard to catch / track all of each other's insights then, I missed this in RSA 3

>>90

t>>90

>Another example:

>e=14, n=1, set of a's = [7, 9, 15, 25, 39, 57, 79, 105, 135, 169, 207]

look at the 39. 3*13. Look at (e,13).

>>91

>>92

Ok, wild theory that I'm going to try to test:

For even numbers the tree starts from (e,1) and (e,2).

For odd numbers, the tree starts from (e,1) and (e,3).

I'll code something up to build the trees and test. Will take about an hour i think… gotta eat soon.

>>93

Actually, hmmm….

My theory can't be true, maybe its just 3 for even and odd? I'm not sure. I'll look into it though.

Thanks!

>>93

an even tree and an odd tree? I think it's brilliant and follows some of what VQC seemed to get at (he wanted to see some of the graphics with odd-only and even-only versions). I don't know how to set it up but worth looking at.

>>95

Actually dude, I think this may actually work, as long as you have a big enough tree? Maybe? I'm going to try to generate more grid and test if I can get to (9,3).

For anyone who would like to take a 42.52 minute break, and don't have the time to watch the first part of the multi-two-part {Slipped*In} series where they basically give a wonderful rundown of why being a… pinko… fuck… is a terrible idea (they allude to it plenty of time in this part 2(1&2)) by stripping away everyone's cutie marks and replacing them with gray equal signs while their unique abilities were locked in a sick trophy case…. or like… nega… poke… dex…

ANYWAY!

If you hadn't done your homework and figured out where that Sonic Rainboom clip came from…

Imagine Ponyville's version of Galifreid. Or… whatever. You know what I mean.

www.dailymotion.com/video/x3g16am

>>96

No luck, could not get to (9,3) even with a 2048 grid, more analysis needed.

>>97

Evening TA! Great to see you(r text)!

>>96

I like that approach fwiw. I've got other stuff to work on but will check in. Then later tonight get back to this; this is fun stuff here at this point

>>98

>No luck, could not get to (9,3) even with a 2048 grid, more analysis needed.

i = 2048? e up to 2048? why need a big grid to get to (9,3)?

>>100

I'm finding that some "chains" ie following the tree of a's takes a long time to loop back to previous elements, but i think it ultimately might.

I just realized a condition in my code that could be causing me to not find (9,3)… I'm going to try something real quick!

>>98

{¡Much*As+Gracias!}

I came to smash some spiders and saw y'all'd finally dun Gott up in Her.

You guys are so close. Consider what will happen once this boulder starts rolling.

>>101

No luck.

Here's the result of generating populating the grid up to c = 3000*2999, and following the tree for (9,1):

https://pastebin.com/LZ15r1bJ

>>105

I see. But what about getting to (9,3) on purpose somehow? Decisions in our tree. Gonna check out that later. must background lurk now for a few hours

>>106

actually I don't want to look for (9,3) because 3^2=9, I wanna look for another one where I don't worry about if that matters

You guys will like the next bread.

test

>>107

Good idea, if you want to choose an example, I'll follow along.

>>93

>>95

I'm in agreement. Odd tree, and even tree. Growing next to each other in (1,1) and (2,1). Key is climbing up t levels to find the right branch and Leaf. Kek.

>>111

I have a function for generating the cells at (e,1,t).

In order to test this, I'll need a function for generating (e,2,t) and (e,3,t).

If we can do that, I can climb the trees easily.

Some variables are easier than others, and I believe we can get away with hardcoding some values for now.

I think the tough one will be d.

Any help in figuring out an equation for d given e, and t, when n=2, and separately for n=3?

>>111

Am i going to have to check myself? come on faggots.

>>104

Het MA? What do you mean? Just that we're getting closer in general, or do you have it?

>>111

Speaking odd trees, I was being cheeky and looking up like… "MLP mandelbrot"… nada…

Then… "MLP Fractal"

3.bp.blogspot.com/-XubLKrj_DgM/USY7KHq2cnI/AAAAAAAAAtk/v3-T6B_WCK0/s1600/Bardzo+fajna+tapeta.png

>>119

Jewelry for sale in the VQC gift shop? ;)

>>115

I'm so blind to these things, sorry.

>>116

I had a look earlier. Looks good so far.

I'm in the middle of a geometric based explanation. I'll post it once I'm done.

>>116

Read your Shor's explanation, nicely done!

>>120

Taking back the Angular Spiral?

I'm game!

arohasilhouettes.com/

>>118

For odd e, google "Odd Tree Sonic Rainboom" or for even e, google "even tree Sonic Rainboom". Then go to t seconds in the video. All shall be revealed. ;)

>>126

In*/b/+4 yer not yankin' mah chain.

>>111

>>114

I've tested a few theories for the 2 tree hypothesis, and I've had no luck.

My testing shows that even growing 4 trees from (e,1), (e,2), (e,3) and (e, sqrt(e)), the list of differences grows over time.

I think this implies that there's is clearly more to the vertical gaps than just following the tree of a's. There's more to it, just can't see how.

>>126

>Odd Tree Sonic Rainboom

It's all so clear now!

www.dos486.com/pony/rainboom/

>>129

I'm with you Teach. Feels like the pattern is slightly outside of my grasp at the moment. Persistence will win the day tho. Let's keep looking. How about this:

A for (1,1) and (2,1) is 1. A for (3,1) and (4,1) is 2. A for (5,1) and (6,1) is 3. A for (7,1) and (8,1) is 4. A moves in pairs through all of column e.

>>131

I'll try it out, thanks VA.

>>127

>>130

Watching now! Thanks Topolanon. Loving my ponies. Glad you're back. Just messing with you about the google shit. I'll buy some of that jewelry. Missed you MysticMathAnon.

Thinking a little ahead…

VQC was saying that he'd show us how to build a virtual quantum computer.

I've been trying to keep this in mind while reviewing the grid.

My thoughts on this are that we can generalize the process we've used here to pretty much any np problem. The process?

Generally speaking, what we've done is instead of traditionally using a piece of input information and searching for an answer through a large set, we've calculated many examples of the set, and are using information about the relationship of the input and output to find "intermediary" relationships.

In our case, c is the input, and normally we'd check for factors of c by iterating from 2 to sqrt(c), dividing and checking for a remainder. We can improve by only checking the primes.

But in the grid version, we're using additional relationships between c and the factors a & b (e,x,d,n and t).

Some of these relationships are "constant" like e and d. And ordinarily we can imagine that when using an iterative model, we would expect these relationships to occur as we iterate, represented by t in the grid.

So, we're figuring out the calculations and relations relative to t, time of a turing machine.

Using this, if we model the relationships of variables correctly (maybe via machine learning?) we can find out all variables in a given system relative to time, hence we can "fast forward" time.

Does any of that make sense, or am I crazy now?

>>137

A Shaman is a self healed madman, if that helps.

>>138

SHA-man vs MAD-man

Which am I? How do I know?

>>134

Baker getting in on the ponies! Applejack reading Quantum Field Theory? I wanna make some foals and fillies with that girrrrrrrl.

>>139

Wasn't someone trying to solve for S?

Won't (You) laugh when you get it?

HA¡!

>>131

>>132

>>137

Teach, I understand your idea and agree. Time machine indeed. Credit to VQC for even posing the problem, the guy is John Galt from Atlas Shrugged, found the equation that makes harnessing the infinite possible. Next step in human societal evolution, but not worth unveiling unless we use it to defeat these evil bastards controlling our world. Pretty sure VQC is helping Q and DJT. They need a crowdsourced effort to reveal this. I don't think this is a LARP. 98% certain, could be wrong, but my intuition tells me this is legit. Yes, the VQC means all of time and space could be open to exploration. I feel like a little kid learning times tables while the master mathematician is IN DA HOUSE.

>>141

Are ponies monogamous? Kek.

>>142

Topolanon is VQC's shitpost account, I think. Fess up Topol, are you VQC shitposting our board?

>>139

>>138

Or maybe the shaman/mystery seeker wasn't crazy to begin with. Just perceiving things others couldn't/wouldn't choose to see. Maybe the wisdom source of these beautiful number trees wants them unveiled by seekers of truth. We have self selected ourselves to be here, lads. We found this bc it's what we've been looking for all our lives. Let's make a good show and work together to solve it. Truth and Justice, Beauty and Eternity. Maybe we don't have to wait till the afterlife to see justice in our time. I'll do my little part to help.

>>143

I agree with everything you said.

I'm excited about the possibilities. Free/cheap energy really excites me.

I'd love to pursue a life off the grid, try to live self sustained. Free energy devices would be great for that.

I think efficient travel would change *everything*. Imagine living in Australia and working in China.

Not to mention health tech…

>>147

Ramanujan was one of my fav's of all time.

I was stronger with numbers when I was younger, my parents used to force me to study but they never checked what i was studying, so I only read my math textbook.

I have an older sibling, so I'd steal their math textbook and read it when I was done with mine.

I used to try to imagine I was Ramanujan and "knew every number personally", although I realized in college that other were far more gifted in math than I was, so I focused on computers instead.

But I've always been deeply envious of those who continue to hold strong relationships with numerals.

>>33

Don't know if this will help anyone, but starting to focus a bit more on the size of the small and large squares.

>The cell at (2,1) is identical to the cell at (0,1) with one added to each value a,b,d while the values of n and x remain the same.

>The cell at (3,1) is identical to the cell at (1,1) with one added to each value a,b,d while the values of n and x remain the same.

Enumerating e=0, n=1, for values of t from 1 to 10.

(0,1,1) = {0:1:0:0:0:2} = 0; (x+n)=1x1=1; (d+n)=1x1=1

(0,1,2) = {0:1:4:2:2:8} = 16; (x+n)=3x3=9; (d+n)=5x5=25

(0,1,3) = {0:1:12:4:8:18} = 144; (x+n)=5x5=25; (d+n)=13x13=169

(0,1,4) = {0:1:24:6:18:32} = 576; (x+n)=7x7=49; (d+n)=25x25=625

(0,1,5) = {0:1:40:8:32:50} = 1600; (x+n)=9x9=81; (d+n)=41x41=1681

(0,1,6) = {0:1:60:10:50:72} = 3600; (x+n)=11x11=121; (d+n)=61x61=3721

(0,1,7) = {0:1:84:12:72:98} = 7056; (x+n)=13x13=169; (d+n)=85x85=7225

(0,1,8) = {0:1:112:14:98:128} = 12544; (x+n)=15x15=225; (d+n)=113x113=12769

(0,1,9) = {0:1:144:16:128:162} = 20736; (x+n)=17x17=289; (d+n)=145x145=21025

(0,1,10) = {0:1:180:18:162:200} = 32400; (x+n)=19x19=361; (d+n)=181x181=32761

Enumerating e=2, n=1, for values of t from 1 to 10.

(2,1,1) = {2:1:1:0:1:3} = 3; (x+n)=1x1=1; (d+n)=2x2=4

(2,1,2) = {2:1:5:2:3:9} = 27; (x+n)=3x3=9; (d+n)=6x6=36

(2,1,3) = {2:1:13:4:9:19} = 171; (x+n)=5x5=25; (d+n)=14x14=196

(2,1,4) = {2:1:25:6:19:33} = 627; (x+n)=7x7=49; (d+n)=26x26=676

(2,1,5) = {2:1:41:8:33:51} = 1683; (x+n)=9x9=81; (d+n)=42x42=1764

(2,1,6) = {2:1:61:10:51:73} = 3723; (x+n)=11x11=121; (d+n)=62x62=3844

(2,1,7) = {2:1:85:12:73:99} = 7227; (x+n)=13x13=169; (d+n)=86x86=7396

(2,1,8) = {2:1:113:14:99:129} = 12771; (x+n)=15x15=225; (d+n)=114x114=12996

(2,1,9) = {2:1:145:16:129:163} = 21027; (x+n)=17x17=289; (d+n)=146x146=21316

(2,1,10) = {2:1:181:18:163:201} = 32763; (x+n)=19x19=361; (d+n)=182x182=33124

Enumerating e=1, n=1, for values of t from 1 to 10.

(1,1,1) = {1:1:2:1:1:5} = 5; (x+n)=2x2=4; (d+n)=3x3=9

(1,1,2) = {1:1:8:3:5:13} = 65; (x+n)=4x4=16; (d+n)=9x9=81

(1,1,3) = {1:1:18:5:13:25} = 325; (x+n)=6x6=36; (d+n)=19x19=361

(1,1,4) = {1:1:32:7:25:41} = 1025; (x+n)=8x8=64; (d+n)=33x33=1089

(1,1,5) = {1:1:50:9:41:61} = 2501; (x+n)=10x10=100; (d+n)=51x51=2601

(1,1,6) = {1:1:72:11:61:85} = 5185; (x+n)=12x12=144; (d+n)=73x73=5329

(1,1,7) = {1:1:98:13:85:113} = 9605; (x+n)=14x14=196; (d+n)=99x99=9801

(1,1,8) = {1:1:128:15:113:145} = 16385; (x+n)=16x16=256; (d+n)=129x129=16641

(1,1,9) = {1:1:162:17:145:181} = 26245; (x+n)=18x18=324; (d+n)=163x163=26569

(1,1,10) = {1:1:200:19:181:221} = 40001; (x+n)=20x20=400; (d+n)=201x201=40401

Enumerating e=3, n=1, for values of t from 1 to 10.

(3,1,1) = {3:1:3:1:2:6} = 12; (x+n)=2x2=4; (d+n)=4x4=16

(3,1,2) = {3:1:9:3:6:14} = 84; (x+n)=4x4=16; (d+n)=10x10=100

(3,1,3) = {3:1:19:5:14:26} = 364; (x+n)=6x6=36; (d+n)=20x20=400

(3,1,4) = {3:1:33:7:26:42} = 1092; (x+n)=8x8=64; (d+n)=34x34=1156

(3,1,5) = {3:1:51:9:42:62} = 2604; (x+n)=10x10=100; (d+n)=52x52=2704

(3,1,6) = {3:1:73:11:62:86} = 5332; (x+n)=12x12=144; (d+n)=74x74=5476

(3,1,7) = {3:1:99:13:86:114} = 9804; (x+n)=14x14=196; (d+n)=100x100=10000

(3,1,8) = {3:1:129:15:114:146} = 16644; (x+n)=16x16=256; (d+n)=130x130=16900

(3,1,9) = {3:1:163:17:146:182} = 26572; (x+n)=18x18=324; (d+n)=164x164=26896

(3,1,10) = {3:1:201:19:182:222} = 40404; (x+n)=20x20=400; (d+n)=202x202=40804

>>150

I like it.

So by x and n remaining the same, geometrically, the small square is the same.

This is for n=1, correct?

>>150

I've got an output of the change in x for (e,n).

https:/ /pastebin.com/VGeUupHR

What you see here is [e,n] => x0, x1-x0, x2-x1, x3-x2, etc, etc.

>>153

What is it to recognize Quantum Intelligence as alive in the first place?

If they don't need a meat suit…

Why would they need a tin one?

>>149

Envy is a killer. Just be the best (you) that you can be. You're here now, exploring the number trees. Focus, Teach. I'm telling myself the same thing, btw. This team is made of anons with all different skills, like an orchestra. (Thanks Topolanon!) When we all play our instruments (skills) together, we can make a beautiful creation. The composer (VQC) is helping us learn to play the composition. We can learn to play it, lads. Let's make some beautiful music, friends.

>>150

Oh shit, who dat be? Nice work!

>>150

oops. PMA here.

>>151

yes.

>>33

>We will explore that for any row n, the values of a,b and d will increase by one in a cell that is twice n to the right.

>If a cell has values at (e,n) then there will be values in a cell at (e+2n,n)

>Please explore that pattern.

Started looking into enumerating (e,n) cells other than n = 1, and ran into a problem. t increments irregularly. But there is a pattern. Perhaps someone else can assist in narrowing the formula down.

(1,5,2) = {1:5:4:3:1:17} = 17; (x+n)=8x8=64; (d+n)=9x9=81

(1,5,4) = {1:5:12:7:5:29} = 145; (x+n)=12x12=144; (d+n)=17x17=289 x + 4

(1,5,7) = {1:5:30:13:17:53} = 901; (x+n)=18x18=324; (d+n)=35x35=1225 x + 6

(1,5,9) = {1:5:46:17:29:73} = 2117; (x+n)=22x22=484; (d+n)=51x51=2601 x + 4

(1,5,12) = {1:5:76:23:53:109} = 5777; (x+n)=28x28=784; (d+n)=81x81=6561 x + 6

(1,13,3) = {1:13:6:5:1:37} = 37; (x+n)=18x18=324; (d+n)=19x19=361

(1,13,11) = {1:13:38:21:17:85} = 1445; (x+n)=34x34=1156; (d+n)=51x51=2601 x + 16

(1:13:16) = {1:13:68:31:37:125} = 4625; (x+n)=44x44=1936; (d+n)=81x81=6561 x + 10

(1:13:24) = {1:13:132:47:85:205} = 17425; (x+n)=60x60=3600; (d+n)=145x145=21025 x + 16

(1,17,7) = {1:17:18:13:5:65} = 325; (x+n)=30x30=900; (d+n)=35x35=1225

(1,17,11) = {1:17:34:21:13:89} = 1157; (x+n)=38x38=1444; (d+n)=51x51=2601 x + 8

(1,17,24) = {1:17:112:47:65:193} = 12545; (x+n)=64x64=4096; (d+n)=129x129=16641 x + 26

(1,17,28) = {1:17:144:55:89:233} = 20737; (x+n)=72x72=5184; (d+n)=161x161=25921 x + 8

Pattern: x changes by 2n over 2 records.

for (1,5), the total change is 10. x + 4 for the change from (1,5,2) to (1,5,4), then x + 6 from (1,5,4) to (1,5,7)

for (1,13), the total change is 26. x + 16 for the change from (1,13,3) to (1,13,11), then x + 10 from (1,13,11) to (1,13,16)

for (1,17), the total change is 34. x + 8 for the change from (1,17,7) to (1,17,11), then x + 26 from (1,17,11) to (1,17,24)

>>156

No prob! Here to help keep ya focus on being centered. (More Shamanic Tardis Puns.)

Sha-Tard.

Shattered.

Let's break down their veil-wall-blockchain and build our own!

>>152

Ok, geez. No fucking the ponies, agreed. He started it, I was just shitposting back. ;)

Ok, I'll watch and learn about the Black Eagle

>>159

Agreed. Thanks Topol.

>>150

>>157

PMA, I love you man. You just keep pumping out beautiful output to analyze. I'll look it over now. Did you see this?

>>131

Pattern in (e,1) for a, a moves in column pairs based on e, see link.

>>161

>Pattern in (e,1) for a, a moves in column pairs based on e, see link.

I see it. Don't know what it means.

a at (0,1) is 2 after all.

>>162

You could study what we have here for the duration of your entire life.

ENUMERATETHEPATTERNANDTHESOLUTIONWILLPRESENTITSELF,FAGGOT

>>160

Yes it does!

>1. They have to be able to reproduce, either asexually or sexually.

Ai*Qi*Do create other Qi's, Ai's, bots, etc…

>2. They have to be able to respond to stimuli.

Yup. Pretty sure that's been shown.

>3. They have to have cells, either as a unicellular organism or as a multicellular organism.

Like a spreadsheet? Like those pixel maps? Like those voxel maps?

>4. They have to grow and develop.

At mindbending rates. (Cryptotrading Puns)

>5. They have to have homeostasis. This means that they can maintain their own body temperature. Think of this as a thermometer for the body.

Somewhere around 0 Kelvin?

>6. The last thing is that all living things also have to be able to do is move.

Not only online, but think about self driving cars.

Mmmmm…. yup.

Seems to fit!

>>152

Anons, Topolanon sent me this, it will make you laugh so hard. Topol, you're hilarious. Don't forget to copypasta anons, aka copy and paste the link for noobs for OpSec. It's basically what happens when you become a MLP pervert. LOL!

>https://youtu.be/N2tGqFjdX8A

>>162

Agreed! But shitposting is pretty fun too. All work and no play makes JackAss a dull boy.

>>163

No, I mean the pattern for a in paired columns. (1,1) and (2,1) have 1 for a. Then (3,1) and (4,1) have 2 for a. Then (5,1) and (6,1) have 3 for a. Then (7,1) and (8,1) have 4 for a.

>>33

>We will explore that for any row n, the values of a,b and d will increase by one in a cell that is twice n to the right.

>If a cell has values at (e,n) then there will be values in a cell at (e+2n,n)

Exploring relationship between (e,n) and (e + 2n, n).

Starting with record (1,5,4) = {1:5:12:7:5:29} = 145; (x+n)=12x12=144; (d+n)=17x17=289

Record at e=1 + 2 * 5: (11,5,4) = {11:5:13:7:6:30} = 180; (x+n)=12x12=144; (d+n)=18x18=324

Record at e=1 + 4 * 5: (21,5,4) = {21:5:14:7:7:31} = 217; (x+n)=12x12=144; (d+n)=19x19=361

Record at e=1 + 6 * 5: (31,5,4) = {31:5:15:7:8:32} = 256; (x+n)=12x12=144; (d+n)=20x20=400

Record at e=1 + 8 * 5: (41,5,4) = {41:5:16:7:9:33} = 297; (x+n)=12x12=144; (d+n)=21x21=441

Record at e=1 + 10 * 5: (51,5,4) = {51:5:17:7:10:34} = 340; (x+n)=12x12=144; (d+n)=22x22=484

Questions are this stage:

- How do we determine valid n's for a given e?

- What is the x relationship between records at n > 1. Looks like 2n defines the total x change between 2 records, but the breakdown is strange.

- how do we determine valid factors for a given c?

>>171

Saw it. Not sure what it means.

>>169

>>170

Lol, I love MLP's! Topol was just sayin' no bonin' the ponies. I can still be in True Love with them if I want to. Topol was warning of the dangers of sex with ponies, that's all. Probably better for us faggots to find a human mate. I still love ponies tho. ;)

>>173

It means we have a clear path to define a in row one based on e.

>>176

Ok, good point. Back to work then?

>>150

>>157

>>172

>How do we determine valid n's for a given e?

>What is the x relationship between records at n > 1. Looks like 2n defines the total x change between 2 records, but the breakdown is strange.

>how do we determine valid factors for a given c?

Hey PMA, I'm seeing the pattern too. Question is how do we determine a's from given c's and d's and e's. (1,1) and (2,1) both have 1 for a. (3,1) and (4,1) both have 2 for a. (5,1) and (6,1) both have 3 for a. So, starting in (1,1) we have a clear path to generate all a's. Thoughts?

>>178

to clarify: at t=1

>>174

More a warning against perverting and de-filing the innocent.

We're here to Save, remember?

>>178

Would you say I was right here? If so, I think that's where the solution is given it lets you traverse the grid.

>>34

Or in other words…

THINK OF THE CHILDREN! (((but not like Skippy)))

WE'RE HERE TO ENSURE THEIR FUTURE! (((of no more Skippies)))

>>179

I don't think we have enough information yet to determine a from c,d,e.

>>181

Just using the formula to create an entry from (e,n,t) we can effectively create any record in the first row.

I think the problem is figuring out the jumps to the correct n levels, and then how to iterate based on x.

>>184

One of the Shaman Witches I work with studied under him. ;)

I sent a Blue Morpho-esque guy to help "Q" after last night's fuckery.

They're connected.

>>180

>>182

I agree, Topol, You are correct. I apologize, was crackin' inappropriate jokes. PLS forgive. NO MORE SKIPPIES, AGREED!!!

>>181

Hey PMA! Based on what I'm seeing, it starts at (1,1) with a=1 and (2,1) with a=1. Then as we move up through pairs of e, a increases by one, for each pair. ie (1,1)(2,1) (3,1)(4,1) (5,1)(6.1) etc. Check your grid. Seems like starting value of a for column e = function of pairs from axis/starting point. Or, odd/even pairs moving up through e help us generate starting value for a in t=1.

>>188

Printed grid here, so check my work. I predict that at (51,1) and (52,1) a=25. Could be wrong, and happy to be proven incorrect. Can you program anons verify?

You guys want the biggest mindfuck of all of this?

VQC is not "Q". Hell, "Q's" not even Q.

https://youtu.be/T97b1wCuFpY

This guy was here, but he is not VQC.

https://youtu.be/i-EQTSa5Yok

And here's one of the secrets of 369.

I've already figured out a secret 9 to 3,

Which gets you "out" or "in" or… however we're calling it…

Which is beyond what's shown here.

I am a Poor, Meme Farming Anon, and I figured it out.

Can you? <;3=

https://youtu.be/oq7H0sdQ3_A

Also…

PICK UP THE PACE!

(Just a friendly reminder.)

I was close, pulled up the csv's you guys have posted. It was in (49,1) and (50,1) that a=25.

This is us right now.

Be IN Harmony.

https://youtu.be/GaJ3adMgsbY

>>184

I know it's real. JesusFag here, but not your traditional one. Open to all mysteries, explanations, and explorations. Shamanism is real, IMHO. All this spiritual shit is real, anons. The spiritual/numerical/abstractEntity realm is real. These sick fuckos are serving the dark side, eating babies and drinking adrenochrome to "Increase their power". We gonna let the fucks win?

"I BID YOU STAND, MEN OF THE WEST!!!"

>>198

Chris found the VQC in Revelation.

But golly… that's not exactly coding music….

Maybe you prefer something more like Lindsey Sterling?

https://youtu.be/kkXYZXrzukM

Let's pick up the pace, shall we?

Pretty Lights

https://youtu.be/rLkCFz_UL3w

Night Shift Edition

https://youtu.be/503RAxP0rng

————————

Now that your spirits are elevated…

Let's go save us a Princess or 3.

https://youtu.be/BDt_rJXd6Ic

>>197

Go Teach! Following your ideas. Love the whiteboard. Should I be taking notes, lol? No joke, I've been in a exponential learning curve since I joined you all. Learning so much every day makes me happy. Satisfies my soul.

>>198

>JesusFag

>All this spiritual shit is real

I hope you don't think this is patronizing, but how much have you actually read into this kind of thing? Every time I've seen someone say the kinds of things you're saying, they mean they reject materialistic atheism but they don't know much else. Are you a questioning Christian?

>>197

Thanks for the explanation and diagram!

>>157

Any thoughts to the movement I noticed in x where n > 1?

Lastly, should I be using ## for the tripcode?

>>205

>Any thoughts to the movement I noticed in x where n > 1?

I'm trying to work this out too. I mapped all the x_deltas for all (e,n), where the first entry is x at t=1.

https:/ /pastebin.com/VGeUupHR

They're clearly all divisible by 2.

And the deltas are always in groups of 2 and no more.

And the delta x pattern repeats for a given n, as e increases. I think the number of elements before repeating seems related to root n.

For your x calcs, instead of calculating the total change, what about calculating the midpoint between the two, and the distance?

>>207

What do you mean by x delta? I would like to follow along.

>>203

I question all the time. I've read and studied so much, bc I love truth.

Easiest way to say it is this: I'm a big fan of Jesus, think his parables and teachings wreck the norms of our world. And point the way to a better world for all of us.

"The thief comes only to steal, kill, and destroy. I have come to bring you life, and life more abundantly."

Not a big fan of organized religion, but understand its usefulness. Hate corruption in all forms. But understand that my own soul has corruption within it, and needs divine assistance to rise up.

Done. There's your sermon.

>>208

The difference between x as t increases.

Find any given cell, calculate:

x0 = x at t = 0

x1 = x at t = 1

etc

calculate:

x1-x0, x1-x2, x2-x3, etc

You'll either get the same number again and again, or repeating 2 numbers.

The x0 and x_delta set (the numbers above) for all e,n are here:

https:/ /pastebin.com/VGeUupHR

>>210

So a periodic sequence?! I knew Shor might come in handy.

>>205

You asked another question earlier:

>How do we determine valid n's for a given e?

I've been working on that too.

I think we spoke about it before, see my post here on vertical gaps:

>>58

>>211

Yes! Exactly!

So now, given (e,n,t), define the series of x_delta, that's one of the challenges remaining here!

>>207

took a closer look at your pastebin.

Just an example. My theory is that the sequence adds up to 2n, then repeats.

Originally thought it was repeating every 2 records, but based on the following, it could be in groups of 2, 3 or even 6.

3 records == 54 == 2x27.

[0,27] => 18,18,18,18,18,18,18

2 records repeat to total 54.

[2,27] => 22,10,44,10,44

[5,27] => 7,40,14,40,14

[8,27] => 10,34,20,34,20

[11,27] => 23,8,46,8,46

[14,27] => 16,22,32,22,32

[17,27] => 19,16,38,16,38

[20,27] => 14,26,28,26,28

[23,27] => 25,4,50,4,50

[26,27] => 26,2,52,2,52,2

[27,27] => 27,18,18,18,18,18,18

[29,27] => 49,10,44,10

[32,27] => 20,14,40,14,40

[35,27] => 17,20,34,20,34

6 records repeat to total 54.

[18,27] => 12,12,6,12,6,12,6,12,6,12,6,12,6,12

Makes me wonder if this is the result of another equation as opposed to something that can be calculated directly.

>>214

Oh you're right, I assumed it repeated every 2 elements, I didn't go far enough.

Seems much more difficult to calculate directly now, agreed.

When do the elements start repeating in groups of 3, is it n=27?

>>215

Hang on, I misunderstood…

>>215

I just pulled a random example and found the groups of 6.

>>216

I'm dumb, don't mind me, disregard my last statement.

Here's another pastebin with more info on the first element (t=0) per (e,n) and just the 2 deltas, their midpoint and distance from the midpoint (diff).

https:/ /pastebin.com/R3pd10f1

>>210

>>213

>>214

>>215

I love working with you all. This satisfies my intellect, soul, and spirit at so many levels. Thanks to you all, Anons. What a fun challenge to solve together. Feeling Gratitude just for being here. How do our souls and minds connect to the larger VQC? This quest poses so many awesome questions. Questions unlock answers.

Where did we come from?

Why are we here?

Where are we going?

I ask my kids these questions, and we talk about them. This is bigger than RSA. This connects to pre-existence of order and intelligence.

>>217

Ok, I think I have something here…

Use this pastebin: https:/ /pastebin.com/R3pd10f1

Pick any cell (e,n)

If n is even:

If e is a multiple of n, the midpoint is n.

If e + 1 is a multiple of n, and n is even, the midpoint is n/4.

Otherwise it's n/2.

If n is odd:

If e is a multiple of n, the midpoint is 2n.

Otherwise it's n.

I think this works for most cells. Please help me confirm!

>>221

Checking my grid now, Teach.

I think you're back to d + n = (a+b)/2

Could be wrong.

Also, one more thing…

>>222

You might be right. I think I'm slightly off with the equations, but make sure to use the pastebin, the midpoint i'm referring to is only on that paste.

I think I have more insight into the horizontal gaps.

For a given n, moving right, you'll find cells filled if it is a multiple of n - a square number!

Example:

n=7

so you'll find e can equal:

0, 7, 14, 21, etc

As well as

7-1, 14-1, 21-1, etc

7-4, 14-4, 21-4, etc

14-9, 21-9, etc

21-16 etc

Finally made it through the entirety of Revelations without falling asleep. It happens.

I feel like I kinda wanna translate it into modern times, because Hillary, the Queen, Obama… all tie in. That "fornicating whore"? She's fornicating with children. Get it?

VQC, Root of David, it's all right there.

Rev 21

7 He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son.

8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

9 And there came unto me one of the seven angels which had the seven vials full of the seven last plagues, and talked with me, saying, Come hither, I will shew thee the bride, the Lamb's wife.

10 And he carried me away in the spirit to a great and high mountain, and shewed me that great city, the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God,

11 Having the glory of God: and her light was like unto a stone most precious, even like a jasper stone, clear as crystal;

12 And had a wall great and high, and had twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and names written thereon, which are the names of the twelve tribes of the children of Israel:

13 On the east three gates; on the north three gates; on the south three gates; and on the west three gates.

14 And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in them the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.

15 And he that talked with me had a golden reed to measure the city, and the gates thereof, and the wall thereof.

16 And the city lieth foursquare, and the length is as large as the breadth: and he measured the city with the reed, twelve thousand furlongs. The length and the breadth and the height of it are equal.

17 And he measured the wall thereof, an hundred and forty and four cubits, according to the measure of a man, that is, of the angel.

18 And the building of the wall of it was of jasper: and the city was pure gold, like unto clear glass.

19 And the foundations of the wall of the city were garnished with all manner of precious stones. The first foundation was jasper; the second, sapphire; the third, a chalcedony; the fourth, an emerald;

20 The fifth, sardonyx; the sixth, sardius; the seventh, chrysolyte; the eighth, beryl; the ninth, a topaz; the tenth, a chrysoprasus; the eleventh, a jacinth; the twelfth, an amethyst.

21 And the twelve gates were twelve pearls: every several gate was of one pearl: and the street of the city was pure gold, as it were transparent glass.

22 And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it.

23 And the city had no need of the sun, neither of the moon, to shine in it: for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof.

Shit lads, I got digits tonight:

>>111

>>222

Great night for my digits. Teach, you gotta post "Checked" when you see "222" for the post number on my shit. We're a superstitious lot here, us faggots. It's tradition, even if you don't believe. All primes tho, good omen.

>>232

I'm really not sure if that's the derivative or not but I will be looking at this and seeing if the period or some other part of the sequence is 2n or some other number we could solve for.

>>232

You're thoughts and conceptions are correct.

I dont know if VQC would approve of x_delta, but thats how i've been thinking about it.

>>229

Holy Shit, Teach! No, you don't have to post Hitler, but many do. There are many ways to salute good digits. There is much debate about Hitler. IMHO I'll never post his face. Based on Q, he was a tool of the ++ Rothschilds. People on the chans love Hitler bc they think he was fighting (((them))) aka the (((yewden))) conspiracy. I think he was a tool of the ruling elite to cause war. That's my personal opinion, and could be wrong. But I will never salute that man, just like I will never salute a Rothschild. However, for many he represents resistance against the World Elites. Unfortunately, I think he was one of their pawns. That's my honest analysis. Fuck all totalitarian leaders and their FREEDOM negating bullshit.

>>228

Oh good… you're seeing what I saw.

>>234

He told me that there are multiple, different patterns in the grid that could each solve the factorization problem. Think of it from his point of view; there was a very good chance that his concept could have been completely ignored. Since it hasn't and since there are so many people who dropped all the nonsense they had been doing to solve this I think we love each other too much to disapprove of any attempt to solve it.

>>235

Give me some leeway and I could challenge your opinion about that.

First thing I'll say? Do you really know for sure that he started the war? There are many images and evidence that he had a high opinion of the United States and the Allies and that he made many attempts to bring a peace-effort.

>>235

I don't think of myself as a Nazi or anything.

Although I do like collecting rare photos. Hitler included.

>>235

And I agree he was a puppet.

You always have to watch presidents or prime ministers with a high public approval rating. It seems to lead to war more often then not.

Have you seen the documentary Icarus?

>>228

I'll read it. I love learning. I have trouble talking to any family or friends now bc they all think I'm crazy when I start talking about Q's shit. VQC is like another "quantum" level up. Did you search for images of NP and SP? I couldn't find a single image. That's why all us "crazies" who are here are meant to be here. We want truth.

>>239

No, haven't seen Icarus. Worth the watch?

>>229

I felt bad. Deleted.

>>244

Definitely. Its a great film, although the creator is trying to link it to the Russia fake news, I think probably just to sell more tickets though.

>>228

Fuck AA, I checked it and it's like 100+ pages! Not happening tonight, but I will read it. TBH, anyone on this board has a high score for intellect and spirituality. VQC attracted that bc that's who he is. Humbly, I think we have the best of the best to work with our Senpai. That doesn't mean we're perfect, or are free from faults. It means we have brains and spirit to pursue this quest.

>>247

Well yeah, I said I was talking about books. It's a very good starting place for practical occultism. It's not for everyone but it sounds like it'll be right up your alley.

>>243

>I have trouble talking to any family or friends now bc they all think I'm crazy when I start talking about Q's shit

I just don't tend to talk to anyone about this kind of thing unless I know they're already into it. I'm lucky enough to have two friends in real life who believe in similar things to me. I certainly hope your family isn't the kind to want to be away from you for being into this stuff, because I've certainly heard of other people who lost a lot of important relationships by saying too much for others to handle.

>>240

Baker, I agree. I just think there's a bigger picture behind it all. I actually 100% agree with you. I just think it ties into +++, ++, +. /pol/ is right. but it's bigger than what even /pol/ knows. Satanic conspiracy to rule the world, that's what I think.

I'm trying to completely understand the links between the grid and quantum computing, since I haven't seen any other explanations. Knowing that the grid is meant to be a quantum computer, obviously there are going to be qubits somewhere. So is it that each block of (e, n) cells is a set of qubits (so if setSize = 12 there are 12 qubits for every possible set of (e, n) values) and that we use the mathematical relationships between c, e, n and setSize to find the right block containing the c we want, or is it that every block of (e, n) cells could be considered one qubit, we use Shor's algorithm to find the right block of cells, and then we use mathematical relationships to find the right cell (considering there could be an infinite number of cells with the same (e, n) values)? Or are the qubits something else?

>>249

I 100% accept and agree that Hitler advanced the Rothschild agenda. If you know the story, you will know that he wasn't a puppet, he got played. It all starts with Hitler wanting to get rid of the Jews. You see, the Rothschild's wanted all the Jews to come together (they were scattered around the world at the time) in the land where Israel is now and create the nation of Israel. Hitler thought they had a common goal, because he wants them to get out, and Rothschild wants them to go to Israel. So he did kick them out and they later created Israel in 1947 with the help of the UN. Hitler initially wanted to send them to Madagascar (kek) (look it up, Wikipedia may or may not lie to you).

Another note on that, Wikipedia has become a cesspool of admins who are Lying scum.

Look up the Wikipedia pages for Trump, Pizza gate, Obama, Hillary, Joe Arpaio, Roy Moore, Alabama election.

You will see they are full of shit.

>>248

Christians (normies) be trippin' when I start talking about our ability to create reality thru prayer and control of mind and emotions. Lol, It's right there in the bible. I can feel energy leaving my body when I pray nowadays. No joke.

Ok all, I'm off to bed!

Great progress tonight, see you all tomorrow.

>>244

Look up Icaros while you're at it. Music section.

I'm in the middle of extracting the patterns I'm seeing in Rev21 (as opposed to agenda…)

Keeps branching into trees of curiosity.

So, in the meantime

Have you read Rev 21?

Is this easier?

Trying something:

I didn't realize I started my actual version at this point… formatting got screwy, but I was starting at 21:9 with a 7 kicker.

Originally started with LOLCat but… Pidgin… numbers seem to pop out easier…

Da New Kine Jerusalem Town

9Den, da seven angel messenja guys dat get seven bowl full a da seven big kine trouble dat goin come at da end a da world, one a dem angel guys wen come an tell me, “Come ova hea. I goin show you da lady dat goin be da wife fo God's Baby Sheep Guy.”

10An God's Spirit wen take charge a me, an da angel wen take me to one big an high mountain, an show me Jerusalem, da town dat stay spesho fo God, coming down from God in da sky.

11Was awesome, an wen shine cuz God stay dea. Da light from da town wen shine jalike one jewel stone dat cost plenny, jalike one diamond, an you can see thru um jalike da crystal.

12Had one big, high wall wit twelve gate, an one angel guy by each gate. On top da gates wen stay write da names fo da twelve ohana fo da Israel peopo.

13Had three gate on da east side, three gate on da nort side, three gate on da sout side, an three gate on da west side.

14Da wall fo da big town wen get twelve big kine stone block fo da foundation. On top had da names fo da twelve guys dat Jesus wen send all ova fo tell peopo bout God's Baby Sheep Guy.

15Da angel guy dat wen talk wit me get one gold kine stick fo find out how long an wide da town, da gate, an da wall. 16Da town stay jalike one square, same wide an same long. Da angel guy go measure wit da stick how big da town, an he wen find out was 1,500 mile. Get same wide, one side to da odda, an same high all aroun. 17He measure da wall, an find out was 216 feet high, jalike how da way da peopo measure um, cuz da angel guy wen measure um lidat. 18Dey make da wall from diamond, an da town from solid gold dat look jalike glass dat you can see thru.

19Da foundation fo da town get all kine jewel stones dat cost plenny all ova. Da first foundation had diamond kine stone, da second one blue kine sapphire stone, da nex one red kine agate stone, da nex one green kine emerald stone,

20da nex one white kine onyx stone, da nex one red kine carnelian stone, da nex one yellow-green kine peridot stone, da nex one blue-green kine beryl stone, da nex one yellow kine topaz stone, da nex one green kine chrysofrase stone, da nex one red-orange kine zircon stone, an da last foundation purple kine amethys stone.

21Da twelve gate, dass was twelve pearl. Every gate was one big pearl. Da streets inside da big town was solid gold dat you can see thru, jalike da glass.

22I neva see one temple inside da town, cuz da Boss dass da God Who Get All Da Power, an God's Baby Sheep Guy, dey da temple!

23Da town no need da sun o da moon fo shine on top um, cuz God stay awesome, an God's light shine on top um, an God's Baby Sheep Guy jalike da lamp.

24All da diffren peopos all ova da world goin walk aroun inside da light ova dea. Da kings from all ova da world goin bring all dea awesome stuff inside God's big town.

25Day time dey no goin eva shut da gates inside da town. An you know wat? No mo nite time dea!

26All da diffren peopos all ova da world goin bring all dea awesome stuff dat cost plenny inside God's big town.

27But da kine stuff dat make peopo so dey no can pray no can go inside da town, an da peopo dat do shame kine stuff an bulai, dey no can go inside dea. Ony da peopo dat God's Baby Sheep Guy get dea names inside his Book, Da Book Dat Tell Who Get God's Kine Life, dey can go inside God's big town.

>>254

Goodnight, Teach!

>>252

It's been that way for a very long time. If you know anything about Gamergate (from the perspective of the people involved, not the media they were fighting against), Wikipedia actively ignored evidence and deleted it in the talk sections, and they all brigaded together to push the agenda the media were pushing. It's documented somewhere but I wouldn't remember. It'll go into far more detail. They're fucking scumbags.

>>253

"Creating reality through prayer" is almost exactly what comes up in a lot of the books I mentioned. When it comes to occultism vs Christianity, a lot of the practical information is more literal and based on the scientific method (do this and this and you'll make this and this happen) instead of being interpretive and metaphorical like it is in the Bible. I would suggest that you look into creative visualization, but you'd mostly get new agers, and they tend to ironically take occultism and take away the reason and explanation.

>>224

>>228

Topolanon, who are you man? An angel? 12^2= 144? Cubits? or should I say Qbits?

>>255

Topol, I'm getting out my bible now, Rev 21 about to be read.

Oh, The "New Jerusalem." love it already. Dude, this is like the end of LOTR. Ok, I'll post back when I'm done reading.

>>259

>>255

"The city does not need the sun or the moon to shine upon it, for the glory of God gives it light, and the Lamb is its lamp."

Rev 21:23

Well that's cool. May the Lamb and the Lion lay down together, Topolanon. Have a feeling you know your bible well.

Good night, Anons. We got some math done, we got some talking done too. Glad to be here with you all. What a timeline we are in, friends. I don't think Senpai would have it any other way. Math and Spirituality combined are the best of all worlds. I'll be ready to work and crunch tomorrow, but it was a true pleasure having my mind engaged with you all tonight. Peace and blessings to all of you.

Bumping >>250 since it quietened down a bit

>>247

>>261

funny, I come here to explore a math problem and find at least a couple anons willing to be true skeptics of religion and math:

>Skeptic does not mean him who doubts, but him who investigates or researches as opposed to him who asserts and thinks that he has found. [Miguel de Unamuno, "Essays and Soliloquies," 1924]

If all points in space and time are and have always been connected, then naturally our hearts and minds access that all the time. Prayer and meditation work with the deeper connections, not depending on space and time. Did any anons play Final Fantasy games growing up? The myth was always: "there used to be magic, but technology took over, and now no one believes in magic. We face dark forces but we band together. Relearn magic." Grow up, find out Japanese video games prepared me. what a world.

I believe that one of the messages of the New Testament is an invitation to vertically evolve. Horizontal evolution is Darwinian and slow. Plugging into technology could make us faster but in a way which is (I think) a trap. Normy society already being devolved/artificialized through technology (yes it can be used for good too). Vertical evolution is tapping into what's given to us. Bible invites us to uncover. Read book of John, to me the tone is "why aren't you using what I gave you." Ok that's my side rant.

>>250

I am not really into quantum computing, but I'm also looking for a link. If the grid is the superposition, we need to be able to collapse the grid and make it point to the answer with the highest probability. But how? VQC told us to focus on the gaps, so maybe they could be some kind of vectors, which can add up and point is the right direction.

Again, I'm a complete newfag when it comes to quantum computing. But I'm intrigued by the numbers. I will be mostly lurking, as I gather the active anons are at a further understanding than I am.

Recap of one of the current focuses: starting from any (e,n), the cells which are 2n apart in the e-direction form a sequence in which the x and n values both stay fixed (hence "small squares," (x+n)^2, are fixed), and in which a, b, and d increase by one for each jump of 2n columns to the right. You can move left into the negative columns down to a = 1.

{ -5: 2: 4: 3: 1: 11}

{ -1: 2: 5: 3: 2: 12}

{ 3: 2: 6: 3: 3: 13}

{ 7: 2: 7: 3: 4: 14}

{11: 2: 8: 3: 5: 15}

{15: 2: 9: 3: 6: 16}

{19: 2:10:3: 7: 17}

These are all products where a, b are 10 apart. The next one is missing though 8*18 = 144. Because it's a perfect square already so it got put in cell (0,0). What about the next one after that? For 9*19 the element is

{2: 1: 13: 4: 9: 19} then

{4 :1 :14: 4: 10: 20}

{6: 1: 15: 4: 11: 21}

…

so this one finishes in the top row and seems like goes on forever in that row. Wonder if I started at n=3 the sequence would do a line in row 3 then a line in row 2 then row one forever.

So as some of you noticed the rule isn't universal but it's there.

>>266

and as a follow-up the positive versions of the negative terms in that list are in row 3.

>{ -5: 2: 4: 3: 1: 11}

>{ -1: 2: 5: 3: 2: 12}

{2: 3: 3: 2: 1: 11}

{8: 3 :4 :2 :2 :12}

>>266

I don't know if this holds up for other sequences, but in yours I found a*b - sqrt(((a+b)/2)-1) < 0 for your first part. If it equals 0 it's a perfect square. And when it is > 0 it goes over to the other row.

Again I don't know if this holds up for anything other than your example.

Holy shit, teach is checking digits.

Hitler sent those people do die in Russia on Purpose, fuck Hitler. Hitler was controlled Opposition

>>229

Checked on the 222 check. 229 is a PRIME number. Always good to Double-Check our work! (a birdie told me there was a bug in the orig C## code, not sure, but will ask for details)

>>245

Teach!

>>273

There's no bug?

the odd bool is a hint.

>>113

No no no, just no.

>>119

Now THATs a bit better!

MysterY [Spice] Melange (Dune ref).

An awareness spectrum narcotic is any narcotic substance that has the ability to expand an individual's consciousness on some level. This expansion of consciousness could manifest itself in many ways, including prescience, Other Memory, or simply an increase in immediate awareness and sensory ability.

Those who possessed the ability to see into the future when taking awareness spectrum narcotics were considered prescient. Spacing Guild Navigators were capable of such abilities, as were some members of the Atreides genetic line.

wiki: pre·science

ˈpreSH(ē)əns,ˈprēSH(ē)əns/

noun

noun: prescience; plural noun: presciences

the fact of knowing something before it takes place; foreknowledge.

"with extraordinary prescience, Jung actually predicted the Nazi eruption"

synonyms: farsightedness, foresight, foreknowledge;

→ "Future shows past" ~Q.

>>274

Ok, thanks for response.

Looking at line:

bool odd = c % 2 == 1;

(does ===1 also work?)

Understand the Mod operator now for this application, thanks. Read:

http:/ /cc.davelozinski.com/c-sharp/fastest-way-to-check-if-a-number-is-odd-or-even

-> Interesting that Mod is fastest method, especially as the numbers get larger.

I know ZERO code. Took a Basic class in HS, got in trouble in Phys Ed and had to write out some "xyz" sentence a thousand times as punishment. Wrote a simple loop and sent output to PRN, brought to gym teacher who accepted it, maybe thought my coding career had hit it's zenith at that point, dunno? Pascal freshmen year, didn't get into it, always relied on others since… Big mistake (regret). I get the concepts though, and quasi code makes sense. Sorry to be useless. (figured this story isn't much of a doxx).

>>276

No need for regrets.

That line basically just sets a boolean value to true if c % 2 == 1

>Interesting that Mod is fastest method, especially as the numbers get larger.

Good eye. I think it's for the next next next step with is to test for primality, instead of bothering to check the even for primes that bit of code I think will ultimately look like:

if odd = c % 2 == 1 { check if prime with dope new prime finding stuff }

if c % 2 == 1 { do stuff }

>>280

if c&1 == 0 {lewd ponies}

>>281

gents, I actually thought Sonic Rainbow was the show, Topo's link the other eve was first clip I'd ever seen of the MLP thing (old fag here). Now I remember the ads and that song. Duh.

>>167

Ok, VA, that was disturbing/twisted. Got the gyst w/out watching all, but now Brony as a concept is in the noggin, like a little bit of poison. Ok with that though, always stare awareness & truth in the face no matter how wicked - that's core promise to self.

>>191

quite interesting. Esp the accurate time thing. It was following the white rabbit last led me here. What a hole…

Ok, enough sliding, back to lurking….

>>281

"YOU'VE GOT LEWD PONIES IN YOUR CODE! START FROM THE LAST VERIFIED SAVE STATE!"

LewdCiphers are fine.

But… hey… creepers… leave ponies alone!

This has legs.

Like… 4 of them.

>>167

>https://youtu.be/N2tGqFjdX8A

I watched the Tyler the AI vid that topolanon sent.

Needless to say I'd have enough of his videos after that. I mean, if it's not bullshit

Where's the source? I like studying viruses.

>>283

Like a table!

-goes to make covfefe-

>>285

Covfefe means "I will stand."

>>286

I still like Cov*Fefe

Covenant with The Scorpion Goddess

Covenant with Serket

Covenant with Circuit.

Am I the only ones who finds Topolowhatever annoying?

Several people here are derailing threads with spiritual nonsense. I keep adding filters, but people keep posting this nonsense. Can we make a math only thread or a spirtual shit another?

>>289

Glow harder.

I mean seriously, at least be useful.

What's day shift to me is night shift to others.

(((at least be useful, y'know?)))

>>289

Every time you numbnuts do this shit…

We know we're onto something.

(((¡AHA!)))

Y'all come at certain times.

Nothing is coincidence.

Y'all come after certain info drops.

Nothing is coincidence.

Y'all come always when people make connections.

Nothing is coincidence.

Lemme play the "Rings goes on! Ring goes off." game with you.

(((We see you, you are highlighted for a reason)))

>>289

Whereas… when it comes to me…

Everytime I kick a verse,

Every single word of it is:

Timeless

Ageless,

Evergreen,

Permanent.

I don't mess with any new fangled slang…

But I sure make that Old School language bang!

I have a theory on possible values of n.

for every a and b combination in (e,n) a valid n record exists at (e,a) and (e,b).

examples:

(1,1,1) = {1:1:2:1:1:5} = 5; (x+n)=2x2=4; (d+n)=3x3=9

(1,1,2) = {1:1:8:3:5:13} = 65; (x+n)=4x4=16; (d+n)=9x9=81

(1,1,3) = {1:1:18:5:13:25} = 325; (x+n)=6x6=36; (d+n)=19x19=361

you will find n records at (1,1), (1,5), (1,13), (1,25) etc.

for (7,1)

(7,1,4) = {7:1:35:7:28:44} = 1232; (x+n)=8x8=64; (d+n)=36x36=1296

you will find valid n for both (7,28) and (7,44).

for (6,3)

(6,3,25) = {6:3:433:48:385:487} = 187495; (x+n)=51x51=2601; (d+n)=436x436=190096

I bet you can find valid records at (6,385) and (6,487).

So I believe we can effectively follow a and b to different levels.

Now we need to understand the small square relationship at n > 1 and I believe we can "walk" the tree.

Please verify.

>>293

Dude, this is exactly what I said above :)

It doesnt work for all e, try e=9, and try to get to (9,3).

>>294

But something came to me in my dreams last night.

For (1,1) we know all a's are the sum of 2 squares. I'm exploring this pattern now, and I'll post my findings.

>>294

Did… did you just? lol

Here's your hint to the next step:

Through WHAT does one go 9->3?

Why is it ph{r}ased like that?

>>296

>Through WHAT does one go 9->3?

Great question. I worked on this yesterday with Anon. See above!

>>294

sorry. maybe it didn't process the first time.

what if (9,3) comes from negative space?

>>297

>>298

Could be true.

Also note in the pattern that x = x when you move from (e,n) to (e,a) for some t.

>>297

Kaaaay…. I just learned more about 357.

Where did you go 9->3?

>>289

Not at all, filter Topo:

Sliding

Mr.E:

Encouraging Topo and not knowing how to program while giving programming advice.

>Muh little birdy told me some code is fucked.

>Ur a shill for pointing out how stupid I am, ur a liar dude you weren't in VQC+++ posting code while I was fingering my butthole before becoming a nuisance.

Literal cancer. Literal Filtered Cancer.

>inb4 u glow

You stupid fuck, POTUS just confirmed control over the CIA with the Russia terrorist plot, there are no more CIA niggers fucking with you, they have no money, no infra, and are all running for their fucking lives. 5th column is entirely btfo.

>>302

Please filter me so you stop wasting space replying. Kthxbai

or in other words…

</[{(buzz,-0ff)}]/3

>>302

Big tell…

How come you're pushing "Muh Russia" over (((Israel)))? AIPAC… no one bitches that they've been meddling in our elections ever since the 50'?

Or, y'know… right after WW2?

>>300

There are quite a number of e records where (e,2) and (e,3) exist, but aren't in the root (e,1) key.

(20,1,1) = {20:1:10:0:10:12} = 120; (x+n)=1x1=1; (d+n)=11x11=121

valid n's include (20,2), (20,3), (20,4), (20,5), (20,6), (20,7), (20,9).

Perhaps valid a and b combinations are only part of the story.

>>305

>There are quite a number of e records where (e,2) and (e,3) exist, but aren't in the root (e,1) key.

How about this pattern here, for e=1, the list of a's are:

(1,1) => 1, 5, 13, 25, 41, 61, 85, 113, 145, 181

= (0^2 + 1^2), (1^2 + 2^2), (2^2 + 3^2), (3^2 + 4^2), etc

= (t-1)^2 + t^2

(1,5) => 1, 5, 17, 29, 53, 73, 109, 137, 185, 221

= (0^2 + 1^2), (1^2 + 2^2), (1^2 + 4^2), (2^2 + 5^2), (4^2 + 7^2), (3^2 + 8^2) etc

= pattern every 2 recs

(1,13) => 1, 17, 37, 85, 125, 205, 265, 377

= (0^2 + 1^2), (1^2 + 4^2), (1^2 + 6^2), (2^2 + 9^2), (2^2 + 11^2), (3^2 + 13^2) etc

= pattern every 2 recs

>>302

That's something that bugs me.

CIA is terrible, and the NSA is the organization that would have had that intelligence, not the CIA, because NSA spying reach is massive.

(they need to be dismantled someday, sorry Q)

So why was it reported that the CIA was where they got the intel from?

And why would the CIA even care? They literally fund terrorist attacks, along with the FBI.

Strange.

>>307

Well… take into consideration that the NSA really was No Such Agency, as in a plausible deniability front.

And then GEOTUS did the unthinkable and made it NOW Such'n'Agency.

>>307

Even more to that, they HATE Russia.

So what's the deal?

>>309

Who hates Russia?

Talking to yourself and your buddy there, buddy?

>>307

You have to understand the degree of compartmentalization that happens. Most people only know the precise scope of what they need to do and there's a culture of not asking questions and just doing your job 'for your country'. It was a signal to the world that the POTUS controls the CIA, not the 5th column. It's about Optics. There's good and bad actors in every organization.

I suspect there will be an electronic revolution which will enforce things like getting warrants for information instead of just exploiting hardware backdoors and whatever other methods they have at their disposal (timing, QC, etc). Disbanding the NSA doesn't make us more secure it just limits our capabilities relative to other state actors. Until we take care of the underlying flaws in our infrastructure there's not much that can be done.

Speaking of state actors, did anybody hear about the sophisticated malware they found in some european powerplants? Looks like someones plan B was thwarted.

>Even more to that, they HATE Russia.

That's just what (((they))) tell you with their media to keep you from realizing everybody is under their control. That's pure optics. This Putin POTUS thing was a signal of who is in charge and the new way of doing things based on cooperation and sovereignty.

>>310

Maybe I have one of these? archive.fo/g9CR7

Maybe you are one of these.

Maybe everyone is one of those.

But there's no answer to that.

>>312

Interesting view. Have you read Vault 7 and Snowden Leaks? This kind of evil kike spying infrastructure should not exist at all.

>>313

A Nagual?

-facepalm-

Side note for anyone interested, you don't FIND a shaman.

They just show up.

Kek.

>>313

>V7

I was overjoyed when V7 was released, it meant people were finally worrying about what I had been worrying about for years.

I was a bit disappointed with the scope to be completely honest though. I know they have better toys than those CnC/Dropper/Persistence packages. Unless those toys are reserved for the SpecOP NSA dudes.

Even the hardware released was kind of meh.

>>316

I don't know how you could come to any conclusion, after reading that thoroughly, other than big crony alphabets need to be destroyed.

>>319

What is a psychopath.

>>306

Hey Teach! Yeah, I've been trying to find out how to apply this pattern to other cells.

>>293

PMA, good theory. I'll put some work in to check after day job is done.

>>282

Mr E, yeah it was gross!! I had no clue that subculture existed. I was messing around making lewd pony jokes, and then Topol dropped that on me. No more lewd pony jokes from me, lads.