[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/p/ - Photography

Needs more borkeh
Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, swf, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


The only contemporary consumer gear thread (feel free to make new threads about rare technology though). New threads of similar matter will be deleted.
Discuss rules.
- Discord channel.

File: 1447775395771.jpg (586.77 KB,2253x1514,2253:1514,girlfloor.jpg)

 No.1102

Lets talk lomography.

Good? Bad? What is your opinion?

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1103

File: 1447775421398.jpg (134.45 KB,1818x1818,1:1,girlconverse.jpg)

some text

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1104

File: 1447775442707.jpg (423.06 KB,1693x1144,1693:1144,girlconverse2.jpg)

Some people think its a waste of film

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1105

File: 1447775461153.jpg (68.16 KB,1523x1523,1:1,girlbikini.jpg)

Other people think its fine art

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1106

File: 1447775499412.jpg (87.41 KB,1228x1228,1:1,girlshoes.jpg)

All I know is that the lomography company is making a killing

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1107

File: 1447775534724.jpg (327.2 KB,1818x1228,909:614,girlstairs.jpg)

These cameras a film cost more than normal versions, and are worse quality on purpose.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1108

File: 1447775633619.jpg (288.24 KB,2285x1535,457:307,girlleg.jpg)

What do you guys think about it?

Is fine art photography now defined by lightleaks, shit film, shit lenses, shit cameras and heavy vignetting?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1112

File: 1447776153474.jpg (159.16 KB,1600x1075,64:43,girllomoconverse.jpg)

Lomo shots of asian women putting on converse is my favorite photography.

/s

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1113

File: 1447776175876.jpg (122.4 KB,2285x1535,457:307,girlslippers.jpg)

Then who was camera?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1114

Is this thread about photography... or feet?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1115

File: 1447777093884.jpg (111.15 KB,1600x1075,64:43,girllacingup.jpg)

>>1114

This is a thread about Lomography bro. Feet just happen to be the most commonly photographed subject in the lomogra-sphere.

What do you think of lomography?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1116

File: 1447777278284.jpg (514 KB,1518x1518,1:1,girlontracks.jpg)

Sometimes the strange contrast irks me. IMO some of these shots would be so much better in focus and sharp.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1117

File: 1447777953592.jpg (81.12 KB,1080x1080,1:1,girlshoesoff.jpg)

The understated fact that asian feet are the majority of subjects in lomography is no doubt the single greatest factor in my enjoyment of lomography. If not for asian feet, these would just be shit photographs taken on shit cameras with shit film and shit lenses.

To put it simply, the abundance of asian feet is the only redeeming quality of lomography. Prove me wrong.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1118

File: 1447778206133.jpg (124.72 KB,1500x1500,1:1,girlhnng.jpg)

Really low angle shots are so easy with lomo. Just put your 20 dollar camera on the floor and set the timer!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1119

File: 1447778412636.jpg (180.12 KB,800x536,100:67,girlfeethang.jpg)

Dont just leave me hanging. What do you guys think about lomography? Do you ever shoot lomography yourself?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1121

File: 1447778623601.jpg (159.69 KB,674x654,337:327,leicalomography.jpg)

If I shoot lomography film in my leica, is that still considered lomography?

If I shoot lomography film, using a lomography lens on my leica body, will that be considered lomography?

How about a summicron mounted on a diana+ with kodak tri-x film? Is this lomography?

Where is the threshold of 'lomography'?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1122

File: 1447778744681.jpg (100.6 KB,916x625,916:625,Lomography-Lomo-LC-A-Minit….jpg)

Lomography company just released a leica m mount 32mm f2.8 lens. Is this lomography?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1123

As you might be able to tell, im a bit frustrated and just want to lick some cute asian feet. But dont think im crazy, because even lomography.com admits that feet are the main lomography subject.

http://www.lomography.com/magazine/228497-is-there-anyone-who-doesnt-like-taking-photos-of-feet

http://www.lomography.com/magazine/181885-an-ode-to-the-feet

http://www.lomography.com/magazine/215117-lift-your-feet-up

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1126

File: 1447800788954.jpg (1.51 MB,2448x3264,3:4,IMG_20151118_094943_483.jpg)

>>1102

OP just letting you know you are a faggot.

>is lomo art

No, why its film. It's what you do with it that make it art. A snapshit will always be a snapshit.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1131

>>1126

gross broseph. you crossed the line

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1133

I love lo-fi film photography if that's what you mean, but I can't stand the Lomography company themselves or their "don't think, just shoot" philosophy that discourages emphasis on photographic composition and encourages unnecessary consumption of film. On the positive side, they're helping to keep film photography alive, but I still don't like them.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1135

>>1102

>Good? Bad? What is your opinion?

Altering the film process to get unusual colour scheme and using specific objective to get specific look both can be artistic methods.

However, most photographs produced with these methods were produced not to express the author's PoV but rather to be liked by wide vriety of people. There is no specific concept behind these photos in most cases - these cases might be bad, not lomography itself.

I myself alter the images from my digital camera in a way which I have never seen to be used to get the specific look which I like but that isn't lomography for sure.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1143

>>1135

Show us some shots of your 'specific look'. Im curious

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1144

File: 1448047121556.jpg (130.26 KB,1810x1200,181:120,kjhasd.jpg)

>>1143

It is not anything superspecial but those few viewers which I have recognize the colour scheme and appreciate it.

More following.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1145

File: 1448047273400.jpg (111.2 KB,1920x1333,1920:1333,asldkjaskldj.jpg)

>>1144

I really want to be original, dear Infinity.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1146

File: 1448047401010.jpg (137.99 KB,1920x1273,1920:1273,l;asdl;fk.jpg)

>>1145

Please do not hate me for trying to be original, Infinity.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1147

File: 1448047462824.jpg (99.08 KB,1280x877,1280:877,;skjfklsdjf.jpg)

>>1146

Being original is worth thousands of words, I know that, Infinity.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1148

File: 1448056470911.jpg (386.88 KB,1810x1200,181:120,gvybjvubgu.jpg)

>>1147

One more.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1150

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

So im pretty sure Kai Wong is one of us. He coincidentally released this video a few days after we were talking about lomography.

Kai if youre there, please give us nudes of Alamby. Cheers.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1151

File: 1448134084462.jpg (Spoiler Image,14.53 KB,400x541,400:541,Cut_End_Mop.jpg)

>>1147

Why is 'originality' something that you are trying so desperately to attain?

Ignoring your outlandish processing, these shots are mundane with no subject and no story. If an 'artist' refuses to exert effort into basic composition, then why should anybody strain to tolerate such ineptitude?

I guess lomographys marketing, "shoot, dont think" has been thoroughly absorbed by your psyche.

All things aside, you should definitely post more shots because criticism will only improve your work.

>mfw hurr durr originality

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1152

>>1151

>Why is 'originality' something that you are trying so desperately to attain?

http://blog.xkcd.com/2008/01/14/robot9000-and-xkcd-signal-attacking-noise-in-chat/

Try to post a chain of photos without coments and see what happens. Also try to read the recent announcement.

Ignoring the rest of your post: are you sure in that I gave any reason for you to act this way? You may try to find the post which I posted photos in reply to and see what was discussed before you decided to post what you posted.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1153

>>1152

Before you posted all those fecal stained images, we were discussing the finer points of images stained with feces. You are correct that your images belong in this thread.

Regarding the r9k filter, I concur; it should be disabled in the board settings.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1154

>>1153

>>I myself alter the images from my digital camera in a way which I have never seen to be used to get the specific look which I like but that isn't lomography for sure.

>Show us some shots of your 'specific look'. Im curious

>>It is not anything superspecial but those few viewers which I have recognize the colour scheme and appreciate it.

And then suddenly...

> these shots are mundane with no subject and no story.

>If an 'artist' refuses to exert effort into basic composition, then why should anybody strain to tolerate such ineptitude?

>I guess lomographys marketing, "shoot, dont think" has been thoroughly absorbed by your psyche.

>All things aside, you should definitely post more shots because criticism will only improve your work.

>Before you posted all those fecal stained images, we were discussing the finer points of images stained with feces. You are correct that your images belong in this thread.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1160

>>1102

hipster cancer

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1181

File: 1449103267196.jpg (188.52 KB,1200x802,600:401,ohshitnigga.jpg)

>>1160

That's offensive to the hipster counterculture.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1250

Ugh. Worst form of photography out there.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1379

>>1250

>best way to get chicks naked

>worst form of photography

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1630

Rescuing thread from being eaten by site.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]