/sw/ - Star Wars

Well what do you know, less liked than The Battle For Endor. Meme it.

What's this I hear about a "critic" wanting to get the audience reviews shut down?

>>6299

disneytards are trying to get the entire site taken down

>>6332

>movie is not a rehash

>bad @ss

Sounds like he's ordering people to go near the end there.

>>6265

OY VEY LITERALLY ANOTHER HOLOCAUST GOYS

Good. Literally the only non-shit thing about the nutrilogy was that one stormtrooper beating Findu Nuffin's ass.

critic level fell to 90%

IT BEGINS

>>6342

About damn time a few more stopped sucking mouse cock.

>>6395

The House of Mouse as well as the Goof Troop are going to have a long word with a few of those professional critics if they keep dropping that percentage.

> ‘Star Wars: The Last Jedi’ Struggling to Second-Place Opening in China

> Despite a massive screen count and the full force of Disney’s marketing power, early screenings Friday put “Jedi” in only second place. The top spot was retained by Chinese comedy “The Ex-File: The Return of the Exes” in its second week.

>>6464

Chinks probably aren't watching it as much because of Finn and Rose.

>>6464

>The Ex-File: The Return of the Exes

Noice. Meanwhile Jumanji is already looking to surpass it.

>>6466

you mean shrek and donkey

>>6489

That's a lowbrow insult. Far more people like Shrek and Donkey than Finn and Rose.

>>6489

shrek and donkey were hilarious and gave out a good message about the bonds of brotherhood, whereas finn and rose were a forced couple that massively virtue-signaled and pushed the racemixing agenda, and china is now telling them effectively to fuck off by not letting it take the top spot. it won't ever jump to no. 1 in china, and quite frankly will have a lower intake than tfa.

>>6488 (checked)

Quick, what's China's answer to RT? I need to see people screaming obscenities at it in chinkrunes.

>>6533 (checked)

I don't think that explanation quite works. Even women seem to be divided on this one, if the RT reviews are anything to go by. Especially since I hear some say Leia and Holdo remind them of middle-management bitches they hate.

>that picture

Nothing about any of her appearances says "military," let alone "admiral." What was she designed for again?

>>6535

She was designed to be an "appealing" Vanity Fair cover.

>>6533

It really losses me off how many good characters like Mara, Kyle, Pellaeongods that really killed me were just thrown off a cliff and replaced with these two dimensional, nearly unlikeable characters. We could've had something truly great and beautiful. And we lost it all and for what?! Tumblrism and virtue signaling

>>6535

>What was she designed for again?

she's nu-mon mothma

>>6533

Women don’t have the technical where-with-all to register to comment anyplace but facebook.

The 50% who like the movie are Disney bots and soyboys with sockpuppets

I'm still waiting on E;R's review to come out.

>>6588

Same. You'd think he'd at least do a "semi" like his Blade Runner review. By the time he releases it, the hate hype will be over.

>>6554

Exactly, but even Mon Mothma's character was unique and the perfect setup for what the new republic was meant to be. And the stories focusing on her put importance on this. She exists to be the wise elder figure and a remnant of a forgotten age for the rebels, much like Obi Wan was to Luke, but unlike him, she's merely symbolic and plays no important role other than exist to show what the Republic will be like. This new bitch is just a fucking weirdo who exists to be a feminist icon and a representation of modern ideas, which are all terrible considering she gets herself and a lot of others killed for no reason.

>>6588

>>6589

he hasn't even made his death note video yet. by the time he gets to the last jedi ep 9 will be out.

>>6593

Honestly, when he made his Blade Runner vid, I was hoping this would be a sign of more regular videos what with his new "semi" strategy.

>>6588

Literally who?

>>6718

A YouTuber who doesn't upload nearly often enough.

Check out his review of TFA, Mad Max and - if you can find it online - GET OUT.

>>6718

Be not a nigger.

>>6720

>his name is actually E;R

Pardon me, I just assumed that was an abbreviation when I saw it.

>>6721

That's actually his own forced meme.

>>6719

>GET OUT

if they didn't delete his backup channel, it's probably on dailymotion or somewhere.

So I went and watched the last Jedi today. I have never been more dissapointed in a movie in my life. I should've listened. The out of place attempts at humor, The trashing of the characters themselves, the terrible deaths and bullshit recoveries, and almost beautiful moments absolutely destroyed. How in the hell they will salvage this bullshit is beyond me. It would take a literary and artistic genius to recover something even somewhat coherent from this trash heap. Never again shall I give a penny to Disney for this travesty that have the gall to call a film.

>>6746

Why sage friendo? Its a common opinion now and most here feel the same.

>>6746

Frankly you should have realized all of this when TFA came out, but better late than never I guess

Here's a nice little paragraph that I found out of Jedi Council:

>1. KK told us Rey was our girl Luke Skywalker. This movie is not a hero journey for Rey. She isn't fighting the good fight against evil. She's a battered wife of a villain she has no reason to give a crap about. Even in her big moment at the end where she turns him down, she takes his insult without retort and cries and angsts about his bad choice. It's the most pathetically disappointing characterization I've ever seen. Rey was supposed to be the hero that little girls dressing up like her on Halloween could look up to. I really hope that they're not looking up to this because it was the absolute wrong message. The movie ends almost with a tone of sadness that Rey failed to fix Kylo. It's just sickening;

If we assume that the writer is another liberal, then it tells us this: the movie utterly fails as the propaganda is meant to be.

>>6265

Its at 90% now with critics.

>>6842

I know you're jesting, but TC-14 was clearly androgynous in appearance.

I got a few simple questions for you, troopers. was TLJ entertaining for you? do you think it matters if it was just entertaining or not?

>>6845

I'm pretty he just posted a betty bot as an example. TC-14 though had female programming.

>>6846

That salt planet looked interesting I guess. That seemed entertaining. Everything else was just boring or dragged on. Why ask?

>>6846

No. The first Disney™ Star Wars would have almost been an OK post current year action movie on its own. (You know, if it did not have the SW label and if the nigger and the spic ended up as a gay couple.) The second one had some moments that almost felt like Star Wars. The Third one was just pure shit with no redeemable qualities whatsoever. My live is worse for having watched it.

>>6849

>The Third one

Counting RO I assume? Seriously, whose bright idea was it to release an SW movie every year?

>>6846

No. It held my interest, but I thought every action taken was unsatisfying, and at the end of it I determined I cared about nothing I saw except that Luke was poorly done and out of character.

>>6847

my dad and I had a conversation about TLJ and the 50% rating. he thought it had it's moments, but he was entertained, and "that was all that matters".

I did find the majority of the movie entertaining, the force-connection-bullshit between kylo and Rey was boring and obnoxious. some parts of the movie that broke my suspension of disbelief too, mostly leia poppins and the magical logistics of the first order despite losing a major base and two capital ships. I seriously thought admiral purple-hair was a bad-guy-in-disguise for how much of a bitch she was to Poe, hell, her sacrifice is literally the only thing that made me realize she was even on the side of the good guys.

>>6846

no. tfa was honestly entertaining, even though i dislike it. tlj was just a slap to the face at all possible moments, and the action was underwhelming as fuck. it was like edging and deciding to blue ball yourself as opposed to finally unleashing that huge load you built up.

>>6852

>>6846

I greatly disliked TFA, but I will say that it was far more entertaining than TLJ and something many of my peers enjoyed, even the ones who hated it found it entertaining as a way to just waste time with friends. TLJ just left everyone I knew who circlejerked about TFA feeling disappointed and unamused.

>>6265

It's at 49% now

We're doing it, we're gonna make it the lowest rated Star Wars movie. I've never been happier to see Disney suffer.

>>6846

I was too busy being baffled by everything I was seeing to be entertained by it. Things like the stupidly impractical bombers and walrus boobs were mistakes that Rian Johnson didn't need to make but for some reason he chose to make them anyway. The protagonists are also really unpleasant to each other throughout the film which is jarring for a Star Wars movie.

There were a few things that made me laugh I guess, like the evil First Order ironing board and that little drunk cgi alien stuffing coins in the astromech like a slot machine.

>>6888

Hans Hermann-Hoppe trips confirm. It's been the lowest rated since we went below 56%, but let's see just how far down it will go.

>>6888

Only thing that would make this better is if the prequels started rising in the ratings just to screw with RLM.

>>6908

Reviews that go something like this:

"I didn't like the prequels but after seeing what disney did to Star Wars, I decided to re-watched the PT. I found them to be masterpieces in comparison, delightful,original, spectacular, and full of likeable and memorable characters.

The PT has some flaws but they pale inn comparison to the loathsome & unoriginal movies disney has put out.

PT: 7/10"

>>6906

>Hans Hermann-Hoppe trips

What? Never heard of it.

From a moderator of Jedi Council (Bazinga'd, as if he wasn't cancer enough) also, this gem:

>Quatum- You have until I get back to my computer, an opportunity to explain to me in a PM why I should not ban you for an extended period for raising the well-denounced misogynistic “ Mary Sue” argument.

He could have phrased it any number of ways, but he chose this one.

>>6935

H is the 8th letter of the alphabet

please go back to the site you came from

>>6936

I told you all Jedi Council was fucked beyond measure.

>>6731

I can't find it, and vid.me has shut down so the backup channel is gone. One problem with naming yourself something short and edgy is that it becomes impossible to search.

>>6959

lucky you i found a mirror, and i downloaded it just in case this one goes down as well.

>>6962

>>6963

>>6964

>>6965

>>6966

nice. tbh we should have story time threads here.

>>6952

Shows the lack of care for fans That Lore Committee Filoni is on, the same Disney did with ep7 it being a fan film.

>>6981

TFA was almost named shadow of the empire

let that sink in

>>6981

Honestly, Filoni/Rebels has gotten lazy lately. Even EA's Battlefront does a better job of keeping consistency outside of the moronic story campaign, even featuring really obscure creatures and plants mentioned in barely known essential guides from the 90s. I could swear I even heard some sobbing in the distant mountains for a split sec on EA/Dice's Endor. Meanwhile Rebels just seems to take shit from concept art that was already included in the old canon in some form.

>>6719

>needing other people to tell you what you think

>ecelab cancer

no you GET OUT

>>7015

Its really worrying how so many anons are shilling for e-celebs. /tv/ in its eternal retardation does it often, but every other board is doing it now. /pol/ has its countless share of unbearable hasbeens who they want stop shilling all over the place with dank memes and "kinos about" threads. Then /v/ with its constant Sargon and reddit-celeb circlejerking and cringy fanart, and /leftypol/ with its fair share of rainbow-haired weirdos, etc etc, and now us. Can't people just write down their own thoughts? Although then again, this makes it feel like /sw/ is becoming more relevant, so that's good… I think.

>>6961

Thanks fam.

Honestly, that was just confusing. Movie is a convoluted and contrived mess, and the "message" just as much if not more so. If it's criticizing black-fetishist leftist elite, why is the white family dressed up with "conservative" stereotypes? Most normies that see an old-money, out of touch family living in the middle of nowhere will immediately think >muh Rethuglican 1%.

>>7017

>Can't people just write down their own thoughts?

Echo chambers have a certain universal appeal. A lot certainly not all e-celebs are able to regurgitate the opinions of their viewers in a more poignant and humorous way than they ever could on their own, which adds to the appeal.

>>7017

>Can't people just write down their own thoughts

If they have any, sure.

>>7026

>Echo chambers have a certain universal appeal.

Let me just point out that there’s no point talking to people too different from you.

>>7048

>too different

Doesn't even some difference destroy an echo chamber (if they don't REEE the intruder out themselves)?

>>6268

http://archive.is/zylcm

Poe's Law, everyone.

>>7150

They also hate Vietnamese, who they recognize as separate.

Back to the failed propaganda angle…

http://scavengersholocron.com/category/home/why-the-last-jedi-isnt-just-bad-its-toxic/

>The problem is that while The Last Jedi is being branded as the most feminist Star Wars film to date, its “feminism” seems like a cheap marketing ploy to appeal to a wiser audience and downplays some of the key problems within the film itself: it’s built on a foundation of sexism, misogyny, and racism. In other words, if you’re anything other than a white male, this film isn’t made for you.

>Despite these obvious problems, the most glaring ones still remain in the fact that Star Wars is a film that claims to market itself to the people it exploits and ultimately rejects. It’s no wonder that merchandise and ticket sales have dropped when the movie is back to focusing on a white male lead, like so many other before it. Kylo Ren tells Rey that you have no part in this story, that she doesn’t belong – something that minorities, women, and the LGBTQ+ community have been hearing their whole lives.

>>7151

True, but I bet they're smart enough to see the bigger picture that hollywood wants to inflict that on their continent in general.

>>7148

Meanwhile

>The draconian decline in screenings might actually help boost The Last Jedi's per-screen averages, as theater supply falls below the demand of moviegoers who still want to see the Star Wars sequel.

The damage control is real.

>>7151

>movie is good for its feminism but the reason its actually failing is because it was made by evil cis-het male white racists!

>It doesn't have nearly enough diversity!

Are these people insane?

https://www.bleedingcool.com/2018/01/08/china-doesnt-care-star-wars/

>Star Wars is only failing in China because Chinese don't know what star wars is guys!

>They just want a movie that's a representation of their diverse culture!

>it has nothing to do with politics, the movie's shitty writing or Disney's horrible way of handling the franchise!

>>7157

>Are these people insane?

Yes. Though I can kind of understand the logic of it. Star Wars: The Last Jedi is the most feminist Star Wars movie to date, but also the most universally reviled. In the writer's mind, feminism can't be the problem, so clearly the film must actually be a secret tool of patriarchal oppression that's carefully calculated to keep women and non-white people everywhere from ever liking Star Wars.

Add in a big helping of the author being a gullible idiot who falls for every piece of propaganda marketing thrown his way, most of his articles on that site are shilling for upcoming Star Wars funko pop releases, along with an article where he seriously asserts that Rian Johnson stole the plot of The Last Jedi from some teenage girl's ReyxKylo fanfic and you can start to see how the madness took root in his mind to begin with.

>>7051

>Doesn't even some difference destroy an echo chamber (if they don't REEE the intruder out themselves)?

There’s nothing wrong with chasing someone out. It simply means the people there feel very strongly and have no interest talking to a contrarian. The lolberg idea that you need to have spirited debate in every forum is a form of cuckoldry. Sometimes people want to seek out likeminded individuals to build a community, share information, and plan activities.

SJWs like to decry ‘Echo chambers’ because it’s how they infiltrate communities. Once they are in, they as a matter of course ban ‘tasteless’ or ‘outdated’ commentary.

>>6936

>well-denounced

No, I don't think anybody has yet found a way to "denounce" the idea that a character is really fucking badly written

>>7151

>one white guy exists in the movie

>DAS RAYCIS

they really do want us all dead, don't they

>>7159

Disney adds token asians and it STILL fails in China…

>>7180

That strategy has always been patronizing and stupid. If I'm an Indian guy I see Indian people on TV, in magazines, in films, on the street, at the store, and everywhere else in my daily life from sunrise to sunset. Why would adding some literal who Punjabi to be a secondary figure of importance who ultimately does nothing valuable to the plot motivate me to see an American movie if I weren't interested in the first place? I'm not going to watch some period drama set in 1930s China that was filmed in Shanghai just because they hire a white American actor to be comic relief or carry the plot device for a few scenes. They've completely lost touch with how flesh and blood people think and act to the point where it's not surprising that they'd pay for excuses to be published enabling them to keep making the same mistakes expecting something different. They're so incapable of criticizing their own visions that they're a hair's breadth away from verbatim stating, "No, no. Surely it is the marketplace that's wrong."

>>7174

Most lolbergs treat freedom of speech as a sacred right and will engage in protecting the speech of others to the absurd. This would be well and good if people truly practiced it, but it only ever goes one way, where we must be tolerant of batshit crazy SJWs and goons.

>>7176

The fact that even straight male villains now triggers them too, its safe to say that we are all fucked.

>>7202

Yes, China is clearly in the wrong here for not appreciating Disney's cheap attempt at pandering to them yet somehow failing to understand how their target thinks. Hell, SW was a popular worldwide phenomenon, even more so in non-white countries despite its white main cast accompanied by three non-humans. Disney can't comprehend that people outside of northern europe and california don't give two shits about politics and diversity. They want good well-written entertainment and likeable well-developed characters they can admire and look up to with stories that offer an almost real adventure.

>>6966

We really need more storytime threads.

>>7207

It's all the more absurd when you consider all of the times that George Lucas spoke of how he considered Star Wars to be the universal heroic myth. He believed it succeeded because he sincerely and earnestly thought he'd captured something that in a broadly egalitarian view transcends race, geography, culture, and time. It's a space opera, yeah, but its DNA is supposedly something more primal and ancestral than any of our Current Year means of dividing and categorizing different humans.

Apparently his hand-picked successor and her cronies have no faith in this achievement and think it's better to discard everyone who got it in favor of people who will never understand and never want to understand. Even if Lucasfilm continues to turn a relative blind eye to villain comics and novels by allowing old timers like Zahn to write what they want, the eventual need to comport and comply with an increasingly pozzed film and cartoon canon will be insurmountable.

Just burn it. There's nothing we don't already know.

5:30 "China criticizes The Last Jedi for insulting the audiences' IQ"

>>7226

I don't like discussing politics and I really don't want this conversation getting derailed, but I will say that left libertarians are by far the most pretentious political faction with an unparalleled superiority complex. While I've seen dems and a few reps lose their shit over recent political events, left-lolberts are the only ones I genuinely find appalling since they seem to be the most deceitful in terms of how they're handling shit. Always pretending they're true neutrals and taking the smug "intellectual" stance when really you can smell their bullshit a mile away, yet newfags will fall for their shit every time thinking they're the true neutrals who want what's best for everyone. Now let's try to not stray too far from the topic.

I could've sworn it was at 48% last night.

>>7146

it wont tho, you very much know that nuEU will continue to exist till people get tired of this crap

>>7262

I agree completely, "left" "libertarians" can suck a polyamorous, STD-ridden cock. Just got triggered a bit because most lolberts aren't that. But you are right, let's try not to stray too far from the subject at hand.

>>7301

The ratings show that people are getting tired. There are still going to be a sizable number of normies that watch it because "OMG Ster Wers," but the cracks are beginning to show.

>>7262

I've never liked blending politics with SW either since it invariably leads to singularity cringing, but it's kind of difficult to avoid it now that official SW media is trying to syringe-feed unwanted politics to everybody still paying attention to it.

>>7226

Right-libertarians are specifically who I was thinking of. The kind of people who see inner cities being turned into Mordor and think the problem can be fixed by lowering taxes and school choice. The willfully ignorant who insist there are no racial differences. They see the source of all problems as government and the solution is limiting government. They cannot (and didn’t) address the shitting up of culture because they view it as not the place of politics. They cannot address racial issues. All they can do is whine about taxation and suck off every megacorp that turns around and shits out anti-white garbage.

>>7313

This. One of the reasons I loved SW so much was the lack of political commentary and irl social bs put into it, the closest being some vegan shit and animals rights shit. Now because of Disney, its now sadly tied to all the political shit.

>>7339

>he's serious

Some advanced retardation right here.

https://web.archive.org/web/20120506110906/http://www.rottentomatoes.com:80/m/star_wars_episode_i_the_phantom_menace

Reminder that prior to the RLM prequel review, The Phantom Menace had a 57% critic rating and a 62% audience rating, yet when the video started trending in 2013-2014 with the announcement of TFA, the audience rating suddenly gained over a million reviews and the score went down to 60% (and the critic rating went down to 56%) and then 59% (and 55%) by the time TLJ's first trailer came out and RLM's video gained over 8mil views.

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/star_wars_episode_i_the_phantom_menace

TPM ain't perfect, but it definitely doesn't deserve to be rotten simply because RLM and Disney told them it has to be hated and despised.

>>7366

The thing that I hate about the RLM videos isn't that they lambasted the prequels. Lots of people thought they were shit and ruined muh childhood. What I can't stand is how intellectually lazy it enables normies to be. Nobody feels like they need to articulate or explain why they think the prequels are a cinematic sin against God. All they do is point you to watch the RLM reviews. Mr. Plinkett does all of their thinking for them. It's offered as an excuse not to argue or show their thinking. The prequels are objectively bad movies and RLM dutifully explains why. What burns my ass worse is how now if you try something like linking the 108 page rebuttal to the Plinkett reviews the same people go, "LOL autism" because apparently you're allowed to make hours of YouTube commentary savaging something as shit and have it be quality entertainment but defending something is for gay ass nerd bois.

>>7351

>>7359

>muh right libertarians

I was in on all that stupid crap myself once. When you kids grow up, you’ll realize that the only way to achieve peace is to maintain a government for your people’s best interest, not to go off in the woods and pretend you are some fucking frontiersman.

Anything libertarian has been subverted by Banking Clan. The only ideology which can’t be subverted by them is banned.

>>7372

To be fair the rebuttal has its own flaws. He should have left out his butthurt about rape jokes and Plinkett as a character, and kept it entirely about the actual criticisms. I thought he was too quick to fall back on "it's a movie" as an excuse, and used it in the sense of "it doesn't have to make sense or be realistic" instead of the more valid use of "concessions have to be made to make things work". I also think he was too generous to the lightsaber fights, and that RLM was mostly right to consider them over-choreographed spectacles without enough emotion showing through.

>>7378

That's a valid opinion, but the people I'm talking about don't even read it far enough to have that argument. They just roll their eyes at the idea that some GEEK would write a long defense of a Star Wars prequel while its perfectly acceptable for a bunch of middle-aged schlubs with beer guts to record hours of bitching. It's the double-standard that pisses me off.

>>7264

Yeah, that fucking came out of nowhere when I heard it. Ready Player One is the epitome of shallow nostalgia pandering complete with SJW propaganda and a complete and utter lack of substance.

>I want to see the Delorean covered in Ghost Busters memorabilia driving into a city and blowing shit up! I want to see that!

>>7372

It's worse than that, normies don't even think they have to watch the prequels anymore to think they're shit because of muh RLM. I like their shit, and the Plinkett reviews are fun watches, but I've always known they weren't representative of the actual qualities of the films. I'm seeing a lot of prequel love lately though, because TLJ sucked so hard people went back and realized how much worse it could get.

>>7375

>right libertarian

>implying

Libertarianism is pretty retarded as a whole and is basically the party for anarcho capitalists who wish they could be anarcho commies. Now enough with the political derailment.

>>7390

>I'm seeing a lot of prequel love lately though

I don't like this attitude. It comes across like people who abandoned a broken raft adrift in the middle of the sea, only to climb up on a ship that passed by, only for that ship to sink, so they swim back to the raft and talk about how much they appreciate the raft. The raft is still broken and adrift, and the people on it are still doomed.

Here's my summary of why the prequels are bad films without Red Plebbit Memeia to do my thinking for me. Some of the best stories are the ones that are never told. I will explain this in a bit, but first understand that stories often have small untold elements to them. When done poorly, they become plot holes that hurt the film, but when done well they become mysteries to be considered outside the main story. Star Wars has several of these: Who is Boba Fett? How did Anakin become Vader? What were the Clone Wars about? How did Solo meet Chewie? One of my favorite one of these mysteries is from the film Back to the Future.

The mystery is "How did Doc and Marty meet?" Looking at this mystery, I have come up with my own answer in my head. More importantly I have realized that while I am satisfied with the answer I came up with, and think it is a perfectly reasonable concept, Bob Gale might have his own answer to the mystery, and that answer will almost inevitably be shit. Because Bob Gale has not given an official explanation, I can sleep soundly at night knowing that what I believed happened is as good an answer as needed, or I can discuss it with other fans in order to challenge its strengths and weaknesses. If Bob Gale were to make an official declaration on the story, it would burn the opportunity to speculate with others, and imagine for ourselves the answers. In this way, the mystery becomes an untold story that has its own satisfaction to it.

This is the problem with the prequel trilogy. Instead of allowing the infinite possibilities of our own imaginations to fill in the mysteries presented within the films, he provided his own answers. All of these answers are inevitably inferior to the speculations that others could provide. What makes it worse however, is that the entire prequel trilogy is placed on a Procrustean Bed and is tortured to fit Anakin's fall to become Darth Vader. Many of the faults of the prequel trilogy fall casualty to these two overarching problems.

Because of how mangled the storyline of the prequels turned out, I initially looked forward to TFA. Not because I wanted a return to form, but a significant departure from the previous films. I wanted a different movie that didn't tie itself to the others. When I saw the teaser trailer for TFA my first thoughts were, "this doesn't look much like Star Wars - good, finally it's got some fresh blood behind it". Then the film came out and well, now we're here with this mess.

>>7424

You can dislike it all you like, but it's still preferable for the Prequels to have both merits and failures weighed fairly instead of what Disney wants.

>>7447

>merits and failures weighed fairly instead of what Disney wants.

But is it? What significant merits do the prequels actually possess that have been overlooked? "It didn't propagandize me with CY+2 politics" does not make for a worthy merit of consideration, considering you can get the benefit of the same merit by staring at a blank white wall.

>>7424

Nobody's saying the raft is a luxury ship. It still beaten and flawed, but everyone would rather sink with the SS Disney just because other people told them not to use the raft. The raft should never be treated as a luxury vessel, but it shouldn't be completely dismissed and treated like some useless piece of rotting driftwood when it at least did its job for the most part and everyone was allowed on it, while on the SS Disney, not everyone is allowed and no care or maintenance of any kind is put into it, simply looking pretty and likeable for the sake of tricking you out of your money because it had pretty aesthetics.

>>7455

The prequels gave us some more worldbuilding. Despite the normie consensus, I actually liked watching interstellar politics, it gave a nice view of what the Republic was. There's also Sheev. Making Palpatine/Sidious a political mastermind playing both sides of a war against one another was a good move.

>>7457

I can't say I hated it. I guess my issue is that to say the films were misjudged I expect something strong in the film that was really overlooked. The world building argument comes off as weak because any film set in the Star Wars universe will by the needs of the story end up giving the audience more world building. I hope that didn't come off as dismissive.

>>7481

>I'm not sure if that was what Lucas had in mind when he wrote it, or if that was an unintended result.

Well, it was explicitly stated a few times in TPM that the Senate were too corrupt to do anything useful to solve the Naboo crisis. And although he claimed to be going for a timeless classic, Lucas did allude to history and mythology in his works more than once; Anakin's parallels with Jesus, the Republic/Empire connection to Rome, and so on. I don't think it's unreasonable to say that he meant for audiences to reach that conclusion. Even if he didn't mean that, and it was just a fluke, it doesn't matter because it's a fluke we've all accepted. The Clone Wars show touches on the corruption of the Senate a few times, as do many of the EU novels. Luke's New Jedi Order goes out of its way to avoid the pitfalls that made the old Order so detached. Even if Lucas didn't mean for any of this to happen (and I don't think that's the case), it happened, and it's had a positive impact on the greater canon.

>>7483

Alright anon, you've convinced me. I wasn't aware that other writers canonized the corruption of the senate, but it helps clear up things. I don't know if it is just me, but I feel like certain aspects of Star Wars get foggy around the prequels.

>>7485

> I don't know if it is just me, but I feel like certain aspects of Star Wars get foggy around the prequels.

Honestly, with something as big as Star Wars I think that's inevitable. Everyone's bound to miss something at least once.

>>7424

>The mystery is "How did Doc and Marty meet?"

I’m pretty sure Marty just answered an ad in the paper to be an assistant part-time while he was in high school.

>>7480

>Because, not only does it fail to give us a good setting, or good characters to expand upon, it forces all future writers to work around this festering corpse that's collapsed over the timeline.

I suspect we’ll see a ‘Legends’ movie be made, particularly if Solo bombs and IX does badly.

>>7526

Is the guy on the left an ayy?

>>7526

That's a thermal detonator, you fucking goon.

>>7530

A Dresselian, if I'm not mistaken.

>>7526

>Leia is some kind of action hero operative, not a politician who can fight her way out of a problem.

>>7543

You need to get your eyes checked, because I see no red there.

>>7556

That's his point, the thermal detonator he posted has no red, but the one in >>7526 does.

>>7559

What with all the things Disney wants to buy, I can easily see Shitendo being in their sights. They'll start off small, asking for Nintendo-themed rides at Disney land, followed by some merch production, then they gain the western distribution rights and become the new NoA.

>>7559

No, you dumb shit. There's no red on that orb on that book cover either. Your eyes are playing tricks on you.

There has been an awakening. Do you feel it?

>>8101

I'll take your 2 egg lonely cat lady and raise you a lesbian feminist sperg who is completely falling apart over TLJ, it might just break her entire worldview by the next film.

>>7590

>no red on the book cover

There is. It's the little light on the thermal detonator and the reflection of the nu-alien's hand. Not saying its red, but there's definitely a little red on there from the little light and the reflection of the hand.

>>8101

I'm feeling it. I don't know much about the guy whose video I posted, but it played right after WCB.

I hope Phasma and Nu-Wars gets more hate after the bullshit virtue signalling her character inspired against sexy animu armors. http://www.funnyjunk.com/Star+wars+is+cool/funny-pictures/5668288

>>8104

Goodness. She might even earn shitlord points by that time.

>>8117

Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.

>>8101

>>8104

shit, i'd do either one of them in a heartbeat. the polack is definitely superior, but i'd take the closet dyke for like a rainy sunday y'know.

>>8125

and i should add on, i mean their thoughts in addition to their physical looks. like the first one is a total "fuck me anon" type, but the second's personality gets me rock hard.

>>8125

I’m into dyke radfem for some reason. Like you give them the D and they turn into a total bimbo. Why is there no porn of that?

>>6265

Pro reviews now at 90%.

>>7580

Put pokemon already turned into garbage so there is nothing for Yidney left to waste money on.

>>8285

You kidding? Pokemon is still a multi-million dollar franchise.

>>8349

When did this happen? Also, its tragically funny seeing Kennedy claiming she gives a shit about in-universe rules and lore when all she wants is a political platform.

>>8376

this was the disney sale, anon.

They are literally reaching bargain bin tier.

>>8412

fantastic.

>>8412

すごいすごい！

Wonder if after Solo crashes and burns someone on the producers>toy makers>toy purchasers>retailers chain will get wiser.

>>6846

No, I was entertained by the Rey/Kylo v Red Guard fight.

Everything else was boring, destroyed interesting future plots, or butchered characters.

>>6961

God bless E;R

>>8602

Now if only he'd upload a TLJ review.

>>8722

https://my.mixtape.moe/zvvovf.mp4

>>8722

robot chicken is making new star wars episodes? let's hope they lampoon the ever-loving fuck out of the disney shits

>>8639

it's in the works

>>8722

to my knowledge mark hamill did his voice in the first rc sw episodes.

>>8725

>/ourguys/ will savage disney

Yes anon. That’s exactly what a group of dude weed lmao soybeards are going to do. They aren’t just going to make fun of fans who think it’s shit the whole time.

>>8727

Didn't they poke fun at the OT too?

>>8727

From this >>8723 it looks they're criticizing the same aspects of TFA that we criticize around here. Unless it's all a setup to some "LOL joke's on you RAYCISS!!!1111!" at the very end they're on the right track.

>>8725

>Cantina full of all the old-EU characters they can find figures for

>a book pops in

>Oh hey, a book from the new canon

>someone reads it word for word

>"It's just a guy farting for an entire chapter."

>[This was actually published] shows up on screen

>We're better off dead. Who's up for Sabbac?

>>8722

Isn't the guy who did his voice the guy who played Luke in all the video games?

>>8753

I may not like Robot Chicken, but if they actually make that into a skit, I will become their mindless shill slave, shilling all over the place even if it pains me. Fuck all, I will fucking do it.

Seems that Disney's even fucking up the damage control.

>>8897

>188 dislikes

The damage control is real.

>>8900 (checked)

The salt rises throughout the Galaxy. And now, a military analysis of TLJ.

>>8726

He actually voiced a segment in an episode that was cut into the first episode.

It was actually a guy called Bob Bergen who's voiced Luke in pretty much every video game and RC appearance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Bergen

>>8753

This pretty much.

48%

The trickle of righteous bile continues.

>>9110

すごいすごい！

>>9110

We shall hit 33% and be known as Order 66.

heheheh

>>9195

Wouldn't that be 34% anon?

>>9247

EA already shit itself, both battlefront games flopped and they made it official that's the reason MTX is coming back to nufront 2

>>9263

this is even better than captain america having captain america taken out of its title

>>9286

they've been brain damaged for a long time lad

>be shriveled old cunt

>hate that boys didn’t let me in treehouse

>fuck jews, climb ladder because suck of cut penises

>fool well-meaning autist into making me his assistant

>connive to sell his company to kikes

>once sold, take over, shit on everything he built

>give francish to ugly weasel faced Jew who should be a bar of soap

>release movie that does well on nostalgia

>hire manlet with a vibrator up his ass to write sequel

>it’s a total shit first draft, but your self-insert with no tits and ass has a prominent role and feminism

>target soyboys, feminists, and chinks

>piss of whties

>shit on Luke Skywalker

>movie craters after initial release

>china hates it because a nigger kisses a fat vietcong peasant

>soyboys go once to theater to pose for instagram with bearded mouth agape

>feminists and pink hairs stay home and write tumblr fanfic about Harry Potter and Draco Malfoy fucking

>actual fans outraged

>let manlet shit on them

>disney is upset

>get called in dark room with altar and hooded figures

>one of them is having a coughing fit

>strapped to table

>stripped

>Abramovic chops off one of your saggy tits

>pisses on it

>gives it to others to eat

>last vision is Tony Podesta dragging a girl into the rape room.

>>8251

Pro reviews are back at 91%. That must've been some bribe.

If Disney decides to axe Lucasfilm, but still retains IP rights to all Star Wars content, you think there's any possibility of them letting the old EU authors write Legends content again? Oh who am I kidding, Disney will litigate the hell out of anyone that tries, even if the free popularity is to their benefit.

>JarJar Abrams pulling Ballbusters excuses

http://archive.is/NKbLM

Because nobody dislikes a movie just because it's shit. This is good news because if there wasn't a significant backlash and fear they wouldn't bother coming up with this kind of crappy excuse.

>>10653

Can you post them? Can't open in archive.

>>10693

It says a lot when the author's of said articles are getting into arguments with their own commenters.

>>10694

Episode IX is going to fall apart.

Do you ever sometimes wonder if we’re being goaded into something, as if they are ruining everything because they want us to get focused on the real world?

>>10700

I don't think so, bread and circuses are used to distract people from the real world. People losing their shit about the circuses to this extent is similar to Roman history. Usually, when you're trying to pull really heinous shit on a populace, you want them as distracted as possible, not tuning in to see why political shit is ruining all their fun. That's why /pol/ was getting so excited about the NFL kneeling, they were hoping it would be gamergate x1000.

To keep this on track, how do you think IX is going to play out with all the shit that's happened? I'm betting that Leia will have a funeral scene and that will magically inspire the other dipshits in the resistance to rally, despite the threat of her dying at the end of VIII. Abrams won't resist using another superweapon, but I think he'll resist another Death Star. I'm betting he'll lift that force bomb from the first Darth Bane novel for Kylo to use since he's so unhinged and wants everything to die. Rey will stop him, but the sequel hook will be taking care of the Knights of Ren, since there can't be definitive endings in franchises anymore.

>>10700

>Everything that has transpired has done so according to my design.

They're nowhere near that clever.

>>10702

>To keep this on track, how do you think IX is going to play out with all the shit that's happened?

To be honest, I just don’t care. Rey will defeat Kylo, and Kylo will either just die or be redeemed and die, but I don’t care about either of them. None of this really matters and I have no investment in any of these people. Finn or Poe could be removed from the series entirely. Hux is an oaf and no one takes hom seriously. The three leads also have no shared adventures. Finn and Poe and Rey didn’t have a death-defying adventure where they bonded. They’re all going to be doing their own thing. I don’t know what the galactic situation is besides there’s a casino planet that has slave stable boys, so IX will simply tell us exactly what it needs and operate in a recasting of the Star Wars universe that does what the plot demands.

Assuming IX does well (and it will probably clear a billion dollars) it will not be due to any die-hard fan enthusiasm, but because normalfags and the SJW hype engine perfected by Black Panther can get people into seats to see an “important” film. (((Abrams))) will contrive a plot to match some visuals and sfx ideas he has, none of it will be logical, and Kathleen Kennedy’s feminist politics will be even more pronounced. They will be more combative about it in the marketing and post-movie phase where they explain why the tail on these movies is nonexistent now.

IX will suck and be remembered as worse than VIII or VII. Disney will not change course, and Star Wars will ultimately just drift downward to become Bayformers, with no real fanbase aside from the vacuous soyboys who work for all these shitty tech and nerd webzines and other progressive “nerds” who purchase funco pops.

>>10705

you sound like you actually WANT this to happen. cynicism is an idiot's philosophy anyway.

>>10651

I wonder, where the stupid ends and the puppet strings begin.

I got a question, but since the appropriate thread disappeared out of existence, might as well post it here.

was chuck wendig that one idiot among the anti-gamergate twitter bunch who kept talking about poop like he was some kind of projecting-but-vaguely-closted corprophilliac?

>>10709

>you sound like you actually WANT this to happen.

Don’t misinterpret me. I wish it wouldn’t. But it’s really beyond my power to change. All I can do is write the franchise off, which it’s pretty much near the point of doing.

>>10710

I'm pretty sure he was and also had a foot fetish, but he does reference poop a lot for some reason. There's also the author of those new fart books who is a different fellow than Wendig.

Great job, Rian, now you're bringing the malaise of your own garbage to Solo's own dump.

>>11380

Rian Johnson somehow made me hate him more completely than anyone else involved in Star Wars, ever, including Chuck Wendig or Kathleen Kennedy herself, because beyond the progressive politics he is such a fucking egotist. I was even inclined to feel bad for him after the shitshow of TFA and the mess JJ left behind, but through his sheer charm I now hate the fucker beyond any of the others. He is so unfoundedly full of himself, he was given Star Wars but he acts like he created it and he’s some grand master of Star Wars.

>>11381

>I was even inclined to feel bad for him after the shitshow of TFA and the mess JJ left behind, but through his sheer charm I now hate the fucker beyond any of the others.

i actually thought he would be the saving grace of this new trilogy since i enjoyed looper, but i never realized that he was such a soyboy. then again, now thinking back on it, there were plenty of context clues for me to pick up that i just never dialed in on.

>>11398

>>11404

Different anon here. You're both wrong. Looper is garbage. Time travel is is easy to do poorly, and Looper managed to do it even worse than usual.

>>11438

THANK YOU. Looper was shit, not only was the time-travel stupid the way it was used was utterly contrived and not in the slightest bit immersive. Then there was the retarded TK shit. Because one sci-fi gimmick that you only shoehorned in to justify your shitty plot wasn't enough.

>>11439

Contrived is putting it lightly. The TK was itself just another contrivance for why Bruce Willis had to go back in time to kill the kid before he could use TK to stop bullets. To jump through all these hoops to justify time travel, I would assume Rian would want to make a time travel movie and at least do time travel justice.

Nope!

I followed Rian's IMDB from the last jedi and Looper is sitting on a 93% critic rating which makes me wonder if isn't Disney buying off TLJ reviewers, but Rian Johnson himself

>>11438

>>11439

>>11446

i think i need to re-watch looper, because i remember it making a lot of sense. then again, i also watched a jumpy cam copy and not a dvd.

>Bob Iger denied compensation

>fails to pass some internal corporate mumbo jumbo despite being in control of the company for years

>shareholder bollocks him for ideological behavior, he can only get defensive in response

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOrgaQQxzeI

<capitalism doesn't work, you naive faggot! The shareholders are part of the problem! They'll NEVER raise their hand against Iger! Give up!

Do you want your plate of crow now or later?

>>11805

>A conservakin was able to stand up and grandstand because he bought yidsney stock for this express purpose

>Gets booed while speaking

>Small smattering of applause after question

>Iger told him to fuck off

>”see how the invisible hand can bring us a victory against public companies owned by so many kike mutual funds they can’t perform oversight on their corporate officers???”

Compare this against Brenden Eich getting fifed from a company he started just because a few faggot developers started a boycott. Meanwhile Target committed itself to losing billions rather than reverse its stupid bathroom decision. No CEO firing. It isn’t about money.

>>11817

Just adding on, the shareholder vote against compensation was non-binding.

>"The board accepts the result of today's non-binding vote and will take it under advisement for future CEO compensation," Aylwin Lewis, chair of the board's compensation committee, said in a statement.

(((Lewis))) later states he believes the compensation is in the best interest of the company, so the compensation is going to happen anyway.

Also, the reason for this is ‘concern’ over the large amount of the money he wanted, not anger over Star Wars.

>>11805

>Do you want your plate of crow now or later?

I'll take two. Seriously I hope Disney fucks itself to the absolute limit. Also what's with the sudden high traffic across the boards? Raids? Hacks? A Happening?

>>11819

We are being probed.

>>11817

Were you listening to the same audio I was? The man stammered as he replied to that. He was rattled. As for the smattering of applause and slowness of the proceedings, you expect the people in the room to not be wary of outing themselves in the presence of the big man? We'll have to see what happens, but I'm tempted to be more optimistic about the outcome for once.

>>11826

>Were you listening to the same audio I was? The man stammered as he replied to that. He was rattled

Sorry but you’re reading too much into it. They’ve had almost the exact same exchange before back in 2013, and you see how much good that did.

>you expect the people in the room to not be wary of outing themselves in the presence of the big man

The room is a bunch of shareholders, anybody who has stock in Disney. It’s more like a town hall for investors and the whole point of going is to register your opinion on issues about the company. Nobody in the room would have any reason to want to impress Iger, the meeting is supposed to be the other way around. The truth is most of the people in the room are representatives from mutual funds, who don’t give a shit about politics or are stridently progressive. Any small time investors there are LARPers who want to go over reports and act like their opinion matters.

It isn’t a bad idea for conservatives to try to buy up stock in Disney, because if a majority of the stock were owned by them then they could start forcing the company to unfuck itself, but that isn’t the reality.

>>10632

They're back at 90%.

>>6265

MONTHS of 1 star reviews and its still at the 48% of a month ago…

These overall ratings are *absolutely* loaded.

Honest question now, the critics obviously where bought, but what did they actually say? I know some critics, and probably a good half of them, are so shit smear crazy, they would have damned this movie for even one of the numerous complaints. Assuming they weren't paid off. I know critics have a big stiffly for "Finding Forrester" failed/fallen hero archetypes to the point of fetish. So I'm not too surprised that this was "critic bait" but I know they wouldn't have ignored the disjointed mess of a story the scenes played out. Unless if these critics where all "scene critics" where the movie itself didn't have to make sense, so long as the "scene by scene" was good, and are able to completely ignore other scenes too.

>>11919

According to the rottentomatoes blurb:

>Star Wars: The Last Jedi honors the saga's rich legacy while adding some surprising twists – and delivering all the emotion-rich action fans could hope for.

Because I can't be arsed to read the reviews themselves, going by this I would say they just circlejerked over "muh nostalgia"

>>11929

It was less that than circlejerking over a feminist star wars and prog politics coupled with an emperor has no clothes thing where everyone had to say it was great or they were a moron. Stoklasa waited until he felt the wind well and good on his finger before he weighed in even kind of negatively.

>>11938

Same thing is happening with Disney's latest disaster, A Wrinkle in Time. Critics are desperately trying to salvage it despite how clearly awful it is, with such statements as it being poorly written but that its message/push for diversity is what really matters, so whether its bad or good doesn't matter, according to them. I still can't believe that a fucking irishman and the The New Yorker are one of the few unbiased film critics out there.

>>11977

I know exactly why they said that - Hologram Leia from ANH is in it, Yoda is in it, Luke is in it. Things from the old movies are in it. Which to a soy eater is honoring them.

>>11380

the dumb cunt talked DOWN to Hamill after a fan asked how HE'D have written TLJ

"What would *you* do, motherfucker?"

*audience laughs*

>>11446

>which makes me wonder if isn't Disney buying off TLJ reviewers, but Rian Johnson himself

"Buying"

>>11982

Remember when reviewers were clever and insightful? Neither do I.

>>12002

I’m trying to think of a time a review had a positive experience on enjoying a movie, and there isn’t one.

>>12002

I almost pointed to reviewers like E;R who use wit and cleverness to rip into things they hate, but even in that sense you're correct in a lot of ways. Sure, the one or two people that stand up and say "the Emperor has no clothes" are better than the legions of willing ignorant who don't say anything, but it also doesn't take much skill to rise to that level; even in the original fable the Emperor was called out by a mere child, after all. It doesn't take a genius to look at a festering pile of dogshit and call it a festering pile of dogshit, any functional person can do that. It's just that these functional, normal people look like supermen next to the morons shoveling the dogshit into their mouths, loudly proclaiming what a delicious apple pie they've found. Although to be fair E;R goes into far more detail about what makes good characters, good worldbuilding, and similar analyses than the bare minimum necessary rip into something objectively bad, something many of his contemporaries fail to do. Spoilered because eceleb shilling

>>12002

People like to pretend Siskel and Ebert were clever and insightful, but anyone who's seen their Return to Oz review (among others) would know otherwise. So yeah, I don't remember such a time either. Gene Shalit was alright tho.

>>12293

Anyone have a Twatter or gab account that can send it to him?

>>12295

Nope. Any brave trooper out there have one? We must get this to that weebfaggot E;R post-haste and hope he does something with it.

>>12297

Fuggit, I've got a burner email address for purposes such as these. I'll make a throwaway and pop it his way.

>>12302

Nice OC

>>12301

In ten years, the audience score will be 30%. We’re not locked in with it, it’s locked in with us.

>>6265

Apparently RT doesnt count 1/2 star reviews. That's how it has failed to go down since hitting 48%

4/5ths of all reviews are half a star.

>>12310

Where did you read that anon? Is it a new policy they implemented just for TLJ? I would assume so, because offering a rating option, then not counting it, is retarded.

>>12310

Not that I don't want this to be true, but you got any sauce? I want to share it wherever I can for any that say that try say otherwise.

>>12304

Cool. Maybe it'll be a part of a later video, though. You might want to send it to other reviewers who've taken our side. Mauler, Worth-a-Buy's Mac, Razorfist, and others I could name. Like I said, this needs spreading as far as possible.

>>8126

>>8137

Her smile stirs my loins too.

>>12301

>and delivering all…fans could hope for

>Audience Score: 48%

It's beautiful.

>>12304

>the last forcebender

fuck, i didn't need to be reminded how the 2nd series of avatar was this crap: the prequel.

>>12422

>What the fuck happened?

jews.

>>12421

>it's the first time he's heard of the phrase "The Last Forcebender"

>he enjoys hating on the Legend of Whorra

Allow me to introduce you to fun youtuber and technically an eceleb E;R

>>12422

They realized they could make more money by selling out to the film makers then actually caring about their content. For fuck's sake, when TFA came out, their tomato meter was a duracell battery and ads for other kinds of shit covered the page.

>>12422

Places that give correct scores, or actual news stories without the bias only do so because they have an incentive. Basically telling the truth is what sets them apart from the bigger websites. Once these places grow to a sufficient size they don't need their niche audience anymore, or some big special interest group pays them off they drop any pretense of objectivity like a box of rocks.

>>12482

I think its a play ball (take the payoff) or we'll shut you down, type of thing.

>>12486

Threats seem unnecessary. I remember listening to Uwe Boll talk about Harry Knowled from aintitcoolnews when he was accused of groping women from his scooter. He said he remembered Harry bragging about how Paramount wanted him to fly out to their studio and were talking about doing a script with him.

Uwe correctly surmised that the move was transparently done to get positive reviews, and that the mere prospect of getting involved in making a movie was enough to buy the fat fuck off. This is pretty much how Yidsney bought off Stoklasa. They sent him cheap plastic shit and he said he loved TFA.

The tragedy is it isn’t even money or threats which buys these people off, just flattery. They just pretend to like them and they go fawning.

>the worry of Luke Skywalker "upstaging" your character

…I didn't know these things could still anger me.

>>12502

The man may have made some pretty terrible movies, but man, listening to him shit on Hollywood is fantastic entertainment. Highly recommend.

>>12661

Real talk - I think Uwe gets shit on more than he deserves. In the Name of the King was a fun movie which was competently made and has some great scenery-chewing from Ray Liotta.

>>12663

No, simply deepening your anger.

>>12312

might be disney strong-arming them, since RT admitted the reviews were genuine and not bots.

Here's another sad one.

Looks like she's back for another pass.

>>12852

Her raw emotion is arousing.

>>6265

HIT 47% TODAY. PRAISE SHEEVUS

>>12852

She's the dyke version of Aydin Paladin.

>>12855

As is her brief moment on "glistening."

Ooh, and she even turned on Kathleen Kennedy for the specific point on "taking the Force away from half the population."

>I am attracted to male energy

Well then. Are we sure she's a dyke?

>>12863

Is she Jewish?

>>12864

Listen to the last seconds of the video that was posted earlier.

>>12869

So she is a Muun.

>>12866

Just a youtube (((normie))) loving Abrams Star Wars but now hating Rian's version.

>>12875

Baby steps. She's a heretic now for rejecting Rian at all. There's no return from that. Also, did you miss her rejecting Kennedy outright? Also, echoes only work when they try to hide it, you goof.

>>12864

Rhetorical questions only work when you use them right, anon.

>>12855

Wait until she makes a rant with her body covered with peanut butter.

>>12882

Inevitably she will turn on us, and in all likelihood she is feigning heterosexuality for pateron bux from men who want to bang dykes, but I shall enjoy the delusion and choose to believe she is sincere for now.

>>12882

Shows how your standards have lowered.

OT, are there any sites where men bang bull-dykes?

>>12886

Anon, you don't need to cover your ass this much just because you like a girl. This is /sw/, not /swr9k/. Which would probably be inhabited by NEETish Sith ghosts.

Also, I'm starting to wonder if none of you faggamuffins live in the Midwest or South. We get a lot of housewives who cut their hair short for practicality's sake.

Sage for the obvious.

>>12891

>Also, I'm starting to wonder if none of you faggamuffins live in the Midwest or South. We get a lot of housewives who cut their hair short for practicality's sake

For older women yes. Having hair that short at her age is unusual. Most often times it is a sign of lesbianism or punk rock enjoyment.

>>12891

As a midwester I do see this phenomenon. However, I'm inclined to agree with >>12892. Something tells me she's not a housewife, and that swept-over, short on one side and long on the other thing she has going with the hair isn't strictly speaking practical. That being said she's far less blue-pilled and far more reasonable than I would have expected, particularly the Kennedy bashing. As you pointed out she will forever be a pariah thanks to going against Johnson and Kennedy. Because the primary benefit of leftism is its social acceptability especially among women, once her friends start turning their back on her she'll have much less reason to support it. Her uploads also show she's made a video decrying the landgrabs happening in South Africa as well, which will accelerate the pariah-making and shows she's capable of thinking critically on things besides Star Wars.

>>12894

>laughing at der furhertrippen’s peccadilloes

Don’t judge me.

>>12894

triple 8 trips are Hans-Hermann Hoppe trips. I intend to force this meme long after it stops being amusing.