No.16304 [View All]
>When the soy milk expires
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.16879
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>16858
It did. Also judging from that "evil" looking Rey, looks like best spoilers are true!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.16901
>>16879
>tfw a now aged JJ looks more and more like Spielberg
Okay, so am I the only one suspecting that JJ may actually be Spielberg's bastard son which is why Spielberg won't stop shilling him and recommending him to everyone? What are the odds that Spielberg is pulling a Palpatine and is setting up clone successors/host bodies?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.16903
>tfw you haven't given a cent to nu wars
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.16907
>>16903
>mfw my parents bought TFA on BlueRay
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.16911
>>16901
i'm betting jj and spielberg are related to some extent, after all ashkenazi jews are a very specific line and not a lot of them are around in the world.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17007
>>16805
>says this is his riders of Rohan speech
>proceeds to post the weakest bullshit in defense of nu-wars
I see your hook-nose Grima Wormtongue!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17013
>>16907
Kill your parents.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17014
>>16805
This desperation makes me feel all warm and fuzzy.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17036
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17037
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17039
>>17037
>>17036
inb4 the empty nest is mara jade
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17040
>>17037
>the first black woman in the Star Wars galaxy
What?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17041
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17044
>>17041
>b-but the prequels
Broken record.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17046
>>16879
I don't buy it. Unless Kathleen has been quietly demoted behind the scenes, Rey wont be shown in a bad light. She's Kathleen's pet.
At the most, they might tease her going evil for the first few minutes of the movie. That'll be the Luke pretending to be a shady figure in Jabba's palace sequence.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17049
>>17046
>That'll be the Luke pretending to be a shady figure in Jabba's palace sequence.
>More ripping off the OT
It'll be this one then.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17050
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17052
>>17044
Literally all they ever say is "But the Prequels!" and "Attack of the Clones is the worst Star Wars!"
They lack the capacity for original thought.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17057
>>17039
You had to go and fucking jynx it, didn't you? You take that shit back right now, and then you shut your whore mouth.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17059
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17060
>>17041
>le prequels
>new things are good because they're new
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17061
>>17039
>red head mutt is now Mara
Oh damn you
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17066
>>17052
I wonder if they even believed that before someone told them to believe it.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17069
>>17041
This is bait, pretty sure.
>>17037
Think he got trolled?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17073
>>17066
The issues with the prequels have been overblown by time and clickbait nuWars ads it seems. Maybe I'm just lucky, but I've seen even the normalfaggiest of normalfags get fed up with what happened to Star Wars under Disney. Of course, being who they are- they still repeat every stale meme about the prequels being worse than Sith they've uncritically picked up from reddit.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17081
>>17073
>Another Ssiposter
Pic related.
The prequels certainly had their problems. Take literally the entirety of Kashyyk from RotS. It serves zero purpose to the plot. Or the factory fight on Geonosis; sure, it shows off what's being done on the planet, but we already saw that when Obi-Wan was snooping around. Or the omnipresent CGI that just grates on you after a while (sure, I heard they had lots of practical stuff, but when you run every practical effect through a greenscreen and a bunch of digital "enhancements" it still looks off). They never even made a single set of clone armor!
But then you have Nu-Wars, which takes these (honestly not movie-killing) problems and blows them out of the water. ALL action sequences with the Falcon are indistinguishable flashy sequences. And the pointless bits can now take up the majority of the film (like Poe, Finn, and Rose in TLJ). At least the prequels didn't have that many plotholes, and you could rationalize around them when pushed. Not to mention the god-awful dialogue that truly reared it's head in TLJ and continued into Solo. And then there's the complete lack of sex drive. A huge chunk of motication in the original saga was sex-driven, but we can't have that, apparently, that's bigoted.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17082
>>17081
The idea of dinosaurs running around with blasters is just too great not to appreciate. Those guys are honestly one of my favorite minor factions for that reason alone.
>The prequels certainly had their problems.
Yeah, they certainly had their share of awkward dialogue and overused special effects. The CGI doesn't bother me too much, since it seems the majority of it was well done- but unnecessary for most scenes and quite a few characters. This may sound stupid, but I think the prequels pull off making the CGI looking natural better than a lot of more modern films. It was just good enough to do the job, but not so advanced that everything looked too detailed to be real. The designs had restraint, and the the film crew wasn't obsessed with making every pore on the actors' faces visible in great detail.
Anyway whatever George had up his sleeves to make the prequels enjoyable films even with the flaws- Disney clearly doesn't have it, at least the part responsible for former Lucasfilm IP.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17084
>>17082
>The idea of dinosaurs running around with blasters is just too great not to appreciate.
Ditto. I have yet to read any material with Ssi-Ruu in it, but I love them by default.
>This may sound stupid, but I think the prequels pull off making the CGI looking natural better than a lot of more modern films.
That's not stupid at all, it's true. This is especially true for Phantom Menace, where some of the scenes that are almost 100% CGI look great despite it still being in the pioneering stage at the time. Not sure what to compare with from the modern age since I've ditched Hollywood. The reflections off the Queen's ship are just stunning, even today, because of how the visual effect was used.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17085
>>17082
>>17081
>>17073
Ah, I see I am surrounded by classy reptoids.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17093
>>17081
Some scenes are just there to be enjoyable. I don't mind that so much. I mean, does everything have to be a well oiled machine? Is it never okay to take a small diversion just to have a bit of fun?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17094
>>17082
The prequels do make me somewhat nostalgic for the days when "computer animation" was still novel, when a film's special effects were still a show piece, and it wasn't just expected that everything should look near perfect.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17105
>>17094
Compare Battle Droids to Transformers or the Prequel aliens to Marvel aliens, it was the simplicity and style that made the Prequels so enjoyable. You could still make good stuff with CGI, the problem is that everyone in charge in Hollywood has shit taste
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17133
>>17105
CG will never be a spectacle in and of itself again. People will never again be wowed at "the clever things they can do with computers these days". That's kind of sad.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17217
>>17133
Which is probably a good thing- though the damage done by practical effects all but disappearing is already done.
>>17105
Yeah. They make it detailed for the sake of detail, instead of trying to make something that looks good.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17224
>>17217
The same thing is true of practical effects too. When was the last time people were wowed by model shots? It doesn't happen anymore, because we just expect everything to look perfect.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17227
>>17224
You've got me there- but what's the last movie you've seen that's done anything significant complex with character makeup or animatronics/puppets?
nevermind, I just realized they brought back the Dark Crystal for a netflix series
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17803
Apparently one of the mods had a breakdown, and only "constructive criticism" allowed now
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17807
>>17803
>it's not a no-criticism policy!
>it's a no-criticism-we-dislike policy!
>toxic behvaior BTFO!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17808
>>17803
>toxic behavior
>constructive
<in other words only posts allowed are those that meet with my standard! Now do what I say or get blocked!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.17842
this is pretty funny so far, but just wait until IX crashes and burns. the cognitive dissonance will be hilarious.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.18110
>Now even the admin for r/starwars is gone.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.18111
>>18110
>the disney shilling in that thread
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.18114
>>18111
Its a sign that they're scared. With the fall of the SW spinoffs and even the over-defensive admin of r/starwars going against Disney too, the remaining idiots are desperate to save this trainwreck even if it means becoming deranged. Despite it all, I was mad at the "lolsonerdy bazinga" normalfags who never missed a chance to shit on us and old SW and all the endless shilling and denial, but then I remember those happy normalfags who weren't in it for the "nerd" trend shit. Just family people who wanted to relive the charm. I remember seeing so many local schools and recreation centers doing star wars things and people renting out R2D2 dummies for events. Seeing that joy they had be sucked away by Disney greed feels almost as bad as when they destroyed our fandom and setting on that terrible day *that is now so long ago…**.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.18116
>>17073
>tfw the prequels had issues but they were still highly enjoyable films
if they had brushed up some of the casting choices and writing they'd be much more fondly remembered
The final duel in RoTS was also a solid payoff, some issues such as spinning is a good trick, but overall a fun fight
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.18346
>>16839
Is that a bullet? or did you machine a bullet? what's that pic, anon?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.18356
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.18357
>>18356
<I was a boycotter just like you! I swear! See? I changed! Why can't you?
The damage control is sounding more desperate.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.18361
>>18356
>regret not watching a pile crap
>implying its the same experience as watching the OT
Good thing I saw the re-release of the OT in theaters special edition in the 90s + the PT unlike this underage faggot.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.18362
>>18356
>i-if you don't watch it in theaters you'll miss out goys!
>by fzkhn
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.18364
>>18362
>fzkhn
Sounds like a hastily made employee account or something that was thought up quickly by a kid or newfag
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.