08fbbb No.7690 [View All]
This thread is for Philosophy about esoteric physics. Debunking climate science, and other fun stuff
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.7997
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
The Ultimate Prompt to Unlock 100% of ChatGPT-5’s Power (FREE)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3fqZf-zfBY
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.7999
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
MUST SEE! Pocahontas LOSES IT When RFK Jr. DROPS TRUTH BOMB!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_k4Fcepizd4
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8000
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8001
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
0dca96 No.8002
Hello Din
How are you going.
Have you had any insights of late on where to go from here.
I have had another minor discovery that is based on the work done already. Perhaps we have covered it already? But it will just complicate what we already know. Are we moving forward ir just taking a "Mind break"
Regards Jopo
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8003
>>8002
Hi Jopo,
Yea. Mind break from time to time is good. To let things sink in and see the broader picture
Every new discovery is great.
Regarding the order of the papers.
Could make electric universe spaper series and planetary/atmosphere science paper series
And could regarding the planetary/atmosphere series start with model F. Then introducing the height between 1 bar and the outer layer of the atmosphere. Followed up by how many scale heights that is and how to do the up and down from 1 bar temperature prediction
Followed by model A. Showing it also works with a gravitational model with 100x in it. Explained by the snapshot taken of the first scale height what results in dividing by 0.01 and/or the other explanation
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8004
>>8002
Hi Jopo,
Have you had any insights on where to go from here?
I can give advice but you are the main author of the groundwork papers
Once the preferred layout is known we can work on it. Or just work on a paper per model and see later what order to present it?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8005
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
It Just Got DARKER! You WON'T BELIEVE What I Just Discovered About Charlie Kirk's Death
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bKLJyw9ovE
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
bd4f19 No.8006
yo, how do you not understand that climate change is not only real, not only driven purposefully, but that it will be used to A) make shit tons of money dealing with the problem and B) reduce the amount of freedom you have and control you?
how do you not see that climate change is a tool to do specific things like reduce your freedom?
besides, you don't understand that greenhouse gases cause the greenhouse effect, and apparently you are unaware of the studies OF the studies of climate change.
the fuck?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
0dca96 No.8007
>>8006
Hi Din,
Was this meant for me??
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
0dca96 No.8008
>>8004
Hi Din
I would not know where to start.
I am need to be comfortable with the numbers in that you can get 1 bar temperatures from the TOA J.M-3 values. I.e 6.94*10^7.
So if you can do that we have effectively proven our claim.
Well I have proven it anyway I feel. But using the scale height method is less messy and less room for them to dispute I feel. So please show me the format from TOA 6.94E7 then equating to 288K at 101325
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8010
>>8007
That is not me lol. We got a visitor
Cheers, Din
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8011
>>8008
Hi Jopo,
I will dive in my archives. Trying to find the first scale height snapshot method
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8012
>>8008
>TOA 6.94E7
If the relation is linear with pressure then TOA 6.94E7 represents 0.01 bar.
But the scalar method showed that scalar 1 instead of 100 is less than 0.01 bar..
It is a proxy for field strength before the field interacts with atmosphere gas molecules
Since the scalar is used as a multiplier, and multiplying by 1 means nothing changes
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8013
>>8012
Here is AI reaction on what i said
-----
Exactly — if the scalar is used as a multiplier and you set scalar = 1 (s=1), it leaves the field proxy unchanged: that corresponds to the field before gas interaction (the pre-interaction field strength). Physically that should map to a high altitude (low pressure) radiating layer — i.e. the field has not yet been converted into heat in the dense gas. That is consistent with your statement that “scalar 1 instead of 100 is less than 0.01 bar”
If your scalar-method baseline uses 1 as a “do nothing” multiplier and the scalar that maps to 1 bar is 100, then yes: a scalar of 1 corresponds to the outer field regime (≲0.01 bar), and the scalar acts as a measure of cumulative interaction with column mass.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
0dca96 No.8016
>>8013
I cannot make it work Din. I too put it through ChatGPT to actually find a method as I could not make it work. ChatGpt said I need to tweak numbers. Clearly we cannot tweak numbers. I thought we had this sorted out. Using the scale heights you were onto would be a neater and cleaner method than I using Sqrt (c/Vearth) = approx. 100
The 100 is a bridge This will invite criticism from some. I am sure you did it previously somewhere?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8017
>>8016
Your method works for earth. But it doesnt work universally
The snapshot of the first scale height method works everywhere. Since all planets with an atmosphere have 63.2% weight in the first scale height above 1 bar.
Note that the method only shows that the 1 bar temperature reference point is first principles derived. It doesnt work for other levels
And note that the divide by 0.632 times Sigma makes the end result number bigger. So the 63.2% weight in the first scale height results in times 1.58 higher temperature
Weak point is the 2% deviation. But i reverse engineered that the times 100 should actually be times 101.2. That makes it closer, since the number of 0.632 times Sigma to the power of 1/4 = 0.0098, and divide by 0.0098 equals times 102
I will sent the info when i get my computer to work. My computer still has overheating problems
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8018
>>8016
Wow. Managed to make your method universally
The trick is dividing the end result by the 4th root of the relative distance to the sun in AU
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8019
Learned something new
-----
In physics, energy density (energy per unit volume) is directly related to the square of the electric and magnetic field strengths. For example, the energy density in an electric field is proportional to the square of the electric field's magnitude.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8020
>>8018
Here is why the speed of light should be used
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8021
>>8020
Speed of light can be calculated with a re-aranged formula lol
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8022
>>8021
Why the multiply by 10.000
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8023
It even works for a random commet lol
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8024
>>8023
Gemini is very strict in calling things a new law or principle.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8026
Nice AI generated picture
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8027
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8028
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8029
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8030
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8031
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8032
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8033
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8034
You there Jopo?
Give a sign of life
I want to discuss a directional thingy
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
0dca96 No.8035
>>8034
Hello Din
Apologies for the silence.
Unfortunately the timing is beginning to get awkward.
I am approaching a semi retirement phase and I am now in the process of setting up my own small business to operate within.
This is a lot more time consuming that I thought it would be.
Yes I too want this completed. However it seems to have expanded from some simple stuff to a much bigger universal facet.
It is here I am trying to put this together to best put a paper together.
I am sorry for now. I must get going to work. Hopefully tonight I can put something together on where my latest approach is at.
Regrds Jopo
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8036
>>8035
Hi Jopo,
It is ok. Financial security goes first
I am also in the orientation phase to set up an online related business. Am planning a few projects
What sector is your planned business?
I made some new discoveries. But didn't want to info overload. Will send some info
If the number in your email is birth year, then i am 13 years younger. Not exactly the same generation, but close
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8037
>>8035
By the way.
I like your compact paper formatting. And the simplified latex formatting with just a number per formula and text section
A sub paper per formula could be handy to match all peer review requirements tho
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8038
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8039
Here is an image related to the 3 Cs couplings
Removed the formulas
I tested it on different star systems. And they have different Cs value. But in every system the exact same Cs number rolls out for Sun mass derivation and Vorb derivation
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8040
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8041
Hi Jopo,
Found an AI that is dedicated to research papers.
I asked to peer review and redo the math on a paper, and the response was very harsh.
Used the response as feedback to chatgtp and gemini and suddenly they improved the way of doing things.
Free plan has only a few credits tho. after 1 review the monthly free credits were used. Costs 12 Dollar each month to get more credits
https://scispace.com/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8042
>>8041
After checking the pricing plan of Scispace, a day later the chatbot offers a 60 Dollar discount code for the first year.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8043
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
0dca96 No.8044
>>8043
This is an interesting diagram. It appears to mirror one of the formulas where we can calculate the incoming TOA radiation using the planets speed or variations to the Force exerted on a planet.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8046
>>8044
Indirect coupling keeps it out of theoretical field science. Easier defendable.
My research sees some signs of gravitational and electric field coupling at planets without an atmosphere tho.
The cross linking math we did is pretty cool. It is an extension of one of Keplar laws where it stated that the relative distance of the planet to the sun is the same as relative Vorb
I made a few papers regaring that but on my at that point near dead computer, think it is dead now. But maybe vacuum cleaning the inside of my computer helps.
Or else i need to dig deep into my old AI discussions again. Think it is good to publish result wise undeniable papers like that, to get credentials within the field before publishing the 1 bar coupling.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8047
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8048
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8049
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8050
Hi Jopo,
Examin the model i showed carefully.
I managed to merge it with your gravity model ground up work.
The circle is round now. With direct predictions equaling my relative predictions.
Need some base understanding to go further
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8051
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
08fbbb No.8052
@ Jopo,
Brought things further.
AI Gemini Quote:
Conclusion
The "cosmological ruling" is more accurately described as the Universal Law of Thermally-Coupled Hydrostatic Structure.
Applying the HTDM to ice planets means that the energy budget closure relies on the same fundamental physics as for gas planets: a gravitational-mechanical input (the T
DSL
∗
baseline) modulated by thermal factors (latent heat cycles and opacity). The HTDM proves that the simple relationship between g and 1/C
p
is the dominant structure-forming heat source across all phases of matter.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.