/techbunker/ - Technology (Bunker)★

>>819

Yes, this is so easy and you can keep the moisture content to between 76% and 78% easily.

>>819

Read the valve datasheet, read the arduino datasheet, do the math on power required vs power available: if you come up short, use the arduino to pilot a relay instead of directly piloting the valves.

>>792

Thanks for the suggestions anon, I'm a little disappointed Logisim is the best we have for playing with digital logic virtually as it runs pretty slow on my old machine. I'll investigate Spice more.

>>791

>Is there a better logic simulator on Linux than Logisim

Your own fucking brain…………

Right now I am working on the project that will use most of those 6 digit alpha numeric displays to create a LED text book thats 4 digits high by 18 across. I found a great way to solder these displays together and multiplexing. I will post an update once i receive my wire and other parts.I ordered a soldering projects kits (here is the link for your convenience https://diystadium.com/solder-project-kits-review/ ) . Keep you posted soon

Thin laptops were a mistake.

>>988

It's not like there is some country selling laptops that is any better though. The large American brands are all just making their stuff in Asia anyways, although perhaps you don't mind Taiwan. (They're a lot better than China).

It's also quite embarrassing that not one European nation can put together a computer worth using.

Look at what the intel kikes have "discovered" now https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=intel-gen7-hit&num=1

>mitigation severe igpu performance hit for ivy bridge/haswell cpus

>xx30, 40 and possibly 20 thinkpads affected

>haswell igpu now performs the same as an ivy bridge

>sandy bridge and earlier possibly affected by the bug but (((jewtel))) was too lazy to check

>>977 (OP)

>Manjaro

you stupid fuck

>>1212

what?

*anyone* can email him about being the BO of /tech/ and it'll get migrated?

>>1212

It's too late to do anything now. This is what you get with centralization. I would host /tech/ myself as I have hardware and enough upload BW to do so, but I don't trust people who post here. It's too easy to upload pizza and call the keisatsu.

You can shill lbry but you can't shill brave, which is why the duality of Luke Smith is in question. Also it was confusing to realize that lbry.tv is like a web host instance of the lbry api, much like realizing that gab, mastadon, gnu social are the same thing

>>1130

I could shill lbry all I want, but I still think the cryptocurrency is going to be enough of a barrier to entrance that it will never grow beyond a niche audience and 50% of all channels being crypto ones.

>>1125 (OP)

>posting that gay meme

>>1130

>shill brave

shill a different browser for me anon, I've been on brave for a year and I feel sinful.

>>1083

tits or gtfo

or even better kys

>>1073

You claim that I'm inventing claims about your person, then you randomly come up with the idea that I'm female and jewish? Dumb fucking hypocrite. And if you're so unconcerned about winning arguments, why did you come back and reply three weeks later? Because you're a dumb fucking hypocrite.

>>376 (OP)

Because women are progams.

http://www.lagriffedulion.f2s.com/math.htm

>>388

Elephants have larger brains than humans, but that doesn't mean that they're smarter. This is the same case with men and women. Women have more folds on their brains. Both men and women are similar in intellectual capacity.

Just like don't give them your personal info. I'm only half joking, especially on the Internet side the solution is to not do certain things. Don't allow Javascript everywhere, don't make third-party requests a site wants you to make, don't sign up for stupid services that rat you out. Won't help much against the government though.

Well, I can supplement the previous post with the fact that you can also use VPN. But here you also need to add that it is not desirable to use free VPN. Many VPN services record your logs and thus you can remain without accounts. Therefore, I recommend using a paid VPN, such as veepn https://veepn.com/ .

Oh yeah to correct a mistake I said in a previous post, I forgot Python 3 actually uses stuff like 0o10 for octal, as opposed to getting rid of it.

>>1190

>Find me a non-trivial program that doesn't need arithmetic somewhere.

Find me a non-trivial program that doesn't need JSON (or something with the same purpose) somewhere. Should there be built in JSON syntax? No, especially seeing as JSON is ill-specified.

>…you said the exact opposite one post ago.

Yes. For the sake of getting rid of crap semantics, the default type of number should not be machine words. That solved Problem A, which is the most obvious one.

Now Problem B is whether we want to bloat the language with some "official" number type or not.

Then if we head further into clown world, Problem C is which syntaxes should be supported?

Octal?

Decimal?

Hex?

Binary?

Thousands? e.g 9_999_999, 1_234_567_891_123, etc. latest fad for Haskell, Java, and now Go (I'm sure C#, JS, and whoever else added it too now while I wasn't paying attention)

In my school of thought that's just merging the UI into the language in a stupid way. (Same for comments. Same for names. Same for code layout.) Instead, why not have an editor that just displays the number literal however the user wants. From an auditors perspective, we never care about how the developer wants us to view his shit anyway. We may be looking at some number written in the code as decimal, but want to see it in hex or binary and would have copied into a converter or calculated in our head anyway.

Say we have an expression like this:

One (One (One (One Empty)))

It could be in the console:

<GetNumThings()

>One (One (One (One Empty)))

Or in the code editor:

>x = One (One (One (One Empty)))

Now let's saPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>1191

>Find me a non-trivial program that doesn't need JSON (or something with the same purpose) somewhere. Should there be built in JSON syntax? No, especially seeing as JSON is ill-specified.

Tons of programs don't use JSON. "Anything with the same purpose", in addition to being unclear (what's the purpose?), changes the question to one where the language arbitrarily chose something out of the things that serve the purpose. There is no "different arithmetic" serving the same purpose as standard arithmetic that is unrightfully discarded by adding the latter to your language. So this doesn't answer my question.

Again, I get the intense feeling that you say "number" and "number type" but mean something completely different like "number syntax" or "special handling for numbers". Your rant about "Problem C" (which I mostly agree with, though if there is no standardized representation I don't see how you'd exchange programs with anything that doesn't natively understand whatever the implementation uses) supports me in that.

So how would a language "without a number type" look like? Does every single program in it have to define what a number is, arithmetic, etc. from scratch out of bits or whatever other primitive? If yes, what is the gain here, especially compared to the compatibility issues and subtle errors a dozen different implementations would create? If not, what exactly would be (semantically!) different from a "normal" language?

>>1192

>what is the gain here, especially compared to the compatibility issues and subtle errors a dozen different implementations would create? If not, what exactly would be (semantically!) different from a "normal" language?

Hrmph. It's kind of hard to go back and go over all of what lead me to this.

10 years ago I was trying to design a secure typed language. Looking at every language and seeing how they have some arbitrary crap machine-word integers pissed me off. So much that I even considered using Peano arithmetic. Later, I started to doubt this path, because Peano arithmetic is crap no matter how you look at it performance wise, and probably can't be guaranteed to be optimized out. I started to think the idea of a general language can't exist and you have to add ad-hoc crap like built in strings or ints to it. Later, I somehow met someone else working on a similar language for similar reasons. He did the same thing as me, just let the user define his own numbers however he wants. However, instead of Peano he implemented binary arithmetic. I was like sheeit why didn't I think of that. And thus the problem was solved. Anything can be implemented by the user without built in support, because it only has to be asymptotically efficient. And this covers all programming use-cases outside of DSP and a few other edge cases, which is fine. I only want the other 99.999% of the OS in my language. Polyglots burn in hell.

Some reasons I don't want built in integers:

I want the language to be as simple as possible (especially because some of the meta stuff might be complicated)

I don't want the language to have a grammar or require parsing (it's 2d like i said before. this isnt some bullshit flowcharts like DRAKON or whatever crap out there. it's 2d because this allows extensible syntax as well as being the opposite of UNIX and therefore the correct choice)

I want to reuse the types _of the language_ everywhere: for sending on the network, for embedding in documents (replace PDF and HTML), embedding in chats, types in the database are just types in the language. And I never want anyone to have to choose how it's serialized. I can send someoPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>1194

>the other way around just lets lazy programmers not care about the edge cases.

In fact, let me clarify that. It's not that lazy programmers are forced to care about the edge cases (they aren't, and some will still blindly copy around a bunch of conversions that can error, for example negative Integer to Natural). It's more that now they forced to tell me what the edge cases are. And they're forced to make the protocol better defined. If I had to count the times I had to consider what happens when some number can be negative or hits some other edge case…

>>935 (OP)

Amazing thread OP. Brilliant.

Still waiting for it to be torn to shreds though. We're a bit slow on the fucking draw here.

>>1057

This is terrifying. I'm too poor to afford VPN, so am I browsing 8kun unsafely or something? I must hide from the Wu-han Clan.

>>1049

This. The primary issue here is that people are unknowingly volunteering what they believe to be private information.

lmao cunt I hope you get locked up for posts you make online and get raped and beaten by big black correctional officers with aids

???

By 2006, LCDs were just finally getting around to not sucking so hard, after they replaced CRTs for very obvious stairway-safety reasons.

My memory of monitors since is that they keep getting larger and cheaper. Where have you ever spent 3x the price of the last monitor?

They've gotten cheaper and then expensive again. In recent years you have niggers paying $500 at a minimum for some bogus features like VRR, HDR, VRR 2.0 with HDR, full array local dimming, wide gamut version 774317, a few extra Hz, ultrawide + fixes to make it work, some other shit features that we forgot existed 5 months after shilling ended, etc. Shit even the marketing campaign of renaming LCD screens to "LED monitors" had everyone trashing their current trash and buying a new trash with LED backlight instead of CCFL.

>Larger and cheaper

The standard has been ~24" for like 10 years now, with lots of people moving to 27" recently (in the 16:9 market). Not that any of that makes a huge difference. Pixel density only became a thing (outside the sane 0.1%ers) recently too.

And to top this all off, not only does each generation have 10x more bugs, but each improvement necessarily trades something off. Like going to 120Hz/144Hz resulted in tons of horse-shit response times.

They've gotten cheaper and then expensive again. In recent years you have niggers paying $500 at a minimum for some bogus features like VRR, HDR, VRR 2.0 with HDR, full array local dimming, wide gamut version 774317, a few extra Hz, ultrawide + fixes to make it work, some other shit features that we forgot existed 5 months after shilling ended, etc. Shit even the marketing campaign of renaming LCD screens to "LED monitors" had everyone trashing their current trash and buying a new trash with LED backlight instead of CCFL.

>Larger and cheaper

The standard has been ~24" for like 10 years now, with lots of people moving to 27" recently (in the 16:9 market). Not that any of that makes a huge difference. Pixel density only became a thing (outside the sane 0.1%ers) recently too.

And to top this all off, not only does each generation have 10x more bugs, but each improvement necessarily trades something off. Like going to 120Hz/144Hz resulted in tons of horse-shit response times.

You're projecting

>>693

nope you're just blind

and what's wrong with that?

>>1148

this

>>561

>>562

>>574

Nice reddit spacing fag

>>599

HOLY SHIT WHAT IN THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT YOU FUCKING AUTIST!!

YOU

BELONG

HERE

I

I

V

https://www.reddit.com/r/Lain/

LAIN IS FULL OF DUMBFUCKS WHO ARE TOO STUPID TO CODE OR EVEN TIE THEIR OWN FUCKING SHOELACES AND SUFFER FROM BAD ASPERGERS AND SHIT EATING FETISHES. THEY THINK THAT BY WATCHIN LAIN THEY BECOME FUCKING SUPER HACKERS.

>>932

day 16 of advent of code 2019 already shamed me into finally doing that.

>>933

I'm actually impressed you got up to day 16 without knowing how to code well.

>>989

He better not recruit ON /g/ though, those cancerfaggots can stay there for all I care.

>>864

>Critique is not necessarily bad. In the west we criticise each other to improve.

You do realize you are talking to a Chinese person who is not allowed to trash his own government………..

>>864

>Criticising homeless people for being homeless is stupid.

People just magically become homeless for no reason, obviously it is never their fault… shit, you are fucking stupid.

>>864

>And then there is only the government left to criticise.

Hippies made an art out of that………….

>>910

>does not know how to quote

动态网自由门 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Free Tibet 六四天安門事件 The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 天安門大屠殺 The Tiananmen Square Massacre 反右派鬥爭 The Anti-Rightist Struggle 大躍進政策 The Great Leap Forward 文化大革命 The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution 人權 Human Rights 民運 Democratization 自由 Freedom 獨立 Independence 多黨制 Multi-party system 台灣 臺灣 Taiwan Formosa 中華民國 Republic of China 西藏 土伯特 唐古特 Tibet 達賴喇嘛 Dalai Lama 法輪功 Falun Dafa 新疆維吾爾自治區 The Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region 諾貝爾和平獎 Nobel Peace Prize 劉暁波 Liu Xiaobo 民主 言論 思想 反共 反革命 抗議 運動 騷亂 暴亂 騷擾 擾亂 抗暴 平反 維權 示威游行 李洪志 法輪大法 大法弟子 強制斷種 強制堕胎 民族淨化 人體實驗 肅清 胡耀邦 趙紫陽 魏京生 王丹 還政於民 和平演變 激流中國 北京之春 大紀元時報 九評論共産黨 獨裁 專制 壓制 統一 監視 鎮壓 迫害 侵略 掠奪 破壞 拷問 屠殺 活摘器官 誘拐 買賣人口 遊進 走私 毒品 賣淫 春畫 賭博 六合彩 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Winnie the Pooh 劉曉波动态网自由门

>>629 (OP)

I don't use smartphones, but I have to tell you, once my current phone breaks I'm going to have a real struggle finding another one.

Hopefully the Librem5 and Pinephone will be more mature and better options by then.

>>910

>You do realize you are talking to a Chinese person who is not allowed to trash his own government………..

No shit nigger.

who cares about smartcrap? how do we defeat the desktop? there is no usable desktop OS right now.