No.10636
What do I read after I read the sequences and the meme compilation of scott's posts (Library of Alexandria) ?
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10640
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10641
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10643
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10644
>>10643
I forgot to add that Radish is a little heavy on reactionary applause lights and minutia, so if you decide to read it leaf through when you recognize those.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10646
>>10641
>>10643
Is there a rss feed for finished series, because I see he has a different way of organising his blog and there are only two tags, Year 1 and Year 2.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10649
Ohh wait the guy hasn't posted in a while, no need to follow him.
Now that were here, is there anything nrx has to offer except Nick that has an ongoing blog that is actually good ?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10655
>>10649
The Future Primeval
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10656
>>10655
>ongoing blog
>last update in January
It has some good stuff though.
>>10649
I like reading Social Matter and I enjoyed the (discontinued) Weimerica Weekly podcast.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10657
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10669
>>10640
I'm going through the gentle introduction.
Will Moldbug eventually promote a solution to his problems because I fail to see how centralization of power is good. His whole fisher king argument is the same when it comes to monarchs ? They're just humans, sooner or later they will be afraid of losing power, etc.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10671
>>10669
nvm, I'm dropping this shit, his writing style is too assumptive
radish looks good tho
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10672
>>10669
You should definitely read his Open Letter first.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10675
>>10672
Don't mean to be a retarded contrarian here but I what will I learn at the end ?
So far it's been pretty meh.
>dude cathedral lmao, who controls the voters, doesn't matter who controls the journalists and the academia it's all perfectly decentralized like my shit Urbit never will, certainly not the jews
>are you a progressive that hates conservatives ? well tough shit sheeple
t. grew up progressive, then /pol/, now ascending to the anime realm
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10697
>>10675
Do you actually think it is the Jews? Your greentext is ambiguous.
Honestly, if you don't mean to be a retarded contrarian (or retarded anything), don't write like that. Your post reads as if you put effort into making it shitposty, like a newfag of the try-hard variety. This may or may not be the case, but it is how it reads.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10713
>>10697
I don't honestly think it's the juice but I don't see why no one is complaining except far right that they hold most high positions today in jounalism/media.
I don't know about education.
I like to post that way. People where I hang out with usually would have a better time understading that than if I write normally.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10714
>>10713
>I don't see why no one is complaining except far right that they hold most high positions today in jounalism/media.
Because people attribute positives more than negatives. They usually do this to themselves but if they're very agreeable they will do it to others too. On average whites are more agreeable, between blacks and jews in intelligence and also the majority in the west. So you hear this a lot:
>if blacks are overrepresented at the bottom, it must be caused by anything but them
>if jews are overrepresented at the top, it's because they work harder/are smarter
If you're white but disagreeable, this may look like a conspiracy by your peers and/or whoever is at the top, but it's just stupidity and bad heuristics.'
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10715
>>10714
And those disagreeable far left anarchists don't like jews much either.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10716
I tend to agree but I fail to see how that contradicts the "jews control the media" narrative.
And I thought the far left anarchist had a thing for 1% not specifically jews.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10717
>>10716
It doesn't contradict it, it just explains why people aren't behaving the way you expect.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10718
Why not simply admit that Jewish success in the economy is caused by high IQ and good Jewish culture?
Then black (American) lack of success is caused by relatively low IQ by American standard that's still OK by the global one and more importantly a horrible culture.
That's why I like HBD.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10719
On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10720
>>10717
what if jews are actually controlling the media and you're just diagnosting proportions of populations from your comfy chair so it fits your worldview.
is us iq over 100 something entirely jewish or what ? is interest in media positions specifically jewish ?
You even brought blacks into this I don't care.
I'm not saying jews don't deserve those positions. I'm not saying ashkenazi don't have high average iqs.
All I'm saying is how someone building that cathedral theory can just ignore this and explain it as a perfect decentralized reinforceing meme when it's somewhat jewishly centralized at least regarding journalism.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10754
You don't sound like you belong here (poor grammar and punctuation, unironic antisemitism). "The joos control the media" needs to be unpacked. Which ones, all of them? Clearly not. So, just some of them, on behalf of all of them (how does that work?) or on behalf of… well then it's not the fucking JEWS controlling the media then is it, you absolute spanner, it's - at most - PARTICULAR PEOPLE who HAPPEN to be Jewish.
inb4 retarded elders of zion wingnuttery.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10755
>>10720
I'm with you until "who HAPPEN to be Jewish" Nothing just "happens" to anything.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10756
>>10755
Maybe I am steelmanning, but I don't think that anon's use of "happen" implies it is random or that being a Jew doesn't predict having power in the media. The implication is rather that "Jewish" is an overly broad category to explain their power, and you should look for what other categories the subset of Jews that controls the media belongs to.
It is pretty much Moldbug.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10758
>>10754
Agreed. I don't think Jewish and non-Jewish elites give a shit about ordinary Jews who can be sacrificed at any time.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10759
>>10720
If Jews do control the world then join them instead of fighting against them. There is nothing wrong with what Jews do. Instead there is something wrong with non-Jews who do not emulate Jews. Why not make white Europeans an Ashkenazi-like group complete with a trade empire?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10764
>>10754
>unironic antisemitism
Not an indicator of not belonging here.
>>10759
>There is nothing wrong with what Jews do.
Sure.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10765
>>10764
Most Jewish jokes have nothing to do with feces. In fact I have read a lot of Jewish humor but certainly don't remember anything more than 1% being feces-related.
What about this sample?
http://www.aish.com/j/fs/Have_you_Heard_the_One_About.html?mobile=yes
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10766
>>10754
I think you should probably go back to the ssc commenting secion where you'll be rewarded for suckling the tit of approved subcultures.
>it's - at most - PARTICULAR PEOPLE who HAPPEN to be Jewish.
I dare say, pure coincidence, goy
>>10759
The absolute state of /ratanon/.
>and you should look for what other categories the subset of Jews that controls the media belongs to.
rich ones ?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10767
>>10766
Beliefs need to pay rent. Politically correct beliefs need to pay rent or they are just nonsense, so do politically incorrect ones. Whether a belief is politically correct is orthogonal to whether it is factually correct.
Now let's examine your evidence. You claim that many Jewish jokes involve poop which isn't even factually correct at all. You need more evidence before your claim can be reasonable.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10785
>>10767
>post a pic displaying jew toilet humour obsession
>You claim that many Jewish jokes involve poop which isn't even factually correct at all.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10786
>>10785
Does 10764 and 10765/10767 appear like the same person?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10793
>>10786
What, like some kind of self-loathing jew act? I can dig it.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10794
>>10793
Nah. It is clear who 10765 and 10767 are. On the other hand, who 10764 is is a good question.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10795
>>10785
Can you even basic logic / reading comprehension? No, you can't, because you are a sub-100 IQ propagandist.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10796
>>10636
The Ascended Economy is Scott's best post imo.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10797
>>10796
It's entirely derivative, there's not an original word in it.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10798
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10799
>>10797
No words are "original".
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10800
>>10799
Some combinations are.
Really though, it's just "Accelerando: the Blog Post".
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10824
>>10636
The answer is Jim.
The answer is ALWAYS Jim.
http://blog.jim.com/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10832
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10833
You see a pastebin link. You don't need to click to know its contents.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10835
>>10636
legit philosophy.
I started off with a bunch of Karl Popper essays, who actually often touches on the same topics as a lot of these rationalist folks. very interesting stuff about the philosophy of science, problem of induction, nice debunk of historicism in the social sciences, fun stuff.
The Problems of Philosophy is a more technical introduction, by Bertrand Russell to some core analytic philosophy topics.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10887
>>10835
Agreed. I also like legit philosophy.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10927
>>10657
>Marxism is a systematic, technical, rational critique of capitalism—and therefore a stage 4 ideology.
What did he mean by this?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10931
>>10927
I think it's fairly clear in the context. Coming from Chapman, it isn't high praise, if that's what you are wondering.
>A stage 4 social system is rational in at least the sense that there is a reason for the nature of each role and relationship; and the reasons together provide an interlocking structure of justification. “Therefore,” an asymmetric relationship between ideas, is the epistemic key to stage 4.
>Political leftism tends to monism, and rightism to dualism. The communal mode tends to mistake the logic of stage 4 for rightish ideologies, particularly capitalism. However, stage 4 is not inherently rightist or anti-leftist. Marxism is a systematic, technical, rational critique of capitalism—and therefore a stage 4 ideology. (Notwithstanding that campus communists rarely understand Marxism’s details, and often misuse it as a simple stage 3 rejection of systematicity.) John Rawls’ Theory of Justice is an elegant stage 4 systematic justification for leftism. Conversely, stage 3 rightism is common; that is the appeal of simplistic calls to “protect our traditional communities.”
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
