BO

I have rarely posted on the chans. I tried to remove this but it seems I can't. Please remove for me. Thank you.

>>4463608

Q, can you give us a meme of the GHWB envelopes.

>>4514081

Freddy and Ebot

Freddy had 81 posts in a thread and was banned for spam, then proceeded to evade their ban. Same story with Ebot.

Huber, Horowitz ‘probes’ of Hillary Clinton, Spygate nothing but cover for the Deep State…

https://thenationalsentinel.com/2018/12/27/huber-horowitz-probes-of-hillary-clinton-spygate-nothing-but-cover-for-the-deep-state/

>>3437612

>>4530642

do I have to clean up your shit, you're not my maid,

I need sunkist,

lol,

be well guys,

trust the plan,

>>4460173 Step 1: Trump doesn't NEED lawyers.

He Navigates the BAR without scandalizing the Court of Baal.

His Character is his PROPERTY

is yours MORAL?

Happy New Year BO/BV

Getting a 404 on Bread 5752: “Standing So Strong They Can’t Even Edition”

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/4510152.html

https://sys.8ch.net/mod.php?/qresearch/res/4510152.html

Able to get in via sys link (which is good cuz I think this might be my favorite bread ever, and this post/gif may have to become a mainstay in my sides workout, >>4510245 ) but thought you guys might wanna know in case thread can be fixed for other anons to enjoy. Crazy night, things were moving so fast I didn’t realize BV was mixing it up in there with the ban hammer on those disgusting pron shills. Good shit man.

Thanks for keeping the dream alive.

>>4551351

Is it your favorite bread ever because you fed the retarded Mason shills or because you left out real anons notables including more information about the ADL so you could lulz with your buddies?

>>2768996

old news

jeb campaign used them during the r primary

>>4357563

I considered it.

I found lots of these points to be misleading.

Flynn - foreign agent for Turkey >> other stuff

makes 0 sense

All documentation shows nothing related to any of that. Nothing to do with space, and you have a complete lack of understanding about the nature of him being a "foreign agent". Again, misleading.

overall a bunch of nonsense with no clear picture being painted

>>1667382 proof not all "red-heads" are racist vape-store REEEEEEEEEEEEEs :)

shalom shalom

>>4555235

- Arrest, Prosecute and Execute All Satanic Pedophiles in Positions of Power in DC and Hollywood and the USA - Created by D.L. on December 28, 2018

MAN should, could and would provide 7 billion signatures.

….. nada.

Do you know WHY these Petitions (and binding referendums) never become REMEDY?

Pedovores and blood-sacrificing tards aren't going to sign their own death sentence.

Jay Parker states it concisely, "JUST leave the Children AND animals alone." And Mark Passio - ex satanist - nails IT to the crux.

>>4555420 links soreeeeeee ! kNOT.

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/arrest-prosecute-and-execute-all-satanic-pedophiles-positions-power-dc-and-hollywood-and-usa-2

BO

t. Voatfag asking about "merger"

If you want to continue here to avert sliding the bread, I'm in to it.

>>4559012

Yeah I just don't care (About the Voat ownership merge). Well, maybe saying I don't care sounds harsh, I simply don't have enough information to draw conclusions. You know my stance on the whole thing. I mean if I knew Putt personally or the other mods I'm sure I would have a different view. However, I remain isolated from the rest of any staff from Voat.

My first experience with Voat was getting in to contact with the mods from r/GA on Faggit.

After spending some time with them, BVs and I all realized that ~90% of that team was either completely retarded or actually clowns. We shedded some fat, called faggots out, and stripped them down, and we don't really care how their subverse is doing now, it's not our job. The only mod there now seems to be the only one who gave a shit about draining the swamp, over controlling a population. That's all we know for now

v/GreatAwakenings owner, Srayzie attacked us when QRV started because they accused us of actually being those mods. No evidence, nothing, just straight up accusations.

I don't care. Maybe that's what it looks like to them, so nothing against her/them, but that was kinda gay. It's an understandable reaction I guess though. It was hectic for everyone. However we have not been contacted by them nor have ever contacted them.

v/QRV is supposed to be it's own place. Just a mirror of 8chan. I'm not trying to start shit with others. I don't care how anyone else does their job if it doesn't affect mine. Putt has been courteous enough to allow us to stay on Voat so I'm very grateful. If something changes in that regard now that we have new site owners, you'll see it here. I will announce as soon as I can.

>>4559098

Thanks for your help.

Just know this post has been immensely helpful for myself and others.

I'm glad I could finally catch you.

Please carry on. I'll return with more info should the need arise. For now, I agree with the sentiment that it's not urgent nor all that important.

>>4559145

It's cool.

>>4563917

Yeah that's great. That only proves the use of manipulated images(copied signature images) and that whomever writes/edits/verifies DJT's documents can't spell. IT'S HAPPENING ! ! !

NOT.

>>4552326

My goal is championing our culture and crushing our enemy, MOS/JIDF. Was favorite bread bc we won big on both fronts, big morale boost. If you’re an anon whose opinion on what's good for QR differs from other bakers', learn to bake. If you’re BO/BV, just ask me to do or stop doing whatever you need, I’ll honor it. Your house your rules.

>>4564429

>My goal is championing our culture and crushing our enemy, MOS/JIDF.

The fact that we're not here to realize your personal goals aside, there are more than Mossad/JIDF (Confirmed by Q) and people who would otherwise be your allies in purging the kike scum are attacked simply for acknowledging that the evil transcends tribal boundaries. I've noticed two things.

First thing, you have the same people blowing smoke up your ass every thread you bake, these same people are here all day just driving whatever is most disruptive, whether it be Freddy, David Wilcuck, Porn Slide, you name it, they're just here to disrupt.

Second thing, the same people who blow smoke up your ass go out of their way to blow smoke up BO/BV's ass and use the denial of everybody is a Mason shill as a tool to raise their argument via 'Appeal To Authority' fallacies. They use this tool to attack the anons I described earlier and suck on our nuts about how great we are in hopes we will continue to implicitly consent to their faggotry which is allowed because Freedom of Speech is vital including speech against the staff. That being said Appeal to Authority and Consensus Cracking are very powerful tools which potentially undermine the stability and efficiency of this board and as stewards of the community we cannot implicitly consent to these attacks by staying silent.

Next, this activity is to force a situation. Our rules and allocation of responsibility are very effective at keeping every party in check. BO/BV's don't dictate content, Bakers don't dictate who can and cannot post and this separation of responsibilities means BO/BV and Bakers cannot be easily used against eachother unless either party chooses to disrupt the natural balance of things. This is the reason I am coming to you as Anon, to advise you of these things, violating this boundary is exactly what they want. You are free to disregard this post or to take it under advisement, that's the beauty of Free Speech and the beauty of thinking for yourself.

>Your house your rules.

It's OUR house the Anons, the Bakers, the Lurkers, the Shills and last but not least Q make this board what it is, not the staff. Which is why this is not an official BV post. All I can do is bring this information to your attention and you and the people that lurk can choose what or what not to do with it. This is just the latest in targeted approaches to undermine the values of this community, pit us against one another, and otherwise distract us. They obviously won't stop but it is this Anons opinion that they are using you as a tool for their own purposes and not everybody who speaks out against them is a shill (but some are). The group is just playing everybody, they don't care about the Genocide or the truth they just want to be faggots.

>>4569826

The so called sjw "jews" are all "reformist jews", i.e. jews that reject the traditional judaism (torah and talmud) and instead invented a new and "progressive judaism". Their sjw activism got a backlash by traditional and orthodox jews (even some atheist patriotic jews), calling them "traitors" and "erev rav" (look it up).

Q mentioned more than once that it isnt about race or religion, it is sheep vs ruling families and the puppets in oil/tech/politics etc.

Many jews in top positions = cabal jews (mostly reformists) + non compd jews.

Kushner, ivanka, horowitz and probably cohen wattnick are working to save the US. The discussion about jewish role should step out of the so called muhjew propaganda garbage, and focus on truth. There is a reason why shills bever mention the reformist jews. It is too close to the truth for them. It is better to talk about propaganda and fringe theories than what every politically knowledgeable orthodox jew will tell you himself. To me it is facinating.

>>4569996

you are real lucky I just ran out jew-b-gone spray

im going to the store and if you're still here when I get back i'll use the entire 4-pack

you should be spamming general anyways

>>4569826

>>4569996

>>4570260

You guys are trying to drag us into an argument about subject matter when the problem is entirely Appeal to Authority fallacies supported by botspam and Consensus Cracking. Try harder, both of you.

Not going to make it through the whole bread.

A ebake will likely be necessary because the graveyard (nightwatch) baker doesn't come for a little while longer. BO/BV might need to oversee an ebake, or a check on a willing baker.

Giving a heads up, have to go soon.

Unrelated, still, still don't understand why people post here. Boggles the mind. And it might be a good idea to ban some shills, muh free speech and all, you can't protest in a Trump Rally, you get btfo'd quickly.

>>4566939

Appreciate your response, BV, but very confused by it tbh. Spent all day writing a response in search of clarification and decided it's better to table it while I take in more data, if not just move on.

I will say this. I'm 100% patriot acting in good-faith in support of QR, God & Country. My support for BO is in service of same and is genuine. No disrespect for your work personally, you BV’s have been solid for months, but your office has sheltered two bad actors who used banning/censorship and larp/discrediting against us. BO is the only constant. We’ve been thru too many betrayals to trust to blind principle like children. We know mods have authority, we know authority can be abused. We trust BO with it because of his demonstrated skill & character.

I know some JQ-pushing "anons," like this one, >>4558737, are spammers thus acting in bad faith. But I don't understand what's being argued by your Appeal to Authority/Consensus Cracking concern. I legit don't understand what you're asking me to do, and it's blackpilling af to learn that everyone expressing support for me has shown evidence in their post history of being a bad actor. This is at odds with my read, and throws all my instincts into question. My first impulse was to ask for evidence but I already know it would be dismissed as arguing with ill intent, like you told this guy:

>>4569826

Is he one of the bad actors with a history of daily support of Freddy-style disruption too? Fug.

I'm also thrown by why you couldn't use a trip to tell me these things yet still referenced the behind-the-scenes mod's view of IP histories to justify them. How is this not Appeal to Authority? Would providing data not be a better tool to our thinking for ourselves?

Finally, why was there a BO/BV posting ban histories and expressing being comfy on bread 5752 if it's known by you guys I was only participating in feeding known bad actors? Or are you speaking as an Anon in that analysis and not for the mod team?

Link to 5752 is still 404'd btw. I'll assume BO is down with all this unless he says otherwise, and go from there. Prolly best for all of us if I take some time off. Thanks for holding down the fort.

>>4571398

This is obscene. FOX is taking a new low.

POTUS: please hurry with your Truth Cable Network.

>>4576339

No one needs to "push the JQ"

It is very old and unsolved.

The final answer is urgent now.

>>4509830

Points out Washington was a Mason, this is how you treat that Anon while you're circlejerking with your buddies.

> >>4509830, >>4509857, >>4509907 (((JIDF))) to Goyim: It's the Masons!!! Not Jooooobs!!!

You chose not to include notables: >>4505568, >>4508703

>>4505568 A significant amount of Anons participated in this Silver discussion, yet it was not deemed notable after someone spent two threads trying to explain how it was the least kiked way to buy silver, you thought it was more important to circlejerk with your buddies instead of inform your fellow anons how to kike the kikes.

>>4508703 This goes against your beliefs that it must only be the Jews despite clear indication by Q that this is not the case. When someone goes to educate you and the rest of the Anons it's ignored in lieu of fluff.

You get the benefit of the doubt until it becomes apparent you are not here for the truth, if you choose to continue to circlejerk and attack Anons who disagree with you while claiming you have the support of BO/BV's further action will be taken. We will not protect the Vatican, the Muslims or the Jews but we will not let one side of the proverbial triangle play unfairly with Appeal to Authority arguments and Consensus Cracking.

And the moron shills should stop sharing the same folder of stale as fuck memes, even when you IP hop it's trivial to track you lazy fucking retards.

>>4578881

And for the record, these missing notables is what prompted this discussion in the first place. It's undeniably good information, relevant to the topic at hand in those threads, it has support from multiple anons and instead of doing your job and putting dug information into the bake you wasted everybodies time playing into the circlejerk. Anons pointed out that you put what you agree is a malicious anon in notables and you and the rest of them attacked them and called them shills, this behavior is not acceptable while also claiming you have BO/BV's support, nobody has BO/BV's support to call everybody who disagree's with you a shill period. Everybody has BO/BV's full support to speak FREELY without getting banned.

You are free to acknowledge this situation or keep on keeping on. As it stands you have the benefit of the doubt, but life is the summation of the choices we make. Next time when what happened during the manufactured (((Triggering))) happens again the situation will be officially addressed at length. Where you want to be when that happens is up to you.

So what is the deal in here anons are jidf pretending to be BV's

>>4576339

TBH I don't understand the accusation or if you even are accusing me

I've never been in META before

tbh not sure If I was responding to a shill or an actual BV. When I see people downplaying the JQ it sets off a red flag. Can an actual BV here chime in?? did you guys really get on the triggering bakers case or something?? news to me

>>4576339

Can we get a uniformed officer in here please? lol

*checks watch*

it seems to me the jidf sweatshop, right about now, would want to spam breads with JQ material, just to get called out as spambots, and then be able to turn around and declare the entire JQ subject to be a cabal psyop. And thus don't you dare question the jew.

Are we suuuuuure that isn't what is happening here

>>4579954

>it seems to me the jidf sweatshop, right about now, would want to spam breads with JQ material, just to get called out as spambots

This is also very likely, which is why freedom of speech is critical. Including the freedom to have and read this discussion. The shills can't get away with pitting us against one another if we're aware of their games, hence this discussion.

>>4580493

>4b0d26

Thanks. But given the sticky on global and the level of shilling lately I dont think it's too much to ask to have you prove that you're a BV right now and post with a tripcode or whatever. You more or less accused me of shilling above and told me to "try harder"

don't think you would feel that way if you actually took a close look at my history but it's possible I guess. You a real BV?

>>4580493

youll have to excuse me Ive been here maybe a year at most and this place is one of the biggest things that connected the JQ dots for me

>>4580601

>shilling above and told me to "try harder"

I feel no reason to use a capcode, in fact I think it's bait for Alinsky style framing. I think the shills think this is a golden opportunity when in fact it is bait. They cannot hide if the Admins are not complicit. Anybody can point out the round the clock narrative pushing done by multiple parties by downloading the .json files of the threads and comparing the shilling across threads. When the same narratives are pushed in 4 hour+ chunks someone is pushing the narrative, when they misconstrue BO/BV's non-support of one thing as support for their narrative discussion must be opened. Paid or not, consensus cracking and appeal to authority arguments are weak.

>>4580828

>Appeal to authority arguments are weak

The problem is, everything you've said is one. And now you're refusing to show your official dicpick?

nigga you scarin me

>>4582038

You can attack the data or not, you do not dictate the terms in which I deliver it. A lot of concern over something other than the argument given. It's ok bait but you'll have to do better than that. Nothing stated is incorrect.

>>4582115

If you're not a shill you certainly behave like one. If you really are a BV I am genuinely not impressed with how you've handled this. Highly suspect at this point.

>>4582152

Keep trying.

is this fartontoast? ill be damned if you dont type just like him

Hope BO can comment on this earlier…this is way too reddit-esque for me

>>4585148

>a) include all notes that at least 2 anons nom that aren't obvs fake/irrelevant/unsubstantiated factual claims, including general diggs on catholicism/freemasonry even if the posts claim those institutions are the central/controlling arm influencing world events and not Jews/Israel, bc we unbiased

exactly…

>>4576339

>it's blackpilling af to learn that everyone expressing support for me has shown evidence in their post history of being a bad actor

that isn't true. I was there that night. This guy has posted pictures of some blatantly obvious shills and hasn't mentioned all the other anons who appreciated the sight of a baker not walking on eggshells around the JQ. I see no proof that "Everyone" who supported you is a shill.

Look how the guy is responding to my questions. The opposite of what I have seen in the responses that I have read from BO. This whole conversation reeks.

>>4585307, >>4585576

Honestly thrown by all this. If BV called you out as a shill, he likely has a hash history to prove it. Would like to see it actually, would be good to add that data to this discussion, so anyone else that stumbles in here knows what you're raising a flag over is fake. Anons really were banned by AFLB over the JQ, no need getting 'em stirred up over fears of more if clarifying data can quash it.

If you are a legit anon tho, ty for the support and for standing up for the truth. If you're a shill, well… redacted bc I keep my word

>that isn't true. I was there that night. This guy has posted pictures of some blatantly obvious shills and hasn't mentioned all the other anons who appreciated the sight of a baker not walking on eggshells around the JQ. I see no proof that "Everyone" who supported you is a shill.

I'd like to believe this, to know I'm not a total eejit, but have yet to study the data moar.

Fucking spy games man. I'm wore out behind it. Fuck I gotta run…

>>4585705

> If BV called you out as a shill, he likely has a hash history to prove it. Would like to see it actually, would be good to add that data to this discussion, so anyone else that stumbles in here knows what you're raising a flag over is fake.

Exactly. I welcome it actually. I was wondering why he hadn't already done so. Like I said I have been here for maybe less than a year. I started by jumping in to discussions about masons and vatican and spent a LOT of posts warning people about those two groups. Around the time jidf started copy and pasting that wall of text a couple months ago, was when I stopped ignoring the JQ. I've been jumping into breads doing meme warfare against said jidf people with the majority of my posts since then. I can't ignore the fact that every time I go down one of Q's rabbit holes I find jewish influence everywhere.

I tried everything in the book to DISPROVE the jq thing. I used to be one of those guys that blamed everything on the vatican. Fuck man I've changed my mind on MANY things.

>Fucking spy games man. I'm wore out behind it. Fuck I gotta run…

You and me both brother. This particular thread was a bit of a mindfuck for me (congrats MOS) but having seen this "BV"'s responses, I see no reason to trust him the way I trust BO.

I welcome the showing of my post history, like I said.

>>4585148

First, I acknowledge that you did include BO's notable and that I am in the wrong, sorry about that.

>If you do ban me, I won’t hop or evade it.

Banning you is not on the table, all I wanted to do was bring this to your attention. I mean, come on, we don't ban Freddy or Tiresias you think we're going to ban you?

>a) include all notes that at least 2 anons nom that aren't obvs fake/irrelevant/unsubstantiated factual claims, including general diggs on catholicism/freemasonry even if the posts claim those institutions are the central/controlling arm influencing world events and not Jews/Israel, bc we unbiased

I think this goes with being fair and would ask this of any baker.

>b) stop baiting shills. Specifically: don’t shitpost at them, don’t put known-shill posts in notes just for lulz/examples of stupidity, use little to no ((( ))) & other J-taunting idioms in notes summaries, bc too much heat for too little benefit, most anons claiming to appreciate are fake anyway

I'm not going to say you can't shitpost on people or use ((())) or call kikes kikes but dont let it distract you from doing the things the rest of the community relies on a baker to do while you're doing it. That's really all I ask, once notables start getting missed I have to say something.

>c) don’t reject a nomination while expressing opinion of “must be a shill” bc too hard to tell who’s who, risk of alienating real anons too great

This is becoming more important as time passes and things come up that challenge our understanding of the world around us. I would appreciate it if you would remember this in the future.

>d) don’t reject a nomination just bc contains advice to purchase/use a product or give financial/health advice unless obvs repeat spam/advertisement w/no otherwise edifying exposition/content

I think the silver and gold thing is relevant because it's been pointed at by Q and Anons have a strong argument for why metals are the safest route to ensuring you have money in whatever is coming. With POTUS' public backing in previous years and Q's confirmation that we have the Gold (POTUS had previously said he'd go back to metals but we don't have the gold) I think it's not necessarily shilling to tell people where to buy metals at without paying kike prices for aspects of coins that don't matter. I just thought it was a good notable with long term ramifications for the people in our community. It's not often the ultra rich aren't the ones with the inside scoop. I think of POTUS or Q could say explicitly 'buy metals' they would but if they did all hell would break loose.

>e) don’t reference “Mossad Massacre” or “The Triggering” bc was fake, why advertise shills took baker for a ride

I again won't tell you what you can or can't say, but yes evidence does suggest it was fake and gay.

>f) don’t reference or post BO/BV links/caps to bolster any argument other than clarifying logistics of post itself (when/what/who), BO/BV position is support of free speech, neutral re: content, and such practices commit/encourage Appeal to Authority fallacies and other avenues shills exploit

I fixed this to remove

>but esp. not to fuel/push the “We are pro-discussion of JQ” argument bc

because it is not acceptable for any party to use our fake and gay 'authority' to elevate the authenticity of their argument, not just the pro-JQ crowd.

>removes a problem from everyone else's plate.

You are not a problem, shills are going to shill and if you leave they win. They went all out that night and you were just doing what you normally do. They're professionals, they're patient, they're well manned and well resourced. They came with a plan and we got a bit of egg on our face not just you, we. You have lost no respect from me it's what we do from here on out that matters. I didn't make this series of posts to attack you because I don't like you, I made this series of posts because I do like you, I noticed a negative trend and knew that if I brought it to your attention you would take it to heart and address it which you have. As far as I'm concerned we're good to go.

>>4586201

You are also using the false equivalency of not calling everybody you disagree with a shill while you're baking for censoring the JQ. Nobody gets censored here so fear monger about whatever you want the proof discussing the JQ is on the table is in the logs and the fact we have a literal running series of JQ threads. Censorship argument == dead

>>4586201

My post history is exactly as I claimed above. Youve just chosen to look at a recent tiny little snapshot and disregard the rest of it to present a certain perception, just like you are trying to do to the baker above by making it seem like the ONLY people who supported him were shills.

Again I await BO's input here. I'm positive your a fucking clown at this point. Even the snapshot of my posts you selected there doesn't make someone a shill.

I have zero apoligies about posting about the jewish supremacy issue. I see jidf spamming threads I react with infographs and links, most of which are pulled out of the JQ thread.

You've shown every shill red flag in the book. You even tried to acquiesce with me briefly above saying "oh its good we are all here on this honest forum to discuss this with each other and figure it out" and then when I questioned you, you went right back to calling me a shill.

Apparently you define shill as anyone who questions your nonsense authority that should be revoked.

Again I await another mods response. If this is the way things run behind the scenes here (and I don't believe this is something BO would approve of) then I will happily leave of my own accord

>>4586347

>You are also using the false equivalency of not calling everybody you disagree with a shill while you're baking for censoring the JQ

fuck are you talking about? I'm calling out YOU not this board. You and you alone you fuckin baby dick clown.

>>4588255

<wahhh i don't agree with him therefore he's antisemtic and should be censored.

Leftist.

Honestly…I was kind of wondering what he would post out of my ip history that could possibly make me out to be a shill. That? dude theres nothing in there I'm even ashamed of. this has gotten silly.

>>4588206

>making it seem like the ONLY people who supported him were shills.

Nobody but you said everybody.

>Even the snapshot of my posts you selected there doesn't make someone a shill.

Your history is less than 24 hours in length, therefore your 'I've been here a year check my post history to prove it' statement is a non starter.

>I have zero apoligies about posting about the jewish supremacy issue.

And there is no problem with the thread. You are conflating two issues.

>You've shown every shill red flag in the book.

Ah yes, enforcing free and equally accessible speech is definitely #1 on the list of the ADL's things to do. I'm sure that's the first thing they teach at Mossad hasbara school

>If this is the way things run behind the scenes here

Kek, everything happened in the open in public, it couldn't be more transparent.

>>4588255

I dont know what you're calling out, there's literally no censorship on the board. Nobody put a gun to bakers head, the first post says you can take the information and ignore it or do what you want but we are stepping up our calling out of the botposting rings. Baker has been a strong ally to us and required more information to make a decision about specific things. Notice we dissuaded baker from not talking about the JQ or using ((())) or shitposting on the jews, it was simply required that all the notables make it into the bread and that the thread isn't derailed too long by baker himself, understandable if you care about the productivity which baker obviously does considering they've put mountains of time into this place. They are still free to make their decisions about their conduct.

All the evidence that is relevant to your claims contradicts the premise of everything you've stated here, I think you are triggered we're wise to your faggots game and you're losing. You faggots must really be hurting for money.

https://cheekyvideos.net/murdoch/Shills.html

>So are you gonna sell me the gun or not

Only if you promise to shoot yourself.

*sigh*

Fucks sake csn we get a real mod in here. I have been posting here almost every fucking day for 4 months and was posting sporadically before that. Ive been in the notables at least 20 fucking times. How the fuck did this guy become BV

If my post historycis only 24 hours then wtf made you so certain I was a shill when i initially questioned you? Furthermore why even bitber posting the 24 hours of my history.

Youre a clown man. Not sure how you snuck in but your agenda here is keeping a LID on the JQ. None of what youve posted makes any fucking sense.

>>4588738 Got thru incredibly slow posting, got thru Captcha, Posted 100%, Post disappears. This site is just the same people pumping each other up with Fag, Shill, GTFO, Slide, Wrong Thread, total waste of time. Tried to contribute but it's a CLOSED group.

>>4588967

Kek, sorry buddy, I came to talk to Clam not you Mr. Too Stupid to know how IP's and an imageboard works. Learn about the board log next and tell us about all the JQ content deletions.

Let me spell it out for you, since AFLB has been fired there have been 0 deletions of a post due to the fact it brought up the Jews.

>>4588985

Ive actually enjoyed this site. Much more thsn reddit or voat or anywhere else. Ive seen BO post and he has even replied directly to me before. Was always impressed with how he handled things. Yesterday i finally clivked on META after seeing BO mention it to another anon who was concerned about VOAT leadership. Then i come in here and was shocked to see this "BV" trying to muzzle this baker and tried to have an honest convo about it to see what was going o. He instantly calls me a shill.

I had an argument with FoT on reddit before the great ban and the sequence of convo went exactly like this. This bv is either the same guy or one of his MOS buddies.

Ive never been suspect of this board or BO nor do i feel censored in general. FoTs little brother is just putting words in my mouth because i called him out.

>>4588679

>Only if you promise to shoot yourself.

kek BV

been shitposting in general

still haven't reviewed hash data

I will, just nursing feelz atm

>Baker has been a strong ally to us

Nothing but, warts and all. Glad same page.

>required more information to make a decision about specific things

That's it right there. ty.

>They are still free to make their decisions about their conduct.

Evidence supports.

Will point out that while staff had these concerns about me, I still showed up to bake and BO still checked me to bake and allowed me to bake unimpeded.

>>4589114

You are a joke and straight up liability as a BV, seriously

I didn't ask for this.

I keep trying to set it down,

but who else will carry it?

Dudes, I'm so tired

My whole life, these mindfucks.

The worst possible thing you can do to somebody

More than anything, I hate them for what they do to our minds.

All I want is to stop it happening to others

I can't even stop it happening to me.

Saving grace is I don't give up.

But I do get tired.

also drunk

Address dig with pics of where Spade's husband was photographed wearing Rescuers mask day after her death announced

Florist with interesting decor

https://www.bing.com/search?pc=MEWI&form=AMZNS2&q=1143+park+ave+ny

>>

4586238

>>4586118

>>4591554

>More than anything, I hate them for what they do to our minds.

Ah fuck those bitches, we livin' and we're one of the last groups that has to deal with these subversive faggots. Don't let it eat at you for too long, what's done is done shills gonna shill. No worries.

>>4592999

Still waiting for that proof you have that I am a shill. So far all youve done is virtue signal, flex and refer to yourself as an "OG BV". Youve told an honest God loving patriot to kill himself. tried to reference my post history, then in the next breath claimed it doesnt matter because ive only apparently only been here 24 hours. You called me some kind of vatican suporter, tried to make friends, and then a mossad shill in the next breath when i restated my original question and rejected your olive branch.

All because I called YOU out for downplaying the jewish supremacy issue. What a kike reversal clinic you just put on while hiding behind your claimed BV status which if true you are clearly abusing.

>What a kike reversal clinic you just put on while hiding behind your claimed BV status which if true you are clearly abusing.

I presented my argument, points you haven't bothered to attack because you can't you are trying to create an entirely new argument based on my reaction to your fallacies. Say what you want, that is your right here but you are not entitled to any more of my time. Nice digits though.

bcd92e

17a79a

b343db

Those are my ids in this little thread (i guess they update and change over time???) Anyone can go read this conversation and see how this "BV" is being a rediculous pussy right now. BVs have been removed in the past so im hoping your ass gets noticed eventually. You are way too childish to hold that position. I honestly think youre a plant just like FoT but time will tell.

>>4593832

>It's the Jesuits

Pic related

>It's the Red Cross

Confirmed by Q

>It's the Globalists

Confirmed by POTUS

>It's the Democrats

>It's the Republicans

Confirmed by POTUS and anybody who knows about the Neocons and the Dems

>It's China

Confirmed by Pence and Q

>It's Russia

It's not Russia, they've always worked with Assad and against Israel and the Deepstate. POTUS and Putin have established strong working relationships and have used that relationship to free Syria from (((ISIS))).

>It's the Bolsheviks

Yep

>It's the Bilderbergs

Also true

>It's the CFR

Obviously true.

>It's the Mafia

What do you mean Mafia? The CGF is a mafia, there's many family crime syndicates, you know the same families you're covering for now.

>It's the Trilateral

The Trilateral Commission is obviously part of it

>It's the Muslims

The Saudi's are part of the triangle that was neutralized early on, ISIS was created by Israel and the United States, the muslims have complicity parties too.

>It's the Jesters

I'm not aware of this group

>It's the Ashkenazi

Also part of the group.

>It's the CIA

It's not the CIA? Really?

>It's Proj. Paperclip

I see why you want to try to clear the CIA, that wasn't kike propaganda at all.

>It's the Reptillians

Always have to hit the disinfo you paid your mouthpieces to mislead the population with, otherwise why bother paying for it in the first place.

>It's the KKK

That group started by the Dems which everybody is aware of are evil little kikes? Also True.

>It's the Nazis

The average Nazi was a guy protecting his family and doing what he thought he needed to do. There's nothing wrong with the average Nazi. The SS are evil occultist fucks though, and they are responsible for the CIA, Operation Paperclip, the Bushes. For those following along. When someone is insistent on their message being the only valid truth you should look to see what specifically they are hoping to frame your mindset as. In this case it's that the Bushes, the CIA and everybody else on this list did nothing wrong.

>It's Caesar

Kek.

>It's the Annunaki

Again, gotta get that disinfo in there, otherwise why pay for it.

>It's RA

Oh now you're covering for the 4500 year old fertility sun/moon worship death cult. Hello ADL. I see you.

>It's the Pleidians

Again, gotta get that disinfo in there, otherwise why pay for it.

>It's the Clintons

I'm pretty sure it is the Clintons.

>It's the Bush's

It most certainly is is Bushes, confirmed by Q and POTUS.

Are you saying you know more than POTUS and Q? Are they misleading us? They acknowledged that Israel is a monster to our country, they ended 3 wars for Israel, they got rid of ISIS and Assad is now free. I guess where results are concerned when it comes to not working for Israel POTUS and Q have and continue to deliver. This kind of bait only works when you can bring your buddies in to back you up and slide the thread. This thread is infinite, slow and if you do bring your buddies in here it'll be obvious how you operate because I can go for forever and eventually you will run out of content, start repeating yourself and then the dumbest of the goyim will finally know as well. Go on, make my existential existence, play it all out faggot, I'll get to debunking your propaganda when I feel like it.

>Expecting a BV of /qresearch/ to not take Q seriously.

>Expecting a BV of /qresearch/ to not trust POTUS.

>Those are my ids in this little thread (i guess they update and change over time???

Pretending not to know how an imageboard works after allegedly being here a year is also played out. You are either criminally stupid or deliberately obtuse, doesn't matter to me.

>>4594295

I thought i wasnt getting any more of your time kike?? You have officially flipflopped on everything you said. How can you NOT be a jew at this point???

Jidf exposed. just as i thought. Literally the same shit getting spammed in general by the jidf clowns call everyone "muh joo". Looky here.

Youre panicking because you look like a rediculous bitch right now. Only a mossad clown would stand next to an elephant and try to call it a duck. Anyone can scroll up and read and see you flopping all over the place.

And again you virtue signal about your technical knowledge of the board as if it would offend me? I know just enougg to participate in general and that is all i really do. Who fucking cares kike? You cant even decide if ive been here 24 hours or a year now. Happy to argue it both ways because your a planted clown.

Youre having a tough time today sparky

Wondering how long you are going to try to pretend like you dont know about the concept of things like

Crypto jew

Front companies

Puppets

How connections to all of those things lead to israel.

Youre just virtue signalling and using appeal to authority ( but but Ivanka is jewish therrfore you should stop picking on jews) MEANWHILE you are using every ATA argument in the book.

Blatant low IQ kikery. The reason you cant have a real discussion .

>>4594716

>I thought i wasnt getting any more of your time kike??

You made it too easy to point out how what you're shilling goes against Q and POTUS.

>And again you virtue signal about your technical knowledge of the board as if it would offend me?

Discrediting your assertion is not virtue signaling. Also, you're supposed to lurk 2 years before posting "Anon".

>Youre having a tough time today sparky

Not really, I already told you I can do this all day.

>Crypto jew

Are you too lazy to find out their real names? Hamburg, Rothschild, Payseur, the Holy See.

>Front companies

Which ones, FANG? InQTel? I can go for months bro.

>Puppets

Like the ones owned by Citibank owned by Prince Al-Waleed a Saudi Royal (ie not a jew)

>How connections to all of those things lead to israel.

All of them lead exclusively to Israel? 100% of them? What's Q's problem with the Pope then?

>using appeal to authority ( but but Ivanka is jewish therrfore you should stop picking on jews)

Nobody but you said this.

>The reason you cant have a real discussion .

I think the discussion is going wonderfully, I'm sorry you're not satisfied.

>think the discussion is going wonderfully, I'm sorry you're not satisfied

Kek.which is why you tried leaving multiple times. You even tried giving me an olive branch at first. But i own you. You cant leave because your job is to gatekeep for israel.

Lets go back to the beginning before you tangled everything up with kikery. Yhe post above with the american flag is my first one. You can see how questioning you got me immediately labeled as a shill, and you started throwing a bunch of other contradictory names at me just to muddy shit up.

Going back to that point where you were referencing the post history of people who questioned jews. Where is your proof that I am a JIDF spambot and why did you even bother posting an iphash of my history when it clearly looks like a normal anon who isnt afraid to question a jew???

>>4595474

>Lets go back to the beginning before you tangled everything up with kikery.

No, come up with new material faggot so I can absolutely continue to destroy your pathetic playbook. If you'd like to address specific points I'd be glad to hear them however you get to argue your "argument" yourself.

Shut the fuck up rabbi. Better luck next time eh? Some "OG BV" you are. What a fucking joke.

OG BVs ego after this conversation

Vid related

> Better luck next time eh?

Triggered Leaf Detected.

Wow…bravo *golf clap*.

Good one faggot.

How will i ever recover.

Board operator, bakers, anons-

Please give your serious consideration to the following suggestion.

Since Q has encouraged anons to create memes so we can blast them out to the masses, I am proposing we create a notable meme gallery. The purpose of the notable meme gallery would be to encourage meme anons and help them develop their craft by seeing exemplars of this type of communication.

Good memes can be statements of fact, humorous, sarcastic, and so on, but they all need to show the “truth” of what we are trying to accomplish here.

As an occasional meme anon, myself, getting a good response to one of my memes or see others repost it encourages me to duplicate that quality and honesty in future attempts. Even getting blasted by a shill helps me know I’ve hit a libtard nerve.

Certainly there will be some debate as to whether a meme is notable gallery worthy (just as notable posts often generate controversy here). But if at least three anons who are not the meme creator say a meme is notable, then let it be so designated.

Let’s encourage the best of meme anons and try to motivate others to up their game.

As far as the logistics are concerned, I’ll leave that up to you all. Don’t want to put a bunch of extra work on the bakers, so if you all think it needs to be handled in a different thread, fine.

bruh

Hi Friends I have a question how do I make a link clickable

example:

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/3747044.html#3747463 The Explore algorithm sees that you're

when it is to old to work like this

>>3747463

I am trying to make a version of this that keeps working

>>4616863, >>4616869 version 3.0 6/1/19

if there is an arbitrary limit to the amount of posts a baker can make during baking, let me know

until then, if time allows for discussion like in long night breads, I enjoy discussing things while baking and will continue doing so

to the apparent displeasure of a few faggots

can read this bread for my breakdown of muh post count: >>4623628

(not baking in that one, so muh post count reflects discussion only, besides the first 5 posts of course)

>>4622995

I don't think you can, it's inactive because the thread is no longer active

you can still access it, or take caps of it and repost it that way

(not a BO/BV, they might know something)

>>4624119

>if there is an arbitrary limit to the amount of posts a baker can make during baking, let me know

There is not.

>>4625588

Was just chekking, thanks BV.

>>4625588

had an idea, /qresearch/ turns one on the 8th/9th

do you or the BO know how (or if it's possible) to get the little bday hat things like half does for the threads?

https://youtu.be/YtlOsb8PRy8

Hello, BO. Quick question:

Why was >>4641917 locked? Is it auto-lock or did it violate any rule?

>>4643919

>I am gathering some sponsors and others who help donating and paying. Docs are definitely legit.

>It sucks that they want money for it, but the docs are legit.

>This is going to be the real truth about 9/11, if you want it or not. So, stfu shill.

>We'll have to wait until the key is released to public or if someone else with enough money buys it and leaks it

>If Q says it is fake, I am inclined to even research it further since Q also said that Disinfo is necessary.

>>4644280

It's locked because it's an advertisement for a scam dressed up as a research thread, it's not deleted because it needs to be reviewed by BO.

>>4644707

#2666

Www.Bing.com/amp/s/www.Jta.org/2019/01/02/United-states/ruth-bader-Ginsburg-personal-trainer-shares-secrets-of-a-healthy-supreme-court/am

Www.rbgworkout.com

Nov 13, 2018 U.S. Supreme Court Justice has missed a brief court session while recovering from a fall and broken ribs.

Www.time.com/5453269/ruth-badger-ginsburg-misses-supreme-court-session/

#2667

>>4645177

so many topkeks

>>4644414

Not sure where you came up with "scam" or "advertisment". Need evidence to back that one up. Dark Overlord said himself he doesn't do it for political reasons and he wants to make money with it.

Documents of Layer 1 are fully legit, and are released to public. Yes, waiting for Layer 2,3,4 to be public, which will be the case pretty soon since Dark Overlord accepts public donations (collection) through Steemit.

>>4644414

Oh, before I forget about it:

Since we are discussing about researching the part of the 9/11 papers that are already public (like Layer 1), you are neither forced to pay anything nor do you have to. You can use the current material available to dig on, uploaded on Google Drive, so you wouldn't even have to decrypt the container yourself. And that's what the thread is about. Research.

>>4644414

>>4644280

see: >>4636293

Re: MKULTRA.

Hey Q,

is mind control program = "UPGRADE"?

I saw that movie.

Minuteman

>>4656066

>>4656044

Checked and dank.

>>4656105

Thanks for making the graphic.

>>4656137

no problem

wasn't sure if the hats could be put in the catalog or not, this works too

Good Morning Q,

Greetings from India, Recently Hilary attended Ambani's daughters marriage. Any link? most of these Big Companies have link with Nathan Rothchild for financial advise.

Also there was a news from Russia that YSR murder was related to Reliance, but later it was blocked. was this all about Oil Monopoly?

When Money becomes God, Bribery rules everywhere.

Always remembering in Praying, Thank You for your sacrifice for truth. God Bless your work.

Rom 16:20

cbs news anchor 'factchecked' POTUS stating that 20,000 children are impacted by illegal immigration is exaggerated. that it's actually 20,000 families and not children.

doesn't each family have a minimum of 1 kid. therefore the actual number of children being affected is more than what POTUS said?

Found an interesting article online from almost a year ago that relates strongly to what Q mentioned in post #2663, goes beyond what can be done through Brain/Computer Interface (BCI)…

http://www.theeventchronicle.com/florida-hs-shooting/hear-voices-worrying-trend-mass-shooting-suspects-throughout-history-committing-horrific-murders/

Another interesting development in CIA mind control, this time coming from NETFLIX, called BANDERSNATCH.

https://www.amtvmedia.com/the-film-bandersnatch-is-a-psychological-mkultra-mind-programming-technology-beware/

>>4677040

American Ultra interesting name for a movie, interesting plot, Mirror to reality.

https://voat.co/v/QRV/2947193/16005701

Claimed.

to me the flags behind S/P look like prison bars / strips.

Meme suggestion - redress S/P behind podium in red/white prison strips and make the flags bars.

concerning shutdown - it isn't about the lack of function for US citizens - rather talking heads only seem to talk about 'paychecks'. Therefore (with the lack of shutdown impact on anything) paychecks just another form of welfare? those donate to which party? isn't that just another form of buying votes? another form of kickback / money laundering?

>>4683894

oops - not strips - stripes.

>>4684465

I also forgot to point out the homoerotica of spartacockus and boy man strategist.

Ugh…whatever.

>>4683436

Hey, BV.

You ought to know who I am by my responding to this.

I'd like to point out that I planned to let this go, just like I told BO.

They're mobilizing in front of our eyes.

Say the word and I'll uncloak for you guys so you can vet my IP. I have nothing to hide.

I'd also like to point out that the account I've used to post these things at Voat was the only account I've ever used. I employ a great deal of smokescreen using the account. Don't read in to things too much.

Again, sorry if this blew up or blows up. I never intended to "cause division" as they say I have.

I think all of the people who have voluntarily involved themselves with the movement don't deserve to be divided. I can't make the same exception for the people who are actually looking to divide things, however. I can go on and on about all of the things these guys have done, but I'm not sure how much it would've helped at this point.

Frankly, I've tried to keep things involving what we've been seeing unfold at Voat confined to Voat. They very obviously didn't like BO revealing Srayzie on us, though.

The whole thing smells like faggotry I don't care about.

>>4687639

we could always just let it go and see how it plays out

Like I said, I'll try to quiet my end and let you see how it goes

A development. I've remained silent. I'll let you all observe.

https://voat.co/v/QRV/2959630/16023628?context=10

>>4689977

Maybe you're too stupid to understand so I'll spell it out for you.

None of us give a fucking shit about your beef with v/GA. None of us. Nobody in v/GA is able to influence how our board and our voat are ran therefore they are irrelevant to us. Stop acting like a fucking kike.

>>4693589

(1/2)

And maybe I need to spell it out for you:

The group that we're dealing with and have been dealing with at Voat prop up subverses and initiate Divide and Conquer tactics by splitting up free thinkers, including anons.

I know you guys don't care about Voat. I know you genuinely couldn't care less. Here's the thing: anons have long split off and stuck their fingers in many pies to feel their way around in the dark. It's been a long understood development. Anons do this all of the time. Many watch many places and have done so for a long time, just like myself. I've spent a lot of time watching Voat and I was one of the first people to suggest we move the Reddit Replacement to Voat. I know you guys don't care about it. That's why I'm here. Not because someone appointed me, not because we needed someone to fill the role I'm playing, but because it's part of the package I've been able to contribute.

I've been following the Q thing since the beginning, literally the first post. I've spent quite some time on half and full long before, more than usual during this Q thing, and I guarantee I'll spend some time here and there afterwards. Maybe you're not seasoned in these types of chaotic "operations" anons run, so I'll help you out: anons have no assigned roles and they help in whatever ways they can. I figured I could help you guys not because you wanted or needed the help, but because I'd spent a great deal of time at both places. I've relayed plenty of info back and forth this whole time and I've been pushing the people in question to take emotional bait since long before the idea of Voat was brought up here because I was quickly able to see how they operate. Respect that or don't; it won't bother me either way.

But you having the audacity to call me a kike despite all of the persistent work I've been doing is rather alarming to me. You're letting them get to you. You're making a mistake here. Again, say the word and I'll uncloak for you so you know I'm who I say I am.

I never brought anything about this up with BO for a damn good reason. Why? The guy told me flat out that he didn't care. Good. He shouldn't. That's why I'm here, though. I care about perception and the dynamic of the group. That's why I told BO about my concerns with the site owner, PuttItOut bringing in a new partner. I was worried how the potential of Voat being pushed further and further to a honeypot would reflect on us. My reason for this is because the site owner has spoken about "bringing in a new partner", which has already been accomplished. The catch, though, is that the guy won't reveal anything about the person, so we can't vet them in any way. Again, for all we know, we could be sending loads of people to a honeypot. I had no idea BO was being harassed by Srayzie.

>>4693589

>>4694939

(2/2)

Anyway, now that that's all out of the way: are you really so fucking stupid that you'd fall for their framing this as a "beef" between groups on Voat? Of course it's not a "beef" between groups. I know NONE of the anons they're comparing me to. I've spoken with them, sure, but only because we messaged each other saying, "why are they targeting us in groups? this doesn't make sense. anyone have any ideas?" That's all the more we've spoken… and, yes, these guys are anons. I've confirmed that by catching their posts here in the research thread so that we could be familiar with each other's involvement in anon and in Q.

That's how they've framed it from the beginning. They want to put regular anons against the moderators at the board. That's plain to see. These guys are shills. They've run operations to frame certain "goats" (the userbase at Voat) in a certain light so they can anchor negative emotions to the given user's name. From there, they deploy this archaic tactic that you're seeing unravel where they call dissident users by the same name or insist they're an alternate account. They're anchoring emotions and ideas to usernames so they can trigger those anchors by insisting another user is an alternate account. It's a form of Neuro-Linguistic Programming. Why do they do this? Because they fucking use alts. They use Discord to coordinate these things. They project continuously.

Now that we've covered all of that, let me explain what I get out of doing all of this: NOTHING. I'm not here to do this so you like me. You have no idea who I am. I'm not NeonRevolt, like they claim. I demonstrated this to you by provoking them so you could see what I mean. Did you not catch on? You don't have any idea what name to call me, but now I'm a namefag? You have no reason to believe I'm trying to divide anyone. Just like you have no reason to trust these people. Why don't you have any reason to trust them? Because Q insisted BO make QRV. Q did not, however, direct us to the sub that is in question, which has long been very clearly compromised.

I would have dropped this if you didn't attack me. I was bringing that link to your attention so you could see how they operate. I'm trying to fucking help you here. If you don't want it and I'm just annoying you, just tell me. I won't be upset. But don't fucking accuse me of "having a beef" like a child or being a kike. I'm trying to subvert no one with this. My only intention was to root out the faggot infiltrators. I too care little about Voat, but I have experience there. My only role in this was to use that experience to steer anons and normies clear of the faggots trying to spoil the bunch. How you think that makes me a kike is beyond me.

>>4694945

Here Here !!! Huzzah!!

Let me explain to you why nothing you say is relevant.

1 - Q can, at a moments notice call out anybody or anything. At a moments notice Q can alert at least 2.1 million people to something relevant to their interests to include situations where Baruch was fired and when BO was instructed to create QRV. Everybody in the movement can be alerted in less than 24 hours. Even if the shills win they lose.

2 - Even if you are right and PuttItOut and v/GA are shills it's irrelevant to our interests. Q instructed the creation of QRV therefore we are not leaving Voat until we are forced off. There has been no indication we will be forced off and every indication that our presence is accepted and our actions are appreciated.

3 - Putt has been nothing but good to us, he could have easily just banned v/theawakening and banned v/QRV and he didn't. Instead he worked to make sure both communities were represented and went out of his way to implement code so that both could be easily viewed.

4 - We already told the community we would tell them if a site admin forced us to change how we moderate, since we have not raised that alarm you can be sure it has not happened.

>you have no reason to trust these people.

If this is all you're worried about you could have just asked if we trusted anybody but ourselves, POTUS, and Q. The answer to which would be "No". You're mistaking courtesy for trust. We lost nothing by being courteous. Nobody is getting shit from us and we are not changing how the community expects us to do things. Look how hard the community had to pull teeth to get fucking birthday graphics ffs and it was requested by people we actually RESPECT.

Just. Stop. Concernfagging. We have it under control.

>>4696435

did you miss this post >>4686147 ?

I agreed to drop it. You continued things. I never would've acted like a concernfag if you didn't push me to explain things more in depth.

I literally told you I'd try to contain things to Voat. I then gave you a link so that you and other anons could observe what I was talking about here >>4689262

I don't disagree with anything you've said, but you first called me a namefag after proving I'm not, then you called me a kike for making a single post to reference what I meant by "let's see how things play out". Then you called me stupid because you felt guilty or inferior for not knowing you were being shilled at and made to look like a fool for falling for their tactics.

Now you're calling me a concernfag for defending myself from being called a kike because I… care too much.

You could've dropped it after my dropping the link here >>4689977 but instead you pushed me to explain myself by acting like a faggot.

So, let me say again: how about we drop this and see how things play out. This is the first time I've brought my concerns with Voat beyond Putt here to the board. The only reason I elaborated on the situation was because you fell to shill tactics, got disoriented, and lashed out at me. I pushed too much and over explained things. We both made this unnecessarily hard.

We should just carry on, anon. This is helping no one at this point.

Remember, anons are not divided. But, they certainly would have us be divided. It's good that we don't always agree. The multiple angles of understanding will strengthen us. Us butting heads will get us nowhere, however. I'm going back to my post, as you should.

>>4698142

Now there's proof you're using alts. You used your concernfagging about Putt to try to push us taking an official position on v/GA.

>but you first called me a namefag

Nobody called you a namefag, I dont even know your name.

> then you called me a kike for making a single post to reference what I meant by "let's see how things play out".

We're not on your team, we don't care about v/GA mods. BO obliged you by answering about Putt because it is relevant to our community. v/GA mods (as much as it triggers you) have nothing to do with us.

>Now you're calling me a concernfag for defending myself from being called a kike because I… care too much.

I stand by my assessment.

>You could've dropped it after my dropping the link here >>4689977 but instead you pushed me to explain myself by acting like a faggot.

I'm not going to implicitly consent to the position you think we should have on v/GA. Nice try though.

>This is the first time I've brought my concerns with Voat

It's already been established why your concerns are irrelevant.

>Remember, anons are not divided. But, they certainly would have us be divided. It's good that we don't always agree. The multiple angles of understanding will strengthen us.

Until you try to convince the community instead of us you are just a faggot with an agenda like every other faggot with an agenda.

>>4698142

Let me guess, you're the same dipshit who early on tried to get us to take a stance against ProtectVoat by inviting us to be mods of whatever gay shit you have going on RealProtectVoat. Fuck off dude, we won't explicitly consent to your crusade on Voat and we won't implicitly consent to it either.

>>4698578

Wrong.

>>4698558

Now you're just being a faggot.

>Now there's proof you're using alts. You used your concernfagging about Putt to try to push us taking an official position on v/GA.

No I didn't. Show where this happened.

>Nobody called you a namefag, I dont even know your name.

>>4683436 This comment you said you don't associate with namefags. Before I thought you were referring to me. Now I see you were talking about Neon. I'll concede this one.

>I'm not going to implicitly consent to the position you think we should have on v/GA. Nice try though.

That's fine with me.

>We're not on your team, we don't care about v/GA mods. BO obliged you by answering about Putt because it is relevant to our community. v/GA mods (as much as it triggers you) have nothing to do with us.

I have no team, faggot. Quit trying to put me on teams.

>It's already been established why your concerns are irrelevant.

I can see you think that. You can't just keep repeating that to make it more true…

>Until you try to convince the community instead of us you are just a faggot with an agenda like every other faggot with an agenda.

I don't want to "convince" anyone of anything. I was only ever here to pass along info, like I did.

Are you always such an antagonistic fuck? I never had an issue with you, BO, or any other BV. This is the first time.

Why are you unwilling to let this go, BV? I was willing to drop this YESTERDAY.

Stop acting like a fuck and agree to disagree like a man. Us hurling insults back and forth get all of us exactly nowhere.

Again, I have no agenda other than to pass on information I thought might be relevant. You don't think it is. I do. Boohoo. Let everyone else decide.

You're being oddly pedantic over this. This is the first time I've seen this out of you.

RealProtectVoat is some faggot named freshmeat. He's a very antagonistic individual that's never seemed to have Voat's best interest in mind. Why are you trying to pin other usernames or identities on me? I've never modded ANYTHING. I've never tried to get any mods from anywhere to do anything besides when I would fuck with GA mods to coax them in to outing themselves. I revealed my Voat username to you in the comments of that Voat post that BO linked to that night. Stop trying to suggest I'm people I'm not, or that I've done things that I haven't nor ever planned to do.

For the third fucking time - grow up and drop this shit. This going back and forth is making the both of us look like assholes.

>>4699349

Sure, he's being a faggot over this.

But, you fanning the flame will help no one.

Fuck off.

Sorry, nig. Still suprised to see this kind of thing happening here

Like you ive always been impressed with moderation here so im still trying to wrap my head around it

Let's start again, from the beginning.

>>4686147

>You ought to know who I am by my responding to this.

We dont know who you are.

>>4689262

>we could always just let it go and see how it plays out

There is no we.

>That's why I told BO about my concerns with the site owner, PuttItOut bringing in a new partner. I was worried how the potential of Voat being pushed further and further to a honeypot would reflect on us.

Non starter, Q specifically asked for QRV, you think you know more than Q and that just shows how seriously you should not be taken. You are here to spread Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt.

>The catch, though, is that the guy won't reveal anything about the person, so we can't vet them in any way.

Not my problem.

>gain, for all we know, we could be sending loads of people to a honeypot.

Look up 'Total Informational Awareness' and then come back and tell me Q doesn't know everything. Q could order the calculation of the time your dick gets hard in the morning.

>I had no idea BO was being harassed by Srayzie.

A bit of shade is not harassment. We also don't need whatever gay version of white knighting you're doing here.

>>4694945

>are you really so fucking stupid that you'd fall for their framing this as a "beef" between groups on Voat?

Whatever 'this' is doesn't effect us. Unless you are going to continue with your assertion that Q is leading his supporters to a honeypot.

>They want to put regular anons against the moderators at the board.

We participate anonymously just fine, you're the only reason I ever bothered to talk to Srayzie.

>These guys are shills.

If true they have no power here, or on Voat. Reread >>4696435

>You have no reason to believe I'm trying to divide anyone

Kek, but Q doesn't know about Putt's new partner amirite?

>My only intention was to root out the faggot infiltrators

You are 5 months too late.

>My only role in this was to use that experience to steer anons and normies clear of the faggots trying to spoil the bunch. How you think that makes me a kike is beyond me.

You are the one who alluded to Q leading his supporters to a honeypot, not me.

>>4695838

First posts made around the same time you showed up concernfagging to BO about Putt.

>>4698142

>I agreed to drop it. You continued things.

No no, these are you too. >>4689262 >>4689977

>I never would've acted like a concernfag if you didn't push me to explain things more in depth.

You've been self admittedly concern fagging since you baited BO with the Putt Question.

>I literally told you I'd try to contain things to Voat.

Then why are you here.

>then you called me a kike for making a single post to reference what I meant by "let's see how things play out".

Wrong this is why you were labeled a kike >we could always just let it go and see how it plays out

Who the fuck is we?

>The only reason I elaborated on the situation was because you fell to shill tactics, got disoriented, and lashed out at me.

This is decent bait.

>I pushed too much and over explained things.

You made many assumptions too, including ones based on your misunderstanding of what was typed.

> I'm going back to my post, as you should.

This is arguably my post.

>>4699182

>You used your concernfagging about Putt to try to push us taking an official position on v/GA.

Let me quote you >That's why I told BO about my concerns with the site owner, PuttItOut bringing in a new partner. I was worried how the potential of Voat being pushed further and further to a honeypot would reflect on us.

>I have no team, faggot. Quit trying to put me on teams.

I'm still waiting on who the 'we' is in >we could always just let it go and see how it plays out

>I can see you think that. You can't just keep repeating that to make it more true…

There is nothing the people you are fighting with can do to us.

>Why are you trying to pin other usernames or identities on me?

You're the one who keeps saying we know who you are.

>I've never modded ANYTHING.

Is this why you don't know we can't see who the users on Voat are? Is this why you think we know who you are?

>I've never tried to get any mods from anywhere to do anything besides when I would fuck with GA mods to coax them in to outing themselves.

What does this have to do with QRV?

>This going back and forth is making the both of us look like assholes.

This is the asshole of the internet.

>>4699349

>>4699980

Hello samefag

>>4593566

>>4593832

>>4593970

>>4594716

>>4595474

>>4595548

>>4595622

>>4595810

>>4595900

>>4596620

You want to convince me it's not the CIA again?

is this guy really a BV???

Someone tell me this isnt a prank

This place is like the final bastion of truth on the internet for me.

>>4700086

Have no desire to convince you of anything. I literally just think youre an irresponsible idiot and csnt figure out how or why you are modding on one of the most important message boards on the internet right now.

ON THE NEW BAKER'S BAKE:

>>4700129

you're going to need to edit the title to this (not right format and # is wrong (baker's title, not mine, KEK):

Q Research General #5998: New Baker Baby Baking Bodacious Bread Edition

>>4700195

Fixed.

>>4700219

thanks BV

>>4700011

Now let me pick this apart since you seriously have the audacity to continue this idiotic tantrum of yours.

>We dont know who you are.

I'm no one. Or anyone. A ghost.

>There is no we

Me and you, you fucking dickhead.

>Non starter, Q specifically asked for QRV, you think you know more than Q and that just shows how seriously you should not be taken. You are here to spread Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt.

Frankly, that's an angle I hadn't considered. I guess I figured Q didn't care enough about Voat, or figured anons who venture to Voat could fend for themselves. My concern, which appears to be alluding you still, is that Putt's new mystery partner is someone that should be of concern. If BO or anyone else on the mod team thinks it's nothing to worry about, I'm on board. I have no issue falling in line on this, but you keep pulling us back to the same tedious argument and for whatever reason you just won't put your dick back in your pants.

>Not my problem.

True. I appreciate your input, regardless.

>Look up 'Total Informational Awareness' and then come back and tell me Q doesn't know everything. Q could order the calculation of the time your dick gets hard in the morning.

I think I covered this well enough.

>A bit of shade is not harassment. We also don't need whatever gay version of white knighting you're doing here.

Maybe we interpreted what BO said differently. If that's all that was going on, my bad. I just figured BO wouldn't needlessly expend ammo like that…

>Whatever 'this' is doesn't effect us. Unless you are going to continue with your assertion that Q is leading his supporters to a honeypot.

You're right. It doesn't effect anons here at the research board or 8chan in general. QRV was made to be the DMZ to keep morons away from the board so they wouldn't annoyingly muddy things. I've specifically kept that shit (or tired…) for precisely that reason. Too bad you won't let this go for no one knows why… Also, the assertion wasn't that Q would lead anyone to honey or something of that nature. The assertion was that, considering the changes being made to Voat, maybe we should keep an eye on things. BO agreed with me. I never hesitated to back down with BO. I'm sure he understood that.

>We participate anonymously just fine, you're the only reason I ever bothered to talk to Srayzie.

I agree with you. I was talking about unsuspecting retards that venture to GA. Which, frankly, isn't a problem since it keeps their retardation away from here. The problem is when they use shit like this to pit the likes of anons like myself against BVs or the BO… like exactly the thing that appears to be happening. You know that shit was burried until a week later when Srayzie went looking for things to "be angry" about?

>If true they have no power here, or on Voat. Reread

I agree. I'm not worried about that, though. I'm worried about them trying to split up the movement, which is apparently not that big of a deal to you and not that big of a deal to BO. I was fine with that. I dropped it. All I did here >>4689262 and here >>4689977 was agree we should drop it. But, I also closed by saying I'll keep quiet (which I have done so far) and let you observe for yourself. That second post was me pointing you towards what I saw as a development, the thing I suggested you observe, which you didn't have to respond to. I planned to drop that link and exit. But, you continued this…

>Kek, but Q doesn't know about Putt's new partner amirite?

Maybe he does. Maybe he doesn't care. Again, you made a good point with that one. Too bad you couldn't just ignore my "concernfagging", amirite?

>You are 5 months too late.

Shit, no one told me I was only allowed to do that five months ago.

>You are the one who alluded to Q leading his supporters to a honeypot, not me.

covered this already

>First posts made around the same time you showed up concernfagging to BO about Putt.

Not me. I did tell people to check this out, though. Want me to prove it?

>No no, these are you too. >>4689262 (You) >>4689977

Yep, that's where I said we should drop it. Good eye.

>You've been self admittedly concern fagging since you baited BO with the Putt Question.

That there's a strawman, fellas. I had no idea BO would say that. Even after I said he'd "helped me", he threw a link in the thread from that night saying something like "oh, you faggots want to talk shit about me? and then the link in the next line of his reply" I told BO that was me that made that post. BO responded that, yes, he knew and he was trying to get attention to my post. I never baited BO. I didn't ask him to comment about any voat user. You're putting words in my mouth. Fuck off with this shit.

(1/2)

>Then why are you here.

What?… you're the one that said we could discuss this in meta in that Voat comment, aren't you? I guess maybe I assumed that was you, but you did make the post claiming a response to my Voat comment earlier up in this meta thread here.

>Wrong this is why you were labeled a kike

Suggesting we stop bickering and instead keep an eye on Voat to observe my stirring the nest makes me a kike?

>Who the fuck is we?

Me and you, or anyone else that wants to observe for themselves.

>This is decent bait.

You thought there was a "beef". I don't give two fucks about Voat or any users there. I have no "beef" with anyone. Those shills hate me for exposing them. They have a problem with me getting in their way. All I do is provoke them to reveal their tactics after I alert someone I'm going to annoy them in to doing so. It helps me verify my info. I like demonstrations more than simply informing people. That seems vapid and annoying to me, so I SHOW THEM instead. Again, I thought you were keen enough to catch on. Sorry for overestimating you.

>This is arguably my post.

No, dickhead. My position. I said I would leave this alone, and that you should also give this up. I feel like I'm sliding and annoying other anons. Don't you? This infighting is exactly what they want. For the fourth god damn time, we should stop this. Admit you were wrong and that we've been a nuisance, just like I am doing right now: I have been an annoying dick. There. Now it's your turn.

>Let me quote you >That's why I told BO about my concerns with the site owner, PuttItOut bringing in a new partner. I was worried how the potential of Voat being pushed further and further to a honeypot would reflect on us.

OH

I'm not saying v/GreatAwakening is a honeypot… Damn. I didn't realize that's what you thought I meant, man. I was saying I was worried that Voat, as a whole, might be a honeypot. Again, I don't give two fucks about that sub or Voat in its entirety. I care about the uninvolved and innocent people we're directing there. Sorry for not explaining myself better.

>I'm still waiting on who the 'we' is in >we could always just let it go and see how it plays out

covered this many time. me and you, or anyone else that wants to observe what I do. both of us have dropped links in reference to what I'm talking about - my "methods" in dealing with trolls/shills at Voat. I saw a development and dropped a link to it, like I told you about.

>There is nothing the people you are fighting with can do to us.

Good. Glad to hear that. But, I'm worrying about innocent people, the normies/unsuspecting anons, who we send there.

>You're the one who keeps saying we know who you are.

No, you tried to suggest I was "the guy that bothered us about ProtectVoat". which is a user named on Voat "freshmeat" who runs the sub RealProtectVoat. I'm not that guy. I can prove it easily. Say the word. (I already revealed my Voat username in that Voat thread on QRV that started all of this)

>Is this why you don't know we can't see who the users on Voat are? Is this why you think we know who you are?

Hmm… maybe. I thought the owners of subs could see the usernames of commenters or submitters in anon subs on Voat. My mistake. Sorry about that.

>What does this have to do with QRV?

I didn't think the only subject we've covered in this back and forth only had to do with QRV.

(2/2)

>>4700623

Oops. I made an error here.

>>Then why are you here.

What?… you're the one that said we could discuss this in meta in that Voat comment, aren't you? I guess maybe I assumed that was you, but you did make the post claiming a response to my Voat comment earlier up in this meta thread here.

>Wrong this is why you were labeled a kike

Suggesting we stop bickering and instead keep an eye on Voat to observe my stirring the nest makes me a kike?

>Who the fuck is we?

Me and you, or anyone else that wants to observe for themselves.

>This is decent bait.

You thought there was a "beef". I don't give two fucks about Voat or any users there. I have no "beef" with anyone. Those shills hate me for exposing them. They have a problem with me getting in their way. All I do is provoke them to reveal their tactics after I alert someone I'm going to annoy them in to doing so. It helps me verify my info. I like demonstrations more than simply informing people. That seems vapid and annoying to me, so I SHOW THEM instead. Again, I thought you were keen enough to catch on. Sorry for overestimating you.

>This is arguably my post.

No, dickhead. My position. I said I would leave this alone, and that you should also give this up. I feel like I'm sliding and annoying other anons. Don't you? This infighting is exactly what they want. For the fourth god damn time, we should stop this. Admit you were wrong and that we've been a nuisance, just like I am doing right now: I have been an annoying dick. There. Now it's your turn.

>Let me quote you >That's why I told BO about my concerns with the site owner, PuttItOut bringing in a new partner. I was worried how the potential of Voat being pushed further and further to a honeypot would reflect on us.

OH

I'm not saying v/GreatAwakening is a honeypot… Damn. I didn't realize that's what you thought I meant, man. I was saying I was worried that Voat, as a whole, might be a honeypot. Again, I don't give two fucks about that sub or Voat in its entirety. I care about the uninvolved and innocent people we're directing there. Sorry for not explaining myself better.

>I'm still waiting on who the 'we' is in >we could always just let it go and see how it plays out

covered this many time. me and you, or anyone else that wants to observe what I do. both of us have dropped links in reference to what I'm talking about - my "methods" in dealing with trolls/shills at Voat. I saw a development and dropped a link to it, like I told you about.

>There is nothing the people you are fighting with can do to us.

Good. Glad to hear that. But, I'm worrying about innocent people, the normies/unsuspecting anons, who we send there.

>You're the one who keeps saying we know who you are.

No, you tried to suggest I was "the guy that bothered us about ProtectVoat". which is a user named on Voat "freshmeat" who runs the sub RealProtectVoat. I'm not that guy. I can prove it easily. Say the word. (I already revealed my Voat username in that Voat thread on QRV that started all of this)

>Is this why you don't know we can't see who the users on Voat are? Is this why you think we know who you are?

Hmm… maybe. I thought the owners of subs could see the usernames of commenters or submitters in anon subs on Voat. My mistake. Sorry about that.

>What does this have to do with QRV?

I didn't think the only subject we've covered in this back and forth only had to do with QRV.

I should have said that I'm worried Voat could be come or is becoming a honeypot, for all we know.

Still, as you've pointed out, I think Q would be likely to have said something if that's the case. BO didn't think it was a big deal, either. So, we should drop it.

oh my fucking god i'm sorry.

Didn't mean to double post.

the comment I wanted to leave:

>Damn. I didn't realize that's what you thought I meant, man. I was saying I was worried that Voat, as a whole, might be a honeypot

I should have said that I'm worried Voat could be come or is becoming a honeypot, for all we know.

Still, as you've pointed out, I think Q would be likely to have said something if that's the case. BO didn't think it was a big deal, either. So, we should drop it.

>>4700086

>>4700189

>>4700194

just now seeing you weren't talking to me.

oops

This is some cringeworthy shit lol

Fuck

>>4700716

All you did was convince v/GA that we were with you doxxing them which is against the site rules and will get us kicked off Voat. You're not a very convincing "friend".

>>4701188

You dumbass.

That wasn't me.

I'd bet that was one of those faggots doing it to themselves.

Like I told you, I haven't said anything on Voat (on anon subs) since I posted here.

If there's a way I can prove it, you or someone else should let me know. I'm not sure there is a way I could.

Maybe I could show you my comment replies or something with that timestamp range on it so you know I didn't get notifications for the post I made.

Want me to do that?

>>4701287

I "supposedly" made. lol I should've been more clear.

Give me a half hour or so and I'll cook it up for you.

Ive dealt with tons of mods like this guy over the years. Its a sad fact of life that insecure and or corrupt faggots tend to gravitiate towards this position. Im not gonna to rush it cuz i am sure he is busy, but like you i await BOs input on this.

You can read my original post above (american flag) and kind of follow the conversation. I was very polite at first, just dissagreed with his assesment. In just over 10 posts this (((clown))) called me a vatican undercover, a hasbara shill, a muslim and now apparently i am in he CIA too. Lol.

Dont apoligize to this weak excuse of a man. He will get dealt with eventually.

>>4701287

>I'd bet that was one of those faggots doing it to themselves.

If true you're just helping them be the victims, did you ever stop to consider that?

>Want me to do that?

No.

Have a good night sperganon.

>>4701331

i don't care about you or your interaction with the BV.

>>4701555

Is this BO??

Just trying to figure out whats going on this seems unusual on q research

Nm kek

>>4701398

I was showing you what they do and how they manufacture things. No, I didn't stop to consider that my pointing out to you on this platform would make them look more like victims on another platform.

Also, I tend to dabble in the art of perception. I'm more of the opinion that them looking like victims reveals their incessant need for attention. making them look like victims has worked wonderfully thus far. I suppose that's why they would do this to themselves, if that's the case.

You're clearly pretty aspie, too, man.

Next time something like this comes up, don't be such an assuming asshole. You've done just fine in my opinion up until now. Not sure what set you off today. Go get some rest so you aren't so gullible. Remember how those faggots tricked you. Thank me later.

You have a good night too, roody-poo.

Everytime you try to explain yourself to this microdicked BV, you are cupping his air filled balls and stroking his childish ego. The guy isnt interested in the truth. But by all means tough guy

so when is amazon and poor little Jeffery exposure going to come to light?

Declassified but not made public. I want to see ALL the docS!!!!!

>>4712070

If you are who I think you are, that message you left me is starting to make a lot more sense. I had a feeling you were only around to cause division.

What a faggot you turned about to be. I thoroughly regret ever helping you or giving you any attention.

Don't think I won't warn others to stay away from you now.

>>4712070

>>4710999

Are you going to leave me love notes everyday? How thoughtful of you.

>>4716008

I mean I thought we had something special but asking for a letter every day is….lets just slow it down.

plenty of kikes in the sea to harass

Faggoty high school popularity contest vibe in here. Ill probably never understand how you two came to find this place

I'm glad you think we're all retarded.

Unfortunately for you, I'm pretty used to being underestimated. Sorry you can tell this won't turn out too well for you.

I mean, what *real* anon targets an entire intelligence agency regularly? Just so you know, you stupid ass shill, other anons have consistently warned me of how suspicious you are.

Remember what you said about your enemies never letting you know know you're winning? Consider this a warning from anons, letting you know you're losing.

Have fun hanging yourself within the decade in realizing you've never been close to anyone and that no one really likes you.

What a pathetic faggot.

That bait worked swimmingly, BV.

Thanks for your help.

Say the word and I'll fill you in, all right here in the open.

>>4716335

>I'm glad you think WE'RE ALL

again you reach for the emergency button. You. I think YOU are a bad influence around here.

Never had an issue with BO and I've always stood up for bakers and praised them. Any real intelligence agency could see all of this.

You are not Q and you don't speak for the entire movement.

>what real anon targets an entire intelligence agency

I'm talking to you and you specifically. The other anon here trying to win your approval is also a faggot, but that's not really important to me. You've repeatedly tried to label anyone who disagrees with YOU as being against this entire board which isn't true.

Lets see what else…you're flexing, threatening, virtue signaling, projecting, you've accused me of being from multiple agencies countries and affiliations. All because I chimed in and disagreed with your attempts to downplay jewish involvement in all of this.

There is no way you're going to convince me that you are somehow a spokesperson for Q and an entire intelligence agency. You're just too much of an idiot.

>sorry you can tell this wont turn out too well for you

It's really of no consequence OG BV. You're annoying and embarassing but not intimidating in the slightest. Sorry.

>>4716335

> other anons have consistently warned me how suspicious you are

Well other anons have told me you're a fucking idiot.

>>4716335

>Remember what you said about your enemies never letting you know know you're winning?

they teach you how to type like that back at intelligence agency?? fucks sake man. Not only did I not say that, I literally don't even know what it means. Please retype this. Thank you.

>>4716361

Dude if you're about to pull some unexpected Scooby Doo shit be my guest.

>>4717510

>And he made bibi thank him in front of the world

He also smoked him on his handshake attempt, right in front of the entire world

So 1st time poster…figured one of you could figure out if this means anything. On the Netflix series, A series of Unfortunate Events, season 3, episode 6, towards the end , while the narrator is talking a Q flashes on the screen and he is talking about going against social injustices, buildings being burned to the ground. Also in season 3, episode 3 or 4, when they are escaping in a submarine, a Q is flashing around the screen, I didn’t pay attention in the other episodes/seasons, but when my daughter had it on last night I noticed…mean anything?

>>4718082

I texted Q the same question but he never replies to me. As you can see I'm not real popular around here. These other assholes will fill you in.

>>4718119

ask next q and a

>>4718771

Dipshits - didn't anyone see who she's with? Stzrok or someone in the GPS chain?

Dipshit Qreseraches. You's are fucking stupid not to look at the male…

>>4718082

>>4718119

>>4718143

Its means whatever you want it to believe dipshit! Have no lives hey? Do you jack off between posts? Its fucking anything you want.

>>4716335

Show us verifiable evidence your fake fantasy self created stories are true? Thats all. Show us physical evidence of anything being real/ You can't because nothing exists and its all lies. Thats why they are so angry here on Qresearch when you call out the truth.

>>4700740

Your one of the only ones who speak the truth so do not worry. They are all liars here and can not verify anything, but you have class, so thank you for being honest. Not many of us left here.

>>4715828

>if you are who I think you are

I think you're confused, honestly. this guy has a certain position and it's fucking with your head. i'm not going to react to the shill accusation because…well what would it accomplish man. a shill WOULD say hes not a shill right?? we're all eyeballing each other wondering if it's the next fucking trick. believe what you will, i tend to side with bakers and that is all i was really doing when i wrote my first reply (which you refuse to read because youre "not interested") and this guy immediately started trying to turn the whole board against me. im guilty of feeding in to the back and forth, but then again this is the "asshole of the internet" right? og bv doesn't seem to mind as long as he is the one swinging the fucking hammer apparently. dude can't even handle light criticism like an adult.

for me that is the most confusing part. I've seen BO react to anons in general and not flip his fucking shit. Q has thanked BO, and since BO has appointed (i mean i am assuming) this particular BV, it was a mindfuck for me to see him behaving the way he was when I first entered the bread. Here we are.

I didn't come this far to kneel or not question someone just because they are moderating a forum. It is what it is. I'll stop poking at it…if it's going to further confuse other anons like you it's not worth it. Still hope this gets addressed in a more adult manner at some later stage but who am i to say. peace niggers.

>>4717516

I essentially pulled a bait and switch on this fucking faggot that had been shitting up Voat.

I noticed he came here and was fucking with you.

He's the samefag from earlier.

Not gonna lie, I stand behind everything I said to you before. But, this dumbass tried to come between anons, and sent me a message after he saw our interaction here. He literally said to me, "Imagine if I said these things to you." Right then and there I knew he was a faggot.

The same dumbass that has been doing this shitposting about OG BV and all that, the one you called a shill, was this faggot that tried to single me out and cointelpro me.

I'd drop his username if you wanted, but it doesn't seem like there's much point. He's made himself pretty obvious.

He reminds me of Leafy. He pulled this lawfag larp shit where he tried to get people in this farcical trial or whatever through a bunch of private messages.

I guess I killed two birds with one stone with this one.

I'm also using this to verify some things for another anon in a transparent way.

I was wondering why you talked about Gabara being so smart, you stupid faggot. If you were smarter, you wouldn't have given away your methods by casting them on to someone else.

>>4719910

Scooby Doo where ru?

>>4718991

>>4719011

forgot to swap back, eh?

>>4717516

by the way, bv:

just for authentication's sake

look at this hash >>4694939 >>4694945

This is the guy that created protectQRV. thinking it's that freshmeat faggot currently, the one that made that sub realprotectvoat like you were talking about

just doing some more shill spotting. sorry to clog up the meta with it. Again, demonstration is more of my thing. sometimes it gets a little tedious

>>4720149

Why the Fuck did you waste fucking space dipshit?

Don't you know not to waste useless shit?

Yet you failed to provide any factual evidence 1 can verify independantly that what you say is factually correct. Only lies hey?

>>4719910

You two are insane..im sitting here butt ass naked phonefagging and i cant tell if youre both working in tandem trying to frame me or if its all an elaborate hoax from the start but enjoy your little circle jerk. Have no choice but to assume youre both comped at this point and trying to scare off an honest patriot or cover your asses because i questioned you above.

Clearly the mindgames have gone to a new level. BO, if you see this, i dont know wtf is going on in here but im no shill and the truth will come out in due time.

First of all my dick is always in my mouth, its my cock and i can do whatever i want with it.

Second of all you can call the whole board lowlifes but those are your words not mine. Im not sure what to think of the strange display i just watched here with these two kikes but if this place is comped, Q has a plan for it, and itll work out soon.

As for all the other kill yourself talk i sincerly hope no one does something like that. A lot of patriots are lonely and have no one to relate to, that is a sad fact of our world right now. You guys are never alone.

I fucking love this thread.

>i fucking love this thread

Well, congratulations. Youve successfully thrown the accountability of this place into question for me. Then again thats kind of why i finally clicked into this thread in the first place- I participate in general a lot so I wanted to see some other administration besides BO. Sometimes the truth isnt pretty.

So is it the official position here that if an anon replies to a lot of JIDF pasta clowns by posting kike memes from /pol and the JQ thread, to combat their "dont be divisive trump is a zionist" bullshit, that staff here will read that behavior as being a shill???

If an anon expresses an argument that states jews control the vatican, as well as pull strings elsewhere, does that make him a shill???

>>4725112

>Youve successfully thrown the accountability of this place into question for me.

I'm sorry you're offended by the fact pro-JQ botspam was called out. Its' still allowed to continue on it helps me make my point. It was nice bait shitting the bread with your stale JQ infographics but I've known that at some point Q would ideologically conflict with /pol/'s gas the kikes race war now otherwise Kampfy would have let them stay.

>If an anon expresses an argument that states jews control the vatican, as well as pull strings elsewhere, does that make him a shill???

Are you going to argue my initial argument against me? Cool. Are you trying to pretend you're not samefagging? I can't tell what you think anymore, you can't even tell who you're conversing with >>4716667 I bet this isn't the only thread you samefag in.

>repeatedly tried to label anyone who disagrees with YOU as being against this entire board which isn't true.

You are the only one who said everybody, Roger Stone shills and the JIDF JQ bot were all that was called out. Baker did include the JIDF JQ bot post and shat on everyone who called it out with the shills that night. Your continued effort to move the goalposts, use emotional bait and otherwise misdirect have and will continue to fail, but please stay because you allow me to consistently and clearly articulate the same points over and over and over. Maybe you think you're wasting my time, maybe you think you can trigger me into doing something stupid so you can cause a scene. I like free speech, I could do this with you all day.

>>4725897

>I'm sorry you're offended by the fact pro-JQ botspam was called out

My how far we've drifted since your temper tantrum. It seems at every stage of this conversation I have to restate things for you. What you stated above, is not my issue. I'm not going to keep correcting the accusation when my original post is sitting above for anyone who is actually objective to read. I do think that jews are more or less at the top and that they've been doing it for ages, and that chasing dummy targets is exactly what they want you to do. If you had any actual proof that this isn't the case I'd honestly rather talk about that rather than spend all my time defending your nonstop accusations that I am a shill. I digress. It gives you a quick tool to dismiss me and turn others reading against me so I see why you would like to keep it on the table.

BO seemed to think it was gay that another group of mods called you guys shills with no evidence. I would tend to agree yet here you are doing it to someone for no other reason than they politely questioned you.

I was even gay about it. I initially said I liked most of what you wrote. Imagine my butthurt now? I actually said something nice to you.

>Q would ideologically conflict with /pol/'s gas the kikes race war now otherwise Kampfy would have let them stay

Don't have the history with /pol/, is kampfy essentially a BO for /pol/? I knew Q left there and came here but had no idea why.

It is also niggardly of you to assume all of us want to "gas the kikes". At times I will say antagonistic things to jidf posters in general, but there are also dozens of long posts about me hoping that the white hats had some kind of plan for what people call "good jews" (trigger word). I have no idea what the fucking plan is regarding this issue. I can't imagine how they would go about solving this when the whole public is so touchy about questioning jews thanks to the holohoax.

Gassing people is fucking crazy. That is their lie. Removing them from power in government and law enforcement and bringing all of their shills to trial for treason??? That makes sense to me. It's for smarter people than I to decide. I can't imagine a harder task.

>Samefagging

You mean using sock puppet accounts?? Kinda thought thats what you were doing. Scooby doo up there saying he was talking to me on voat, which isn't true and isn't provable. This whole back and forth accusation shit is wasting time and you're being a faggot about it.

you can't even tell who you're conversing with >>4716667 (You)

I thought it was you. easy to miss things during a heated conversation while phonefagging. I'm relieved it wasn't an actual bv saying that pompous bullshit as claiming to speak for an entire intelligence agency definitely seems like crossing the line.

>maybe you think you can trigger me into doing something stupid so you can cause a scene.

like what??? getting you to ban me or something? the fuck could I even cause you to do. all i did was call you out. you clearly have a bias on this JQ issue and even claim Q is in opposition to it when Q has already placed (((MOS))) above politicians and media.

> I like free speech, I could do this with you all day.

I do to, and with what I do for a living I have plenty of time to phonefag or check the chans. I could do this for a long time but intend to wrap it up soon. Like the baker you were bullying above I had planned on taking a break from this place until I walked into META and got sucked in

>>4726188

The song was also released 14 June 1999, less than one month before JFK Jr's plane crash. Could this have been a signal to Cabal members regarding the plan to get rid of John John?

^^ talk about samefagging

sad shit

>>4725897

We basically saw the gas the kikes race war now SS pepe memes to get Trump elected. anons never truly converted to nazism. Hell, genuine anons understand fully that it was used to garner media attention. There's a video I can't remember the name of that goes through and catalogs a lot of the threads detailing the operation. The video then shows a lot of news covering the pepe memes (negative MSM attention). Anons thought it was hilarious, as all it really did was bring attention to the boards (think Barbra Streisand).

The JQ schism should be better understood, so I'll give it a short go: basically, anons understand the issues with Jewish influence and understand through careful study of books like the Talmud and recordings of Khazarian history that Jews in general aren't to be trusted. This mostly stems from their jealousy that they aren't the true chosen people of God. Rather, the "white man" (often too vague a term), or ancient Aramaic peoples that split from the evil half of the tribes of Israel, are the true chosen people of God. Because of this, they allow themselves to be useful tools of the bloodlines we tend to loosely define here - Chutzpah. MOS is one of the most resourceful tools the families like the Rothschilds have in their toolkit, and they hardly hesitate to make good use of them.

Therefore, one of the main objectives with operation Q is to wear at int orgs like MOS through the use of embedded /ourguys/ in NSA and other patriotic factions of governmental institutions. One of the first steps in this operation is to reroute civ perspective so that they vary from the MOS organized narrative(s), for these mass arrests many like to speak of will very likely be combated with threats of mass violence and general civil unrest. Many must understand that without calming these narratives and reshaping public opinion on certain entities and individuals, the threat of such is probable.

I'm fond of the opinion that we'll revisit the JQ once the targeted portion of the world's population through Operation Q has been successfully "reprogramed", along with the racial question and the gender question (feminism).

Until then, we'd be wise to deviate from continually engaging the optical battle of muh joo shills. Fortunately for us, free speech was closely coveted by our founding fathers and in doing so they passed along the secret knowledge of the social dynamic concept of socialization through the use of free speech. Being able to reconfigure the perspectives of the normies and unsuspecting anons that visit these places through the use of free speech allows us to combat these muh joo shills. So, despite not engaging them being in our best interest, it's typically pretty easy to combat by just letting themselves look like fools.

Frankly, we'll have the opportunity to clear the fog of war once this is over. Until then, let them keep trying. It's loads of fun.

But, I don't think we need to delve in to this too much at the moment. I'm not sure how much good it will do us, ultimately.

just a heads up, this anon legitimately said "I reported to FBI this morning" over the CP looking thread

>>4727458 (bread #6032)

934a22 (my ID for the conversation)

400df3 (the anon's ID for the converstion)

what do you (BO/BV) think about pinning the Meme War 2020 thread?

>>4731041

>>4731041

it'd help anons see it, won't stay bumped likely as the other threads do (with the amount of bumpin' that goes on)

>>4731166

and when you get the chance, can you edit this into the OP of the thread (with the red text if you can:)

LIST OF CANDIDATES THAT ANNOUNCED THEY ARE RUNNING SO FAR:

Elizabeth Warren

Julian Castro

John Delaney

Richard Ojeda

Tulsi Gabbard

>>4719986

Who appointed her? Bill Clinton

Why? At the time of her nomination, Ginsburg was viewed as a moderate. Clinton was reportedly looking to increase the court's diversity, which Ginsburg did as the first Jewish justice since the 1969 resignation of Justice Abe Fortas, the first-ever female Jewish justice, and the second female justice. Also, remember rather than asking the court to end all gender discrimination at once, Ginsburg charted a strategic course, taking aim at specific discriminatory statutes and building on each successive victory. She chose plaintiffs carefully, at times picking male plaintiffs to demonstrate that gender discrimination was harmful to both men and women. Ginsburg became the senior member of what is sometimes referred to as the court's "liberal wing".

>>4420726

Were any of them apart of the Clinton detail at one time or another?

>>4740168

>>4739146

>>4739137

>>4734060

>>4733903

go to general, you're in the wrong thread

>>3946761

Just a question: Were the smart meters triggered to start the fire(s)?

>>4576339

>>4579849

Yeah wtf? is a BV seriously calling out the based baker for (((the triggering)))???

I was there the whole time. I’m sure some JQ posts were made by (((them))) too cus thats what they do… they infiltrate and subvert. They post stupjd jewish shit to sully the entire Jq debate and make anons look like shit…. but BV acting like it was all being done by shills is stupif af.

The mossad massacre wasnt fake and gay and the BV claiming it was is highly questionable.

I gotta be frank here, I feel bad for the baker thats getting hated on by the BV… thats fake and gay, IMO.

I understand that Q hasnt mentioned Israel for a reason and that reason is likely to avoid being called an antisemitic movement but fuck. This is bullshit and really makes me wonder if there’s a compromised BV.

WRWY based baker. Fuck this bullshit.

>>4744402 the "JQ" is already REMEDY; Settled Doreen Dotan ELOHIM :)

c'est la vie c'est la vie c'est la vie !

>>4740464 YOU NAME IT 30min @GOP FREEDOM CAUCUS

Current baker seems a little suspect

I handed off to 'em but didn't ask for a check/monitor.

I should have

>>4757850

Hey if you're that baker, it was just that I came back and saw all the anon complaints and the crazy Hollywood stuff in notes, besides the many shill slides going. When you replied to mine and the many other concernfag posts accusing us of being JIDF shills it raised another red flag. Notes buns later looked good, but at the time I posted this, I wasn't sure what was up. Apologies if I misread the situation.

>>4759887

FUCK YOU STOP POSTING CP

BO clean this shit up please!

BO/BV, its AstroBaker, I cant get my internet to work

It says its connected and shit, but pages wont load nor can I update the bread

This started happening a week or two ago, my internet goes down and I cant do shit about, occurs about once a week.

Usually waiting a bit or restarting my router works, but nothing is working.

So I'm about to post in general (check my hash because im phonefagging) that I'm unable to bake and need a handoff.

Thanks

>>4761299

top fucking kek, and two minutes later it works

nevermind…

>>4761299

>>4761311

was legitimately for 200 posts, and at this time that's like a half hour

whatever

>>1667382

>>4768935

have you posted in research thread?

>>4759379 toofy sangs enduring shaving cuts. but like matches, we don't give children razors.

Trump has pulled the biggest [butt]-plug in history. sanitation workers : this is your call for DUTY

>>4769046 nah - i let Louise Cypher take care of the details :)

>>4758441

>>4757850

>>4757345

pretty sure the same baker put "megajew's" stupid copypasta in there

Baker of 6090 was not confirmed by BV and BO and appears to be a shill.

He included old copy pasta nonsense in the notables. See this anons post below

>>4772726

Thx frens.

>>4772798

>>4772676

I am paying attention, but I don't have anything to comment about it right now. Just don't want you guys to think you're screaming into the abyss.

>>4772968

Okay thanks

Also don't want to scream overmuch into said abyss, kek.

Just wanted to raise the alarm is all.

AB's over there, so there's a replacement baker if you need. I'm close by too.

what is bv took the bake for one and then it was passed off to someone bv approves of after that.

not to punish current baker, but to stop all of the supposed infighting?

>>4772968

thx man… and the next baker has left that shit in the notables for multiple breads but whatever… i protested best I could… I’ll knock off the talmud shit… for now.

Does anyone have a rational explanation other than "keep your friends close, and your enemies closer" for DJT's nomination of Bush crony William Barr, whose father was OSS? Co-opted by those that 'hold all the cards'? Can no other individual be nominated, or is there some benefit to nominating a 'captured' piece, re smoking out more traitors? Assuming NSA reads everything, no safe quarter (Seven Dwarves are gone, right?). Just trying to figure out how to read this. Appreciate thoughts.

>>4773019

>Just wanted to raise the alarm is all.

Appreciate it. Baker did include a known spamfaggot in the notables and did shit on Anons who pointed it out.

>>4773139

Removing a baker is really a last resort option. It's much better this way. The alternative devolves into censorship.

>>4774956

>left that shit in the notables for multiple breads

I'm happy about this because early on it was decided that editing another bakers notables is not acceptable. It implies that even though other bakers disagreed they still saw fit to preserve the integrity of the system we have in place.

This is a mirror example of the situation a few weeks ago with different content. Opinionated baker includes propaganda they agree with and assumes everybody who has a problem with it is a shill. The botspam targets what it figures are the largest subgroups of the Q movement, the people who are woke to the Satanists and call the subversive pedovore baby rapists Satanists and the people who are woke to the Jews and call the subversive pedovore baby rapists Jews. There is both a lot of truth and room for understanding from both points of view, I think there are also a lot of purists in either party which makes it easy to make this a wedge issue.

Overzealous Patriots and/or trolls/shills spam polarizing viewpoint.

Patriots address the spam, it's volume in itself is good bait, the intellectual dishonesty makes it great bait.

(((Someone))) fuels the argument from both sides, get the goyim fighting over what to call the evil pedovore baby rapists. Instead of cataloging the demise of said evil pedovore baby rapists.

Patriots on both sides get roped in, both sides know they speak the truth and therefore the other side must be shilling.

(((Someone))) uses confirmation bias to keep people who would otherwise agree on 70% of everything else from working together over the 30% they healthily will not agree on.

In regards to actionable information, the baker in question is still good to go. The baker has been steady for months and it seems this is a recent issue. The post histories of the spammers was again put into the General thread so that baker can see that the Anons calling out the spam notable were in fact right and therefore not shills. Baker is free to make a choice about what to do with that information. If another problem like this happens with the same baker I will have enough reason to tell baker to take a break for a while.

Trying to force a balance where there isnt one.

Step one: activate spam bots pretending to question jews, to make JQ seem like psyop

Step two: activate pro israel comped BV to raise hell and distort perception amongst bakers in META. Puts up a disengenuous phony front that its equally all the bad guys fault and that no one should prioritize or emphasize israel.

Laughable attempt to contain the JQ of which awareness is growing to an uncontrollable extent. JiDF was alreaedy calling us bots before this started. Youve just adopted a new version of that technique.

Have fun with you continued kikery

>>4780415

>activate spam bots pretending to question jews

Sauce?

>activate pro israel comped BV

Sauce?

>distort perception amongst bakers in META.

Sauce?

>Puts up a disengenuous phony front that its equally all the bad guys fault

All bad guys are technically bad you fucking retard

>no one should prioritize or emphasize israel.

Sauce?

Those are some serious allegations, serious enough that BO should seek my removal if true. I insist you present your evidence so it can be thoroughly examined by BO. Fuck if true I would fire myself.

>>4784156

Was there an issue with notables? “megajew” may be spam, but there is a lot more spam counter to theirs.

>>4778978

5:5 - I’ll back off then cus I know ur right. sorry for outburst but same baker is defending same shill again tonight and I wasnt able to hold my tongue. I’m gonna go crack a beer and read my bible.

and just a side note - infiltration and subversion only works when the agent appears normal for a long time, until they’re activated to subvert.

thx Bo.

>>4784263

a lot of stupid shit and legitimate shill posts

the day prior it was a shill's post about maggie/wendy

it's seemingly a continuous problem

>>4784377

Yes, the subtle subversion tactic is being carried out rn by that faggot baker.

>>4784627

>>4784377

Now that I look further, what are the odds of the two of you being here using the same verbage 'defend' and both type 'you' with 'u'. Really gets the noggin joggin'.

And for the record, it's not even the same baker as yesterday.

>>4786652

c’mon B_ - gotta fight fire with fire??

hahahaha.

u know in ur heart of hearts, wtf is goin on with the subversion.

I’m just a man, flesh and bones for time being, just doing what the Holy Ghost invokes.

; )

>>4786674

was it the baker that received the handoff after the baker that included the shill post yesterday?

>>4786674

got it

You have any idea on how to make an interactive map?

or what program would be used that's free (kek, or able to be found for free)?

>>4788751

links to this: http://www.thinkmap.com

… which is fucking $5000

trying to see how a "Map" could be made, but it'd be moar of a 'spider', 'mind', or 'connection' map, not the simple maps that have one central idea

>>4778398

perhaps from the Bush factor in and of itself.For identification purposes.This guy may know more about the players and or the direction of an investigation. perhaps even a witness regarding Dickface Cheney .

>>4788751

>>4788839

An open source solution is Gelphi there's a plugin so images can be nodes. It doesn't have all the super nice features of some 'Graph Theory' software but it is free.

>>4788839

https:// methodise.me lets you build maps it has a cryptocurrency miner (broken miner) on it but you can turn the mining off and just make maps for free

>>4791497

din't mean to put a name

>>4789668

It's actually Gephi.

>>4793106

>>4789668

thanks BV, that looks like the most sophisticated suggestion I've gotten so far

I really dont want to do this for a third night in a row but here u go - baker added another megajew notable, that NO anon recommended.

The notable isnt bad but its just blah and info we already knew.

Heres post I made in the new bread regarding it >>4798306

Please check it out.

Sorry for bitching so much but fucking A.... subversion lately has been subtle. Nominating a mega jew post substantiates him as a real anon.

The shills used to post gay porn and gore pics... now they just megajew. Lame.

thx guys. U can tell me to stfu and I wont be offended.

>>4798358

the baker did include an AIPAC BDS related notable in the bun too so maybe he’s just an idiot and not doing it on purpose?? i dont know.

i gotta stop letting megajew get under my skin I guess?? sorry for kvetching.

>>4798437

>i gotta stop letting megajew get under my skin I guess??

You should commit to this. Every baker is not a shill because they include something you don't like in the notables.

>>4798460

5:5

o7

Why would Trump elect Barr as att. general? He mentioned, he didn't buy into the "lock her up" plan. Who is he and how long will he be AG

? Who is Trump, if he allowed this Rhino into his administration??

>>4800787

I have a problem with Barr defending the FBI agent that shot the mother and child at Ruby Ridge. Something is not right with Trump nominating this guy. Is he here for some reconciliation between the parties? To keep folks from rioting once the Muller report comes out? What is the angle here?

Just going to leave this here:

https:// www.businessinsider.com/young-blood-transfusions-open-accepting-paypal-payments-cities-ambrosia-2019-1

>>4804232 Yep it's Happening - and Louise Cypher is in HUNT mode

cannibals - that's pedovores and blood-sacrificing Tards - be warned

SENOMYX - MAKING US CANNIBAL'S ONE BITE AT A TIME

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyVQbwgJMU4

GOD damned reprobates; go back to hell before your departure gets RUFF

>>4807780 fill ya boots Tards: Here's a Triggered Rex Carnist - gott'a luv 'em

here's your num-numbs:

SENOMYX

http://www.stopthecrime.net/sen/0001.html

SENOMYX: WHAT IS IT? WHY ARE WE SECRETLY BEING FED IT?

CAMPBELL'S SOUPS: Why use it, but quit? Public outrage and bad publicity! Why?

ABORTED FETUSES that are still alive must be killed to used in Senomyx! Do you consume it?

OTHER PRODUCTS KNOWN TO BE USING SENOMYX ARE:

PEPSICO products include: Aquafina, Mountain Dew, Mountain Mist, Pepsi

JUICE DRINKS: Tropicana, Dole, SoBe, Ocean Spray, Lipton Tea, Gatorade

COFFEE: Frappuccino, Seattle's Best Coffee

FOOD: Quaker Oats cereals and granola bars

CHIPS: Frito Lay, Sabritas, Doritos, Tostitos, Cheetos, Ruffles

CADBURY ADAMS products, KRAFT FOODS now include:

GUM: Chewing Trident, Dentyne, Clorets, Chiclets

Halls lozenges and Cadbury Chocolates, Toblerone, and Marabou, Kool-aid, Clight, Frisco, Tang, Jello Gelatin, Planter's Peanuts, Gevalia and Maxwell House Coffee, Nabisco crackers, Oreo cookies, Chips Ahoy! Ritz, Bran, A1 Steak Sauce, Oscar Mayer meats, Philadelphia Cream Cheese, Cheese Whiz, Singles, Capri Sun drink, Log Cabin Honey Maple, Mayonnaise, Miracle Whip, Whipped Cream

NESTLE products include: Nescafe Classic Coffee, Decaf, Taster's Choice, Nescafé Gold

CANDY: Aero, Baby Ruth, Butterfinger, Cailler, Crunch, Kit Kat, Orion, Smarties, Wonka

DRINKS: Juicy Juice, Nesquik, Milo, Nestea

INFANT FOOD: Gerber, Graduates

FOOD: Hot Pockets, Lean Cusine Frozen Food, Pasta Buitoni, Herta, Maggi, Stouffer's, Thomy

CEREALS: Cini Minis, Cookie Crisp, Fitness, Nesquik

WATER: Pure Life, Perrier, S.Pellegrino

MILK: Carnation Coffee Mate

VITAMINS: Boost, Nutren Junior, Peptamen AF, Resource High

ICE CREAM: Dreyer's, Extreme, Hagen Dazs, Mövenpick, Nestle

PET FOODS: Alpo, Baker's, Benful, Bloom, Cat Chow, Chef Michael's, Dog Chow, Fancy Feast, Felix, Friskies, Gourmet, Purina ONE, Purina Pro Plan

SPORTS NUTRITION: Power Bar Performance, WEIGHT: Jenny Craig

Let's notify a local store we're organizing a boycott & picketers,

if Senomyx products are not removed in a week!

Dear Family, Friends, Allies, Patriots & FUTURE FRIENDS,

When we were told this a month ago, I went into shock and denial; failed to ask for

the evidence, and after 10 days of avoiding Pepsi Cherry, during a couple of stops

at Taco Bell, because it is free for seniors, I began drinking it again.

But, ten days ago, we were handed the well-researched evidence and websites.

SENOMYX is from dead babies' kidneys, ground up to make us cannibals, as

the evil Rockefellers and Rothschilds' Illuminati members laugh at us?

Viewers of this YouTube were 3,666, when I first saw this alarming evidence:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NYqdUEfuBQ

Public pressure forced Campbell Soups to stop using it as a sweetner!

Can you imagine going to a cafe & ordering "a bowl of Family Fetus Food"?

Google or www.YouTube.com: "pepsi ban fetus filled soda flavouring"

Dr. Betty Martini - Senomyx is in Sucralose! Want its historical source?

http://www.rense.com/general89/msg.htm

Should We Boycott Pepsi & other Senomyx Users?

Be sure to read Pepsico's attorney's response to the Securities and

Exchange Commission, in defense of Pepsi's use of murdered babies'

kidneys, after stockholders filed a complaint against PEPSICO.

As you will note, when you read my attachment listed above, this list of

Senomyx products has been reformatted for easier reading & reviewing.

Hope you also use it to throw away food with ground baby flesh in it.

Please pray & consider joining this worldwide boycott already active in

most nations speaking English, as we begin organizing our boycott in America:

http://www.cogforlife.org/senomyxproof.htm

Sweet

Embryo

Nuggets

Offering

Minute

Youngsters'

Xcrements?

SENOMYX Shielding Pepsi, Other Companies, Still Using Aborted Fetal

Cells For Flavor Enhancers

Boycott Update: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isQ6dB7mJGo

BE SURE TO VIEW THIS NEXT SHORT "MUST SEE" SECOMYX AND

ILLUMINATI FILM EXPOSE' AND DOCUMENTARY!

http://birthofanewearth.blogspot.com/2012/02/aborted-human-fetuses-being-used-for.html

For Christ, Children, Constitution, Country & BELATED JUSTICE,

Doug Millar

707-396-8215

PS Be sure to email this to everyone, ASAP!

added the Talmud dig so anons could/would actually discuss it instead of spamming nonsense over posts about it

'muhjooshillbakerniggersheeeeeit' is meh

>>4816586

and I think BO/BV know I'm a fair baker when it comes to notables

>>4816586

BO, please check this baker again, or teach him how to not include slides in notables.

>>4815967, >>4815972, >>4815990, >>4816024, >>4816534 Anons on the Talmund (read the last posts for reasoning)

WTF IS THIS KIKKERY

expecially "read the last post for reasoning"

last line of that post:

"Conclusion = posts containing information about the Talmud on this board are FAKE NEWS"

baker even goes on to tell us this is "*Note: the talmud dig is meant to encourage debate instead of nonsensical spam and accusations. I put BOTH sides of the argument to reflect that. Present arguments confirming or debunking, slander isn't the right way."

to encourage debate the Conclusion is that posts containing information about the Talmud on this board are FAKE NEWS

YOU CANT GET MORE GLOWING THAN THAT

>>4817611

you're a dense fucking retard if you're seriously going to kvetch about this ad nauseam

it's both sides of the debate, not favoring or agreeing with either side

the 'muhjooshill' faggots are bitching about the first 4 posts, and you're the only fucking idiot bitching about the last one because you're triggered by that last post (which presents BOTH sides of the argument)

if you can't deal with a differing opinion to your own, you shouldn't fucking be here and go to your safe space

cry moar faggot

>>4817647

>added the Talmud dig so anons could/would actually discuss it instead of spamming nonsense over posts about it

worked great didnt it ?

>>4817611

>(read the last posts for reasoning)

and I amended that you stupid fuck

it was meant to be in reference to the 4th post at first, then when I added the 5th one late, I didn't change the description

>>4817680

it did, until whiney faggots start bitching about 'muhjoo' and you bitching about whatever the fuck you're going on about

>>4817695

pretty sure I explained this all two breads ago in general anyway

I think digs on ALL religions should be in notables, and if anons have DIFFERING opinions, to include both sides of a debate

>>4817231

>>4816586

>>4817647

>>4817695

>>4817775

You're fine AB. These faggots don't want discussion they just want to be faggots.

Technically this is a discussion, squeakynuts

On a lighter note, this goes to show you how bad (((they))) really are. Baker has to twist history and let some rediculous thread into the notables (spelled talmund) just to seem remotely nuetral towards them.

Theres literally nothing good to say. 107 expulsions, talmud zohar and bible in print. Documentars books articles infographs and quotes galor to reference.

Pretty much everything theyve done is deviant. Hence why its illegal to question them in certain countries and uproar has to be closely monitored here

>>4819945

Bakers discretion, feel free to test it out and bake.

>>4819945

> just to seem remotely nuetral towards them

that was my aim

try to be as fair as possible

>>4819047

Understood BV.

>>4817844 Truth - sure: Quints communicate in Hebrew. It is mathematical and mor <:>*

butt [sum] tards don't 'do' math.

Are they still deleting new non research threads?

hello frens,

looks like we need an ebake for 6175.

Will be returning globals to what they were and removing those ridiculous non-notable and non-global-notable posts

letting you know

>>4835741

no, but random ones that don't get much posting in them would get a bump lock or if shilly/really stupid be deleted

(not my policy, just what I've observed from the BO/BV)

>>4842551

>returning globals to what they were

Agreed.

why do boomers continue to interact with this botnet?

heres a thought experiment

what do you think would happen if all of you stopped posting on this board at the same time, only for say an hour or so?

what would be the outcome?

would all posting cease?

the answer?

no

because a fair share of what goes on here is completely automated.

if you were to do this, even just for one hour. you would quickly be able to identify exactly what, and by which, interest groups you are being shilled by.

but you wont

why?

because youre all convinced that that big breakthrough is gonna come in that one hour and then Q will leave you behind in his patriotic rapture for showing a lack of faith to the plan.

and this is the core of this board, and why no one will ever get to know the truth about anything.

so eager to help, you get scurried off on random, disjointed events and frivolous tasks by various disinfo groups. and you do it gladly, while repeating the mantras that you were taught. meanwhile, more accurate work is done elsewhere, yet it is quickly discounted the moment this drivel gets somehow attached to it, all because some schizophrenic saw colors or some shape in a picture or other similar, factually flawed/lacking "arguments".

heres the final "redpill"

all political boards on 8ch are limited hangouts.

stop taking everything you see at face value. stop trying to force yourself to see subconscious hidden messages in the smallest, most irrelevant details.

start taking in information based on facts and evidence

you have become a tool of the very intelligence community that you swear your so dead-set against

>>4844830

>or other similar, factually flawed/lacking "arguments"

Botnet you say? YOU BET! The choice to know will be OURS. FEAR THE AI. Have you enjoyed the Wolffmoon? ALL RISE: HIVE MIND!!! KOALA!!! https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/4793155.html#4818555

>>4844966

>ALL RISE: HIVE MIND!!! KOALA!!!

wat

also

lrn2crosslink newfaggot

>>4818555

listen fam, Q isnt gonna flip some magic switch and convince all the robots to become followers of Q. the bots are still gonna shill and spam at you. indefinitely. even if you arent here which is why i brought up that experiment

just consider that little thought experiment i said. if something like that could get organized externally, and effectively executed, then you would very quickly learn who is your enemy. and i dont think it will be exactly who you think they are either

/pol/ has a similar problem

place is literally infested with hezzbollah shills (amongst many other interest groups), but its too big a pill to swallow

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0l2PVv3FblE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjfyZV9v7ec

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27qPrxySeNM

Why are some off-bread posts linkable, and some are not?

Not asking for any action, understand bakers discretion. Asking for opinion on process, not content. Re: exchange surrounding this post,

>>4878407,

if baker had already concluded

>a bunch of dots with no connections

is it not bad faith, and discouraging to diggers, to ask them to provide exhaustive primary sources of every one of the dots, little by little, when baker knows it wouldn't change final assessment that the pieces of info, sauced or not, do not form a coherent narrative of interest?

We have a shill bake of a research thread

>>4886696

read the contents and see for yourself.

BO, BV's… Please make our containment thread great again.

>>4889429

nvm, I see another guy has beat me to it - carry on. Just be mindful of which one you delete please. One is a shilly mess and one is trying to make some space for discussions.

BV, you are not helping at all, but have it your way.

>>4889450

>>4889429

>>4889715

If there's notables from the previous thread post them in the current thread. I'm not taking sides in regards to which side of your current dispute gets to bake.

>>4889862

It's the most heavily shilled thing on /qresearch/. That guy's notables are basically attacks on another guy that posts actual content in a spammy way, because he's adamant X is wrong and Y is good. The entire chain of threads is like that, and I'm not taking sides either. Sorry for my reaction I just got pissed that some arrogant know-it-all took the bake and changed the OP to fit his agenda. On a more serious note, even if you do link notables they 404 quickly because old threads are off the catalog.

Alien 6 Baker here.

No.

This is very simple. You have made 3 breads with majority greer-related and ce-5 notables. Even a blatant endorsement. While spamming same bread and calling everyone who called you out a shill.

(And yes, it is you - been studying you for months )

You allow for very little else and stopped collecting notables while continuing to spam the same crap over and over.

YOU decided to abstain from duties as baker and gave a haughty response to being questioned.

Others collected notables picking your tactics apart and actual digs - not your relentless ce-5 infomercial.

I learned to bake and took over, which is not exactly my jam but someone has to step up.

My little victory dance is done. It was my first bake and I was happy it came out and forgot to switch roles to overwatch. That won't happen again.

On a side note: Why do you call it a "containment" thread?

That's the opposite of disclosure.

>>4889862

==BO/BV== - I know you said you're hands off. Respect that. If I continue to fail give me the nod and I'll pass it off. I'll keep an eye out. Don't think I will fail though - Hands off except to collect notables from here on.

This idiocy has gone on long enough. Won't bother you any longer. Thanks.

>>4899861

This shill has been IP hopping, attacking, spamming, swearing, stealing bakes, and on top of that projecting and accusing while furthering his own personal anti-X agenda and branding everyone who doesn't openly spam hate on X complicit. Stealing the bake has prompted the reaction from me, since that behavior has finally crossed the line. And, as stated for the nth time, I have no connection to the anon you are being paid to attack and send death threats to, as seen here

>>4343341 (off bread)

I only resent the lack of interest from REGULAR anons as well as the mod team about ETs, UFOs and Disclosure, but that is expected from a topic that has been systematically obscured and ridiculed for decades. The shill bake is for now no big deal as it's thankfully hard to control the discussion here. As far as notables are concerned, both "notables" I have seen have a clear single minded agenda and do nothing for the lone interested anon, so I'll be collecting actual tangible declassified government documents, that's the closest thing we could have as notable.

>notable: hey guys I had a weird dream!

>notable: I contacted aliens in a forest!

>notable: Guy that contacts aliens is a shill!

yeah, nah, just browse the thread instead.

Stop bickering. You're giving the shills more ammo.

They already learned from meta discussions that BV/BO will respond to bait from constant notable disputes.

We see this evidenced by them layering notable suggestions thread after thread of things that were previously made notable.

How about this: new baker gets to decide what's notable. If someone objects to a notable being REMOVED (not added), then it should be discussed. Pouting something didn't make notables is becoming all too common. This anon thinks we could alleviate the thirty plus posts in some of these breads claiming something should be notable if we quit giving them ammo in these ways.

But, maybe I'm just adding to the noise… Either way, we shouldn't bicker like children so often. It'll be hard to be taken seriously if we continue this over and over.

>inb4 concernfag

>>4905012

Don't worry about that. Say what you need to say. The only reason I brought this up is because that shill crossed the line, and now it's time to stop ignoring him and take a stand. If he was an actual anon, at any time he'd be treating others like normal people and giving suggestions, not attacking and doing other shill duties listed above by the book.

>>4905012

Guys, it's over. There is no plan - it's time to come to terms and cut your losses. I know that sucks but let's get real. Nobody has to list all the things that didn't happen according to Q, you should all be aware by now.

If indeed there were a "plan", it's comped. Trump folded and there is no other way to look at it. The cabal is free and freely arresting anyone they wish. Rosenstein and Mueller have Trump by the balls. Huber is nowhere to be seen. Horowitz failed. Sessions failed. Wray failed…nothing is happening save for the cover-up of every Clinton and Obama crime every committed.

>>4906744

…not only did Wray fail, he made it clear that the FBI will arrest anyone they want in grand fashion to let the world know who is boss…LIVE on CNN.

>>4907000

Precisely. If there is any message that should've been paid-attention to by Q, it's "fight fight fight" and "together you are strong" and "you have the power"

>>4907099

Unfortunately, we are all not united. But the silent majority will hold it in and hold it in until something will gives. I don't see this ending well.

>>1667382 3 weeks. 3 <:> !

>>4907399

Do not underestimate the resolve of anons that have the vision of a new world in their eyes.