/erp/ - Erotic Roleplay

Where is pee stored??

>>163164

in your mama

>>163175

3d I've found is for more normal shit because it's with real life models so people don't always play ludicrous things like 3 cocks on one dude, but it's also full to the brim with shitty pornstar profiles with no substance. 2d on the other hand gives more room for depravity but there are still plenty of vanilla lovers with anime/drawn refs.

Honestly, if you can manage you could try making a profile for each type and approaching people with the proper type of references.

Would f-list be a good way for me to find more partners for the MMOs I play. I generally recruit and find partners in game but the pool has slightly dried up. I just don't have any interest in the politics of f-list and spending hours on end autistically crafting a profile.

>>163301

They are NOT popular.

They are so very unpopular that there is no one demographic that is most interested in them and interest is spread widely.

MPreg is one of the most prevalent kinks among them.

I do not seek them for play because I am not interested in vaginas.

>>163301

Masculine greens are usually popular in gay rooms.

>>163301

As someone that plays greens, it's hard getting roleplay with them. I usually play mine to be more masc than the average one I do believe that a majority of cuntboy RPers should just play girls/femboys but that's for another day.. But if you want to do it, go for it. I'm trying to look for a trans male/cuntboy for some of my pinks.

>>163301

>Popularity

If they were popular you'd see a lot more of them, don'tcha think? In case the last four replies hasn't hammered it into your head: ' ' They're not popular. ' ' For a fair amount of the F-List populace (at least, SDLFRP) they combine the worst part of a male (…being outwardly male) with one of the worst parts of a female (no penis), the exact opposite of purples' recipe for success.

>Amount of play

You're going to get about the same amount of play as a blue, maybe less. You'll have to put in similar effort advertising in appropriate rooms and making yourself approachable and INTERESTING.

>Primary audience

Most straight dudes aren't going to want to touch you. Gay guys interested in topping–not necessarily doms– are the most lucrative audience dependent on how masculine you are. Just know that not everybody of [x gender] dislikes or likes cuntboys.

>General attitude

Indifference.

>Second part

Personally? I have the taste of a prepubescent girl and like gay bishonen and don't care for too much masculinity, so that's my ideal body type. Personality doesn't matter so much as a character gimmick and scene accessibility does. Give potential partners an interest point and ways that your character could possibly end up bumping uglies with theirs.

If you're going for mass appeal, disregard everything I just said and make a muscular manly man that happens to have mismatched genitals and, if it's fine with your own set of kinks, capability for mpreg. If it ever crosses your mind to make a green femboy/trap just save yourself the grief and make a pink instead.

What's the character limit for kinks and guestbook posts?

>>163344

Custom kinks allow 1024 characters in the description and 30 characters in the name

Guestbook posts on the other hand don't seem to have one, seeing as it only stopped me from copy + pasting my 2,124,868 W's when the webpage outright crashed at around (what would have been) 6mil

>>163184

A majority of the people on F-List want to roleplay, well, on F-List and will rarely go any further than Discord. You can try, but don't hold your breath (especially if you don't want to bother making a profile, and ESPECIALLY especially if you plan on playing male)

>>163347

Yeah it might've helped if I stopped being a retard for 2 seconds and thought to actually try and post - in my defense I wasn't aware of splitting because I can't remember the last time I saw a guestbook post, let alone a long one. Looks like 4590 is the magic number

>>163184

You won't be taken seriously by anyone else but shitters if you don't have a profile.

>>163402

Something involving scissoring, pussy worship or pegging. My pinks tend to be dominant, so to dominate a guy with a pussy is just A+ in my book.

Is there any market for a kind of conspiracy theory-esque profile? Things like Egyptians meeting aliens, hidden world orders and other wacky stuff you can make sexual fairly easily

>>163411

Yes, definitely, but you are probably better off pitching it as science fiction/fantasy than some conspiracy thing.

I've played a story where my character was from a low-technology culture interacting with an alien from a high technology culture and I've played stories where there was a kind of x-files/delta green secret organization dealing with monsters and shit, they can be fun.

>>163415

>I never see that played by anybody

Nayrt, and maybe I’m just stupid or none of them actually play, but it feels like last time I was in the Gay Males room a surprising amount were FtM with RL reference images. Obviously not as common as MtF in female-friendly rooms, but frequent enough that I was kinda disappointed

I need a fucking edit button phone posting is a burden

>>163405

I don't really do orientation play. The idea sounds nice, but I prefer my guys to have some form of self confidence. But I do play gay/bisexual blues, so if you want to plan something else out I'm game.

https://www.f-list.net/c/webhead/ I'm too lazy to make a hub. Just note me from here I guess.

>>163434

kill yourself vauun

>>163424

>Any other tips on how to not be seen as a shitter by everyone else?

How you approach makes a big difference, that said, some tips to the profile itself:

Give your character a profession and you'll have a lot of characterization sorted out as you extrapolate from there. Different professions have different expectations and a lot of the personality can be developed based on how your character conform or break those expectations. It also provides a source of ideas, simple by trying to figure out how said profession could lead to lewd.

Artwise, if you don't mind using canon character for faceclaim, then fujoshit serie tend to have a lot of artwork for the male characters.

Avoid wishy-washy 'I'll do what ever you want' when it comes to what kind of scene the character is for, instead make it clear what you want and offer and cater to those where the taste and kink lines up and if you're also in the mood for something that doesn't matches up with the character at all, then make a new character where it does. "What ever you want" and no presented preferences of your own, reeks of desperation in my opinion.

Provide hooks, if not directly, then by having the profile written so that potential partner can envision what kind of scenes they could play out with your character.

Depending on what kind of scenes you're going for though, then you might have to be the one doing the approaching the majority of the time and here it's important to have at least a suggestion for a scene. At worst it gets shot down, but you've shown that you have read the other partners profile, can take initiative and be creative so brainstorming isn't that bad after that. Better than starting with brainstorming.

>>163436

>>163439

>People recommending to use bishie art

As someone who plays straight pinks, that's a great way to get yourself ignored. Those fuccboi types drive me against the fucking wall, and I know I'm not alone with these sentiments. You'd be better off choosing character art stolen from some bara doujinshi or whatever. Even real models are preferable over the typical anime boy with cd player.

>>163436

>>163439

Everything except recommending fujoshit girly boy art is good.

t. straight pink

For me the best men are the ones who are traditionally masculine and obviously strong without being xbox hueg muscle beef boys. Chubby and strong is also fine but usually I prefer just strong because I like discipline themes and the blue being more shapely fits that better.

How are musician characters generally regarded? And I don't mean playing a character where I autistically link background music to the RP, I mean as a profession. DJs, classically trained, jazz musicians, hippie stoners, rockband bad boys. Do they come off as try hard/boring, or would you a musician?

>>163507

I don't think there's anything inherent better or worse about it. If anything, musicians are good for scenes unique to celebrity.

The heart-breaker lead singer of a rock band, who behind closed are being blackmailed to suck his producers cock, so that he doesn't go to the press with the fact that he's a faggot.

The quiet violinist being invited to perform together some rapper, adding a touch of class to the latest release and the clash in culture and expectations of a woman's place.

The rapper with the gangster image, in private just having a sweet relationship with his girl, until they get caught in public and he have to start treating her worse to maintain his image and his girl going along with it.

Lots of things you can do with musician.

>>163508

Damn, those are some really good ideas anon. Did you come up with those on the spot?

>>163509

Sorta? needed some moments to brainstorm them, while writing the reply. Feel free to steal them though.

>>163515

Stealing ideas is no good. At least, not a whole idea. Maybe bits and pieces of it.

what is worstgender? what's it mean?

>>163528

Shemales.

>>163531

as in trannies, or dickgirls?

>>163532

They're both the same thing.

>>163528

Shemales, feminine herms, and MtF transgenders that are literally just shemales self-inserting and/or vying for attention. They're the worst because a huge chunk of their playerbase is made up of:

>Scorned male shitters that just play them as blues with a pretty name color and scarcely acknowledged boobs because it's 10x easier to get play on one

>Hyperdominant bitchbreaker(-breaker-breaker-breaker-breaker)s

>Canons with a cock bolted on arbitrarily

>One-sided "write for me!" garbage that is successful because of the aforementioned hyperdominance, and also the fact that

>IRL trans/gender-whatever/mentally ill people that project their issues onto their character, who also happens to be The Ideal post-top-operation goddess ft. a dick that they wish they could be

>>163528

Shemales who use real life references are the worst thing ever as far as I've seen.

>>163544

>and also the fact that

they have a tendency to make dummy profiles specifically to go on them*

>play a pretty attractive pink

>almost constantly get 'she's hot' pms

This, I know. I picked the pictures for a reason. I was thinking about putting a disclaimer about this on the profile but I don't wanna come off as a sperg.

>>163598

You are right, disclaimers come off as red flags no matter how well intended they are.

How do I come up with a decent male profile that's not a generic blank sheet?

I have a few loli or futa characters and they are all super popular, but when I'm writing up a description for a dude I just don't know what to do. Like at least with the latter two I could take inspo from some doujins

>>163649

former two*

>>163649

see >>163436 and >>163439

>>163652

advice taken

I don't think I'm gonna go for fujo cuteboi art though, everyone seems to hate it when they want a dom.

>>163852

It's hard to tell without an example or another, as far as coming on too hard is concerned. I generally tease the shit out of people in my introduction post and so far it always went decently well. But yes, in the rare case ya' get someone that says something like "Sounds nice, want to do it?" just makes me lose all interest. The few that respond in kind or with some enthusiasm make it all worth it tho.

Show us what ya' throw out at peeps.

>>163852

Yes, it's very possible

If someone tries to dirty talk at me any time outside of RP I'm usually pretty disgusted

I prefer a friendly but sterile approach where the other person and I can talk over stuff enthusiastically without it having to get sexual.

Creating a Evangelion character a good or bad idea?

>>163889

>is the answer to simply have two characters

Yes, yes it is. Assuming you want decent RP, no amount of nested spoilers will stop people who actually read the profile.

>>163890

>Creating a Evangelion character a good or bad idea?

Do you think you'll have a fun time with them? If yes, then it's a good idea. There are several tens of active Asukas, Reis and Shinjis for you to mess around with. I have an Eva character too, who were you thinking of creating?

>>163889

The more extreme the kink the less likely it is you should include it alongside “normal” kinks. Trust me, I’ve tried to combine vanilla and hard vore/general gore into one profile on multiple occasions and can safely say no amount of “it’s not required!” or strategic placement will stop the evil seed of what you’ve done from germinating within you. Being a cute girl or other in-demand character type doesn’t help. Two profiles sounds like effort but it’ll save you a lot of time if your kink is one of the usual suspects or up there with them.

>>163887

Not the same anon, but assuming those posts were both the first thing you sent to someone who was presumably set to looking or posting adverts, the length alone makes them somewhat off putting. Not in the sense that the details you included are bad or anything, in fact showing off some of your writing skills at the start when you're still OOC flirting about the scene and stuff is wonderful.

Looking the first one over again, there are just some small things about it which would give me minor doubts about type fucking you. The first and admittedly most minor thing is asking someone if they are still looking or interested in playing, then proceeding to give the entire scene which you had in mind before actually confirming that they are. For me, this comes down to just courtesy. Say there is something on your profile which made me already say no right out of the gate, or that I had been taken by someone else who replied to my ad earlier than you did. It would make me feel harsh to reject you or ask to actually fuck another time after getting what appears to be an approach with effort put into it, even if I had legitimate reasons for declining.

The next thing though is how you offer the scene. Saying that you're willing to hash out extra details at the end is good, but when it seems like you basically have set up the entire scene and outlined what is going to happen already you do not leave your partner much room to actually engage in the process of making this scene. Whatever details you have left to actually discuss strike me as if they would be somewhat minor ones, like where the couch where you two will be fucking on top of will be, or what thinly veiled set up the porn scene is going to have. The way that I look at this is the main reason you two are there is to have an uncertain housewife get her brains fucked out by nigger cock, and that core of the scene is already established.

Also much like the point from before, having to reject someone right off the bat just makes things more difficult, assuming that even if I am typically cool with porn shoots and cheating is my favorite thing, there have been plenty of times where I have done the same scene 20 times and want to do something else. So the phrasing of "being up to hash out details" as opposed to being down to hear whatever the person had in mind which they might like doing instead is somewhat off putting.

Looking back at what you were saying in >>163852 it kind of comes as no surprise to me that people say "that all sounds nice" in response to these sorts of approaches. What are they supposed to say in your mind, when everything you've said is good and there is not much left to actually discuss besides those minor points. When you come off as this forward, it seems like you're in the mood to fuck. So for partners who are willing to indulge you in it and are interested more in actually role playing than in talking out the specifics, supposedly the fun part of ERP for most people, saying they are down to go would just seem natural.

Really, the main issue which you have is just the way in which you are ordering this out. I'm aware that it can be boring or frustrating having to go through the motions when half the time you just get nothing, but assuming you want to keep with this style of approach would you lose much time by changing your first post to something along the lines of "Yo. You still lookin' to set up a scene? Something crude, over-the-top, and race-play oriented in particular~" It keeps the same forwardness and confidence about what you want to do, without being the same level of daunting for the reasons outlined above.

Then, when they presumably said Yes because you're approaching snowbunny sluts, you could move on to offering that scene you had in mind. Considering most people on F-list are just complete push overs, at this point where your foot is already in the door you probably do not even need to ask if they wanted to brainstorm something. You could just offer that scene up right then and there, and it would be completely natural. Albeit, instead of saying you're up to hash the details out, I would go with something like "If you had any particular scenes in mind which you wanted to play out though, I'd be happy to hear them" just to make it easier for them to say "Actually, while I love cheating, porn shoots are not my thing. How about you're the pool boy and this is an equally stupid easy set up that is slightly more in line with my interests!"

That said though, I would likely fuck you with those approaches. Link profile yo.

>>163887

>>163898

Seconded. Link it.

>>163896

The alternative is that if you are the one doing all the approaching is you can try to low key pass it off in your maybes, then when confirming the other person is into it tell them it's there to not scare off the normals. But typically two profiles are required.

>>163895

I was thinking about creating a OC_ profile since I've had pretty terrible luck withcanons. If I did write a canon, I probably would've gone with either a more open Kaworu and almost ignore Shinji or Misato.

>>163898

I appreciate the thoughtful criticisms a lot. I've always tried to stay to true to the whole "approach with an idea and clear interest" method, but it hadn't really occurred to me to space it out between replies, or to leave the suggested scene more open and conductive to discussion.

I certainly don't have a problem with people finding everything I blurt out to be agreeable, but just a little reciprocation is what I'm looking for. A "Yeah, I think an unfaithful bitch getting her marriage destroyed one womb-deep thrust at a time sounds great~." instead of just "Yeah, sounds lovely." Which I think ties back to what you said. Mentioning so much at once doesn't really leave a lot of room for the other player to express their thoughts since I've more or less stone-walled them.

So thanks again.

>>163915

https://www.f-list.net/c/lily%20sterling

Every day I can't help but wonder if ERP is right for me. I'm in numerous popular rooms and find it difficult to enjoy talking in them because the regulars have such an overwhelming presence. I can barely even approach someone I'd be into because either they're one of the aforementioned regulars or someone with an attractive enough character that they'll get swarmed by the regulars, in which case talking to them in the room goes out the window.

Replying to ads in the LFRP room seems harder than it should be, whether it's thinking up a good response to an ad or getting a response back. As such, I really don't roleplay often. I'm probably to blame the most for that though, since most of the time I just don't feel like roleplaying; either it's my odd hangups about having a male as my main character and a lot of characters I'm interested in (mainly in the rooms I frequent) having something that turns me away from them or just my lack of enjoyment on the site that has my mood almost always nonexistent, or some combination of the two, I don't know.

I'm just wondering if anyone else here has experienced something similar to this and has any advice they could give. It seems like most of my time is spent either on busy/away, looking through the numerous rooms I'm in for some kind of 'in', posting a line or two and feeling weird about doing so once I've subsequently been ignored/passed over.

>>163936

>but just a little reciprocation is what I'm looking for. A "Yeah, I think an unfaithful bitch getting her marriage destroyed one womb-deep thrust at a time sounds great~." instead of just "Yeah, sounds lovely."

This alienates many people. A lot of players aren't going to reciprocate before actually roleplaying with you.

Is there any way of preventing you from accidentally noting someone's alt who is on your ignore list? I have so many people I'm trying to avoid and it only becomes tougher as that list grows. Adding people's names prevents them from sending me notes on all their characters, but it feels like an oversight that you can still message them.

>>164000

This. Unless I'm already somewhat familiar with my partner or the idea really nails it, I'm very sterile and "robotic" in personality simply because I'm distant like that out of character.

>>164015

Its not an oversight. If you wanted to findout of X alt is an alt of Y. You could just block Y and see if you could message X.

>>164020

Yeah! I'm not gonna be mean to people, but out of character I have no interest in flirting with people.

Because of who I am as a person I don't enjoy flirting OOC (I do like it in character though!). If someone flirts at me OOC I feel like they're wasting their energies. Save the sexy stuff for the roleplay! Save it for my character, don't waste it on me!

>>163974

Yeah, feel free to throw a note or message if you're feeling what I'm putting out. I figure I want to be looking out for customs that are 'gushing', to put it one way? Fun, provocative, and clearly into what they're typing.

>>164000

I always figured a more friendly and flirtatious tone was one of the better ways to really gauge someone's interest, be it in a character, kink, or scene. Otherwise there's only so much of a read you can get off cold, metallic text OOC, but I'll keep that in mind nonetheless, so thanks.

How well can mute characters work? There's a particular canon I want to play but I'm not sure if being mute would kind of ruin the whole point of ERP

>>164044

Just because I'm not flirting won't mean that I won't be enthusiastic about a play. I tend to use exclamation marks and toss out idea suggestions. I'll ask questions about you and what you like specifically, etc, I just don't want to flirt with you, a stranger, and feel really weird that you would want to flirt with me. Friendliness and enthusiasm are great but I keep the sexual stuff in the RP.

>>164049

It's heavily dependent on the character they are playing opposite and the kind of story you want to play. When characters can't communicate equally it makes it really hard to move a story forward and most of the work will go on the character who communicates more (the speaking character). The player of the mute character will pretty much always have to write more than normal about body language.

Works great: Both characters understand a common sign language and sign together or one signs and the other speaks. This is best if the players know enough about a common sign language to be able to write about it. I got to do this once despite being barely conversational in ASL and it was delightful. If you read some short stories about Deaf or mute people, particularly by Deaf writers in my experience, you can do this little problem

Works ok but not great: Mute character writing on paper and gesturing.

>>164044

Sometimes I do it when I know my partner will enjoy it, but ooc dirty talk makes me feel weird. Especially when I know the idea we're discussing has potential but I'm not horny at the moment.

I think another thing is that a lot of people use OOC dirty talk to try to get off before the RP and will do that and then never follow through with the RP because they got what they wanted ahead of time.

The great tragedy of our age is that no one is into Pern ERP

I just want to play a green rider girl getting railed by a bronze rider while their dragons fuck

>>164086

The autism thread is over there

>>163936

I'm curious what other people think about customs like this. I feel like they can be very divisive considering how overbearing they are. Some people might like that, though.

>>164024

Think about it from the context of someone approaching you, though. When all of your replies are just, "Sure." and, "Yeah, that sounds good." It's offputting because it's hard to tell if you actually give a shit. I'm not even the same person, but it really is one of my pet peeves when my partner can't muster up a half assed. It's like I came to you with an idea and something a little flirty, meet me halfway.

>>164106

Just because I'm not flirting doesn't mean I'm giving one word replies. See >>164051. I'm an enthusiastic player who likes to talk about story stuff and plan things and I'm happy to swap ideas .

I'm just not interested in helping someone jerk off until we're actually playing.

What are some of the major pitfalls to avoid when creating a feminine-looking male character?

>>164196

Don't be a stuttering faggot. Probably avoid incase art. Don't be a wet noodle if you're a bottom.

>>164196

have something interesting to offer other than “well I look like girl lol”. and like the previous anon said, don’t be a boring pushover

Do one of the fchat clients send you a popup notification whenever bookmarks come online or something? I just wanna know how people are pm’ing me literally seconds after I come online

>>164267

Slimcat does, although it's a common enough occurrence I'm starting to believe people just log onto two characters, one with which to check their bookmarks tab 24/7 instead of actually using the client.

How important is timing when it comes to finding a good partner? I have a steady job with fixed hours, so I'm always online to RP around the same time every day, about 6pm to 9pm CST. I get the feeling that more players that match my kinks would be on later, but I'm not staying up late till midnight just to spam typefuck ads. Also, is it me, or do most actual female role players have stay at home or casual office jobs that lends to daytime typefucking?

>>163883

You are a very slow typist, and your brain is shit at forming coherent sentences. I certainly wouldn't want to RP with you given how little content comes from such a length of time. How old are you? How often do you practice writing things that aren't smut or typefucking? How often do you read, and what do you like to read? Reading more and writing more will solve these problems. Practice practice practice.

>>164011

Not the anon you're replying to, but I don't see how I could ever get replies without posting ads. All of my male characters get replies solely through spamming ads on related channels, and even then I can go days without a single reply. My profiles have custom kinks, inlines, artwork, and evidence of creativity and good writing. I don't know how on Earth anyone would just message a male profile without seeing an ad first, since most role players just want to ignore male profiles to begin with. One profile I read recently went so far as to say "you aren't trusted" in reference to males. Sheesh.

>>164313

Oh, and - have you posted your profile in the profile help thread? It might be a very simple issue that's holding you back; there's a lot of 'red flags' for seasoned players that are frankly not obvious to newer players through no real fault of their own. Definitely worth a shot, it's a helpful thread.

>>164446

I have. They told me my profile had too many words between pertinent bits of inormation, and my original homemade art for my character wasn't good enough to appeal to players. I spent yesterday evening drawing a new avatar, inline, and writing all new text. There's still more to do. Really I think I set myself up for failure with so many stipulations. I don't RP with anyone who dislikes unrealistically big tits or dicks, and I rarely find appropriately themed female profiles that tolerate the fetishes I have to indulge in while also exhibiting taste and intelligence. I lurk room lists for pink or purple names and I just get sick and walleyed sifting through shitters and fucking furries. I've had perfect partners about three times in my role playing career, and they've ruined me to every other partner I've met. Goddamn summit girls.

>>164453

I've been on F-List for years, and the fact that I impress you as a noob upsets me a little. I gave up on playing males for a long time and experimented with herms and females to great success, but I've gotten very tired of living vicariously through my partners rather than actually getting what I really want, which is to assume the role of the players in a campaign that I would run. The whole point of this profile is power fantasy wish fulfillment, which is all I've ever wanted from a role play, and it seems it's what turns off good female fantasy themed role players the most. I don't want verisimilitude in my plots– I want to have fun, and do the things I dream about. Am I selfish for feeling this way?

You saying my character art doesn't have sex appeal convinces me that handsome young men aren't appealing to F-List, because that's what I'm doing my best to accurately illustrate. Not realistically, but in a western comic book sort of style with an open eye for eastern aesthetics. I suppose for a site littered with weeaboos this puts me at a disadvantage, except I've made artwork for my female and herm profiles, and I've gotten plenty of compliments on them. I could do some nudes of this character, and will certainly work on a few sex scenes. I just can't paint for shit because my whole artistic focus is on line work and detail, not color and tone. I'm trying to learn, though.

If I were to scrap my own artwork, where the fuck would I go to find artwork that resembles my character? I thought about sending all my art to an artist I like for a commission.

What is a mainstream heavy kink? I don't want to rape anyone, I don't want to portray orc gangbangs as a DM, I don't want to transform species or gender, and I don't want to "break" anyone or dominate them. I just want an egalitarian partnership based on physical attraction and mutual respect. Is that what you mean? Despite my love of huge cumshots, breast growth, and harems of willing teen girls I'm too vanilla?

Would a drop down paragraph describing things I find sexy work in terms of exhibiting my sexual inclinations?

>>164454

While not the previous anon you've been speaking to. If I might just chime in on the kinks.

Yes. That's pretty vanilla. This is, unfortunately, F-list, where the numbers and size of appendages and cum, for the most part, have lost meaning. Just look at those 20+ or 30+ inch cocks and the sparrow art. Or the people not into them because they still retain some brain cells. Breast growth is transformation play 'light' because the real TF people want to turn into like furries or monsters, not just up a cup size, or be entirely rewritten, and the expansionist people want to be blown up like a balloon, aka belly and arms and everything else too. Which you are probably not into, and neither am I, for that matter.

Harems…. while not a giant red flag, is typically one of those things that has the unspoken, Everybody wants one, Nobody wants to provide that. Females have the advantage here over blues/purples. Because most people don't want to run the gangbangs because they have to provide multiple characters to the one female. But if the males are desperate enough, it's something they can give that will definitely attract attention at least. Females don't want to do that either. But they aren't usually starved enough for attention to offer to do it either.

If you are lucky and find the diamond who ends up so into you that they are willing to give you a harem, then thumbs up. But. Yeah. Like who would honestly turn a harem down? Provided that the writer isn't complete shit.

>>164455

I've offered to play harems under the guise of my pink or purple profiles in the past. To me it's fun and easy because it's simply including all the hot shit I want to see in a sex scene written by one of my favorite online smut authors. I don't expect an actual female to want to do this. I do assume most female profiles are like my own in that they're played by men who are tired of being ignored for who they are, and must pretend to be what they want so they can live vicariously through their partner. It can be fun, but I got into a rut of running out of steam in the middle of a sex scene. Something about the way my partners react to situations, or how they handle dirty talking just really sets me off on occasion. I'm giving it a break for now, probably for a long time.

>>164454

Not who you're replying to, but maybe I can provide some insight.I play pinks in fantasy settings seeking stuff with a lot of story and character development. I even like some of the same kinks you do so I think I'm pretty close to your target demographic.

There is no shame in wanting to play a power fantasy wish fulfillment character, but it is a major RP turn-off. It's not fun to play a character with faults, failings, and weaknesses when your partner's character breezes through his life. It's not fun to play a character who is growing as a person or becoming stronger when your partner's character is already very powerful.

I love to play opposite characters who are flawed, who have weaknesses, who have the capacity to make mistakes, learn from them, and grow and change to become better people. But it never happens if I play opposite a power fantasy wish fulfillment character, because they start "complete" and don't change and evolve meaningfully with the story.

You aren't selfish for wanting to play such a character, but f-list is a bad place to do it. If you want to play out power fantasies you might be better off saving them for nonsexual roleplay or roleplay where story isn't that important. Save it for when you have people who also want to play power fantasies with you.

Your character art doesn't bother me in the slightest. If anything I'm inclined to like you more for making it yourself. I don't find it particularly sexy, but I also don't judge profiles by sexiness of art.

Don't make a drop down menu for things you find sexy. That's what your kinks are for.

>>164464

I would say I love DMing for overpowered characters more than actually playing them. I'm just tired of DMing for shonen shotas, though I'd jump at the chance to DM for the right pink. I don't really expect to find a DM willing to run a campaign for me, so the best I can do is provide what I can't attain for myself. I'm trying to portray myself as flexible, and capable of doing RP's with verisimilitude, but my drive to be a superhuman is overwhelming. Maybe you'd like to bookmark me and hit me up on the chat some time?

>>164472

You can definitely be a superhuman and still have a character who isn't a generic blue power fantasy wish fulfillment character. I play as/with superhuman characters all the time because you can make all kinds of interesting stories with them.

It's the power fantasy characters you can't drag an interesting story out of

>>164474

Maybe I'm using the wrong terminology. To me a power fantasy involves playing a character who is generally more intelligent, and more competent than the surrounding NPC's, and usually has an easier time with low level enemies than their peers. They have powers and abilities not normally granted by the rules of a TTRPG, in addition to useful quirks like being very attractive and outgoing. Pretty much the exact opposite of a realistic and flawed human being, but not so far from the realm of possibility. There are truly exceptional people out there, after all. What exactly is wrong with wanting to be one of them, and play in an RP with someone who likes playing them, too?

>>164475

Alright. So here's the question. Who's power fantasy is being fulfilled? Because it certainly isn't both sides. Why should the other side fulfill the power fantasy for the power person?

>>164477

For one it endears them to you, and it allows you to live vicariously through their characters actions. It's not what you want, but it's close enough to be worth something. You only hope through karma someone will do the same for you one day.

>>164478

Take that sentiment and apply it to F-list. Now the resulting realization is that very few if any people, want to live vicariously through another. Considering the average partner lasts maybe a few weeks to up to a month if you get lucky.

The vast majority of people are looking for instant self-gratification. Anybody who might fulfill the previous requirements is completely and utterly spoiled for choice in a seller's market. Because that's what F-list is. If you have something worth selling. The system bends to your whims. Anybody and everybody else? Better get to work hoping for scraps or that you catch their eye somehow. Which always becomes harder then it sounds since you can be what, one of a dozen people approaching them that day?

>>164481

I think I know what to do. I'm going to make a new character, and put this one on the shelf.

>>164482

I'm sorry - and I hope you still find something similar to what you're looking for! Try to pitch it if you find some player that likes you a lot for some reason.

i've been interested in playing male feral horses, but how do you play one in a way that it isn't generic or boring?

Completely unrelated to the Anon from the beginning of the thread: is there anywhere at all to find decent art for cuntboys regardless of body type? I'm not above just using SFW male images, but porn is always nice to have.

>>164564

As someone who has ridden horses lots I have to agree.

They're really dense. They have personalities sure, but a lot of that is on a scale of kinda dumb to turbo dumb.

>>164548

Just like the other anons said, horses are stupid and boring, even the anthro ones. So you either write absurdly long and nasty kinks to show you can at least make the in out in out part of sex interesting, or give yourself a couple gimmicks that other people don't normally do. Like weird kinks, or being willing to go through the effort of playing a bunch of feral horses at once and gang raping people half to death.

>>164588

>mlp horses

Get the fuck out.

>>164548

As someone who plays ferals a lot:

Horses are terrible to play as, they are extremely limited, stupid as shit and can't even rape anybody without help.

The only way you can get through it is if you're very good at physical descriptions and if you are going the non-con route, willing to have somebody assist the equine you are playing.

Then its neat for a very short while.

Is it cringe to play female characters and not want compliments from lesbians? It tends to creep me out.

>>164617

You'll get hit on no matter what. While it's never nice to recieve unwanted attention, this is one of those cases where anything you can do about it will just make things worse or paint you in a poor light.

>>164617

the lesbians on f-list are 99% played by men so you're probably not getting any compliments from real lesbians.

>most of my profiles have been doms or switch-doms

>decide it would be fun to try out subbing for once

>trying it I realize I'm nothing but an stuttering pushover, a "MORE MORE" record going on repeat and at worst I take over my partner and become the dom myself

How2sub? I don't have a lot of trouble with the first two, but I feel bored after a while and even more concerning I feel like I'm having my partner do all the work, any ideas?

>>164751

This aint't that hard fam, just be an active lay that switches things up or gives actions yo which reactions can be formed. I'm a massive fucking powerbottom so my shit won't work for everybody, but there's fewer things more delicious than holding someone down by the shoulders whilst twisting your hips in an 8 with that fattened cockhead drooling against slit. Thrusting up and down ever so slightly without ever entering just to lean down and dare the limpdick to fuck the shit out of you, spur them on more abd more by attacking their ego only to reinforce it once they give it to ya' properly by calling them Daddy and shit.

If you want a submissive bottom on the other habd tho, then play up the physical twitches and minuscule movements. Toes curling before uncurling, ragged breaths, pupils dilating, cheeks rippling with each thwack, so on and so forth.

OK, I´m lazy as fuck, so before I do it, I´ll ask here:

Should I make 3-5 seperate profiles for the NGE girls or just one with all of them?

>>164771

If you want all the same kinks with all of them (or only a few minor changes) then I'd make a single profile. If there's one gril you want to play the most then maybe let her be the focus but have the others in a dropdown/custom kink. If they each deserve their own kink list based on what you want to do with each of them, then I'd make separate profiles.

I think I have a bad habit of coming off as an indecisive pussy who asks for permission before every one of my actions whenever I'm playing as an aggressor. I usually don't play aggressive dominant characters, but I'm trying to step out of my comfort zone and experiment. If their character is a cocksleeve and is meant to be weak, then I usually just do whatever the fuck I want to and everyone's happy. but if they actually pose to be at least a small threat to my character, I try my hardest to avoid godmodding and refrain from removing my partner's options to react or retaliate.

let's just say that you're playing out a scene where your character is going to rape another character who is stubborn and is expected to struggle a lot. they're already pretty winded from the fight so far while your character is unarmed and has only taken a few hits. If they're attacking you with a sword from a vulnerable position and your intent is to disarm them, throw them down onto the ground, talk shit to them for a moment and begin ripping their clothes off, how would you phrase that and when do you pause for their reaction?

I'm pretty sure I'm overthinking this

>>164783

Disarm, throw them down and talk shit. Let them reply, and depending from there proceed to strip them. Pinning them down is more forceful but simply putting them on the ground leaves them more room to do whatever before you start ravaging their brains out.

Unless they're too retarded, most people will get your cue.

>>164783

I think >>164784 got it right

If you are in a play where you are EXPECTED to win the fights with some struggle, it's okay to assume that you can get away with stuff like disarming or knocking a character down or hitting them. If you're playing an aggressive rapist and your partner is happy with that then you really don't have to worry.

I've been seeing "empty profiles" in a lot of No sections lately. Maybe I just never noticed before. What exactly constitutes an empty profile? I see these on a lot of profiles with customs and inlines, but no actual text to the profile. And to me, that constitutes empty in and of itself.

Or do they literally mean just the standard kinks without an icon or inline or anything?

>>164617

Nah, I hate getting driveby compliments like that too, and I'm in the opposite situation. It always feel like they're trying to niceguy their way into having you make an exception for them, even if they frame it as 'just a compliment'.

>>164830

I think they mean empty profiles as in the typical shitter who approaches with a profile void of any description and with the default icon. Some don't have any kinks at all, but when they do, it's just the default ones. Some of these shitters have been around for years, and still don't bother to put any text or image in their profile.

But yes, ironically, those with the "empty profile" custom tend to be hypocritical shitters, with profiles consisting of just a picture of the character as an inline and no kinks, or a few custom ones without description.

>>164830

Most of what >>164839 said, but also like typical minimal shit. Like a simple Wiki copy and paste to make it sound like it's full but it's actually a lot of nothing. At least to those familiar with the source. These days can also include profiles that have no meat to them besides an inline or two as well.

Also, people who just grab custom kinks and either have no description to them, or you've seen the same wording enough that you genuinely cannot identify the point of origin anymore because it's been slapped onto so many profiles from one source, and is usually just the verbatim definition.

If your all 1337 and stuff, it's usually pretty obvious because your usual post size has more words then these profiles.

>>164837

dunno how often the loonies on flist use that tactic, but that's not always the case. sometimes I compliment well-done profiles that I really like with no ulterior motive at all even if we're completely incompatible. same thing if I notice a mistake on their profile but I'm not interested in typefucking them; I just give them a heads-up that they fucked something up and move on

>>164904

I always appreciate when folks do this, I try to do it to others too.

It's pretty obvious when someone is being genuinely nice versus when someone is just trying to get typefucked. Someone who is just being nice won't try to weasel their way in after the compliment and obligatory thank you and someone who wants to typefuck will eventually try to typefuck.

What's the standard practice for when you agree to a scene with someone that has a post length preference set to semi-para or higher, and then when it actually begins, they're giving you one-liners that take them 5-10 minutes to type out?

>>165001

It's really awkward but the best thing to do is to say, "I'm not really interested, sorry." or "can't get into this."

>>165001

"Sorry, I thought I was going to be more interested in this than I am. I don't wanna continue."

How appealing are "over the top" kinds of characters for ERP? Something along the lines of Asura's Wrath

>>165026

Sexually over the top. Yeah, they work fine. But godmod OP strong character typically isn't too appealing.

>>165058

I mean, of course, with each other.

>>165027

>>165026

There's really a crowd for extremely godmod OP characters, but they're generally not the best of players and the whole subculture there has a lot of various issues. You have to do it with really high quality, basically.

(Then again - that's true for a whole lot of f-list!)

>>165121

No pretty much everyone wants to inject their shitty furry/anime fetishes into anything remotely related to D&D.

Which of these two female characters would receive more play: a character who is a default female but can add a penis and is a "switch" or a character who is a female that doesn't deviate from her gender and is a full time sub?

>>164839

Some of them put in the results of a fucking BDSM test instead of an actual character.

Let's say that a couple is forced into a threesome. As in, a rapist swoops into their lives and rapes both of them at the same time, using their love for each other as a bargaining chip and making them have sex with each other for his amusement. At what point is it NTR? Is it just NTR outright?

>>165219

It's not NTR at all IMO. I'm sure there will be debates and autism and shit. But to me, NTR is specifically that Japanese doujin style cucking. Granted cucking is cucking don't get me wrong. But NTR, to my mind, is that over the top. my husband has a small dick you're so much better, fuck me harder I never want to go back type stuff. But again, everybody draws the lines differently.

>>165219

>>165221

Rape is rape, NTR is emotional, cucking is sexual

I was thinking about making the whole "time traveling to save the future" kind of character in which she fails and gets fucked my monsters. But I was wondering whether to go down the more cutesy route or the shamed military commander kind of route

>>165235

Monsterbait is always good. Think of the monsters out there who need love.

Though pigeonholing yourself into 'timetravelling modern soldier' is going to limit options.

>>165250

>>165236

Duly noted, I was going to go down a more broad route anyway but I'll definitely try not to push myself into only doing the same thing over and over again

>>165251

I wasn't really thinking about going that far back with the character but a dinosaur angle might be a good shout

>>165251

>T-Rex

>Triassic

Come on anon.

>>165121 here.

Hey, >>165124! Someone directed me to https://www.f-list.net/c/The%20Great%20Wheel/ which is a hub profile for specific-setting stuff. Isn't huge, but it's nice and the operator is quite civil.

I'm bigoted against furries. I've never had an interaction with one on f-list that didn't leave an awful taste in my mouth. Something about the behavior encouraged and propagated by the culture creates people I can't stand. However, I think there can be legitimate fun had with /me posting, and I want to participate in chat rooms, but the presence of furries and shit posters in the rooms I lurk just makes me fucking sick. I don't want to interact with furries at all, whatsoever, but they're in every public space on the site. As such I've entertained the possibility of making my own room. If I'm in control of this room I'll certainly have a long list of rules, with "No furries!" at the very top, followed soon by "No flopping" and "No snuggle posting". Enough of you salty bastards bitch about the same things on this board, so I know I could garner legitimate interest from like-minded players. Would openly displaying my willful bigotry get me in trouble, though? Would this be considered a "hate group" by the moderators, or is it in my rights to have preferences and expect others to respect them? I don't explicity have an agenda against furries. I just want to avoid them at all costs, and having the ability to remove them from a public room is tantalizing.

>>165360

Private rooms aren't held to the same standards as public rooms, so yes you can ban all furries. So long as you display it clearly and give the reason "we prefer to not RP with furries" as opposed to "furfags burn in hell" then you'll be fine. There are plenty of rooms which ban all certain kind of X profile, from no human males allowed to no real life reference images, and so on and so forth.

>>165188

The switch would probably get more play. Generally there tend to be more subs available than doms, but it depends. Don't let that dissuade you from making whatever character you want though. There's enough people out there that you can probably find play with just about anything.

>>165360

Just make a humans only room

>>165360

>i don't have an agenda against x

>i want to avoid x at all costs

I don't even like furries, faggots or shemales but I don't behave like an autistic spaz about people who do.

Bonus points: I bet you're a disgusting weeaboo, too.

>>165360

It's a furry site you mouthbreather. This is like going to the Special Olympics and claiming you don't have an agenda but you want to avoid retarded people at all costs.

>>165360

There are already plenty of rooms that have those rules. You'll just get a bunch of people in there that'll do something that equally upsets you. No furries, no flopping, no snuggleposting. People will just find rule skirting one-liners that are essentially cuddleposting. Or you'll just have people talking about their video games or anime. If not that, you'll get shitposting and memes either IC or OOC.

Sure, you can make a room that's serious RP only with all of the above (and more) banned, but it'll be dead. A ton of decently sized rooms below 100 members don't see posts in days. Getting rid of all the popular ways of posting in chat will not make that any better.

>>165533

Different ways you can run it; might be worth asking the person getting run if they'd like to get a reaction in at some point or just enjoy it all in one go. If they'd like to get a word in, quickies. Otherwise get your smutty novella prepared and decimate that fucker.

Fuck, I wanna do that now.

>>165439

Not really. I'm a fan of European comics and classic American cinema.

>>165533

Make them do a number post minimum underneath five. Then play the next one with the consequences of the first one's previous interaction.

Shouldn't this board have ID's enabled?

>>165819

Fuck off back to reddit, you weak-minded idiot.

What would make worstgender bettergender?

>>165891

A higher IQ behind the keyboard.

I don't understand how people find furries attractive or fantasize making out with them, I can't conceive of sex without kissing at some point and how can you kiss an animal mouth?

Let alone having oral sex.

It isn't just disgusting, it's something I literally can't imagine. Do furries skip kissing and just have PIV sex?

>>165910

Furries have snouts, what are you talking about.

>>165908

Some people don't like kissing anyway

I'm into regular humans and I've always hated kissing IRL and in RP

There is a LOT more that you can do in an RP between the phase where most folks kiss and the phase where penis goes in vagina

holy shit though get a better imagination. I'm a not a furry but even I understand this using my basic empathy skills

>>165917

Gonna need some sauce on that gif, or some logs if you've done shit like that. So hot it fucking hurts.

>>165919

Gif is by "ungulatr" who actually has a ton of shit like that. Muzzle-locking with a long jaw ain't exactly my thing though, hence the plump pair of lips instead.

Maybe I'll give it a try if I ever get around to making a proper feral profile though.

>>165917

>>165920

Thank you for your helpful answers.

I… think I can adapt to fantasy canine, feline and reptilian faces. My character kissed a canine furry once, even though I wasn't sure how it was supposed to feel like. Then the same person introduced me to a horse character, and I realized I couldn't deal with that one. Equine teeth just put me off, the likes of which you can see in that horse on human gangbang picture. It's hard to imagine an equine mouth I wouldn't mind kissing. I guess I don't have the right kind of imagination.

>>165915

To each their own. It's hot to delay kissing until after orgasm but it would be a disappointment to never kiss. I want to kiss.

>>165923

>even though I wasn't sure how it was supposed to feel like

It can honestly feel like whatever the goddamn fuck you want it to, though there are "preconceptions" in place obviously. If there are people willing to play their characters as cumming their brains out while cunt is drilled apart by a dick as thick as their fucking thigh and writhing in masochistic bliss, then there's nothing stopping you from figuring out a pleasurable way to describe a make-out session with your kitty boy/girlfriend.

I'd say it's pretty understandable if it's not something you can wrap your head around though, either at first or just in general. Try to think of what facets would make it enjoyable while still being different from a normal session of spit-swapping, while focusing away from the stuff that doesn't turn you on.

>>165915

>Some people don't like kissing anyway

>I'm into regular humans and I've always hated kissing IRL and in RP

Look, I know where we are and all, but… you are one weird fuckin weirdo.

I can't imagine enjoying sex with someone who won't kiss me. What the fuck is the point if you aren't absolutely assaulting their mouth with your tongue while pounding their cunt?

>>165926

It's always just seemed super duper gross to me. So many germs in mouths. IRL it has always made me think "oh fuck this is gross I wish I knew for sure when this person last brushed their teeth and what they last ate." It's easier to tolerate in RP but it's still not fun for me, just seems like it's killing time.

I prefer touching my partner's face, like putting my palm on their cheek, or rubbing my forehead on theirs, or hugging. I'm also a big fan of talking and stuff and you can't do that when kissing. Things like little smooches on the cheek are good though.

>>165931

Porn logic, anon. Unless specified for any particular reason, it's assumed characters have bathed and done all the necessary primping before fucking; or are just naturally clean and only sex can dirty them. Spit sucking can be hot as fuck though, especially if you're deep in a roleplay and the two of you are into it.

Also, considering it's porn; the last thing they ate is probably cum. Just make sure it was yours, and you're all good.

Kissing can be way more of a primal show of romance or dominance, claiming lips and, by extension, them. Their breath, their sole form of communication. Combine that by pinning their hands above their head with an arm and you've got a hell of a vulnerable character that can either melt in your grasp or thrash and cry depending on the circumstances.

Kissing is mandatory for me, it's versatile and amazing.

Also I don't know if you were the anon I was calling a glue-eater earlier but if you were, I'm sorry. Had a shit day.

>

>>165934

shut up, bitch.

>>165935

<Fuck me in the face.

Is it better to get no play as a character that's part of a universe you enjoy to almost an autistic level, or get a lot of play as a character you like just a little bit less?

>>165941

No play. My absolute favorite character to play as does not get much interest by anyone worth a damn unless I bust my ass to get their interest most of the time. I still push through because it's so fucking worth it.

How do you make an interesting blue?

I have pinks and have made purples in the past. They aren't god tier characters or anything but they're sympathetic and human. I just cannot into making blues that are worth a damn. I can't come up with anything decent that makes me want to roleplay as them, but I want to play a male.

Do I just make my D&D character on f-list? I like playing him fine, and he has a story to him. But that seems really lazy - I want to write something new.

What do, /erp/?

>>166021

Depends entirely on the kind of character you're going for, honestly. Blues get a bad rap but it's almost entirely because of the sheer volume of shitty males out there. There are a lot of really good male characters as well. Find something -you- like and make it work. Don't fall into the trap of trying to appease an amorphous and retarded public.

But if you're looking for any advice from me; pretty, androgynous males or big, buff bara style dudes are great archetypes to start with depending on what you want in a blue. Play around with the personality to get something interesting out of it. Buff guys are fun, for example - but over confident, smug turbo-doms are kind of old and tired.

What are the odds of F-List staff releasing a name that hasn't been online for a few months, is pretty clearly not being used, and is only not technically blank because it has a no list, no other information whatsoever? I know the general rule is one year if the profile isn't blank, but does anyone have any experience requesting anything like this?

>>166043

It really depends on which mod reads your ticket and which pair of underwear they're wearing that day. 6 months would be an absolute safe zone, but it wouldn't hurt to send a ticket now - the worst they can do is say no and tell you to try again later.

>>166023

Took your advice and made a guy I'm pretty happy with. I actually got out of bed and wrote it down in the middle of the night last night so I wouldn't forget the idea today. Not sure why I had such a difficult time with it before, once I got started it was as natural as my other characters.

Thanks!

Say that you have a character of a somewhat obscure fandom or setting, like, say, a Chinese mobile game or a forgotten 90s anime or a light novel or something like that. Then a player with a reasonably good character says they'd like to play with you, and although they know nothing about the setting it seems really interesting and fun for them. They approach and ask for some guidance on lore or a quick rundown of the story.

Is that wrong? I mean if you approach a canon of something a bit obscure, is it wrong to ask for a rundown? Or should you simply get informed yourself before asking?

>>166224

It depends on how much of a tight ass they are. I say it's fine since no one wants RP homework (unless it's about improving your writing).

>>166224

I mean like other anon said nobody wants homework. If the canon looks cool, and I know nothing about it would it be better to just try and wiki absorb all the information, assuming the wiki has any decent amount of it anyways, and claim to know it based off that?

It's a gamble to try and pretend that you know the super deep lore or whatever because if the other player assumes you do, you can end up fucking yourself over if they even hint or reference something that the wiki doesn't cover. Seems less risky to be upfront about it.

What else can I do during burn-out? I just haven't been getting any play as of late.

>set a looking status, throw up an ad

>approach people instead of waiting to be approach

>revamp customs and profile if quality comes into question

I feel like I've hit a wall.

Why are OOC brackets even a thing? You know, (Now I'm talking OOC)

I get it when you're doing shorter posts and it might get a little confusing, ''but why the fuck would you put everything in brackets when you're just talking OOC and not playing'?'

>>166260

I don't know why people would do it when they're just having a conversation, but the brackets are useful when

>you have to interrupt an IC post with something OOC, or make an OOC note at the beginning or end of the IC post

>you want to indicate that you are transitioning out of IC posting and in OOC posting

for example at the end of a session, my first OOC post is usually in brackets and it goes like this

>I make a post IC. It is the last post of the session.

>(I make a post OOC with brackets to transition to OOC discussion with my partner so I can ask them for feedback).

<(They reply OOC to me, and sometimes they use brackets and sometimes they don't.)

>I drop the brackets now because we are both using OOC.

<When they next reply, they are for sure do not use brackets.

>>166261

Yeah but point is, OOC chatter is plainly obvious at first sight even without the brackets. At least it is for me. Just from the size alone it should be plain that if it isn't some typo correction, it's OOC.

>>166260

>>166261

>>166262

I do it at first, when throwing an idea or whatever, simply because there are people out there that strictly consider anything not in brackets to be IC - The worst is people who see an introduction with some ideas without brackets and responds to it AS THEIR CHARACTER ON A CHAT PROGRAM or what have you - But as soon as I get a response, I take up whatever style and rules my partner is using. Imo, the smartest way to go about it.

>>166263

I do it that way too. I am just befuddled at the actual purpose of OOC brackets, especially in casual conversation.

>>166259

What kind of play are you looking for, anon? If you're just looking for some generic typefucking, PM shitters. I hate to say it but that's the best way to get play if you're desperate. If you have a shred of dignity or standards left, though, I would suggest taking a short break. Maybe make a new character that's totally different to what you've been playing. I did that just recently and now I'm getting all kinds of satisfying play.

Which would be a better idea to run with: female Yakuza or female warlord

>>166650

whichever one you feel that you can pull off better. though If I had to choose between two profiles that are completely identical aside from their occupations, then I'd say that the warlord will generate a larger audience for you

>>166650

Female mob boss is one of the most popular domme occupations. It's basically just the female version of the "rich CEO dom" character.

Do warlord.

>>166650

I have a female Yakuza character, I really like using her because I can freely play as a dom that cuts, punches and does all that kind of gore sick shit, but at the same time I get my chance to play cute, lighthearted plays with what essentially is a Female Kiryu. Mobsters are amazing variety characters if you enjoy things with a bit of story.

>>166676

whatever you do, don't make a shitter version of majima

How advisable is making a canon when the amount of people already playing that canon is saturated enough as it is? I want to make several Fate canons but I'm pretty sure there are already a ton of each

>>166846

Totally depends on how saturated the market is for actually good profiles of the characters. A large majority of canons tend to be sparse inlines, lmao check the wiki profiles, or people looking for or playing something crazy specific, like only other canons in the same universe, or some really unappealing kink. If you know how to set up a really good, informative, appealing profile that lends itself well to crossovers, and targets a wide audience, it can be an incredibly successful endeavor.

>>166954

Third person. Anyone who uses first person is a big fucking red flag for "I have identity issues and this character is a self-insert." The exception here is if you're quoting your character (but then again, why are you quoting your character? Stop fellating your own ego).

>>166956

Really? Even if you faithfully stick to your character's personality and mannerisms? I thought it might be a way to showcase competence in playing your character. Guess I'm mistaken.

>>166956

I dunno - sometimes I find it fun to write a specific profile from the perspective of the character as if it were like. A dating site profile or something.

>>166958

At best do a mixed thing. The hard part about first person is that most people fucking suck at it. Hard enough finding literate people.

I'd write most of the profile third person. If you want an excerpt use second person in a cleaver way. Which will also involve some headbanging to figure out.

Is there a way to make maid characters interesting? The only type I see people being interested in is the "uguu master" kind

Should I advertise my hub or all my characters individually? That goes for both on here and F-list

>>163405

this entire sentiment aroused me. you should use a fate twink. Fate has excellent twinks.

>>163411

I have a Delta Green type character, a conspiracy nut and a paranormal PI if that's any encouragement fam.

>>163424

Faceclaims, expies, pixiv, artstation, obsecure comics/rule books/magazines and more are my general choices. Concept art for video games can be really good because you can use unused designs.

>>167188

just off the top of my head, a deceptive maid that puts on a subservient facade in order to gain their master's trust. one moment they're blowing them after serving them their morning coffee and suddenly they're raping their master in the basement after they awake from the effects of their roofied drink. or maybe they gradually mind control their master with magic or whatever until their roles as master and servant eventually reverse. you could also just switch up the stereotypical scene; a brash and dominant maid that tends to their meek master. I also think there's potential in training a bitchy maid who was forced into the occupation, whether it'd involve the master being patient with them until they eventually come to enjoy their fate, the maid being violently raped into submission, or anything in between

>>167197

It really depends anon. IMO a hub that links to individual profiles or small groups probably work slightly best?

It does make tracking you down a bitch if one is unaware of the hub. But a lot of people will judge you for the number of alts and what those alts are if they see those on the sidebars. (They will as well from the hub, but I think it's again, slightly better.)

Because there are some kinks or some things that just turn people off no matter how much 'no kinks are necessary' you put up all over your profile. For example shit baths. So the general opinion is the more we can see or find, the more likely we find something that turns us off. (Of course, the flip side is if somebody finds a character that's a better match.)

>>167271

I have a known hub profile. I started with a catch all first, made it a hub. Now, I'm just unsure is it better to advertise for like 8-10 characters or not

>>167272

If all the characters fit in the one 'hub' umbrella. Then go for it. Divide things up by fetish or what they differ in.

If it's all fantasy characters then sure. If they are all canons, sure. It's mixing that could be good or bad.

>>167297

I'm a bondage sub. My best shibari partner writes it amazingly. These are some things that he does:

>He has a good understanding of every patterned tie he describes so he is never just making shit up entirely, he can envision it in his head very clearly

>He explains it in enough detail for me to understand where the rope is on my character's body and which parts of her are restrained

>He knows the names of various ties and isn't afraid of specific, precise language about knots

Essentially, get really familiar with various shibari ties and knots so you know them very very well. It really helps if you have someone IRL who will let you practice ties and stuff.

>>167297

>>167318

I struggle with this as well but have no one IRL to practice on. Is there like, some guidance/step by step on different ties?

Also, how much detail does he go into when tying? Does he describe every rope movement, every knot tied or does he gloss over parts? I've struggled with this for shib as well.

How overdone is Gyaru these days? I really like the idea of having a childhood friend type of scene but they've completely changed in the meantime. Though I suppose you could do it with the "prim and proper student is a closet pervert" deal as well.

>>167324

I honestly don't know how people learn without a lot of practice! Maybe there are instructional videos that you can watch?

He puts emphasis based on how much a given tie or rope placement affects my character. So just the zigzags over the body aren't important, but the ropes on either side of my character's labia get a good amount of detail. I pulled out a quote I really adored of his.

>He brought the new silky cord of rope down, and, to her surprise, snaked it between her legs. He tugged up, a touch harder than necessary, and she could feel pressure on the right side of her crotch veering in the back around the right cheek of her behind, as if it were a saddle. Thankfully he kept it from grazing her hurting her little slit, but the sudden, new pressure there, even if it was on the skin in the joint of her leg instead of her labia, made her acutely aware of what a vulnerable position she was in.

There has to be something that allows a video game controller hooked up to a PC to be vibrated remotely, right? I can't imagine that doesn't exist, but I can't seem to find anything that'd work.

Asking for a friend.

>>167405

BUY A VIBRATOR

>>167416

That's not as much fun.

Do goofy, over the top villain-type characters have a place in ERP? Think along the lines of Rita Repulsa, Vypra etc. It's something I've been keen to try out and have a small idea for

>>167472

110% fam

>>167472

Abso-fucking-lutely. I have both a hero and a villain.

>>167472

Yup, my over-the-top villainous loli draws a pretty big audience. a lot of other mustache-twirling egomaniacs I've seen seem to be pretty successful as well

Does anyone still care about One-Punch Man characters

>>167553

I've been craving subby bad-endable Fubuki and Tatsumaki expies lately but I imagine Genos/Garou could be cute boys as well. So yeah, it's got good designs fam.

Primp and proper closet pervert or deceptively slutty older sister type?

>>167446

vibrators are substantially more fun than any other standard vibrating thing

I have experimented

things like controllers don't vibrate hard or fast enough to provide adequate stimulation. Same with back massage toys and cell phones

go big or go home. Get a serious business vibe or don't bother, everything else will just disappoint you.

How do I get a sub to get on top without getting a one way ticket to the cuck shed? More importantly how do I find a good sub that does more than lay there and moan? I mean I get that as a dom and the one doing the fucking, the impetus is on me to lead the scene, but would it kill subs to put in effort beyond the bare minimum?

>>167624

>What the fuck are you trying to ask? "How do I get a sub to do more?"

You answered your own question.

>Easy. You don't play with wet fish.

Care to elaborate?

>>167625

You're playing with shit subs. Just laying there and moaning is the sub equivalent of a dom expecting a partner to get on their knees and go to work without doing anything to establish dominance. I'm not sure what kind of scenes you're looking for but if you don't mind a sub you have to actively put in their place look for one that had "Uppity" in favorites or yes. Ones that refer to themselves as "bratty" might also be good. If you're looking for non-con scenes ones that like fighting/wrestling like to fight back instead of lay there and take it.

>>167627

>You're playing with shit subs.

Do you think subs are still worth pursing or should I start looking for switches instead?

>I'm not sure what kind of scenes you're looking.

Depending on the mood and plot con, "non-con", and non-con. What irks me is when they're uppity\bratty or resisting (in case of a non-con scene) for a few posts. However, as you said I'm playing with shit subs.

>>167629

As someone who plays subs yes subs are worth perusing. Just stop pursuing shit subs like the ones you've been playing with. It's not like encountering shit doms made me stop pursuing doms.

Ignore any sub without an uppity kink in faves or yes

>>167652

/me pouts

>>167652

There's no bigger sign of being shit their anything though than being Fai.

Honesty time, /erp/. I've got a worstgender character that is essentially a Mary Sue. She's a drug lord that's grown bored with her role and often leaves the 'boring parts' (shipping, trafficking, etc) to others while she fucks off to get into other adventures, and if forced to settle into her role as kingpin would immediately put a gun in her mouth and end it all out of boredom.

I very much enjoy playing as her, and I also openly embrace and acknowledge the fact that this character is ridiculous. I don't take her serious nor do I expect anyone else to. I enjoy playing somewhat exaggerated and slightly comical scenes with her, but I want some fucking 100% real responses. Is this a shit thing to do? Should I keep this kind of character reserved for private role plays with partners I get along with already?

Less worried about shit talking and more about courtesy to other players.

>>167721

I mean there's nothing that really seems too grabbing about your character beyond the gender/kink and to make a completely silly character and expect 100% real responses is fucking delusional, but if people choose to play with them that's up to them.

Honestly though, I'd probably just approach people on other profiles first and then tell them about her later if they'd seem interested. Unless she's already popular which, given f-list, she sadly probably is in which case I'd say just do what you want.

>>167732

I don't parade the character out too much. Don't want to attract shitters or even make them popular. I'd rather have super low interest but great roleplays once in awhile over constant attention but constant shit along with it.

Thanks for the advice, though. I will probably keep the character private and as a suggestion for later roleplays.

>>167721

What? No, absolutely not - there's literally nothing wrong with fun, creative and somewhat out-of-this-world type characters. Fuck it, and especially fuck what anyone might think about it. If you're enjoying yourself that's literally all that matters.

Let's say I want to play some sexy bisexual incest twins, and engage in some light room play on top of serious private RP's. Is it better to make two profiles and play them at the same time, or just one profile while avoiding /me posting when controlling a specific twin?

>>167847

I'd make one profile

>>167571

Primp and proper, who let's the floodgates open uncontrollably

>>167847

The latter.

Two profiles are too hard to manage and get confusing.

>>167847

If you never plan to play one twin solo then one profile. No point in two profiles if they always come as a unit.

>>167865

If they aren't creepy one mind two bodies kind of twins you should still give them distinct personalities though.

>>167865

I'm overhauling my oldest profile from a single character without siblings to two twin girls. We'll, they're half-sisters whose mothers were impregnated on the same night during a threesome, and were raised together as twins of a sort.

>read this post >>167889

>look up:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superfecundation

>realize it's irrelevant because they're half-sisters the other way

How political is political enough to turn people off of a character? I had the idea for what is essentially an officer in a blatantly fascist/communist spacefaring faction, hating every alien race and maybe some other humans alongside of it. I don't actually care about politics, it's just a neat idea, but it's not like I want to alienate people.

>>167914

I wouldn't know. But I imagine it's how serious vs satire it comes off as.

I personally find

https://www.f-list.net/c/viktoria%20edelschwert/

To be hilarious because it's so over the top.

But never approached them since I'd just fall flat on my face. But they have a variety of characters/themes.

>>167914

You could subtly reveal that the actual politics are irrelevant by adding a paragraph about being willing to play a different ideology. So if you play a nazi, say you're willing to play a communist or other ideology too.

That way you're showing that you aren't married to the particulars of the kind of totalitarianism you're playing and showing you're not just playing that group because it represents your own views.

Is there a healthy community for lewd writers to talk about their stuff together? I want to network with other creatives. Rp is where I got my start, of course, but I don't want to discuss stuff here that isn't really rp.

>>167641

It's literally in the name, Fai. It's a person who switches between the role of sub and dom. They can be a sub in one RP with one partner, but a dom in another rp with a different partner. Hell they can switch between the role of sub and dom during a scene or the whole RP.

>>167644

As a sub yourself, how would you define a shit sub? Also if you don't mind what do you look for in a good dom?

>>167923

4chan's smut threads?

I doubt anyone would mind a smut writing thread here anyway. I don't even write besides RP but I'd still read it.

>>167923

There are a few that used to be connected to /tg/ before smutwriting got banned, there.

>>167924

A shit sub lays there like a wet fish and moans and practically orgasms with pleasure any time their dom touches them. A good sub takes note of what their dom wants and tries their best to work with the dom to move the roleplay in that direction so both players end up satisfied.

There are areas where what I look for in a good dom in text based RP match up with a good dom in real life and areas where they differ. Think carefully before trying to apply to real life Dom/sub relationships rather than text based ones where they're trying to dom your character not you.

A good dom looks at their subs no list and doesn't decide that since they're the dom it doesn't matter. Only shitters ignore no lists. I've seen doms who's character page actually says they will ignore a sub's no list.

While partners should be willing to work together to shape the RP a dom should have at least some idea in mind when approaching a sub. If you don't know what you want it doesn't come off as being very dominant. I've been approached by doms who seemed to want me to carry the entire process of figuring out what scene we were going to do.

A good dom remembers that their character is doming my character, they are not doming ME. Don't think you're going to start bossing me around OOC. Whether I might find that hot in a real life relationship is irrelevant, I didn't sign up for that when I agreed to RP with you.

As for what I look for on the character sheet itself, well other than a few obvious factors like the profile is well written and our kinks lists aren't wildly out of whack that's really going to differ from sub to sub. Personally I look for characters that are physical and violent. Larger than my character but they don't necessarily have to be heavily muscled. I personally like physical dominance and violence in my RP so i look for characters that seem able to manage that.

Rich successful attractive doms are a dime a fucking dozen, if they're well written sure I'll play with them. Especially since it's hard to find anything else. I'd fucking jump at a fat ugly janitor though, unlike a rich successful handsome man getting fucked by the janitor in a broom closet is humiliating. For me that adds to the fun.

A lot of it boils down to don't be an asshole just because you're the dom. The rest is think about the kind of sub you want to attract. Subs who like rape and violence scenes look for different things than subs who prefer abuse of power like threatening their job or their grades without violence. And subs who want consensual BDSM scenes look for different things than either. Make a character who you think would appeal to the characters you want to play with and try not to be the tenth version of the same damn character they've seen today alone.

>>167929

>>167925

the /tg/ writing migrated to /d/ and then to /trash/ and there is still a thread in /trash/ most of the time

I wonder how fun or disastrous it'd be to get drunk with a good partner and typefuck each other. has anyone here ever done that?

>>168007

Its fun

>>168007

I frequently play with my partners high and drunk/high/drunk as fuck. It's rare they really notice a difference besides my writing speed at the start, before I get my flow going and then it's just same ol same ol

>>167944

A good part of it migrated to discord, too - it's kind of split and scattered, now. (Like a lot of old board groupings, honestly!)

>>168007

It's really fun! Some of them pass out earlier than usual because of it, but would recommend, still.

>>168007

It's very fun for awhile, but my writing genuinely suffers after a point. I'm not capable of drinking unless I'm getting black out drunk. I've also posted cringy statuses when I was completely smashed that I deeply regret.

i lost a bet and a coin toss and now i need to pretend to be the servers airhead girl that only plays video games for attention. Some fag remarked i sounded much more like a faggot then a girl but didn't give me tips on how to…do it better.

So, how do I best go about roleplaying a braindead woman without sounding like a faggot?

>>168069

I've done this as well, and it's why I've sworn off F-List when drunk. I devolve into even more of a retard while drunk.

>>168070

Act like yourself and give your genuine opinion when solicited.

I'm interested in making a pink incorporating some kinks I have a hard time finding, like pinks who haven't had light years of cock in them. Usually play blues, but the RPs aren't very satisfying. I write very well, and I'm praised for it, but what I get back from pinks is mostly mediocre garbage you can't even have a good fap to. Is it worth my time, or will I only make it worse? Am I better off advertising a hyper-specific prompt with the blues and going from there? Will playing pinks make me even more of an insecure faggot?

>>168146

It won't make you an insecure faggot, but you will fall down the rabbit hole I have. I, too, started to play the dream partners I've always wanted to see. Thinking that it'd be satisfying to at least play them, if I couldn't ever find someone else to.

It's not the same, man. It's fun, sure. But fuck me - some times I want to play a sweet, innocent girl being seduced by a big, strong older woman or something. But there's almost no one playing the specific type I'm into - except me apparently. Which then puts me into relatively high demand, so I'm sitting there mildly jealous of all my partners who get to experience the dream I want.

What I'm saying is; it'll probably be fun if you're into it. But don't expect it to be as fun as playing with that kind of partner, if that's your ideal.

>>168148

What's your type, anon?

>>168155

Presumably the sweet innocent girl getting seduced, but not enough strong older women, so instead she has to play the woman to other people's girls.

Ironically the reverse of >>168146 who wants pinks who haven't got so much experience.

>>167847

Make 2 separate profiles. UNLESS YOU ARE SURE YOU WILL ALWAYS WANT TO PLAY THEM TOGETHER.

Nothing pisses me off more than a 'twins' profile that only feels like playing 1 of them. It sets expectations and then becomes disappointment. At the very least, make 3 profiles.

>hate planning out scenes, much prefer to just get into it and build from there.

>mfw someone comes up and wants to plan a scene. AT LEAST they have an idea.

>they're slow to respond, getting more and more annoyed as the scene is painstakingly etched out in every detail leaving nothing to chance.

>Literally 45 minutes later I just ask if I can start us off already because we've got pretty much everything down.

>They log off.

>>168155

>>168156

Basically. Most people who play big, buff ladies are extremely boring and almost never indulge in my favorite kinks. So I had to make one I thought was good. And like, I'm glad she's been very popular and I guess I need to make another one to get in on some other demographics she doesn't cover. But fuck me, I'd really like to, like. Brain swap with some of my partners, you dig?

>>168148

Alright, anon, I will make an attempt. I have nothing to lose but my chains time.

>>168176

Post your profile when you're done.

>>168179

But I'm shy.

>>167188

Undercover maid (this has been done a lot in media) who's really some sort of martial artist or badass

A manipulative maid who subtly gets their master to comply with their wishes

A new maid who both has to appeal to her master and to the cunty head maid, struggling to suit both their needs since they're so different

>>168181

How can you expect to get the good textfucking if you don't post your profile so competent people can find it.

This is only tangentially RP-related.

My fantasies tend to involve a lot of story to facilitate a romance and lots of breeding/pregnancy in a monogamous relationship. So that's what I tend to RP - I only play characters who end up entering a full relationship with other characters and start families. I also seem unusually preoccupied for a guy of my age and educational level with starting a really traditional family, to the point where I really don't care about financial viability that much.

The more I thought about it the more inclined I am to think it may be because I came from a broken home. I've no brothers or sisters, I never really knew my father, and my mother (who raised me) I'm pretty sure was borderline and did tend to mistreat me a lot and was very unstable - she tended to go through men pretty fast and oscillate a lot in her affections. I never really was socialised well and I was pretty friendless and lonely growing up, and I think part of the reason I live so far in fantasy is because it's easier to do that than live out real life since I'm pretty sure I've been conditioned in a weird way by the situation I had in my youth.

Do you think having one's fantasies revolve around such things as romance and breeding is common from people who came from broken homes?

>>168194

I mean, the whole point of a fantasy is to have stuff that you cannot or do not have IRL. A fetish is a very different thing. Though it can certainly be hard to differentiate the two and there's some overlap.

If you have a fetish for being pissed on, or pissing on people. Then sure RP can help facilitate that. But you can also potentially find somebody IRL to fulfill that fetish.

A breeding/impregnation fetish is very different from a want of romance and a family. And it's often easy to distinguish the two. Breedings become pretty common, but that's the whole my sperm claimed this womb or whatever or recipients feelings of being claimed. But usually, you wouldn't see them play past impregnation. Let alone non-sexual or even sexual pregnancy play. Then birthing.

>>168194

This makes sense to me and seems like a very viable possibility.

I think it's likely that your family situation and desire for stability is a major contributing factor for your kinks, but there are probably a lot of reasons all coming together to make it so central and prominent for you.

CONVERSELY and possibly related, I grew up in an extremely stable family with extremely stable role models in healthy happy relationships and my favorite things to RP are things where I play characters getting abducted, attacked, or pulled into all kinds of noncon horrible relationships. My kinks/fantasies have more contributing factors than just my family life, but it may be worth noting.

>>168194

I grew up in a broken home and I don't desire any long term relationships or have any fantasies about them at all. In fact I actively look for one time flings.

>>168188

Why would posting it here help competent people find it?

How many notes a day are fellow notefags okay with?

I've never done noteplay before aside from some minor posts that had to be delegated to that, and now a profile that I'm very interested on it's asking me if we could play like that. I'm a bit nervous about it, I feel like without the flow of chat it'd be hard to get much done, specially when you know you ain't getting a reply for a while. How much should I expect to do and receive from a noteplay partner?

>>168224

It just depends. As much as notes make life easier it can be difficult. Or just completely random.

With an EU player I'm playing with, on weekdays it's roughly one or two notes a day. Because I get home when it's way late for them. But on weekends that just speeds up and we usually ping back and forth whenever we don't have stuff distracting so it's a lot closer to chat speed. It comes down to who's the one with less free time as the limiting factor really. Or bitch ass time zones.

With a different person, It can be a note every night following mine, usually fairly late, or a few days later. It really just depends.Somebody I no longer RP with, worked on cruise ships. So work was synonymous with X days or a week without a reply. One person, we hybridize it. Just note at our pace until we meet up in chat again.

Best I can say. Is that there's no upper limit to how fast you can reply. Though if I get that note at 1am when I'm about to sleep, sorry, but not replying before I get off work most likely. But everybody has a different 'floor' usually a day or two without a hold over note saying why you've been busy or just a busy week.

If it's multipara stuff, then yeah. I'm just upfront that I might not be able to reply every day because I ain't on that level yet.

>>168224

It depends on the same things of chat RP: time zones, schedules, and how long it takes you to write up a post. My usual noteplay partner and I can get through an upwards of ten notes each in a day if our schedules are relatively free, more coming the earlier we pick things up. On average though, five each per day is what we can do before having to eat, sleep, work, etc.

On the other hand, I've had a few partners on the polar opposite and we can only trade one post a day, or less depending on life circumstances, but it was good enough to make it worth the wait. The flow is definitely much different but I feel it lends itself well to more plot-heavy RP and things along that line. Having the option to take your time and think out each post without having someone watching and waiting is a nice feeling, though I understand a lot of people prefer to go with the heat of the moment.

You won't lose anything by trying it, so if you're really into the profile then you might as well do it. If it's not for you and you can't get into it, so be it.

Are there still avatar-based games/whatever where people typefuck consistently? Like, I first started on Furcadia nearly two decades ago, and when F-List came around and became hugely popular, a lot of the crowd just vanished. I've tried, for years, to get used to it but I just can't. For whatever reason, it just helps me to have that visual representation of our characters in a room or whatever. It feels more "intimate" and real than a chat client, I guess.

>>168179

Not my finest work, but whatever, gotta overcome my faggotry somehow. Roast me.

https://www.f-list.net/c/brunhilde__/

>>168239

I guess I never thought of that, thanks.

Are there any alternatives that aren't games, just sort of casual chat things like Furcadia?

>>168258

One of the few profiles posted on here I actually like the concept and look of. I would add more custom kinks but that's just my thing. Good job.

>>168278

Yeah, I know, I fully intend to flesh it out more. I usually list a dozen or so customs, but I wanted to go for half-decent descriptions (more than a sentence or two, anyway) as per Fai's suggestion, so I spent my time there. I don't know why I ever did it differently. I love custom kinks, but it really annoys me when profiles list a ton of stuff with a wikipedia-style description or no description (or God forbid, a heart emoji).

I really like the idea of anal exclusivity. How upset are you going to be if I steal that?

>>168258

Great profile work! Really enjoyed reading.

>tfw play a pink loli and can't play with her

>>168284

> "steal"

Do a custom kink search for "vaginal neglect", it's niche but not that uncommon. Have fun. Most people take it in a BDSM "deny my character pleasure" direction, which I'm not really into.

Also thanks for all the praise, guys.

I wasn't even aware that was a thing! For a while I've just wanted to make a woman who was solely into getting fucked up her ass, just pure anal, like vaginal is either non-pleasurable or even painful to her. Not a dominance thing, just an incredibly strong personal preference.

>>168258

Who the fuck makes a magical girl that isn't rapebait? All the same, nice profile. Add more customs though, it'll let people know what really gets you going.

What's the consensus on quotes and pieces of verse/poetry on profiles? Can it be done well or does it always come off as try-hard or ill-fitting/dumb? If you have examples of profiles you liked it on that'd be really helpful!

>>168319

It CAN be done well, but it is almost never done well. Err on the side of caution and avoid it.

>>168319

If I like a profile, having a poem won't stop me from approaching. Verses are a minute detail, and worrying about it isn't worth your time, when you could be focusing on getting the fundamentals right.

>>168323

>>168322

The profile I'm making is already more heavy on story than what I normally do - I think it fits, but I'm worried about moving from 'interested in some nice story' and going into 'pretentious asshole'. I'll remove it for now and see if it looks nice after truly finishing the rest of the profile.

Thank you, anons!

>>168322

>>168319

>>168323

>>168331

If they serve the character, they can work. They often don't though. Also don't make it autistically long; a line or two is all you need for a good quote.

Who would be the best Taimanin to make a profile around if I were to give it a try?

>>168361

Sakura or bust.

>>168361

Aight, so you got 3 options here. You can go main series and do Asagi/Sakura/Ingrid/Murasaki or Oboro. You can go main series and use one of the side characters that are not from the main/core game series like Taima Seikou or the yukikaze shit.

Finally, you can use someone from the Battle Arena card game where they just print out rapebait after rapebait. The first option is by far the most saturated and all the girls are quite well known; any of them would work but generally, people seem to like Sakura or Murasaki the most.

The other thing you could choose to do is one of the 'marine' type characters Taimanin has because the series is actually just Ninja Gaiden but America has been taken over and controlled by the demons where they make spec ops seal team six cyborgs to hunt down Taimanin or be used as broodmares for demons. The Americans aren't aware they've been compromised so you got a three way war kinda thing going.

also you better post profile

What do you even put in a profile if you believe a character's backstory is best discovered through RP

>>168583

Anyone else besides Fai answer please

>>168584

Literally what Fai is saying. I personally look for profiles that get me aroused but still deliver a key concept. ie this character is monster rape bait, usually in fantasy settings. This character is an uppity cunt and I want you to knock her down a peg with harsh bullying in a school setting. This character hangs explores decrepit urban environments and likes lots of dialogue and playful spur of the moment sex.

Make it clear what you're looking for and what you're offering. Show some personality and a little creativity, and make the whole thing nice and arousing. There's plenty you can add asides from backstory in addition to these pointers. Appearance, personality, interests, minor world building. All of this should really sort of come back to accomplishing the aforementioned notes though.

I mean, fucking everything can be discovered through RP. Think about what you look for in other's profiles.

>>168585

Well, when I look at other people's profiles I mainly consider their kinks, the info tab, and their images and just skim the description part enough to see that they know English

>>168582

Information that assists people in finding out 1) What I am looking for and 2) How best to approach. Scene ideas, examples/expressions of personality, character hooks. Make as little work for the viewer as possible to extrapolate 'Am I a good fit' and when that's decided, 'How should I approach?'

>>168590

Despite the fact that your answer was actually sound, you do realize your name really does imply 'shit' here, right? Broken clock is right twice a day and all that.

>>168593

A lot of that is done through kinks though

>>168617

But anon.

Custom kinks aren't important and should be kept as bland and boring as possible. Don't you know the /erp/ way?

>>168617

That's a dumb attitude. People treat their kinks lists differently. I wouldn't trust someone to even remember half of the shit they write in there. Sure it's decent for a general idea of what they want but some niggas haven't updated their profile for months, and certain kinks could be ignored for fucking years. Worst of all they may not even feel like doing something listed on their faves and if you approach them looking for that, you're out a partner after just a few words.

But character compatibility and ways to approach and scene ideas are far less fluid. Ideally the person logged onto that character because they want to play the character, not because it has certain kinks listed that they want to do. For fucks sake.

Say, does anyone know how to find info from deleted F-list accounts? I think one of my friends on there got banned, but most of my conventional means of scrounging through internet archives, but understandably F-list isn't exactly open to have its info mined.

>>168660

You'd need to have an archive for that and nobody is going to make an f-list crawler that saves every profile ever made.

>>168620

On the other hand, ways to approach, scene ideas and character compatibility can all be expressed through kinks and often are. And I'm not sure I buy the idea that kinks are less durable than character personality and scene cravings, because a) I've seen those things change too and b) kinks are by definition something that you're "stuck on"

How many characters is the norm for a user to have on F-List? I have some weird autism about having less than 3 always but I'm not sure how manageable it is to go above that

>>168702

I've got three, but am only active with two. Many, many other people seem to be comfortable with much more, though. Wish I had more advice for you.

>>168712

>>168702

I have six that I'm active on, with two more I don't really use. I'm on the low end among the people I know - most seem to have ten plus, but from what I can tell they're rarely active on most of those.

>>168702

I'm at around 100. Most people I know are around 30 or so. These numbers seem to be fairly typical.

>>168719

FFS when the alts hit three digits, how do you even keep up? Most of them would be clones of each other. Just make a hub profile.

>>168734

fake it 'till you make it. fail until it becomes natural and all that good stuff

Any advice on making a "vanilla" rapist character? Like an orc or something. A lot of success with that? I'm kind of a busy person but sometimes I crave dick so I made a character who exists primarily to get raped. I see people with characters similar to mine and I'd like to roleplay with them instead.

I always run into illiterates because I aim for short roleplays and it just seems to attract them. Like, "Have you never actually spoken in English or are you just retarded" tier. Does anyone else just want to have a quick rape? I have shit to do in my day other than write porn.

>>168813

noncon fetishist here, I gotta say that I never do short scenes because the best part of rping noncon stuff is about the heavy impact that it has on the characters' lives after the fact. Just doing a short rape RP is like reading only the first chapter of a book.

This is especially true if you are doing basic vanilla noncon. Short RPs will always attract the worst shitters.

>>168815

God that sounds hot. Any books or stories that appeal to this taste? Anyway, right now I spend the vast majority of my day studying. Would you recommend making a discord or something like that? I'm beginning to think a lot of F-list is just terrible.

Ever have that one character that you just cannot figure out what to do with? Dealing with one right now a human male I plan on playing on F-list and so far nothing I've thought up for a concept has really stuck or felt right. Anyone else ever deal those characters of yours that are just a bitch to figure out?

On the other side of the coin, what was the best character you made that took next to zero effort on your part because it all just came to you so clearly?

>>168817

I've always written my own smut and stories to fit this theme I'm afraid. Personally I prefer that, in the long run, the rape victim and the rapist end up getting along. Long-term noncon to con is a great emotional roller coaster ride.

I recommend having a discord account, if not for RP then for socializing. I do some RP on discord and some on F-list.

Why does chat 3.0 look like it's gone 10 years backwards and pop up notifications through chrome? 2.0 was as good as it needed to go imo

>>169012

2.0 was a fuckin resource hog that didn't look good

Not that 3.0 looks good either

>>169019

Am I the only one that genuinely likes 3.0? I think it's all sleek and fancy.

>>169020

I like that unlike 1.0 and 2.0 I can leave it on a LFRP channel without it crashing. Otherwise no

Hey, fucker that makes F-List Simulator? Make a new one. I know you lurk here.

>>169043

Just create your own F-List Simulators instead of waiting forever. In the past year, there's been lots of material that's gone unused.

>>169046

I have no idea where to begin. I'm incompetent as fuck when it comes to that editing shit.

>>169201

Many styles of wrestling, but this article seems decent enough for a very basic overview. A bit meme-y, but hey.

https://sportsaspire.com/wrestling-moves-list

>Want to create a mech pilot with a more sexualized prospect to the 'rules'

>Remember Zero Two is the flavour of the month

Should I go ahead and do it anyway? I've never seen that show but I feel like being called a rip off could be a bit of a dampener

Anyone know where I can find some good anime girl art? Not generic titties-hangin'-out or school uniform stuff, I mean some stuff with fashion. Working on a character but can't really find much in the way of good art. Snapbacks and jackets covering down to their thighs, stockings the only other leg garments aside from snug panties. Shit like that.

I've checked some of the boorus, but I don't know if there's a specific term for shit I'm looking for that is hiding it. Any help would be appreciated.