SABAL vs ADL - Stopping Anti-First Amendment Bullies
Read it: https://www.norredlaw.com/documents/63-ORDER-MSJ-GrantingIP-DenyingIP.pdf
ADL Accusations:
That Sabal has engaged in discriminatory practices in violation of federal, state, and local laws by excluding protected classes from employment opportunities.
That Sabal has allowed or promoted hate speech on its platforms, which includes content that promotes hatred against certain minority groups based on race, religion, or ethnicity.
That Sabal has directly or indirectly supported extremist groups, providing them with financial or other forms of assistance.
That Sabal has been a source or conduit for misinformation, particularly content that could incite hatred or violence against certain groups.
That Sabal of failing to adequately moderate its user-generated content, leading to an environment where hate speech, harassment, and other harmful content proliferate.
Sabal's Rebuttal:
Sabal vehemently denies the allegations of discrimination, asserting that all hiring practices are based on merit and business needs without regard to race, religion, or any protected characteristics. Sabal provides evidence of their hiring practices, including documentation showing that employment decisions are made based on merit, skills, and business needs, not on protected characteristics. They present statistics and testimonies from diverse employees to support this claim.
Regarding hate speech, Sabal explains that they have implemented robust content moderation systems and community guidelines to prevent and remove such content, asserting that any instances cited by the ADL were promptly addressed once reported. Sabal outlines the implementation of robust content moderation systems, including:
-A detailed set of community guidelines which prohibit hate speech.
-Employment of a significant number of content moderators.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
Post last edited at
