No.98964
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/8565486/porn-uk-ban-unlock-card/
>As early as next month, porn sites will be required to get proof of ID from UK residents before showing any X-rated clips.
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.98966
>>98964
Well porn is a nasty addiction, but this law is ominous for things to come.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.98970
>>98966
This, basically. I am all for porn services requiring age verification, but the state mandating its form sets a dangerous precedent. If the state is to intervene, then in the form of making it a crime to make porn accessible to children, because - as far as I am concerned - it is, according to the natural law. Even that would probably cause more problems than it solves, but at least it wouldn't be treating criminality as the default state, as regulations tend to do. Porn providers would still have the choice of requiring ID verification, face verification, or what else they can come up with. Even good moderation might be enough, it's hard for kids to pass off as adults online for long.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.98977
>Let's make sure that the disaffected, affluent youth can't distract themselves anymore in a politically restrictive environment.
Honestly, it's a problem that will solve itself in short order.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.98985
>>98964
KEK
So British /pol/acks will lose their access to BLACKED.com?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.98987
Is porn prohibition compatible with the hoppean covenant community concept?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.98994
>>98987
Why wouldn't it be? Just throw a clause in the lease agreement, "use of this property to consume any media deemed 'not suitable' by the HOA review board will result in a revocation of the lease and a prompt eviction of the tenants."
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.98995
>>98970
This kids will VPN their way around this. The boomers will pay for a wanking license. This is just another UK tax.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.99000
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.99004
>>99000
>temporarily
>for infrastructural safety concerns
>only isolating domestic from foreign
What a sensationalist title. Here I was hoping I'd never have to see another gopnik write his disgusting cyrillic garbage, nor have to suffer under their video game retardery again.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.99005
is /pol/ going to call the uk based now?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.99007
>>99005
i got the news from /pol/. everyone one calling the UK based
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.99008
>>98964
I'm still not sure how they determine what a "porn site" is. Are UK ISPs expected to block any site featuring adult content, or does this only apply to large porn sites?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.99018
>>98966
>porn is a nasty addiction
So is eating anything, driving a car, watching television, listening to radio, reading books, or skydiving. Would you approve a BLANKET BAN on any of these activities? Is it ok to shoot people who put food in their mouths, because some people are fat?
Not all people who watch porn are fucking addicted to it moron.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.99019
>>99007
/pol/ really shit the bed
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.99020
>>99018
Never mentioned anything about a ban. Simply said it was a nasty addiction. Go visit >>>/nofap/, I would wager they would agree on that. Stop trying to be an edgy blowhard.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.