>>7446
>unemotional machine means no possibility for mercy
I do love that too tbf
But see, here's the thing: I'm thinking if tickling machines/robots ever do become a thing (they won't, but lets say they could) and what you're saying applies to all lees, us lers are gonna have it a lot tougher than you when it comes to using machines to satisfy our… needs. I say that because I have to assume that a machine with hands/tools that tickles a human HAS to be a lot easier to build than a robot or android that responds to tickling almost exactly as a real person would, and I don't think as a ler that I could be satisfied with anything less than that.
In other words, you could enjoy an emotionless machine as a ler, but I'd have a tough time enjoying an emotionless machine as a lee unless it was sophisticated enough to be indistinguishable from an emotional human, in which case it might as well be a human
I know this is a lot of rambling about nonsense but I considered it an interesting thought.
So, anon, will you at least let me flip the switch and watch when you're all hooked up to your personal tickle machine?
