/qrb/ - QResearch Bunker

DOUGH

https://fullchan.net/?4e188da265bbc487#EX9nLtDosXNoxb5GQussHNZZnZdA7yTbiLS5MzC5HxF

>>118120

>>118120

tyb

Via: https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/adam-kinzingers-dad-helps-run-the-world-soy-foundation-were-not-joking/

Adam Kinzinger's Dad Helps Run the World Soy Foundation (We're Not Joking)

Anti-Trump Rep. Adam Kinzinger’s father, Rus Kinzinger, is a Board Member of the World Soy Foundation. He starred in a promotional video extolling the virtues of soy that was uploaded to the World Soy Foundation’s YouTube channel in 2011.

The younger Kinzinger may be best known for his frequent uncontrollable, tearful, and emotional displays in the U.S. House, mostly delivered while denouncing 45th President Donald Trump, his voters, and other members of the Republican Party.

His father, however, is perhaps best known for his love of soy.

In a video for the World Soy Foundation, Rus Kinzinger extolled the virtues of the crop as he attempted to sell a new product that would allow farmers to process soy beans at their kitchen tables.

“They’re basically table top models that will allow soybeans to be turned into soy milk and other products,” said the elder Kinzinger.

“It produces soy milk!”

Kinzinger is credited as Board Member of the World Soy Foundation in the video, and is otherwise credited as a consultant with The Talon Company.

On his LinkedIn account, Kinzinger identifies himself as “Principal & Consultant” at The Talon Company.

Kinzinger indicates he has been a consultant at this company – and ostensibly involved with the World Soy Foundation – since 2007.

“The soy milk has a decided advantage for young children in the developmental stages,” Kinzinger urged. “It provides tremendous nutritional benefit.”

“Very little that a corporation can do will have as much direct impact, I think, on the future,” said Kinzinger.

“Join me in donating to the World Soy Foundation.”

Adam Kinzinger, meanwhile, has bragged to Illinois farmers about bringing more soy production to the state.

“The hardworking men and women of Illinois’ agriculture industry make our state a leading producer of corn, soybeans, and swine,” wrote Kinzinger on his House website.

“I have fought during my time in Congress to pass legislation to ensure the policies and regulations coming out of Washington, D.C. work for the average farmer.”

Further, the American Soybean Association has donated to Kinzinger’s campaign in every election since he began running for public office, including $1,000 for Kinzinger’s 2022 reelection campaign. Kinzinger ultimately decided not to run.

Since he began in politics, the American Soybean Association has donated nearly $20,000 to Kinzinger.

>>118120

TYB

great to see u bake again

real helpful too

i wuz gonna sleep - really needed - but talked to fren who had a wild adventure last night instead

now i'm kinda "toast" but will stay a bit

>>118101 pb

>>118102 pb

hullo der

one of ya'll is doc

howdy frens

>>118126

>>https://rsbnetwork.com/news/president-trump-headlines-rsbns-2021-year-in-review-show/

The special will also feature special guests including GETTR CEO Jason Miller, Rep. Matt Gaetz,

RSBN’s Grace Saldana, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, Republican activist Scott Presler,

and Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake.

screenCAP on TruthSocial:

Trump talkin' terminated, total killers, terminators, people terminating themselves {from twitter}, ..."

faceBOOK btw

"people outta drop off twitter."

President Trump Interview featured in ‘Year In Review 2021 with RSBN’

2,806 views

Dec 30, 2021

https://youtu.be/fuQ7xcLXPK8 { archiving / compressing for next post }

>>118128

>President Trump Interview featured in ‘Year In Review 2021 with RSBN’

>2,806 views

>Dec 30, 2021

>https://youtu.be/fuQ7xcLXPK8 { archiving / compressing for next post }

https://t.me/CovidRedPills/11148

[ Video ]

🇧🇷🔥 Citizens in Brazil beat the shit out of the Mayor of Toritama who mandated vaccine passports to eat and mandatory vaccinations for children. ⚡️💥

https://t.me/BREAKINGHEADLINES/1331

[ Photo ]

Facts Matter with Roman Balmakov (Dec. 30): 7 States Rebel Against Pentagon: Won’t Comply with National Guard Vaccine Mandates

WATCH: https://breakingheadlines.news/pI9k8Z

@BREAKINGHEADLINES

https://t.me/realKarliBonne/63092

'''[ Video ]

President Donald J Trump interview on RSBN December 30th 2021'''

>>118132

https://t.me/realKarliBonne/63093

[ Video ]

A victory in 2022 - you’re going to have a tremendous republican victory for that beautiful White House it happens to be a White House called the White House you’re going to have a great victory in 24 too - I think we have a chance to take back not only the house but the senate in 22 big chance

I'ma goin, back hurts like a son of a gun

got in a lil news

God bless this board and all who post upon it

AFL Files Brief at SCOTUS Supporting Dr. Carter Page’s Suit Against the DNC, Perkins Coie, Marc Elias, and Michael Sussman for the Russia Collusion Hoax

Wednesday, December 22, 2021

WASHINGTON, DC

– Yesterday, America First Legal (AFL) filed a brief at the Supreme Court of the United States supporting Dr. Carter Page’s effort to hold the Democratic National Committee (DNC),

the law firm of Perkins Coie, Marc Elias, and Michael Sussman accountable for the Russia Collusion hoax, a political dirty trick without parallel in American history.

Based on the investigations conducted by the Department of Justice Office of Inspector General, the oversight work of principled Republican legislators like Rep. Devin Nunes and

Sen. Ron Johnson, and the federal indictments obtained by Special Counsel John Durham against former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith, Perkins Coie partner Sussman,

and Democrat operative Igor Danchenko, the facts are clear.

Working closely with some of the highest ranking political and career officials in the Obama White House and the Department of Justice, the DNC, Perkins Coie, Elias, and

Sussman developed and executed a plan during the 2016 Presidential campaign to distract the public from Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server, and to discredit

then-candidate Donald Trump by tying him to Russia using the fake “Steele Dossier.”

The Steele Dossier’s defamatory claims against Dr. Page, a patriotic American, provided pretext for U.S. government spying against President Trump and his campaign.

When, despite it all, President Trump won the 2016 election, the defendants, their allies in Congress (including certain prominent Republicans), the career civil service,

and the corporate media, turned Russia collusion into a weapon for crippling the President and nullifying the expressed will of the American people.

Statement from America First Legal Vice President and General Counsel Gene Hamilton:

“All conservatives, all people of good will who care about integrity in government and law enforcement, and all who claim to support our Constitution,

should be standing with Dr. Page.

AFL is proud to do so. And AFL will continue to fight alongside Dr. Page, exposing and holding accountable those who perpetrated the Russia Collusion hoax,”

Gene Hamilton said.

Read the Amicus Brief here.

{ 35 pages } https://wordpress.aflegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Carter-Page-Amicus-122121-3.pdf

{ p.24 CONCLUSION The Court should grant the petition for certiorari. Respectfully submitted.

https://qagg.news/?wordsearch=on&q=Carter+Page

3340 (10) (1)

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 05/23/2019 21:53:04 ID: c476fb

Q Clock [ Minute: 52 | :25/:55 Mirror: 58 | 180 Mirror: 22 | :35/:05 Mirror: 18 ]

Anonymous 05/23/2019 21:45:18 ID:a054cb

>>6572243

Carter Page anon. 🤪

>>6572267

Carter Page 'public' FISA.

Remainder are still under classification (until today).

Waterfall of proofs coming (post DECLAS).

Q

Sally Yates 100

SY Traitor/Pawn

Sally Yates is an American lawyer.

She served as a United States Attorney and later United States Deputy Attorney General, having been appointed to both positions by President Barack Obama.

Sally Yates is connected to the Russia hoax and was a signer on the fraudulent Carter Page FISA.

https://qagg.news/?q=%7Bplayer+%20100%7D

>>118135

>https://qagg.news/?q=%7Bplayer+%20100%7D

{ Q Drops: 17 }

examples:

3117 (12) (3)

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 03/18/2019 19:28:44 ID: ebfcff

Q Clock [ Minute: 46 | :25/:55 Mirror: 4 | 180 Mirror: 16 | :35/:05 Mirror: 24 ]

Image Name: Sally_Q._Yates.jpg

Filename: a7b9bb89e6600e20c8fd98f2c21fc0c22130cf24117dffa7c7fda9390a4486c0.jpg

3211 (7) (7)

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 03/26/2019 17:13:38 ID: 1b6cc8

Q Clock [ Minute: 54 | :25/:55 Mirror: 56 | 180 Mirror: 24 | :35/:05 Mirror: 16 ]

Anonymous 03/26/2019 17:07:28 ID:599478

>>5908738

Whoa Q…these texts are from 2016. Long before RR became DAG!

>>5908881

If Sally Yates (SHE) was DAG during this period of time what does (HE) refer to re: DAG?

Was [RR] planned to assume DAG at that point in time?

Bake your noodle.

Q

>>118135

>AFL Files Brief at SCOTUS Supporting Dr. Carter Page’s Suit Against the DNC,

duh sawz:

https://www.aflegal.org/news/afl-files-brief-at-scotus-supporting-dr-carter-pages-suit-against-the-dnc-perkins-coie-marc-elias-and-michael-sussman-for-the-russia-collusion-hoax

~ breakin' for viddles n fuel foods, muhNoodle brief ...

~ out

~ goodKnight >>118134

>got in a lil news

<>God bless this board and all who post upon it

!o7

Part of an extended decode on DOJ, Russiagate, Comey, and related topics (Flynn, Pence)

Prior segment start points, pb: >>115813, >>116087, >>117057

Most recent, pb: >>117060

In the prior installment, I started arguing for the proposition that Comey is a straight-up white hat.

Several anons replied...

>>117080 pb

>>Comey a white hat

>hmmm....he's got a lot against against him

>acts like a jerk, among other things

>and bff with brennan

>but i'm sure there will be surprises at the end

>we'll see.

>>117081 pb

>corney ain’t no white hat

>>117082 pb, >>117086 pb anti-Comey memes

I have much more reasoning to provide, in this and in coming installments.

But let me explain my basic strategy for replying to the objections.

First, the vast bulk of the "hard evidence" against Comey has to do with his active fostering of the attempt to take down Trump via the Russia hoax.

But this totally failed and humiliated the enemy.

Earlier posts pointed to the idea that our team intentionally directed the enemey towards precisely this counterattack, and if I am right, then Comey was a key player in leading them to debacle.

This means that any "moves" Comey made to support the Russia hoax do not count against him.

Second, the positive evidence for Comey as a white hat utterly hinges on the fact that his actions with respect to the HRC email inquiries seem to have actually swung the 2016 election to Trump.

I have more on this shortly.

But it is crucial to isolate the issues.

Did Comey contribute to the Russia hoax? Yes.

Did Comey contribute to Trump's Electoral College victory? Yes, almost certainly.

How do we reconcile these two apparent facts?

I am progressively building a case that the best way to do this is to read Comey as a player on our team.

Third, I grant that many anons see Comey as a jerk.

Consider that this negative perception arises partially from the apparent mismatch between his cultivated innocence and the seemingly duplicitious stuff that he has done.

But I think much of this duplicitious stuff turns out to benefit our team.

Still, I think it also worth considering that strong personalities do not always do every little thing as we might wish.

The most obvious case, of course, is Trump.

But that actually goes for most of the top players on the white hat team.

For instance, contrast Trump, Bannon and Flynn.

They have three totally different personalities, but they all strive to bring it to the game in their own way.

Maybe Comey just has his own way of doing things which might in the endgame prove rather attractive to some who have been duped.

>>118140

>>117084 pb

>bet he was the first deal they made to kick this off, fired doesn't begin to describe what he's gone through

>kek

>walkin ded

>he loves his kids

>what a father won't do

>*flip*

This anon suggests that Comey is not a white hat, but was nonetheless flipped to act for the white hat team, what some call a grey hat perhaps.

I will mostly hold off an examination of that issue, since I want to note the underlying presupposition, that Comey has indeed acted for the white hat team.

The most obvious way in which he seems to have done so was in his treatment of the HRC email inquiries.

This would seem to be the view that Q directly pushes, especially in Q36.

I have highlighted the portions most directly relevant.

Recall that the Bill Clinton/Loretta Lynch "tarmac meeting" was June 27.

Loretta Lynch was Attorney General, and Bill Clinton "just happened" to run into her on airplane tarmac where he claimed he chatted about grandkids.

The speculation is that he offered her a seat on the Supreme Court if she could make the email case go away.

Then on July 5, Comey pops up and announces that Hillary will not be charged.

Did Lynch "get the message" and get Comey in line?

Think this out very carefully.

On the surface, letting Hillary off the hook seems like a bad thing.

But suppose Comey had done the "right" thing and fired all missiles in order to prosecute and convict.

Would Andrew Cuomo be in his second term right now?

The black hats could have "sacrificed" Hillary just like they seem to be sacrificing Ghislaine.

In July, they had time to replace her with a "new face" who could go head-to-head with Trump.

It seems like a bad joke now, but at the time, I think Cuomo might have seemed an excellent replacement candidate.

A brusque and "alpha male" New Yorker, but one from a traditional political family who didn't have all sorts of outlandish "baggage".

I wonder if he was being "held" for that very role.

But Comey said that Hillary should not be charged.

Jumping ahead, Q insinuates that Comey was then "forced into the spotlight" just before the election.

He is talking about the reopening of the email inquiry on October 28.

To say that this "cast suspicion" on Hillary is a great understatement, I think.

But look ahead... Q suggests that the prospect of a Hillary victory would have required military action.

The insinuation is that white hats in the military would have sought to take power in an outright coup.

That would have been an extremely risky venture, so it makes sense that they would go all out in order to win at the ballot box.

Q is saying that forcing Comey to reopen the HRC inquiry was part of that plan.

Obviously, Hillary took a big hit from the very fact that this topic was again in the news so close to the election.

But when Comey closed the inquiry and stuck to his original claim that she should not be charged, this was outrageous.

If the "new evidence" had been so serious that Comey had to "risk" swaying the election by announcing that she was again under investigation, then nobody with any sense would believed it had been adequately examined in just nine days.

It seemed quite obvious that Hillary was getting "special treatment".

I mean quite obvious to any halfway intelligent potential voter.

Remember that Hillary fully expected to win, even on election night.

She did not concede until Obama told her too.

Q says that the white hats somehow warned Obama that he better do so.

I have no idea how literally true that is if true at all.

But I do think Obama's role in this points to the value of the very late move against Hillary.

The deep state (morons with credentials, connections and cash) was seemingly oblivious to the actual state of the electorate and did not seem to have an effective countermove prepared.

(They fixed that in 2020.)

But Obama shut that down when he got Hillary to concede.

It seems to me that he might well have done this of his own accord.

They seem to genuinely dislike each other (BO & HRC), and perhaps Obama, being a very self-absorbed guy, simply wanted to prevent his reputation from getting tarnished.

And he very likely underestimated Trump.

I am speculating on a few points, and perhaps getting some things wrong.

What isn't wrong is that Q really does suggest that white hats used Comey's reopening of the HRC case to swing the election.

Whether Comey was forced or not is a separate question.

>>118141

The idea that Comey, and especially the Oct 28 letter, swung the election to Trump has not received adequate attention, and I suspect that is largely because the person

most associated with promulgating this idea is Hillary Clinton herself.

The most "objective" analysis that I know of is by pro-Democrat stats guy Nate Silver:

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-comey-letter-probably-cost-clinton-the-election/

https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/855800824567562240

Hillary herself has cited Silver's analysis to justify her whining.

Here are some other pro-Clinton discussions that "blame" Comey:

https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/1/11/14215930/comey-email-election-clinton-campaign

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/02/james-comey-fbi-director-letter archived: https://archive.ph/spc71

Here are some critiques of that view from an anti-Clinton leftist:

https://mtracey.medium.com/comey-cost-hillary-the-election-is-a-groundless-liberal-myth-9a8957051b65

https://medium.com/theyoungturks/why-we-cant-quit-hillary-the-comey-delusion-b64fb98a3877

Here is my take on that back-and-forth:

It seems likely to me that Silver is basically right when it comes to the statistical analysis.

I did not at all scour his reasoning for fatal flaws, but it seems viable.

It certainly fits with what I have come to believe for a number of other reasons that I am presenting.

But then Silver makes some dubious jumps.

Having apparently established that Comey did swing the election, he thinks there is something wrong with that.

He seems to think that Clinton is actually innocent, and so Comey's actions should not have influenced voters.

But he realizes that they did, and so Silver assigns blame.

He blames the media for being obsessed with exciting stories and stuff like that.

The other guy Tracey fires back at Silver and points out that Clinton is guilty as hell.

Even if she was not legally guilty in the email case, she was guilty of doing all sorts of things that any normal person would see as corrupt.

And the DNC was guilty of allowing this compromised candidate to become their nominee.

The upshot is that the really interesting thing, the fact that Comey seems to have swung the election, ends up getting buried in leftist infighting.

Hillary says Comey is to blame for her failure.

Semi-reasonable leftists slam back and so no, the problem is that Hillary is a corrupt profiteering politician.

None of them really undertakes to investigate how it came about that Comey swung the election.

On the flip side, not many in the pro-Trump camp seem to delve into this either.

I suppose some might think that according Comey a key role amounts to calling the Trump victory a fluke, and so disparages the vast grassroots effort that many know made it happen.

But I don't think there was any fluke at all.

>>118142

It is utterly central to the case I am building that we take seriously the idea that Comey's email shenanigans swung the election, so I'll try one additional argument route.

I will very loosely describe my own personal recollections of how these things went down, and then consider a variety of "characters" who might have been swayed by the same events, but not exactly in the way that I was.

My political background is somewhat eclectic, so I'll skip that.

Let's just say I was not particularly enamoured of Trump at first.

I was following all of the email stuff: DNC leaks, Podesta/Pizzagate and Hillary's servers.

When Comey first let Hillary off the hook, my main reaction was perplexity.

I was still pretty naive then, I guess.

I slowly warmed to the idea that maybe Trump was really the guy needed to smash the corruption.

When Comey reopened the case I was ecstatic.

I thought they were going to nail that bitch for sure.

And then came the rage.

On Election Day I had a small window in which I could vote.

And I went out there and pulled the lever for DONALD FUCKING TRUMP!!!!

When he came out for the victory speech, I was drunk as hell, but I was ECSTATIC!

From that point on I felt like I had ALWAYS been part of the team.

(And in my case I think that mattered, since "the work" was just beginning...)

But that's me.

Let's invent some characters.

And remember that many people hated both major-party candidates, and thought they were the two worst ever.

Also remember that there were three somewhat prominent third-party candidates: Jill Stein (Green), Gary Johnson (Libertarian) and Evan McMullin (Never Trump).

(McMullin could have theoretically won had he won Utah, placing third nationally, and so putting him in the mix if the House had to decide the election.)

Consider a somewhat intellectual social conservative. He is not thrilled with Trump and all the strippers and casinos.

Maybe McMullin or a write-in seem viable.

He is not into "conspiracy theories" about hidden cabals, when so much can be explained by people being raised in a society that cares very little for cultivating virtue.

But letting HRC off the hook again is a travesty of justice that signals an utter abdication of the government's duty to enforce the law.

He goes and votes for Trump.

Consider a guy not really into politics since they are all losers.

Maybe he spends a lot of time online with music, games, videos, etc.

He can't stand the obnoxious SJW's and is somewhat into meme culture and trolling and larping.

He follows some of the political stuff but it is all still somewhat of an online game.

Maybe being a Trump fanboi is a little too cringe but how the fuck are they letting that bitch escape justice again?!

Why not go vote? For TRUMP.

Consider a guy who maybe has an IT job.

He is pretty good at his job and married with kids.

He is non-political.

But he can't stand HR and their bullshit.

The diversity hires and the total morons and absurd rules just seem to accumulate.

He sometimes votes out of duty and sometimes doesn't bother, but letting her off is just too much.

He knows he would be fired IMMEDIATELY if he ever tried to pull something like that.

He goes to vote for Trump.

>>118143

(had to chop that post into two)

Consider a guy who hates Wall Street and knows they are corrupt bastards who don't "earn" their wealth in any meaningful sense at all.

He supported Sanders and knows the DNC screwed him.

Maybe he's a bit peeved that Sanders didn't find back more.

He knows he "should" support Hillary because... reasons.

But that Goldman Sachs speech... and they're letting her off again!

She is JUST AS BAD AS TRUMP.

He does NOT go to vote for Hillary.

Consider a nice lady who goes to church and always votes for Democrats since they care more.

She watches a lot of TV news.

She knows that Hillary seems to be a not-so-nice word.

But she always votes for Democrats.

She has some errands to do and some Kohl's cash.

If she doesn't spend it today she will lose it.

She has to watch her expenses and there are some deals.

Now it is getting to be dinner time and she doesn't have the energy to go stand in line at night.

Hillary: -1.

I am trying to be fair.

Consider a self-pitying bitch.

Everyone tries to get her even though she is always trying to do the right thing.

She usually doesn't vote because she hates those shysters but the persecution Hillary endures....

She goes to vote for Hillary.

I think you can get the picture.

It is MUCH easier to construct characters who gave Trump a net +1 due to Comey's actions.

You don't need to suppose that many actually switched their vote from HRC to Trump.

Comey got the job done with the +1's and -1's.

I'll pause there for today.

All my posts in this installment aimed at building the case that Comey's actions in the Clinton email case swung the election.

Did white hats aim to use Comey for this purpose? Probably yes.

Did the actual events support the view that this happened? Seemingly yes.

Does this all intuitively make sense? I think so.

I haven't yet tried to build the case that Comey acted freely as a white hat (as opposed to being forced), but I think both Comey and Q have dropped some clues relating to this and I hope to post some very interesting decodes soon.

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

(but we've got to win in 2022!)

>>118133

>>118132

17 mins left when President Trump starts

picrel

morn'n all

been couple of days since i have been on. still pretty sick. healing naturally. better 1/2 on zpck.

day 3 and my 24/7 pounding headache is gone

back still feels very scratchy and sensitive

throat feel like i have strep today but no swollen nodes.

ran out of zinc today, but took sum c and d

fatigue is still there. could go back to bed but rn it's no more comfy dan sit'n in my 1bdrm apt chair. starting to feel like i am approaching the end of the tunnel tho. wakes always positive yo's.

deez fuggers all need to be hunted down for this ongoing attack

>>118147

Sorry you're still feeling it

Hang in there, usually over quickly

Project Veritas FOIA’d The DOJ/FBI’s Communications With Reporters, Including New York Times – James O’Keefe: “Sh*t’s About To Get Real. #2022”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/project-veritas-foiad-doj-fbis-communications-reporters-including-new-york-times-james-okeefe-shts-get-real-2022/

Sh*t is about to get real, because last Thursday, Project Veritas FOIA’d the Department of Justice and The FBI, in request of the following items.

All memoranda, e-mails or other communications or records created or exchanged since August 1, 2020, that refer to or otherwise address the FBI and DOJ investigation into Project Veritas and the alleged theft of Ashley Biden’s diary, or other personal property or personal effects. A communication should be considered responsive to this request if it refers to the diary, or other personal property or personal effects, allegedly belonging to Ashley Biden and, at a minimum, any of the following: the FBI’s search of James O’Keefe’s home; James O’Keefe; Project Veritas; efforts to monitor Project Veritas; whether Project Veritas is a news organization; and whether Project Veritas reporters are journalists.

All memoranda, e-mails, or other communications or records created or exchanged since January1, 2020, discussing (i) James O’Keefe; or (ii) Project Veritas or Project Veritas staff, representatives, or agents, including, but not limited to, Jered Ede, Paul Calli, and Ben Barr.

All communications discussing or referring to James O’Keefe, Project Veritas, or its staff, representatives, or agents exchanged between DOJ or FBI personnel and any representative of a news organization including, but not limited to, the New York Times and New York Times reporters Michael Grynbaum, Marc Tracy, Mark Mazzetti, Michael Schmidt, William Rashbaum, and Adam Goldman.

In addition to records and communications exchanged between DOJ personnel, between DOJ personnel and representatives of other government agencies, or between DOJ personnel and members of the public, we request all responsive records and communications exchanged between DOJ personnel and any of the following: White House personnel, Executive Office of the President personnel, Secret Service personnel, Joe Biden, Ashley Biden, any other member or representative of the Biden family, including Roberta Kaplan and any other attorneys or agents of the Biden family, and Biden presidential campaign personnel.

See the full FOIA request here.

https://assets.ctfassets.net/syq3snmxclc9/7aAOmnS8avoWI6BtTjvVUw/ed6eecead2572fb4d822752560dfe917/Redacted_Project_Veritas_-_FOIA_Request__2021.12.23_-1-_copy.pdf

Last month, The FBI executed raids on Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe and multiple PV reporters.

TGP reported that The New York Times was the first to publish the story and request comment on the confidential investigation, immediately after raids were conducted.

The FBI was apparently looking for Ashley Biden’s “stolen” diary.

The Gateway Pundit reported that the FBI colluded with the New York Times and leaked this story to them, per the New York Times.

This investigation into Ashley Biden’s diary is a deep state witch hunt and even the courts know it.

James O’Keefe received a copy of the diary from an anonymous tipper, but he did not publish it because he could not confirm its legitimacy. He turned the copy of the diary over to law enforcement.

No crime has been committed.

This is a politically charged attempt by the federal government to take Project Veritas down.

See the full timeline of events, here.

https://www.projectveritas.com/fbi/

Get ready for the FOIA Officers’ responses! Happy New Year!

>>118150

https://t.me/realx22reportchat/1362302

FLURONA 🤣🤣

>>118158

>>118162

oops... brain isn't all there today

Let’s Go Brandon Crypto Coin to Become NASCAR Driver Brandon Brown’s Primary Sponsor #LGBCoin.io

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/go-brandon-crypto-coin-become-nascar-driver-brandon-browns-primary-sponsor/

>>118147

oh wakers, glad they is lite at the end of the tunnel for you, took a couple of weeks to shake it off and feel human again

of course you always pos yo, imma the dank cynic

that was the prollem I had in 19, not comfy sitting up but couldn't lay down either, what to do

take care yoself and yours too

not easy

>>118164

thx bro. habby tgif and new years eve

>>118165

>>118166

kek

>>118162

>>118163

They'll cry "sexual appropriation" when they figure it out

I don’t normally give financial advice but it’s time to buy LgbtqCoin!

TikTok bans Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitton

“Permanently banned." "No warning."

https://reclaimthenet.org/tiktok-bans-judicial-watchs-tom-fitton/

The president of anti-corruption group Judicial Watch Tom Fitton was permanently banned on TikTok.

Judicial Watch is a conservative group that focuses on exposing corruption and misconduct by government officials.

Judicial Watch revealed the ban through Instagram. According to Fitton, his account was suspended without warning.

The Instagram post read: “From Judicial Watch President @TomFitton: Well, the communists running #TikTok just “permanently banned” my account. No warning.”

TikTok has been criticized because of its ties to the Chinese government. Its parent company ByteDance is based in Beijing and the company has been linked to the Chinese Communist Party. Critics fear that the popular social media app is used by the Chinese government to spy on the world as well as influence people through algorithms.

How it started/ How it’s going.

>>118176

QDDITY / koinQidinks:

WHO_shaved_71sec_from RSBN youTube_wPDJT.2021.12.30

^> https://youtu.be/B3tv3ANHNaE / just PDJT interview: https://youtu.be/fuQ7xcLXPK8 { runtime 16:17 }

>>118128

^ screenCAP shows end time 1:38:50

RSBN start at 21:00h

The duration is 1 hour, 38 minutes and 50 seconds

<17 5930 seconds

<17 98 minutes (rounded down)

1 hour (rounded down)

0.02% of 2021

6.86% of a 24 hour day { 6 + 8 + 6 = 20 = T }

>>118145

>17 mins left when President Trump starts

^ screenCAP shows end time 1:37:39

The duration is 1 hour, 37 minutes and 39 seconds

5859 seconds { 5+8+5+9 = 27 = [9] }

<16 97 minutes (rounded down) { 1 + 6 = [7] ( ^ + [9] = 16 = [7] ) }

1 hour (rounded down)

0.02% of 2021

6.78% of a 24 hour day { 6 + 7 + 8 = 21 = U(N_i_VersaL ONES_aka_111 / 777 or 3x7) }

WHY U(N_i_VersaL ONES_aka_111 / 777 or 3x7 )

{ RSBN start at 21:00h to end }:

From: Thursday, December 30, 2021 at 10:37:39 pm

To: Thursday, December 30, 2021 at 10:38:50 pm

Result: 0 hours, 1 minute, 11 seconds 00:01:11 { 1+1+1 = 3 }

The duration is 0 hours, 1 minute and 11 seconds

< 71 seconds { think mirrOR 17 /|\ 71 }

1 minute (rounded down)

0.00% of 2021

0.08% of a 24 hour day { 8 = [7] + 1 =[H] }

(((who?who?OVVL? THEY = U(N_i_VersaL ONES))) shaved 71 seconds from first or orig TStamp ?!?!?

<>end time 1:38:50 { 1+3+8+5+0 = 17 }

end time 1:37:39 { 1+3+7+3+9 =23}

>>118178

>lemme know

tybb

comma dere

118133 >>118145 President Donald Trump

>{ VPN change ID c43374 }

>>118147

howdy pardner

Day 5 for me - slight fever, throat, headache, backache, big fatigue, sneezing, phlegm

zelenko regimen, whole 9 yds coz i'm older

hit so fast - like BAM

never had a cold do dat, usual come gradually, take tons of vit c and it goes

FEEL BETTER SOON

Putin warns Biden sanctions will be a 'colossal mistake' and threatens to SEVER ties

US president urges Russian leader to 'de-escalate' during high-stakes phone call and says West will 'respond decisively' if he 'further invades' Ukraine

- Both sides threatened consequences if Ukraine crisis is not resolved quickly

- Biden and Putin talked by telephone for 50 minutes on Thursday afternoon

- The Russian president said new sanctions would lead to the complete breakdown in relations between Washington and Moscow, said the Kremlin

- Russia has deployed almost 100,000 troops close to the border with Ukraine

- Putin says he wants guarantees that Ukraine will not be admitted to NATO

- Earlier it emerged that a US spy plane had been spotted over eastern Ukraine

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10356959/Biden-calls-Putin-Delaware-home-Air-Force-flew-SECOND-spy-plane-Ukraine.html

from /qr/

Germany shuts half of its nuclear plants amid energy crisis

Europe falling into trap of green energy policy, expert says

Germany is shutting down three nuclear power plants on Friday, in a move to halve the country’s remaining nuclear capacity. The measure comes despite the worst ever energy crises the European region has experienced.

The closures, which come as a result of decision to completely phase out atomic energy, taken by Angela Merkel after the Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011, is expected to tighten the current squeeze on gas and energy prices.

Berlin is planning to completely wind down atomic energy by the end of 2022, when its final three plants in Neckarwestheim, Essenbach and Emsland shut.

German state officials can’t prevent the shutdown of nuclear power plants, since they are in somewhat of a bind when it comes to the “green economy,” according to Alexey Mukhin, director of the Center for Political Information.

“Angela Merkel’s decision to shut down nuclear reactors after the disaster at Fukushima has been denounced as bureaucratic,” the analyst said.

“The federal government should have taken very serious efforts to prevent the next scheduled shutdown, but, apparently, they are not allowed to do this by the so-called new rules of the green economy.”

With energy prices across the continent soaring to the unseen levels, the timing of the German plan’s coming to fruition could hardly be worse. In December, Dutch TTF reached €187.78 per megawatt hour, which is 10 times higher than at the start of the year, while electricity prices are soaring as well.

According to Mukhin, the country’s authorities fell into a trap that had been set by Berlin.The expert expressed bewilderment over the dogged attempts by the EU at pushing green energy policies forward amid the worst energy crunch that is most markedly straining the wallet of the European citizens.

“The energy crisis should correct the global economy and ‘green’ policy, but this does not happen, due to the stubbornness, pride and prejudice, even the snobbery and tenacity, of European partners,” Mukhin said.

https://www.rt.com/business/544897-europe-germany-green-policy-trap/

Politics

The D.C. Brief

Biden’s Been Counted Out Before—And Loves To Prove the Haters Wrong

By Philip Elliott

December 31, 2021 7:00 AM EST

{ excerpt only / mostly prop-garbage }:

It’s been an easy idea to hold over the years, a tempting one at times, really: Joe Biden is dunzo and isn’t coming back from this setback. The 1972 death of his wife and daughter, before he even got sworn into office. The plagiarism scandal that ushered him from the 1988 presidential race. A less-than-1% showing in Iowa 20 years later. The death of Beau Biden. A “gut punch” of a fourth-place finish in Iowa in 2020. And yet Biden got up off the mat every time. Joe Biden doesn’t always win, but he certainly doesn’t quit.

That’s why, as Biden ends 2021 and noodles the lessons learned from his first year in the Oval Office, it’s tempting to write him off as irrelevant, a has-been placeholder. But that would be a mistake, because being Biden means never letting adversity have the final word. In fact, the talkative president seldom lets anyone have the last say.

Every President puts his—and, yes, to this point it remains an all-boys club—mark on Washington, and Biden is no exception. He has brought back some sense of civility and compromise missing during the previous four years. He’s as buttoned-down a President as has walked the West Wing since George H.W. Bush. Unlike his immediate predecessor, errant, middle-of-the-night tweets aren’t a problem. And, with some trepidation, America’s allies are starting to recognize the Washington they’ve known in the post-World War II era.

But there’s still a sense of disappointment, even among Biden’s allies.

... blah caffff cafff hork ...

https://time.com/6130410/joe-biden-2021/

CDC’s Sudden Change in Quarantine Guidance Exposes Arbitrary Nature of Covid Policy

By Philip Klein

December 28, 2021 8:52 AM

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention just halved the recommended quarantine period for individuals who test positive for Covid and also reduced the time period for those who have been exposed.

In a statement, CDC said, “CDC is shortening the recommended time for isolation from 10 days for people with COVID-19 to 5 days, if asymptomatic, followed by 5 days of wearing a mask when around others. The change is motivated by science demonstrating that the majority of SARS-CoV-2 transmission occurs early in the course of illness, generally in the 1-2 days prior to onset of symptoms and the 2-3 days after.”

There are a few ways to look at this change. One idea — the least believable — is that our scientific understanding of Covid has changed so dramatically in recent days that it prompted this change. The other possibility is that it was an arbitrary standard to begin with, derived out of “an abundance of caution” that was never firmly supported by science. It’s become simply too inconvenient now that Omicron is ripping through the professional class.

Anthony Fauci’s comments on CNN point toward the second explanation.

"The reason is that with the sheer volume of new cases that we are having and that we expect to continue with Omicron, one of the things we want to be careful of is that we don't have so many people out," Dr. Anthony Fauci explains why CDC changed Covid isolation guidelines. pic.twitter.com/g48XwcDdJh

— The Situation Room (@CNNSitRoom) December 27, 2021

The reason why this is so revealing is that for nearly two years now, we’ve been told we have to “trust the science.” Every time somebody has argued that we cannot be so myopically focused on Covid, and we have to balance our interest in Covid mitigation against the harm and disruption to people’s lives caused by draconian guidance, they have been attacked as being anti-science, and even as participants of a death cult. But in his answer, Fauci is arguing that it’s prudent to match our Covid mitigation practices with practical concerns. This is what we should have been doing all along.

This should be an eye-opening moment for those who treated the public-health community as all-knowing and deferred to them at every twist and turn. It would be a good opportunity to now ignore CDC’s other arbitrary and destructive guidance, starting with masking in schools.

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/cdcs-sudden-change-in-quarantine-guidance-exposes-arbitrary-nature-of-covid-policy/

https://twitter.com/philipaklein/status/1476755920608710658

@philipaklein

Reminder that when Ted Cruz went to Cancun during Texas energy crisis, AOC blasted him for "abandon[ing] his constituents" https://nationalreview.com/news/aoc-spotted-in-miami-beach-as-nyc-reports-record-covid-cases/

>>118192

>abandon[ing]

https://qagg.news/?q=[ing]

https://qagg.news/?q=%5Bing%5D { Q Drops: 4 }

das-~st[ing]

3689 (26) (8)

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 12/15/2019 16:55:10 ID: 6c75be

Q Clock [ Minute: 18 | :25/:55 Mirror: 32 | 180 Mirror: 48 | :35/:05 Mirror: 52 ]

...

>>7517634

Time[ing] is important.

How many coincidences [use of coincidences essential not to violate NAT SEC?] before mathematically impossible?

FISA = START

Q

>>118195

>>118191

>what a compelling argument by Time

/s

>>118196

<>GMax dindu Herself.

https://t.me/realKarliBonne/63203

Betty White Dead at 99

>>118198

yeh, i'ma going soon too

come n go, won't be forever

blessings

https://t.me/realKarliBonne/63205

https://nypost.com/2021/12/30/ghislaine-maxwell-veridct-could-kill-prince-andrews-return/amp/

Yesterday’s sex-trafficking convictions for Ghislaine Maxwell could make it hard for Prince Andrew to get what he wants: his old life back.

The Duke of York, 61 — who once hosted Maxwell at Buckingham Palace, where she even sat on a royal throne — was banned from his public duties over his friendship with the madam, who groomed and recruited young girls for the late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. The prince now faces a civil suit from Virginia Giuffre, who claims Maxwell and Epstein trafficked her and forced her to sleep with Andrew on three occasions when she was 17.

Just this week, Andrew’s legal team tried to get the case thrown out, insisting that Giuffre is not a US resident and lives in Australia. The prince’s lawyers claim that would mean she lacks the ability to sue the royal in New York through “diversity jurisdiction,” which does not allow US citizens who live abroad to sue in federal court...

https://nypost.com/2021/12/30/ghislaine-maxwell-veridct-could-kill-prince-andrews-return/amp/

https://t.me/ReinerFuellmichEnglish/218

[ Photo ]

Ad-hoc 20 | In conversation with Pather Dr. Karel Gržan

Corona Investigative Committee

One of the most respected Slovenian thinkers, the author of highly respected and highly acclaimed books, Pater Dr. Karli Gržan, spoke with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and Viviane Fischer of the Corona Investigative Committee.

"We are seeing a huge hypnosis that is successfull because everybody cooperates: the media and also the religios institutions."

There are two video-versions available:

➥ A recommended short version in English only, with the Slovenian parts missing 🇺🇸

(https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/Ad-hoc_20_short_english_fixed2:1)➥ A long version with the slovenian parts 🇺🇸/🇸🇮

(https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/Ad-hoc_20_complete:b)Lawyer Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, go to the channel here:

t.me/ReinerFuellmichEnglish

https://t.me/ReinerFuellmichEnglish/219

[ Photo ]

Session 85: "Rethinking"

Dec. 31 from approx. 11:00 a.m. CET (https://www.worldtimebuddy.com/) (Berlin Time)!

Here you can go directly to the:

➥ Odysee Video 🇺🇸

(https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/s85:b)➥ Youtube Video 🇺🇸

(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJIBYSJ-3yc)➥ Dlive Video 🇺🇸

(https://dlive.tv/CoronaInvestigative?ref=coronainvestigative)➥ Here's to the inserts of the session 📺

(https://t.me/ReinerFuellmich_Multimedia/133)➥ Here you can find the link to the German stream 🇩🇪

(https://t.me/ReinerFuellmich/675)Topic excerpt:

▫️Greening deserts and more: concrete technologies revealing resource crisis and population growth limit are lies

▫️Highest UK court overturns ruling to revoke a doctor's license

▫️First criminal complaint launched against UK government officials for criminal misconduct in public office relating to the Covid vaccine roll-out

▫️World's first vaccine-murder lawsuit launched against Bill Gates in India

▫️"Humane Economics" and the Science of Social Tripartism

Lawyer Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, go to the channel here:

t.me/ReinerFuellmichEnglish

>>118205

din last long on YT this time....

nabben imminent n warmth covers are callin'

"Stay Healthy Frens"

!o7

<King of the tards

>>118205

Holly fuck

>>118215

Haven't listened to the Corona cmte report this week, just posted it, but saw someplace that, yes, the thing applied with Pfizer as with Moderna - there are a handful of batches that are much more toxic.

Will listen soon. Gotta finish eating my RAW steak. Heard it's chock full of ZINC - man's gotta do what a man's gotta do.

Sorry can't share wid everbody.....

>>118222

no longer on bitchute but archived on wayback -

https://web.archive.org/web/20211221105625/https://www.bitchute.com/video/OG1NLvZQ4JFu/

Death by Alphabet - Moderna Batch Codes and Associated Deaths

BATCHES J, K, L, M = most deadly

BATCHES A, B, C, D, E, F = least deadly

>>118224

https://hillmd.substack.com/p/vaccine-batches-vary-in-toxicity

The investigator is Craig Paardekooper. Here is an UPDATED ARTICLE showing results for both Moderna and Pfizer.

Death by Alphabet

UPDATED ARTICLE, 12-22-2021

Researcher Craig Paardekooper (Kingston University, London) claims US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data show vaccine batches are sequentially marked by varying toxicity.

Paardekooper claims:

- VAERS shows about 1 in 200 vaccine batches (~ 0.5%) are “highly toxic,” having a high number (1000-5000 times the baseline rate) of severe adverse reactions — including hospitalization, disability, and death — in the short term, i.e., within a few days or weeks of injection.

- 70% have only one short-term adverse event reported.

- 80% have only one or two short-term adverse events reported.

- The toxic batches are distributed among all 50 US states.

You can look up VAERS data on how toxic batches are at http://howbad.info, at least unless and until they change the batch numbering system further to conceal toxic batches.

Ex-Pfizer VP and Chief Scientific Officer Michael Yeadon, PhD:

Dose range finding for lethal outcomes

- There are 4-5 different sets of lots … in the US showing this DRF [dose range finding] effect.

- Worse, there is a quiet period between each of the lethal batches, the purpose of which is clearly baseline establishment.

Source: https://t.me/robinmg/12207

The final, chilling observation is all three companies are doing similar, sinister studies.

They’re operating so as to not run over each other. When company A is deploying lethal batches, companies B & C are deploying only harmless batches.

Source: https://rense.com/general96/toxic-01.pdf

'If Paardekooper is correct, the implications are profound: we could be facing mass murder through coercion of Americans to play Russian roulette by vaccination.'

This warrants investigation by Congress, the Department of Justice, and state attorneys general.

Paardekooper‘s VAERS analysis should be replicated or refuted by others, including government investigators, as soon as possible.

Paardekooper:

Here is the video presentation by Craig Paardekooper recommended by Dr. Yeadon:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/keoCmPh3vuiG/

Pardekooper: Patterns of Deployment of Toxic Covid Vaccine Batches:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/6xIYPZBkydsu/

"There is a striking change in batch numbers for the Moderna deployment once toxicity exceeds 1780 x. The batch number changes to ending with 20A. Below this range, almost all the batches in the toxicity range of 100-1780 x have batch numbers ending with 21A."

How to download VAERS data to Excel for analyzing batch toxicity and verifying Paardekooper’s findings:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/EPQPrWBQzi6d/

"It appears adverse effects are not random, but are rather the product of dosage testing within various toxic ranges, each denoted by a particular alphanumeric sequential code."

Source: https://t.me/CovidScienceLibrary/371

Moderna used the alphabet to label vaccines of varying toxicity, claims Paardekooper:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/vImdZ7WsV9iW/

Paardekooper video (12/7/21) claims VAERS data show deaths vary by batch.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/OG1NLvZQ4JFu/

He says deaths decrease “in a linear fashion as the alphabetic [batch] designation ascends. Batches can cause 1x [to] 7x the number of deaths, depending on their alphabetic designation.”

"In this video I show how number of deaths per batch also decreases as the alphabetic designation ascends."

This video demonstrates that -

1. There are different ranges of toxicity for different batches.

2. These ranges of toxicity are distinct from each other.

3. These ranges of toxicity are each labelled with a different letter of the alphabet

4. Toxicity decreases in a linear fashion as the alphabetic designation ascends

As a result, batches can cause 1x, 2x, 3x, 4x, 5x, 6x, or 7x the number of deaths, depending on their alphabetic designation.

Moderna has labelled their vaccine batches in accordance with their toxicity [including deaths].

Source: https://t.me/CovidScienceLibrary/377

Paardekooper video (12/10/21) claims VAERS data show disabilities vary by batch.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/C4UJNsiH82sR/

>>118227

entire article:

https://hillmd.substack.com/p/vaccine-batches-vary-in-toxicity